Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for June 15, 2011

  1. Logo
    cdhaley  over 13 years ago

    GT’s rerun, especially in the second panel, harks back to the perennial male habit of objectifying women. Men will continue to do this and Mel’s “sisters” will continue to encourage them, but at least it’s no longer politically correct for men to indulge their overt sexism, and that’s why Trudeau’s arc (and Mel) seem out-of-date.

     •  Reply
  2. Deficon
    Coyoty Premium Member over 13 years ago

    Sorry, I don’t understand your logic.

     •  Reply
  3. What has been seen t1
    lewisbower  over 13 years ago

    No woman wants to be noticed by men. This is why the fashion and cosmetic industries make no money.Even in the Corps, the WMs had regulations on how to apply makeup in a military manner. The same standards were to be applied in or out of uniform.

     •  Reply
  4. 2011 04 12 smoking but not so hot
    Commentator  over 13 years ago

    Mel is making a good case for a men-only military.

     •  Reply
  5. 10155273 624313380994797 1301453986 n
    Knightman Premium Member over 13 years ago

    DUDE?

     •  Reply
  6. Theskulker avatar ic07
    TheSkulker  over 13 years ago

    @gmartin997You been eatin’ those mushroom from BC?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    gladlythecrosseyedbear  over 13 years ago

    It’s absurd to think women never objectify men. GT’s always trying to seem pc but he overreaches — he hits his stride when he glorifies those who rule by apartheid and when he pokes fun at foreigners, specially muslims

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    tankdude7  over 13 years ago

    I hope Sgt Merrifield is getting a cut for using his idea from Bob on the FOB.

     •  Reply
  9. Avatarneal2
    APersonOfInterest  over 13 years ago

    Yes! I agree.

     •  Reply
  10. Avatarneal2
    APersonOfInterest  over 13 years ago

    So … were you faking chivalry before?

     •  Reply
  11. Photo  1
    thirdguy  over 13 years ago

    You first Clark.

     •  Reply
  12. Andy
    Sandfan  over 13 years ago

    My sympathies are with Roz. Can’t be easy having a humorless emotional cripple as a best friend.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    bigal666  over 13 years ago

    The Governor of Texas once said “Fred Astaire was a great dancer. Ginger Rogers did the same thing backwards while wearing high heels.”.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    corpcasselbury  over 13 years ago

    Garry Trudeau will never do anything like that, I’m sorry to say. His contempt for our military is far too well documented, though he does appear to be showing more respect for the troops. However, it should be noted that even here, Trudeau tends to portray them as victims, a role that most of them do not want or feel is necessary.

     •  Reply
  15. Dgp 61
    DavidGBA  over 13 years ago

    Maybe past abuse has her stuck in time.

     •  Reply
  16. Dgp 61
    DavidGBA  over 13 years ago

    Meanwhile, where is explosion-brain-trauma-Ray?

     •  Reply
  17. Logo
    cdhaley  over 13 years ago

    From the number of comments about Mel’s fear of male sexism, I’d say GT miscalculated with this rerun. He probably wanted to stir up the outrage most of us feel towards Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who raped a chambermaid from Guinea and now has hired a legal team to “objectify” her as a consensual lover.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    timewell  over 13 years ago

    If I remember correctly, we were first introduced to Mel while in therapy for being raped by a fellow soldier. So it’s pretty reasonable that she would not want that sort of attention.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    Doughfoot  over 13 years ago

    Key words “this kind of unwanted attention” - everybody likes attention, whether it comes from the opposite sex or not. Question is, what kind of attention? Unfortunately, we don’t all agree on what is appropriate and what is not, but we could do better by finding out what kind is welcome and staying away from the other kind. Mel would not mind having her fellow soldiers show respectful attention, attention that takes into account that is not “looking”. Let them treat here the way they would treat the commanding officer’s wife or married daughter, or the way they would treat a nun, say, and she’d probably have no problem. Imagine serving with openly gay soldiers who act as sexually aggressive around their fellow soldiers as some soldiers act around their female colleagues; better still, imagine such soldiers holding superior rank. Then “sexual harassment” would not seem like such a joke to some people. Imagine a general who habitually gropes and comes onto the enlisted personel the way some generals are said to have done to WACs and such in WWII.

     •  Reply
  20. Bla   version 2
    FriscoLou  over 13 years ago

    Oh man, another rerun. No need to comment now since everything has pretty much been said. I’ll just checkout tomorrows strip instead.

    Oh man, another rerun. This has been a really unlucky week. I wonder if Mel would be happier in the Ga Ga platoon? No wonder the Taliban hate us. DADT infidels singin’ it up in Afghanistan must be hard to take.

     •  Reply
  21. Turkey2
    MisngNOLA  over 13 years ago

    I don’t think anyone wants to hear what I have to say on this issue, since I served with a group which was about 35% female, and of those, nearly 90% had deployment boyfriends, or played the men in our unit as well as the supporting and surrounding units we were deployed with. Several had to redeploy back stateside because of pregnancies which were initiated after our deployment overseas.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    yumitori  over 13 years ago

    Wow. gmartin seems to have some issues with women, eh?And Commentator isn’t far behind.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury