About 10 years ago I was standing in line to buy a movie ticket, and overheard two twentysomething girls talking behind me; the tenor of the conversation was “I haven’t read a single book since I left high school. Me neither, and I don’t ever plan to, either.” These people vote, and breed. It’s frightening.
There are certain books for different ages, and interests and you can’t insult people because you don’t like certain categories and or writers. If you don’t like certain authors DON’T READ THEIR BOOKS! As for me, I like reading from Shakespeare to Mysteries, to a good Novel, to a trashy novel…..AS LONG AS IT TAKES YOU AWAY TO ANOTHER PLACE, AND RELIEVES YOUR MIND …READING IS GOOD ! NO matter what!
I’ve been doing the internet dating thing since January. Prior to that, it honestly never occurred to me just how sexy intelligent women are. Really. And yes, at least in my experience, there is a direct correlation between a woman’s intellect and her reading list. (For you women out there, I’m sure the same is true of the men you’ve bumbled into.)
I just read a comment on Amazon about a series of books which are FREE. Commenter gives them one star, says he won’t read them because they’re a “cash grab”. Unbelievable.
Met a neighbour’s son who was being home schooled and who expressed an interest in alternate history. So I told him about Harry Turtledove’s Southern Victory series that begins during the Civil War, won by the Confederacy, and spans nine decades, up to the mid-1940s. After he started reading I realized with horror that there were many rather “colloquial” words and some racy scenes in this adult literature which this home schooled child was reading upon my recommendation. I went to his mother with my concerns, and she started by thanking me profusely for getting her son interested in reading for enjoyment. It seems he was fascinated by the story as well as learning historical subjects, racy scenes and bad words notwithstanding. The kid went on to more serious books and his parents were grateful for my ham handed intervention.
There has always been hand wringing over children not reading! In the Forties, C.S. Lewis began the Narnia series because he was worried about how little English children read. Narnia became popular. In the Fifties and Sixties all was blamed on television and comics. None of the critics seemed to notice how dreary most of the classics were (Mill on the Floss, anyone?) and the current children’s books. And then, right when it was concluded that it was hopeless, Harry Potter exploded onto the scene! The thing is that’s a long, complicate book and children loved it and the sequels. What is needed is the equivalent to erupt today.
Tell you what, Rat. I like your idea, and I know a producer-friend who can make a franchise series of films out of Dumbnado! You’ll be in line for big bucks ’cause of those book-hating dummies!
I broke my “reading wall” On Louis L’Amour, while I was in the Service, at 18. I have genre preferences, like Robert Ludlum for espionage, L’Amour for westerns, and Dean Koontz for thrillers. John Jakes did an amazing job with “The American BiCentennial Series,” later to be known as “The Kent Chronicles.”
In the grand scheme of things, what does it matter WHAT someone likes to read? Are we not basically allowed our own preferences, desires, and enjoyments?
Heaping derision on someone for their choice of reading material is no more correct than doing so based on someone’s political views. You don’t have to agree with them, but, you do need to honor their right to make their own decisions, and allow them those decisions without invective, or condemnation.
I’ve been trying to read Moby Dick for about 4 years now, but just get bogged down. Sci-Fi? Fantasy? Techno-thriller (Clancy, Cussler, Dale Brown (not Dan)? John Grisham? Political books? Absolutely! I usually read at least 4-5 books at a time.
Wait, Ra’s not agreeing with these idiots about books being lame? Wow, I’d normally be yelling at Rat for making the comment that idiot made about books. And agreeing with Goat on this subject. Can’t say Rat doesn’t think that, but I’m just shocked not to see him say it.
BE THIS GUY about 5 years ago
Can’t stop it, Rat. It happens every morning when McDonald’s opens.
enigmamz about 5 years ago
That’s how trailer parks are formed.
GROG Premium Member about 5 years ago
Fuddle duddle. Keeping them all in one place means they won’t mix with the rest of us.
Bilan about 5 years ago
In other words, they blow.
DennisinSeattle about 5 years ago
They reinforce each other’s wind to create the dumbnado, But Rat, those girls look like your type.
Gary Williams Premium Member about 5 years ago
like Congress
B UTTONS about 5 years ago
Congress will soon be congregating for another session
cdgar about 5 years ago
Happens at dog shows and dog shelters all the time too.
Masterskrain about 5 years ago
Rat better not get anywhere CLOSE to the Republican National Convention, then…
einarbt about 5 years ago
So, does this explain all the tornadoes in certain places?
PICTO about 5 years ago
If you bought a house that backs onto tornado alley you might be a dumb people
The Old Wolf about 5 years ago
About 10 years ago I was standing in line to buy a movie ticket, and overheard two twentysomething girls talking behind me; the tenor of the conversation was “I haven’t read a single book since I left high school. Me neither, and I don’t ever plan to, either.” These people vote, and breed. It’s frightening.
Troglodyte about 5 years ago
Isn’t there anything that may Kindle their interest?
Dave Thompson Premium Member about 5 years ago
Or watch Fox “News.”
Atanwat about 5 years ago
It just so happens that in German, “der Tor" means “the fool”.
Major Matt Mason Premium Member about 5 years ago
Stoopid Event Horizon.
Breadboard about 5 years ago
Every now and then Rat comes up with a good one. All of us commenters read or we would not be here. May the power of the Croc be with you :-)
rdav1248961 Premium Member about 5 years ago
Since when does Rat read books?
jel354 about 5 years ago
More dangerous and impactful than a “Sharknado.”
jessie d. about 5 years ago
AKA the GOP and greedy as well.
mjb515 about 5 years ago
Stay away from Milwaukee next mid-July then.
Zebrastripes about 5 years ago
There are certain books for different ages, and interests and you can’t insult people because you don’t like certain categories and or writers. If you don’t like certain authors DON’T READ THEIR BOOKS! As for me, I like reading from Shakespeare to Mysteries, to a good Novel, to a trashy novel…..AS LONG AS IT TAKES YOU AWAY TO ANOTHER PLACE, AND RELIEVES YOUR MIND …READING IS GOOD ! NO matter what!
asmbeers about 5 years ago
Or copulate.
YippiKiAyMofo about 5 years ago
I’ve been doing the internet dating thing since January. Prior to that, it honestly never occurred to me just how sexy intelligent women are. Really. And yes, at least in my experience, there is a direct correlation between a woman’s intellect and her reading list. (For you women out there, I’m sure the same is true of the men you’ve bumbled into.)
YippiKiAyMofo about 5 years ago
They congregate. They copulate. They propagate. And, most of all, they aggravate.
aerotica69 about 5 years ago
Sadly, dumb people have found a safe haven – major corporate offices with politically correct HR departments.
Diat60 about 5 years ago
I just read a comment on Amazon about a series of books which are FREE. Commenter gives them one star, says he won’t read them because they’re a “cash grab”. Unbelievable.
nopainogain about 5 years ago
Cyclist Jef would kick their a_ses
BiathlonNut about 5 years ago
Met a neighbour’s son who was being home schooled and who expressed an interest in alternate history. So I told him about Harry Turtledove’s Southern Victory series that begins during the Civil War, won by the Confederacy, and spans nine decades, up to the mid-1940s. After he started reading I realized with horror that there were many rather “colloquial” words and some racy scenes in this adult literature which this home schooled child was reading upon my recommendation. I went to his mother with my concerns, and she started by thanking me profusely for getting her son interested in reading for enjoyment. It seems he was fascinated by the story as well as learning historical subjects, racy scenes and bad words notwithstanding. The kid went on to more serious books and his parents were grateful for my ham handed intervention.
Some things indeed go right.
WCraft Premium Member about 5 years ago
Now days they call those crowds “Social Justice Warriors”
DCBakerEsq about 5 years ago
We could use a nice, big dumbnado to clear out North America.
MeGoNow Premium Member about 5 years ago
Get enough of them together, and not even light can escape.
SunflowerGirl100 about 5 years ago
There has always been hand wringing over children not reading! In the Forties, C.S. Lewis began the Narnia series because he was worried about how little English children read. Narnia became popular. In the Fifties and Sixties all was blamed on television and comics. None of the critics seemed to notice how dreary most of the classics were (Mill on the Floss, anyone?) and the current children’s books. And then, right when it was concluded that it was hopeless, Harry Potter exploded onto the scene! The thing is that’s a long, complicate book and children loved it and the sequels. What is needed is the equivalent to erupt today.
prrdh about 5 years ago
Meaning Congress should never be in session? That might not be such a horrible idea…
Eric S about 5 years ago
that’s where Antifa came from.
gsteele531 about 5 years ago
Well, that would eliminate the Democrat National Convention . . .
Purple People Eater about 5 years ago
It’s not “me too” it’s “I too”. (Propper English sounds weird).
Snoots about 5 years ago
I read a great deal in the days before VCR, DVDs, BluRay, and of course, the Internet. Now I still read a great deal. It’s just not books.
fix-n-fly about 5 years ago
“Who” is “they”?
gopher gofer about 5 years ago
⇧ the lineman
how eloquently phrased. would you mind repeating that comment about “little brains” in intelligible english…?
oakie817 about 5 years ago
what about Washington DC?
Sisyphos about 5 years ago
Tell you what, Rat. I like your idea, and I know a producer-friend who can make a franchise series of films out of Dumbnado! You’ll be in line for big bucks ’cause of those book-hating dummies!
David Henderson about 5 years ago
The only thing I have time to read now days is tech manuals.
David Henderson about 5 years ago
The only thing I have time to read now days is tech manuals.
tinstar about 5 years ago
I broke my “reading wall” On Louis L’Amour, while I was in the Service, at 18. I have genre preferences, like Robert Ludlum for espionage, L’Amour for westerns, and Dean Koontz for thrillers. John Jakes did an amazing job with “The American BiCentennial Series,” later to be known as “The Kent Chronicles.”
In the grand scheme of things, what does it matter WHAT someone likes to read? Are we not basically allowed our own preferences, desires, and enjoyments?
Heaping derision on someone for their choice of reading material is no more correct than doing so based on someone’s political views. You don’t have to agree with them, but, you do need to honor their right to make their own decisions, and allow them those decisions without invective, or condemnation.
Just my 2 cents… thank you!
BWR about 5 years ago
I’ve been trying to read Moby Dick for about 4 years now, but just get bogged down. Sci-Fi? Fantasy? Techno-thriller (Clancy, Cussler, Dale Brown (not Dan)? John Grisham? Political books? Absolutely! I usually read at least 4-5 books at a time.
knight1192a about 5 years ago
Wait, Ra’s not agreeing with these idiots about books being lame? Wow, I’d normally be yelling at Rat for making the comment that idiot made about books. And agreeing with Goat on this subject. Can’t say Rat doesn’t think that, but I’m just shocked not to see him say it.
OldManMontgomery about 5 years ago
The DNC, explained.
Sirhic_nab about 4 years ago
and that kids is why you read