Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for December 31, 2015

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  almost 9 years ago

    CONGRESS DO SOMETHING!

    —I always though Rat was a libertarian.

     •  Reply
  2. Avatar
    Partyalldatyme  almost 9 years ago

    CONGRESS, DO SOMETHING!

    ANYTHING!

    About anything?

    Anything at all?

    Pleeeeze?

     •  Reply
  3. Right here
    Sherlock Watson  almost 9 years ago

    Rat is absolutely right. Family portraits should show the members dressed as themselves, displaying their individual personalities; forcing them all to dress alike is inhuman and unforgivable.:Venting done. Happy New Year, human individuals!

     •  Reply
  4. Blackbear
    ursamaj  almost 9 years ago

    ,,,& it’s even worse when they did the same with their and/or their pets. Nothing like a chihuahua & a persion wearing the same plaid outfits as their grinning humans.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    AGED_ENGINEER Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    Bert and Nan and Flossie and Freddie object!

     •  Reply
  6. Hellcat
    knight1192a  almost 9 years ago

    Define matching. If by matching you mean same or complimentary color clothing to the others in the photo but each wearing a different outfit, you may need to look elsewhere if you’re expecting my vote. But if you mean everyone wearing virtually identical or exactly identical outfits which so often result in my mocking them as the dorks they are, would it be wrong to sign the petition twenty times using twenty different names? Ok, I do at times feel sorry for kids who appear as if their folks forced them to dress in virtually identical to exactly identical outfits as themselves, at least when the kids look miserable that is.

     •  Reply
  7. Unnamed
    smorbie the great and beautiful  almost 9 years ago

    I can take the matching outfits. It’s when they are all barefoot that I can’t stand.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    danfromfreddybeach  almost 9 years ago

    is he talking about the Duggans?

     •  Reply
  9. Mewtwo wallpaper
    uksing921  almost 9 years ago

    Don’t we all, Goat.

     •  Reply
  10. Lucy2
    IQTech61  almost 9 years ago

    Frankly, I don’t give a damn about other people’s family photos. I’m too busy living my own life with my family to care. I think people who obsess about what other people need a hobby or medication or both.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    juicebruce  almost 9 years ago

    Tis there money they may spend it as they like, but for me………………………….HAPPY NEW YEAR !

     •  Reply
  12. Suducko
    Logical Duck  almost 9 years ago

    You mean like this?

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    eddie6192  almost 9 years ago

    Congress already did something………recess.

     •  Reply
  14. Quill pen
    Yontrop  almost 9 years ago

    @LogicalDuck, No, that’s not what Goat would object to. Two people in gender neutral sweaters isn’t that bad; besides it isn’t a “portrait”. You can tell by the surprised expression on the dudes face. But basically I agree with DOSQueen.

     •  Reply
  15. 14513553819061040552560
    Acomicfan  almost 9 years ago

    Get well soon, Rat.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    MitmanArt  almost 9 years ago

    Seriously, if the family is happy, what’s it to y’all? Who are they hurting?

     •  Reply
  17. Thinker
    Sisyphos  almost 9 years ago

    Coincidentally, I just lately saw over on that social networking site a photo of a family of friends wearing matching colorful outfits while visiting a very foreign country—and I “liked” it! Yet here I find myself agreeing with Rat (and Goat). Isn’t life paradoxical?

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large 2
    Phatts  almost 9 years ago

    never ask Congress to “do something” because they’ll invariably do something to make things worse.for example, in this case they’d pass a 400 page bill that not only forbids family fotos with matching outfits, but also grants new tax credits to companies that make film for non-digital cameras, new tax loopholes to companies that make digital cameras, and, just to be fair, subsidies to companies that make solar-powered tanning booths.and, of course, only lawyers will understand the bill, and they’ll know the intricacies that allow families to take forbidden fotos with matching outfits so long as they include pets, the mom is smiling, there are no Soviet flags in view, and it’s Thursday.at the end of the day, everybody except the lawyers will be a little bit poorer.

     •  Reply
  19. Airhornmissc
    Liverlips McCracken Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    I understand Goat’s sentiment. I feel that way when I agree with certain politicians.

     •  Reply
  20. Untitled
    angelfiredragon  almost 9 years ago

    The less congress does the better, we don’t need no body of governing people thinking up new laws year round for us. Don’t we already have so many laws in place that nobody could possibly follow them all?

     •  Reply
  21. Penguin hero
    grainpaw  almost 9 years ago

    Or like this. Peace on earth or else.http://www.fox29.com/trending/56049483-story

     •  Reply
  22. Airbrush 20240305192116
    Number Three  almost 9 years ago

    I think it’s sweet.

    There’s a cricket bat coming towards my head isn’t there?

    xxx

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    abbybookcase  almost 9 years ago

    some of us get forced into these things it’s not always our fault. it wasn’t my idea for a family picture where we all looked like the waitstaff in a middle class restaurant. sometimes it’s not worth being a rebel

     •  Reply
  24. Suducko
    Logical Duck  almost 9 years ago

    @saywhatwhat:That was a still from a British TV comedy called “Ever Decreasing Circles”. One of the running gags was that these two characters Howard and Hilda often dressed in nearly identical outfits. It just seemed to fit in with Rat’s theme and extend it in a comical way. I guess the joke would make most sense to those familiar with the show. Happy new year.

     •  Reply
  25. 1e353f5b 1f95 4540 8a3c 07b57122ab3a
    The one and only Eldest Arc (now at peace)  over 2 years ago

    Well, this is relate able

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine