Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
In my opinion, weâre not out there exploring possibilities beyond the moon because NASA and the US government choked when the inevitable happened and people were lost. The momentum to back off was generated as much by the incredible shock that was felt in the NASA community as by the fact that this one major disaster was repeatedly displayed in excruciating detail on monitors all over the world â plain for all to see.
I believe in the dream, and I regret the loss of a single one of the astronauts who gave their lives, but similar tragic outcomes have been found in almost every effort that involves taking risks to achieve a higher goal. Where would the world be today had some believers not taken the second or third risky attempt after the first ended in tragedy. There is no such thing as a perfectly safe, no loss trek into the unknown. There also is no such thing as a brighter future if one doesnât try.
@kroykali: It took the spectacular Challenger disaster to show the public the extent of the dangers of space travel. The Apollo I fire was an âin houseâ event and public perceptions were limited to news releases and lots of discussion by the pundits, but not major 24/7 on site news coverage.
I donât think âpublic apathyâ was the primary force behind the discontinuance. Political fears of public recrimination caused the pols to duck having to answer the âwhy is this happeningâ question. From then on, they slowed funding and avoided openly supporting NASA.
Additional loss of momentum occurred during the mourning period, and also the Challenger investigation and the months of testimony that required. Meanwhile fear grew at the possibility of another such disaster.
Yes, they had the lifters. They could have corrected the o-ring problems and continued the program after some delay, but they didnât. In order to ignite a rocket you need fire and many of those involved no longer had it.
Yes, it really was rocket science! But here in the good ole âWeâre #1â USA, weâd soooooo much rather use all that expertise figuring out ways to blow up the human race instead of advancing it, and thatâs where we chose to devote our resources.
Letâs be honest here. The early days of the Space Race were an extension of Cold War political and military bravado with a dash of science thrown in for taste. Once we beat the Evil Empire to the moon, the motivation quickly evaporated. And Iâm saying this as a self-styled, proud Space Geek.
@bigpuma: She might have picked up the clues from her parentsâ or other family friends. Plus coffee gets a cameo in almost every tv comedy and many movies. She canât help seeing it.
Too expensive. We donât have the resources we had in the 60âs. Also, we might want to try to mitigate the upcoming âlong emergencyââdrastic climate change, resistant microbes and insects, oceans dying, etcâŠand we canât get past Trump and his circus.
Republicans donât believe in government or government projects. So when thereâs a Republican president or the GOP controls Congress, NASA gets minimal funding. Weâre not looking a âpublic-privateâ partnerships for space exploration. What logo would you like to see on the moon? Exxon? Nike? GM?
Once the political fortune had been taken out of the very political space program the idea of risking human life fell by the wayside for cheaper robots and drone flights.
Mr Nobody over 7 years ago
McDonaldâs first, then Starbucks.
Bilan over 7 years ago
Seriously? Thereâs no Starbucks there yet?
(that covered the most obvious joke)
tammyspeakslife Premium Member over 7 years ago
A Tim Hortons on the Moon :D
Ignatz Premium Member over 7 years ago
I think air is probably the first consideration, actually.
whiteheron over 7 years ago
Being a semi-romantic, I think it took most, if not all of the mystery out of it.
sandpiper over 7 years ago
In my opinion, weâre not out there exploring possibilities beyond the moon because NASA and the US government choked when the inevitable happened and people were lost. The momentum to back off was generated as much by the incredible shock that was felt in the NASA community as by the fact that this one major disaster was repeatedly displayed in excruciating detail on monitors all over the world â plain for all to see.
I believe in the dream, and I regret the loss of a single one of the astronauts who gave their lives, but similar tragic outcomes have been found in almost every effort that involves taking risks to achieve a higher goal. Where would the world be today had some believers not taken the second or third risky attempt after the first ended in tragedy. There is no such thing as a perfectly safe, no loss trek into the unknown. There also is no such thing as a brighter future if one doesnât try.
Masterskrain over 7 years ago
The review of the first Starbucks on the moon wasnât that good. âGreat View, decent service, but No Atmosphere!â
sandpiper over 7 years ago
@kroykali: It took the spectacular Challenger disaster to show the public the extent of the dangers of space travel. The Apollo I fire was an âin houseâ event and public perceptions were limited to news releases and lots of discussion by the pundits, but not major 24/7 on site news coverage.
I donât think âpublic apathyâ was the primary force behind the discontinuance. Political fears of public recrimination caused the pols to duck having to answer the âwhy is this happeningâ question. From then on, they slowed funding and avoided openly supporting NASA.
Additional loss of momentum occurred during the mourning period, and also the Challenger investigation and the months of testimony that required. Meanwhile fear grew at the possibility of another such disaster.
Yes, they had the lifters. They could have corrected the o-ring problems and continued the program after some delay, but they didnât. In order to ignite a rocket you need fire and many of those involved no longer had it.
Richard S Russell Premium Member over 7 years ago
Yes, it really was rocket science! But here in the good ole âWeâre #1â USA, weâd soooooo much rather use all that expertise figuring out ways to blow up the human race instead of advancing it, and thatâs where we chose to devote our resources.
Fido (aka Felix Rex) over 7 years ago
Letâs be honest here. The early days of the Space Race were an extension of Cold War political and military bravado with a dash of science thrown in for taste. Once we beat the Evil Empire to the moon, the motivation quickly evaporated. And Iâm saying this as a self-styled, proud Space Geek.
Masterskrain over 7 years ago
Havenât had a cup of coffee in over 35 years! Nasty, burnt tasting slop! YUCK!!
sandpiper over 7 years ago
@bigpuma: She might have picked up the clues from her parentsâ or other family friends. Plus coffee gets a cameo in almost every tv comedy and many movies. She canât help seeing it.
renewed1 over 7 years ago
Maybe they discovered that there is nothing there worth going after.
danketaz Premium Member over 7 years ago
Mostly we donât go back because thereâs nothing to get. No natural resources to easily exploit and you canât even grow a decent coffee bean.
Kind&Kinder over 7 years ago
We canât go back because the aliens already there have issued a travel ban.
Bysshe over 7 years ago
Too expensive. We donât have the resources we had in the 60âs. Also, we might want to try to mitigate the upcoming âlong emergencyââdrastic climate change, resistant microbes and insects, oceans dying, etcâŠand we canât get past Trump and his circus.
PeterClapp over 7 years ago
Republicans donât believe in government or government projects. So when thereâs a Republican president or the GOP controls Congress, NASA gets minimal funding. Weâre not looking a âpublic-privateâ partnerships for space exploration. What logo would you like to see on the moon? Exxon? Nike? GM?
Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo] over 7 years ago
Once the political fortune had been taken out of the very political space program the idea of risking human life fell by the wayside for cheaper robots and drone flights.
RWill over 7 years ago
A Moonbucks on every crater.