After two and one half years of Trump displaying anger and contempt for anyone who won’t break the law at his direction, now you’re upset? Because a Trump hireling spouts a self-serving legal opinion to keep the Fat Man placated, you actually believe it’s the law? Or is it just time to play “Sheldon Says” again?
The Michael Ramirez reality reversal is accelerating.
The Congress is seeking to comply with its oversight and legislative obligations and is issuing appropriate subpoenas to compel witnesses, documents and other evidence it needs for its oversight and legislative responsibilities.
There is no basis on which Attorney General William Barr (or Treasury Secretary Stephen Mnuchin or IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig) can legitimately refuse their respective subpoenas. All are for legitimate oversight and legislative purposes, and there is no such thing as “blanket” executive privilege or privilege simply to shut down an investigation of wrongdoing.
And as to the claim many CONservative are raising about seeking confidential grand jury testimony, this is routinely waived in matters of oversight as it was in Watergate, Iran-Contra, Whitewater and many other investigations.
Ramirez is now proving himself to be nothing more than a propaganda puppet for a corrupt administration.
Some principled conservatives have repudiated this lawless gang of political thugs whose policies bear no resemblance to anything conservative. Clearly Ramirez is not among the ranks of serious, thoughtful conservatives. What a pathetic shell of a man who once cartooned for the great Los Angeles Times.
Hundreds of former federal prosecutors sign a letter stating their beliefs that Trump committed felony obstruction of justice and the AG does nothing? Please, Mr. Ramirez, you’ve gotta too blind.
I was hoping the Democrats would be better than this. They should be emonstrating to us how they will fix immigration and gun control. They are wasting everyone’s time, money and patience fighting a useless battle with Trump that will go away in less than 2 years. Show us now what you can do better than Trump or get ready for 4 more years with Trump.
The House submitted a subpoena for Barr to testify and he refused, saying that he didn’t want to answer questions from lawyers. Barr’s refusal is a crime. Ramirez, Trump and the Repubs are falsely claiming that the House is revealing grand jury testimony as a distraction. Barr needs to answer questions about his “summary”, his press conference and other testimony because there are so many contradictions between each of these and the Mueller report.
There’s enough in the redacted report to justify investigation of impeachable offenses. Maybe it’s better to hold off, but that’s a different question. When we can see so clearly that there’s a clear case that the President obstructed justice, should we just let that go?
red, we shouldn’t be too upset about Ramirez lying, Everyone lies once in a while. There are only three perfectly truthful things in the world: drunks, small children, and yoga pants.
Say What Now‽ Premium Member about 5 years ago
Mr. Ramirez doesn’t mind that Barr is covering the Rump’s butt.
Judge Magney about 5 years ago
After two and one half years of Trump displaying anger and contempt for anyone who won’t break the law at his direction, now you’re upset? Because a Trump hireling spouts a self-serving legal opinion to keep the Fat Man placated, you actually believe it’s the law? Or is it just time to play “Sheldon Says” again?
RAGs about 5 years ago
Has Ramirez been watching “Fox News” or reading the Federalist again?
Dtroutma about 5 years ago
Even Faux News seems to be catching on to Bonespurs and company, why not Ramirez?
brwydave Premium Member about 5 years ago
Mike has produced, in vivid color, a good representation of the GOP Senators’ current song.
DD Wiz Premium Member about 5 years ago
The Michael Ramirez reality reversal is accelerating.
The Congress is seeking to comply with its oversight and legislative obligations and is issuing appropriate subpoenas to compel witnesses, documents and other evidence it needs for its oversight and legislative responsibilities.
There is no basis on which Attorney General William Barr (or Treasury Secretary Stephen Mnuchin or IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig) can legitimately refuse their respective subpoenas. All are for legitimate oversight and legislative purposes, and there is no such thing as “blanket” executive privilege or privilege simply to shut down an investigation of wrongdoing.
And as to the claim many CONservative are raising about seeking confidential grand jury testimony, this is routinely waived in matters of oversight as it was in Watergate, Iran-Contra, Whitewater and many other investigations.
Ramirez is now proving himself to be nothing more than a propaganda puppet for a corrupt administration.
Some principled conservatives have repudiated this lawless gang of political thugs whose policies bear no resemblance to anything conservative. Clearly Ramirez is not among the ranks of serious, thoughtful conservatives. What a pathetic shell of a man who once cartooned for the great Los Angeles Times.
davidthoms1 about 5 years ago
Ramirez is clueless.
Brian G Premium Member about 5 years ago
The right-wing keeps saying that as if it is true. Well you have to commend their tenacity to believe in the unbelievable.
Ontman about 5 years ago
Mr. Ramirez, why do we bother?
walfishj about 5 years ago
Bet Senor Ramirez can’t quote that law.
jborg Premium Member about 5 years ago
He’s just overriding The Constitution along with the GOP Senate.
mourdac Premium Member about 5 years ago
Hundreds of former federal prosecutors sign a letter stating their beliefs that Trump committed felony obstruction of justice and the AG does nothing? Please, Mr. Ramirez, you’ve gotta too blind.
txraiders Premium Member about 5 years ago
So, the rule of law is not compelling ?
Radish the wordsmith about 5 years ago
Republicans put themselves above the law, therefore they can never break it.
Radish the wordsmith about 5 years ago
Barr’s father hired Epstein at Dalton.
Trump was accused of raping children at Epstein’s NY mansion.
Alex Acosta shut down the investigation into Epstein’s multiple rape charges.
Trump appointed Acosta as Labor Sec and Barr as AG.
Retrac Premium Member about 5 years ago
I was hoping the Democrats would be better than this. They should be emonstrating to us how they will fix immigration and gun control. They are wasting everyone’s time, money and patience fighting a useless battle with Trump that will go away in less than 2 years. Show us now what you can do better than Trump or get ready for 4 more years with Trump.
mhbaty about 5 years ago
B.S.
Librarylady about 5 years ago
Sorry Ramirez, the clown icon belongs to the Republican party.
shakeswilly about 5 years ago
refusing to break the law ? We saw Barr lie to congress several times under oath on live television and that is breaking the law.
Bookworm about 5 years ago
Refusing to uphold the law is more like it.
ideations about 5 years ago
MR doesn’t seem to comprehend (or appreciate) American values and laws.
Nantucket Premium Member about 5 years ago
The House submitted a subpoena for Barr to testify and he refused, saying that he didn’t want to answer questions from lawyers. Barr’s refusal is a crime. Ramirez, Trump and the Repubs are falsely claiming that the House is revealing grand jury testimony as a distraction. Barr needs to answer questions about his “summary”, his press conference and other testimony because there are so many contradictions between each of these and the Mueller report.
Stephen Runnels Premium Member about 5 years ago
Ramirez believes lying to Congress is legal.
Mr. Blawt about 5 years ago
He is being held in contempt because he is breaking the law.
braindead Premium Member about 5 years ago
Yet another set of lies by the Trump Disciple cartoonist.
Perjury is not illegal if it’s committed by a Republican, right?
lonecat about 5 years ago
There’s enough in the redacted report to justify investigation of impeachable offenses. Maybe it’s better to hold off, but that’s a different question. When we can see so clearly that there’s a clear case that the President obstructed justice, should we just let that go?
DrDon1 about 5 years ago
Looks as if Ramirez is trying to get a medal from #45 for ‘Boot Licking!’
Andylit Premium Member about 5 years ago
Instead of blathering your party line, why not research the actual topic?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6
Followed by the Appeals court ruling just handed down a few days ago.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/summary-dc-circuit-rules-grand-jury-secrecy-mckeever-v-barr
DaleHopson about 5 years ago
Why is Jared standing next to Jerry????
red6235 about 5 years ago
Gee Mike, Its good to know that you have no problem lying, take after Spanky.
Spock about 5 years ago
Fascinating.
NeoconMan about 5 years ago
red, we shouldn’t be too upset about Ramirez lying, Everyone lies once in a while. There are only three perfectly truthful things in the world: drunks, small children, and yoga pants.
Concretionist about 5 years ago
Break which law again? It’s Ramirez, so I expect a lie but this one’s a whopper!
gcottay about 5 years ago
And what law would that be? The law of King Trump?