Coming Soon 👀 At the beginning of April, you’ll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
When The Lion King 1st came out in 1994, I generally liked it but I had serious reservations about some of its messages. In the intervening years, I’ve grown less tolerant of stuff like this:
 • Royalism. I’m a small-r republican to the core, and the idea that some folx are inherently entitled to rule over others by dint of royal birth (or divine right) absolutely rubs me the wrong way.
 • Chauvinism. The lionesses do all the work but have no say in how the society is run; all the glory is heaped upon the big, hairy male, despite Simba’s having been out-wrestled by Nala (as both a cub and an adult) as well as outwitted by dopes and out-ethicked by half the supporting cast of critters.
 • Oppression. The prey animals — wildebeests, giraffes, zebras, and gazelles — all bow worshipfully before the predators who will eventually eat them, as if such submission is only just and proper. The lions rationalize this with a nice tune about the circle of life, but the film never shows us the ugly reality. That’s the only mercy involved.
 • Incompetence. A youth spent in idleness, dissolution, and goof-offery does not prepare one to be a competent governor of others, something I wish America would have paid more attention to before George W. Bush hove onto the national stage.
 • Stereotyping. Is it merely a coincidence that the treacherous Scar is both darker-furred than the other lions and facially disfigured, or is this a shameless shorthand message that such characteristics are instantly suspect?
 • Despoliation. The over-exploited veldt is ravaged, gray, and dying when the triumphant Simba climbs his pinnacle and roars; by the next morning the sun is shining, the leaves are green, and the babbling brook runs crystal clear. If environmental cleanup were really this easy, they should import lions into West Virginia.
danketaz Premium Member about 4 years ago
Al Hirschfeld?
Kind&Kinder about 4 years ago
Too bad he’ll never have any depth as a person.
Qiset about 4 years ago
He ain’t lying.
iggyman about 4 years ago
When my daughter was little I said why would anyone want to be around a king that lied? She always corrected me!
Flynn White Premium Member about 4 years ago
You’ve heard this old Lion King joke? What do you say to Simba when he’s walking too slow? Mufasa
gopher gofer about 4 years ago
♩will the circle be unbroken…
Amra Leo about 4 years ago
Huh. Looks like my self-portrait, only neater…
ksu71 about 4 years ago
♫ Because your mine. I walk the line. ♫
Major Matt Mason Premium Member about 4 years ago
“To the vector go the spoils.” -Charles M. Jones
uniquename about 4 years ago
The Limn-on King.
the lost wizard about 4 years ago
Stick with it.
mistercatworks about 4 years ago
Early kinematics for The Fully Embellished King movie.
Packratjohn Premium Member about 4 years ago
I draw the line at this kind of “art”…
Mayor Snorkum about 4 years ago
There’s a great documentary about the caricaturist Harry Herschfeld titled “The Line King.” Now there was a guy who could draw.
jel354 about 4 years ago
This production lacks depth.
gammaguy about 4 years ago
Writer’s head.
Not to be confused with “writer’s blockhead”. (Double meaning.)
Old27F20 about 4 years ago
Scott is my favorite cartoonist…bar none!
Richard S Russell Premium Member about 4 years ago
When The Lion King 1st came out in 1994, I generally liked it but I had serious reservations about some of its messages. In the intervening years, I’ve grown less tolerant of stuff like this:
 • Royalism. I’m a small-r republican to the core, and the idea that some folx are inherently entitled to rule over others by dint of royal birth (or divine right) absolutely rubs me the wrong way.
 • Chauvinism. The lionesses do all the work but have no say in how the society is run; all the glory is heaped upon the big, hairy male, despite Simba’s having been out-wrestled by Nala (as both a cub and an adult) as well as outwitted by dopes and out-ethicked by half the supporting cast of critters.
 • Oppression. The prey animals — wildebeests, giraffes, zebras, and gazelles — all bow worshipfully before the predators who will eventually eat them, as if such submission is only just and proper. The lions rationalize this with a nice tune about the circle of life, but the film never shows us the ugly reality. That’s the only mercy involved.
 • Incompetence. A youth spent in idleness, dissolution, and goof-offery does not prepare one to be a competent governor of others, something I wish America would have paid more attention to before George W. Bush hove onto the national stage.
 • Stereotyping. Is it merely a coincidence that the treacherous Scar is both darker-furred than the other lions and facially disfigured, or is this a shameless shorthand message that such characteristics are instantly suspect?
 • Despoliation. The over-exploited veldt is ravaged, gray, and dying when the triumphant Simba climbs his pinnacle and roars; by the next morning the sun is shining, the leaves are green, and the babbling brook runs crystal clear. If environmental cleanup were really this easy, they should import lions into West Virginia.
zeexenon about 4 years ago
Ironically, the artist is no Kunta Kinte.
Stephen Gilberg about 4 years ago
This is one strip that might work better without color.
Lablubber about 4 years ago
These comments are getting drawn out.
gopher gofer about 4 years ago
he looks a bit drawn…