Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
This is not like the joked-about ambitions of the previous administrationâs many âinfrastructure weeks.â In fact, although it provides for major new improvements to highways, mass transit, electric vehicle charging systems, water systems, the electric grid, research and development and key parts of our health system, itâs not just an infrastructure plan.
As Biden made clear through the name he gave this initiative, it is at its core a jobs plan. In his Pittsburgh speech unveiling it, he said Wall Street economists have estimated the program could generate up to 18 million new jobs.
It is not however, just a jobs plan. It is also a growth plan. Investing in infrastructure increases productivity and attracts additional investment. Economists with S&P estimated that Bidenâs plans (including a $1 trillion American Families Plan he said heâd announce in a few weeks) could inject $5.7 trillion into the U.S. economy and raise per capita income by $2,400.Canceling out GOP tax cuts
The âAmerican Jobs Planâ plan is very different from the big recent emergency relief packages we have seen, like the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan. It spreads outlays over eight years, so annual spending associated with the program is under $300 billion a year.
An even more important difference is that Biden calls for his plan to be fully paid for with new tax revenues. He wants to raise corporate taxes to 28% from 21% and require companies to pay higher rates on earnings from overseas. Heâd also end tax breaks for fossil fuel companies and intensify efforts to collect corporate taxes.
Further, the cost of many of the projects themselves will be defrayed by revenues from those projects.
Surprising no one, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has already warned the president not to turn the program into âa massive effort to raise taxes on business â
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh admitted that Republican fear-mongering over the federal deficit under President Obama was âbogus,â while defending the deficitâs explosive rise to $1 trillion under President Trump.
During Limbaughâs show on Tuesday, a caller suggested that Republicans should nominate a young fiscal conservative instead of Trump, citing the rising deficit. Limbaugh dismissed the concerns, declaring that fiscal conservatism was basically a sham all along.
âRepublicans can nominate a young, potentially two-term president, one that believes in fiscal conservatism,â the caller told Limbaugh. âWeâre gonna have â in 2019, thereâs gonna be a $1 trillion deficit.
Trump doesnât really care about that. Heâs not really a fiscal conservative. We donât, we have to acknowledge that Trump has been cruelly used.â
âNobody is a fiscal conservative anymore,â Limbaugh shot back. âAll this talk about concern for the deficit and the budget has been bogus for as long as itâs been around.â
Now is this something only the government can do�
Or is there a âbusiness caseâ to be made for eliminating unsecured weapons-grade uranium?
in Kazakhstan?
~
â So you might have missed a news item from Kazakhstan: the elimination of the last weapons-grade uranium in that country. In a program jointly operated with the United States, Kazakh scientists ground 2.9 kilograms of highly enriched uranium into a fine powder.
They then mixed that powder with enough low-enriched uranium powder to render the whole batch useless for bomb-making.
And with that operation, Kazakhstanâs career as a nuclear state came to an end.
Your taxes covered the cost of much of that transition.
.
The crack-up of the Soviet Union left behind a grim legacy of nuclear danger. The former Soviet arsenal was shared among four post-Soviet successor states: Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine.
Even before the Soviet collapse, the security of the arsenal had been poor by U.S. standards, for reasons explained by David Hoffman in his Pulitzer Prizeâwinning history of the Soviet nuclear aftermath, The Dead Hand:
In Soviet times, the nuclear security system depended upon closed fences, closed borders, a closed society, as well as the surveillance and intimidation of everyone by the secret police âŠ
People were under stricter control than the fissile materials. When the material was weighed or moved, it was tracked in handwritten entries in ledger books.
If material was lost, it was just left off the books, no one wanted to get in trouble for it. And factories would often deliberately keep some nuclear materials off the books, to make up for unforeseen shortfalls.
When the surveillance and intimidation stopped, much of that off-the-books material was stashed in tumbledown buildings sealed by padlocks that could be snipped by ordinary bolt cutters. â â
I can vaguely remember a college economics professor talking about the national debt in 1966/1970. His basic point was that itâs money we owe ourselves so donât worry about it. I wasnât even aware that I should have been worrying about it then and I really donât give a short s@!t about it now.
Weâve covered this ad nauseum, but zombies need brainsâŠ
Krugman: Bidenomics Is as American as Apple Pie â Big spending on infrastructure goes back to the Erie Canal. Thereâs a reason Bidenâs people put âmade in Americaâ in the title of their tax plan⊠the Trump tax cut wasnât just a huge money-loser, it was badly designed in ways that actually encouraged corporations to invest abroad⊠In its broad outline, however, the plan represents a turn away from the free-market extremism that has ruled U.S. policy in recent years, back to an older tradition â the tradition that prevailed during Americaâs years of greatest economic success. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/opinion/biden-infrastructure.html
Clinton eliminated the deficit, then Bush 2.0 blew it up, Obama got it back under control, then Trump cut corporate taxes and the debt exploded, then he ignored covid and it got worse, Bidenâs plan will invest in infrastructure that will make America more efficient and profitable, I am unconcerned with the debt as long as Democrats are in control, Republicans care nothing about paying our bills.
Weâve been crying about the national debt for at least since the 1970s, but we never do anything to back our crying⊠that includes several administrations from both major political parties â they both contributed to the size of this debt. Iâm tired of Democrats who largely ignore the debt problem, but I am even more tired of Republicans who pretend that they never contribute to it while not paying it down when they have the White House and control of Congress.
The numbers being tossed around are mind boggling I am 89 yo and on my 15th President and I have survived all of them. I donât know if I will hit number 16 but it has been one helluva ride. Absent Friends.
And most of our debt is used to loan out to folks all across America and around the world.
We borrow at insanely low rates, and then turn around and relend it to banks and other financial institutions who, in turn, relend it at ever increasing rates.
The US makes a TON of money off of our âdebtâ.
alaskajohn1 almost 4 years ago
Maybe PayPal.
feverjr Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Only if youâre Matt GaetzâŠ..
https://www.rawstory.com/matt-gaetz-2651326023/
braindead Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Stantis, shouldnât you be pushing for more tax cuts for the rich?
How else are we going to achieve herd mentality?
.
Republicans* are so precious when they âsplain economics.
KenseidenXL almost 4 years ago
We SHOULD be taxing the top 5% and corporationsâŠ.
Sanspareil almost 4 years ago
In the 4 years of the (cough) presidency of the egregious orange imbecile, deficits were the last thing the repukes were interested in!
Now they are front and centre!
Surprised? No!
Expected? Yes!
Predictable? Oh Yes!
fuzzbucket Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Even if everybody could pay their share, the politicians would have a hell of a party before they divide it up and spend it.
quixotic3 almost 4 years ago
We may be broke, but weâre armed and dangerous. Thanks, Republicans.
Silly Season almost 4 years ago
This is not like the joked-about ambitions of the previous administrationâs many âinfrastructure weeks.â In fact, although it provides for major new improvements to highways, mass transit, electric vehicle charging systems, water systems, the electric grid, research and development and key parts of our health system, itâs not just an infrastructure plan.
As Biden made clear through the name he gave this initiative, it is at its core a jobs plan. In his Pittsburgh speech unveiling it, he said Wall Street economists have estimated the program could generate up to 18 million new jobs.
It is not however, just a jobs plan. It is also a growth plan. Investing in infrastructure increases productivity and attracts additional investment. Economists with S&P estimated that Bidenâs plans (including a $1 trillion American Families Plan he said heâd announce in a few weeks) could inject $5.7 trillion into the U.S. economy and raise per capita income by $2,400.Canceling out GOP tax cuts
The âAmerican Jobs Planâ plan is very different from the big recent emergency relief packages we have seen, like the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan. It spreads outlays over eight years, so annual spending associated with the program is under $300 billion a year.
An even more important difference is that Biden calls for his plan to be fully paid for with new tax revenues. He wants to raise corporate taxes to 28% from 21% and require companies to pay higher rates on earnings from overseas. Heâd also end tax breaks for fossil fuel companies and intensify efforts to collect corporate taxes.
Further, the cost of many of the projects themselves will be defrayed by revenues from those projects.
Surprising no one, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has already warned the president not to turn the program into âa massive effort to raise taxes on business â
~
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2021/04/01/biden-american-jobs-plan-infrastructure-week-no-joke-column/4820010001/
Silly Season almost 4 years ago
Once againâŠ
~
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh admitted that Republican fear-mongering over the federal deficit under President Obama was âbogus,â while defending the deficitâs explosive rise to $1 trillion under President Trump.
During Limbaughâs show on Tuesday, a caller suggested that Republicans should nominate a young fiscal conservative instead of Trump, citing the rising deficit. Limbaugh dismissed the concerns, declaring that fiscal conservatism was basically a sham all along.
âRepublicans can nominate a young, potentially two-term president, one that believes in fiscal conservatism,â the caller told Limbaugh. âWeâre gonna have â in 2019, thereâs gonna be a $1 trillion deficit.
Trump doesnât really care about that. Heâs not really a fiscal conservative. We donât, we have to acknowledge that Trump has been cruelly used.â
âNobody is a fiscal conservative anymore,â Limbaugh shot back. âAll this talk about concern for the deficit and the budget has been bogus for as long as itâs been around.â
~
https://www.salon.com/2019/07/19/rush-limbaugh-admits-gops-fiscal-attacks-on-obama-were-bogus-defends-trumps-deficit/
Silly Season almost 4 years ago
Now is this something only the government can do�
Or is there a âbusiness caseâ to be made for eliminating unsecured weapons-grade uranium?
in Kazakhstan?
~
â So you might have missed a news item from Kazakhstan: the elimination of the last weapons-grade uranium in that country. In a program jointly operated with the United States, Kazakh scientists ground 2.9 kilograms of highly enriched uranium into a fine powder.
They then mixed that powder with enough low-enriched uranium powder to render the whole batch useless for bomb-making.
And with that operation, Kazakhstanâs career as a nuclear state came to an end.
Your taxes covered the cost of much of that transition.
.
The crack-up of the Soviet Union left behind a grim legacy of nuclear danger. The former Soviet arsenal was shared among four post-Soviet successor states: Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine.
Even before the Soviet collapse, the security of the arsenal had been poor by U.S. standards, for reasons explained by David Hoffman in his Pulitzer Prizeâwinning history of the Soviet nuclear aftermath, The Dead Hand:
In Soviet times, the nuclear security system depended upon closed fences, closed borders, a closed society, as well as the surveillance and intimidation of everyone by the secret police âŠ
People were under stricter control than the fissile materials. When the material was weighed or moved, it was tracked in handwritten entries in ledger books.
If material was lost, it was just left off the books, no one wanted to get in trouble for it. And factories would often deliberately keep some nuclear materials off the books, to make up for unforeseen shortfalls.
When the surveillance and intimidation stopped, much of that off-the-books material was stashed in tumbledown buildings sealed by padlocks that could be snipped by ordinary bolt cutters. â â
~
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/03/the-quiet-end-of-kazakhstans-denuclearization-program/618424/
oldchas almost 4 years ago
I can vaguely remember a college economics professor talking about the national debt in 1966/1970. His basic point was that itâs money we owe ourselves so donât worry about it. I wasnât even aware that I should have been worrying about it then and I really donât give a short s@!t about it now.
Darsan54 Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Hey Scott, how much do each of. your kids owe on the home mortgage? Youâre deficit spending them into the pour house.
William Robbins Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Weâve covered this ad nauseum, but zombies need brainsâŠ
Krugman: Bidenomics Is as American as Apple Pie â Big spending on infrastructure goes back to the Erie Canal. Thereâs a reason Bidenâs people put âmade in Americaâ in the title of their tax plan⊠the Trump tax cut wasnât just a huge money-loser, it was badly designed in ways that actually encouraged corporations to invest abroad⊠In its broad outline, however, the plan represents a turn away from the free-market extremism that has ruled U.S. policy in recent years, back to an older tradition â the tradition that prevailed during Americaâs years of greatest economic success. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/opinion/biden-infrastructure.html
BRBurns1960 almost 4 years ago
Clinton eliminated the deficit, then Bush 2.0 blew it up, Obama got it back under control, then Trump cut corporate taxes and the debt exploded, then he ignored covid and it got worse, Bidenâs plan will invest in infrastructure that will make America more efficient and profitable, I am unconcerned with the debt as long as Democrats are in control, Republicans care nothing about paying our bills.
gammaguy almost 4 years ago
Huge national debt.
And yet, would be immigrants apparently prefer our situation to what theyâre fleeing.
Anybody here want to trade your situation in the US for the situation theyâre fleeing?
ferddo almost 4 years ago
Weâve been crying about the national debt for at least since the 1970s, but we never do anything to back our crying⊠that includes several administrations from both major political parties â they both contributed to the size of this debt. Iâm tired of Democrats who largely ignore the debt problem, but I am even more tired of Republicans who pretend that they never contribute to it while not paying it down when they have the White House and control of Congress.
Davao almost 4 years ago
The numbers being tossed around are mind boggling I am 89 yo and on my 15th President and I have survived all of them. I donât know if I will hit number 16 but it has been one helluva ride. Absent Friends.
Durak Premium Member almost 4 years ago
And most of our debt is used to loan out to folks all across America and around the world.
We borrow at insanely low rates, and then turn around and relend it to banks and other financial institutions who, in turn, relend it at ever increasing rates.
The US makes a TON of money off of our âdebtâ.
Radish... almost 4 years ago
And we got nothing for it when the republicans gave billionaires 2 trillion in tax breaks.