Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for October 21, 2023

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  8 months ago

    In what jurisdiction would this “marriage” be legal, even if it was an opposite sex couple?

     •  Reply
  2. P1000780 2
    boniface22  8 months ago

    Looking forward to a new story arc, as soon as possible, please.

     •  Reply
  3. Photo
    RobertWright1  8 months ago

    can we finally be done with this?

     •  Reply
  4. Logo
    TwilightFaze  8 months ago

    I look at them and I think those 5 would absolutely kill it on a stage! Congratulations, Mark and Chase! It may not have been the PERFECT marriage, but you two are perfect for each other. Here’s to many happy years together!

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Differentname  8 months ago

    There’s a line in one of the Travis McGee adventures. He owns a houseboat and has a little plaque that says “All marriages performed by the captain of this ship are null and void upon docking.”

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Will_Scarlet  8 months ago

    And in the end Trudeau will have these two break up in the most bitter fashion possible. That’s Gary Trudeau for you – always the anti-romantic.

     •  Reply
  7. Profile msn
    vaughnrl2003 Premium Member 8 months ago

    As long as they don’t try to open the door this is a trip.

     •  Reply
  8. Images
    Honorable Mention In The Banjo Toss Premium Member 8 months ago

    Would it be legal if a clergyperson did it over the radio from within a country’s borders? Kind of referencing the old Cary Grant film “Father Goose,” where he and the bride were out at sea in a small motorboat.

     •  Reply
  9. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member 8 months ago

    The US Constitution has a “full faith and credit” clause that says that each state has to respect legal arrangements made in other states. This was problematic in the days when some states permitted slavery, but the 13th Amendment put a halt to that. It became interesting once again when some states started permitting gay marriage but others hadn’t. The Obergefell decision replaced that mishmash with a national standard. Now we’re seeing the effects of some states prohibiting abortions while others permit it, so can a Texas resident be prosecuted in Texas for traveling to California to have an abortion? Or can the travel agent who sold her the plane ticket be prosecuted for aiding and abetting a felony under Texas law? The current batch of Catholic wackos on the US Supreme Court have opened a gigantic can of worms with their Dobbs decision. Maybe they view it as long-term job security, because the cases based on all those worms are just gonna keep on coming!

     •  Reply
  10. Rwljlogo2
    The Wolf In Your Midst  8 months ago

    “You are… on fire, water… desired….”

     •  Reply
  11. Harold peary
    thegreat.gildersleeve  8 months ago

    I believe this is only a “civil union” not a legal marriage. It would only become a legal marriage when proof of ceremony with two witnesses is presented to a city hall in application for a cerificate of marriage. You used to need blood tests, but not anymore, at least in the US.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    sid w  8 months ago

    Back in those days marriage was not an option.

     •  Reply
  13. Bill murray drink
    Eric S   8 months ago

    and the fires just keep burning

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury