Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for January 25, 2025

  1. Missing large
    snsurone76  2 days ago

    Just what HAS overthrowing Saddam done for our country??

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    think it through  2 days ago

    It taught republicans how to overthrow governments and how to create and run a dictatorship.

     •  Reply
  3. Img 20230511 134023590 portrait 5
    markkahler52  2 days ago

    The lush pastures of Greenland are ripe for conquest! It will be a victory for the People!!

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    [Unnamed Reader - 641507]  2 days ago

    It eventually gave us tRump.

     •  Reply
  5. Packrat
    Packratjohn Premium Member 2 days ago

    It distracted us from problems on the home front… for a couple of minutes.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    mrwiskers2008  2 days ago

    The United Nations was designed as a platform to peaceably resolve problems between member countries in order avoid war. It would probably have gotten much closer to its goal if all countries had equal standing. I sincerely hope that happens in my lifetime. It was never designed to be a foreign policy extension of a just a wealthy few.

     •  Reply
  7. Profilepic yellowwarbler
    Squoop  1 day ago

    If you think Bush’s CIA was bad, buckle up for what it is about to become, thanks to the utter lack of courage and integrity of Republican senators last night which confirmed an inept drunken toady to run the entire defense department, to the joy of all of America’s enemies.

     •  Reply
  8. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  1 day ago

    Even if he weren’t an alcoholic sexual predator (he is), he has ZERO experience in running even a small organization, let alone the MILLIONS of people in the military.

     •  Reply
  9. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  1 day ago

    He’s a former talking airhead on the Fox propaganda channel, and that’s it.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    charlieschulze  1 day ago

    WAR! Huh, what is it good for, absolutely nothing.

     •  Reply
  11. 2008happynewyear1024
    TexTech  1 day ago

    Let’s take a look at the law of unintended consequences as caused by the CIA.

    In the 1950s the CIA overthrew the democratically elected president of Iran and put the much despised Shah back on the throne. In time this lead to the the Islamic Revolution and an Iran that hates America and is allied with Russia.

    During the 1950s and early ’60s, the CIA was complicit in the overthrow of various Central American governments in order that United Fruit could plunder the countries without any local interference. The repeated destruction of local government lead to the lack of functioning governments in many of those countries. This anarchy has caused the mass migration of people from those countries trying to escape the chaos and death this anarchy has brought about. So they head to America. Guess the Dulles brothers and Ike never expected that to happen.

    I imagine the CIA is responsible for some more subtle foreign government interference we don’t know about and whose results we don’t know or else the feces hasn’t hit the fan yet. It is sad that so much the CIA does to make things better ends up making things worse. Someone needs to get them a better crystal ball so they can see how their actions now will screw up the future.

     •  Reply
  12. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member 1 day ago

    The name is interesting: Central Intelligence Agency. The implication is that the agency will gather as much information as possible to enable the decision-makers to make informed choices based on reliable evidence. What’s not implied by the term is that the agency itself will act to make certain things happen in foreign countries. But apparently that’s what it does. And not just casually, infrequently, or unintentionally. And it’s not at all clear who’s determining what those “certain things” are or should be.

     •  Reply
  13. Froggy with cat ears
    willie_mctell  1 day ago

    For a low information voter Zipper does surprisingly well.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    gh787888  1 day ago

    As to Saddam, it takes some looking even on Google, but the majority of the Iraqi people think they are better off without Saddam, although they didn’t ask if they thought it was worth the trouble. 80% of Iraq is Shia Muslim but they had been ruled by Sunni Muslims since the Turkish conquest 500 years earlier. This means nothing to us but a lot to them. At the end of the war a Shiite Muslim leader led protests demanding immediate withdrawal of American troops, but the top Ayatollahs sent him out of the country for “more education” Later American troops were withdrawn at the request of the elected government. It might have been a fine opportunity for good relations with Iraq just as the present situation in Syria where the Russians were forced out by the revolution might be. Good luck with that.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury