Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
Nice to see Collinsâs greatest (non-rogue) character contribution make a triumphant return to the strip. Last year we saw an article with her byline, but now we get the real deal!
Some observations this morning:How does Wendy have the nerve to confront Tracy as a "shoot first. . " cop when he is standing there with bullet holes in his hat as proof that the crooks shot at HIM?Wendy was a post-Gould creation, so Chester himself never drew her. But this art today sure does justice to the Gould style! She looks awsome!Is that an actual fountain pen in Wendyâs hand? She doesnât use a ball-point pen? How cool is that!
That profile, those thick lips (Wendy Witchel). So mindful of Rick Fletcherâs ART !
In his latter day work with Collins, Rick (more the illustrator), seemed to slip into a mode of BOLDER CARICATURE. One âcapturedâ here by Staton in the above representation.
Itâs almost as if Rick Fletcher were back, doing that illustation for Staton.
Iâm still enjoying DT walking around with two bullet holes in his hat and Iâm also puzzled by the people in the background. EMTâs? Spikeâs band members? Cops? Cabbies? Wendy is a great character because sheâs always wrong and gets us pissed off at her.
@ElGuapo:Sometime a while back, someone posted information on this comment page about Chicago Police uniforms. According to that link, the checkered cap design is a part of the Chicago Police Dept tradition.
Canât believe thatâs really you talking Matthew !.You actually come across as if you are - EXCITED !
Never heard you teenage â swoon â over Dick Locherâs work that way ! (?) Maybe at last youâre begining-to realize what we have all been missing these past 15 years (?)
WELCOME to the Club !
I agree with you . . . the strip looks considerably better in B&W ! Why not read it on ComicStrip Nation?. Thatâs the way they carry it. I enjoy it so everyday !
Matt,.Re your comment below:.âANDâI donât read it at Comic Strip nation because I want to PAY for the strip and not rob Mike Curtis and Joe Staton of their royalties for doing the strip. I am a firm believer that if you read the strip, you should pay for it and if you enjoy the strip and want it to continue you REALLY ought to be paying for it. Oddly enough, Jim disagrees strongly with me about that.â.Youâre perfectly free to do what you want with your own money, and if you feel you have an ethical or moral obligation to pay to see TRACY when you can get it for free, itâs not my place to overrule your conscience..That said, I see nothing wrong with reading TRACY for free as long as itâs not violating the rights of the copyright owners..To the best of my knowledge, both Comic Strip Nation and the Houston CHRONICLE are showing TRACY on their sites with TMSâs permission. They are not pirating it. .In other words, they have paid for the privilege of running TRACY on those sites. So neither TMS, nor any member of Team Tracy has a kick coming..I donât think either TMS or any member of the creative team gets anything extra from GoComics as a consequence of GoComics having paid subscribers. I know I donât. So paying for it doesnât put money in anyoneâs pocket except the folks who run GoComics..And thatâs fine. If you think that GoComics is more likely to keep running TRACY because of paid subscribers, maybe itâs even a tactically adroit maneuver. But it doesnât have any effect on how much TMS or the people theyâve hired to do TRACY make..Comic Strip Nation, the Houston CHRON site, and the free part of GoComics all run advertising, so theyâre all making money from selling space to advertisers. I donât feel like Iâm stealing by reading those sites for free. The sites are making their profit by selling ads..Would it be stealing if, instead of buying a paper to read Tracy, or instead of reading it on a paid âNet site, I went down to the neighborhood library and read it in the local paper that I could find in their newspaper section? How about if I read it in a paper that I found abandoned on a train, or bus, or hotel lobby?.I canât convince myself that it would be. The paperâ s there. Itâs available to the public. Itâs SUPPOSED (at least in the case of the library) to be available to the public. The newpaper companyâs been paid, both by the library (or the person who left it behind), and by the advertisers who buy space in the paper. How is my reading TRACY in it somehow depriving the paper, or the creative team, or money it would otherwise have?.And, ethically or morally, how is reading that free paper materially different from reading a free website?.Nor, for that matter, do I feel any ehtical or moral obligation to buy the goods or services of those who buy advertising space in the newspaper, or âNet site, any more than I do buying the goods or services of those who buy commerical time on the television shows I regularly watch or the radio shows I regularly listen to. .In such a case, the newspaper features, the material on the website, or the TV/radio show is the bait, and I (and the rest of the public) are the fish. Do you really think I (and the rest of the public) have some moral obligation to be hooked?.I wonât try to talk you out of following your conscience, but I just donât comprehend the moral or ethical reasoning behind the choice youâre making, particularly when the product youâre paying for is inferior (because of the bad color job) to the product you could get for free at Nation or CHRONICLE.
This is a strip I enjoy to a level I didnât think possible. Team Tracy has made me love DT just like when I was a kid reading âThe Celebrated Casesâ.
margueritem about 13 years ago
Wendy Wichel? Havenât seen her in years! What a witch!
Vista Bill Raley and Comet⢠about 13 years ago
Good morning everyoneâŚ
pnorman1 about 13 years ago
I like the snazzy air vents in Dickâs hat. It must help him keep a cool head in crisis.
Sisyphos about 13 years ago
Nice noir Tracy images in panels 1 and 2.But, curses! Wendy WitchâŚerrâŚWichel! What a revolting development this turned out to beâŚ.
Aaron Mimura about 13 years ago
Nice to see Collinsâs greatest (non-rogue) character contribution make a triumphant return to the strip. Last year we saw an article with her byline, but now we get the real deal!
Aaron
johnrussco about 13 years ago
Whatâs next ? Love it!
Mdstudio about 13 years ago
Great to see Wendy, looking very Fletcher-esque I might add.
Ken in Ohio about 13 years ago
Some observations this morning:How does Wendy have the nerve to confront Tracy as a "shoot first. . " cop when he is standing there with bullet holes in his hat as proof that the crooks shot at HIM?Wendy was a post-Gould creation, so Chester himself never drew her. But this art today sure does justice to the Gould style! She looks awsome!Is that an actual fountain pen in Wendyâs hand? She doesnât use a ball-point pen? How cool is that!
Blackthorne42 about 13 years ago
The Wichâ is back!
Blackthorne42 about 13 years ago
And good morning, VB!
J Short about 13 years ago
Needs her like a hole in his hat, I mean head.
FFosdick about 13 years ago
The cop in the background in panel 3âs hair is too long. If its a cop and if heâs a guy.
sydney about 13 years ago
That profile, those thick lips (Wendy Witchel). So mindful of Rick Fletcherâs ART !
In his latter day work with Collins, Rick (more the illustrator), seemed to slip into a mode of BOLDER CARICATURE. One âcapturedâ here by Staton in the above representation.
Itâs almost as if Rick Fletcher were back, doing that illustation for Staton.
APersonOfInterest about 13 years ago
Love it!!!
Maxine_Viller about 13 years ago
This Wendy is definitely NOT a Good Little Witch.
Buzza Wuzza about 13 years ago
Iâm still enjoying DT walking around with two bullet holes in his hat and Iâm also puzzled by the people in the background. EMTâs? Spikeâs band members? Cops? Cabbies? Wendy is a great character because sheâs always wrong and gets us pissed off at her.
Carlo Recagno about 13 years ago
Wendy is truly drawn in glorious Rick Fletcher style. And she holds the fountain pen like a cigarette holder, like a femme fatale!
dook about 13 years ago
You mean Carmen Sandiego?
ChucklinChuck about 13 years ago
Love the art and story and new/old characters. But I do think those checkered caps say cabbie not cop.
kdrkolka about 13 years ago
Is this her first appearance since the Max Allen Collins years?
Ken in Ohio about 13 years ago
@ElGuapo:Sometime a while back, someone posted information on this comment page about Chicago Police uniforms. According to that link, the checkered cap design is a part of the Chicago Police Dept tradition.
deangup about 13 years ago
Not very imaginative dope smugglers. I read about a shipment of dishes that were glazed hashish.
436rge about 13 years ago
This new team is able to get more in just three panels than what Dick Locher was able to give in three weeks! Congrats DT team!
Tarry Plaguer about 13 years ago
Hey MPH did you catch the New Teams nod to Brenda Starr back in November?
sydney about 13 years ago
Canât believe thatâs really you talking Matthew !.You actually come across as if you are - EXCITED !
Never heard you teenage â swoon â over Dick Locherâs work that way ! (?) Maybe at last youâre begining -to realize what we have all been missing these past 15 years (?)
WELCOME to the Club !
I agree with you . . . the strip looks considerably better in B&W ! Why not read it on ComicStrip Nation?. Thatâs the way they carry it. I enjoy it so everyday !
BillWa about 13 years ago
Like the person she is drawn from, Waqlter Winchel, Wendy is a muck raker of the first order
Weegel about 13 years ago
Matt,.Re your comment below:.âANDâI donât read it at Comic Strip nation because I want to PAY for the strip and not rob Mike Curtis and Joe Staton of their royalties for doing the strip. I am a firm believer that if you read the strip, you should pay for it and if you enjoy the strip and want it to continue you REALLY ought to be paying for it. Oddly enough, Jim disagrees strongly with me about that.â.Youâre perfectly free to do what you want with your own money, and if you feel you have an ethical or moral obligation to pay to see TRACY when you can get it for free, itâs not my place to overrule your conscience..That said, I see nothing wrong with reading TRACY for free as long as itâs not violating the rights of the copyright owners..To the best of my knowledge, both Comic Strip Nation and the Houston CHRONICLE are showing TRACY on their sites with TMSâs permission. They are not pirating it. .In other words, they have paid for the privilege of running TRACY on those sites. So neither TMS, nor any member of Team Tracy has a kick coming..I donât think either TMS or any member of the creative team gets anything extra from GoComics as a consequence of GoComics having paid subscribers. I know I donât. So paying for it doesnât put money in anyoneâs pocket except the folks who run GoComics..And thatâs fine. If you think that GoComics is more likely to keep running TRACY because of paid subscribers, maybe itâs even a tactically adroit maneuver. But it doesnât have any effect on how much TMS or the people theyâve hired to do TRACY make..Comic Strip Nation, the Houston CHRON site, and the free part of GoComics all run advertising, so theyâre all making money from selling space to advertisers. I donât feel like Iâm stealing by reading those sites for free. The sites are making their profit by selling ads..Would it be stealing if, instead of buying a paper to read Tracy, or instead of reading it on a paid âNet site, I went down to the neighborhood library and read it in the local paper that I could find in their newspaper section? How about if I read it in a paper that I found abandoned on a train, or bus, or hotel lobby?.I canât convince myself that it would be. The paperâ s there. Itâs available to the public. Itâs SUPPOSED (at least in the case of the library) to be available to the public. The newpaper companyâs been paid, both by the library (or the person who left it behind), and by the advertisers who buy space in the paper. How is my reading TRACY in it somehow depriving the paper, or the creative team, or money it would otherwise have?.And, ethically or morally, how is reading that free paper materially different from reading a free website?.Nor, for that matter, do I feel any ehtical or moral obligation to buy the goods or services of those who buy advertising space in the newspaper, or âNet site, any more than I do buying the goods or services of those who buy commerical time on the television shows I regularly watch or the radio shows I regularly listen to. .In such a case, the newspaper features, the material on the website, or the TV/radio show is the bait, and I (and the rest of the public) are the fish. Do you really think I (and the rest of the public) have some moral obligation to be hooked?.I wonât try to talk you out of following your conscience, but I just donât comprehend the moral or ethical reasoning behind the choice youâre making, particularly when the product youâre paying for is inferior (because of the bad color job) to the product you could get for free at Nation or CHRONICLE.
sydney about 13 years ago
Matt, If it helps your conscience by all means PAY for the strip here. But please your eyes and TASTE too and READ it IN B&W at ComickStrip Nation.
The best of bothe Worlds. And exactly what I do, PAY here,and READ there !
sydney about 13 years ago
Well you are right in the sense I canât prove WHAT you are thinking !
But I cab with cofidence note that unusual, , NEVER before SEEN ACTIONS speek louder than WORDS !
cowboy1 about 13 years ago
fantastic art & writing !!!
Buzza Wuzza about 13 years ago
This is a strip I enjoy to a level I didnât think possible. Team Tracy has made me love DT just like when I was a kid reading âThe Celebrated Casesâ.