Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for February 03, 2011

  1. Comic face
    comicgos  almost 14 years ago

    Yet another hater trying to change the constitution!

     •  Reply
  2. Stewiebrian
    pouncingtiger  almost 14 years ago

    Danae’s a Republican.

     •  Reply
  3. Croparcs070707
    rayannina  almost 14 years ago

    She can’t be – she’s not old enough to register yet.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    kreole  almost 14 years ago

    She will fit right in with the current administration.

     •  Reply
  5. Nebulous100
    Nebulous Premium Member almost 14 years ago

    You have the right to remain silent. If you waive this right then anything you say will be taken down and used to ridicule you later. It is unnecessary for you to know or understand this right for it to be in effect.

     •  Reply
  6. Warthog
    wndrwrthg  almost 14 years ago

    Perhaps Danae should take a long constitutional off a short pier.

     •  Reply
  7. Loudmouth
    loudmouthbass  almost 14 years ago

    Darkeforce said, 31 minutes ago

    You don’t have to be old enough to vote for the Republicans to accept your votes. They’ll take them from any source; even fictional ones.

    there you go again….that’s the “Chicago way”, silly….

     •  Reply
  8. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  almost 14 years ago

    I’ve just re-written them myself: You have the right to never disagree with me in the comments section.

     •  Reply
  9. Owls 96
    gjsjr41  almost 14 years ago

    Ladyfingers86, I never heard of a talking horse either. Except for Mr. Ed, of course.

     •  Reply
  10. Spiral2
    Desultourist  almost 14 years ago

    You stole this from Palin.

     •  Reply
  11. 20141103 115559
    Potrzebie  almost 14 years ago

    So how is she going to get the majority of congress to vote for her changes? No one can change the constitution by themselves.

     •  Reply
  12. Moose2 copy
    HowieL  almost 14 years ago

    …and NO ONE expects the Spanish Inquisition!

     •  Reply
  13. Junco
    junco49  almost 14 years ago

    OK OK OK so Danae does get a little (A LOT) irritating from time to time. This does not mean she is hopeless. Think positive thoughts about her. She’ll come around. I hope.

     •  Reply
  14. B w catpaw
    joefish25  almost 14 years ago

    @ Desultourist…. I think that’s the point, which you noticed

     •  Reply
  15. What has been seen t1
    lewisbower  almost 14 years ago

    Ya say ya got the real solution I think you’d better change your head Ya say you’ll change the Constitution You’d better change your mind instead

    Cause if you go carring pictures of Chairman Mao Ya ain’t goinna make it with anyone anyhow

    (NOW SING TOGETHER IN 3 PART HARMONY)

    Don’tcha know its going to be

    ALL RIGHT!
     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    DjGuardian  almost 14 years ago

    @ Darkeforce

    All I have to say is: Al Franken.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    DjGuardian  almost 14 years ago

    Props to Radish & Howie…

     •  Reply
  18. Destiny
    Destiny23  almost 14 years ago

    The Canadian Human Rights Commission is under the mistaken belief that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms grants Canadians the right to NEVER be offended by anyone or anything. (Hence a magazine that published cartoons of Mohamed being bankrupted by the HRC because someone was offended by them.) Danae would feel right at home as a Commissioner, happily presiding over a kangaroo court set up to take away people’s Constitutional rights…

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    puddleglum1066  almost 14 years ago

    Actually, I think Danae’s got a point. You have the right to speak freely, but I am under no obligation to listen to you. Nor do you have the right to force your speech into my ears if I don’t wish to listen. Yet many people in our society (and not just political speakers; the entire advertising industry is based on this idea) claim the “right” to force their “speech” upon others, regardless of the others’ desire to listen.

    Indeed, this perversion of the free-speech concept has become so widely accepted that we had a major debate not that long ago, in which one side insisted that the technological equivalent of putting your hands over your ears was somehow “censorship.” Remember the furor over the television “V-chip” and filtering software in web browsers? These things were always under the control of the person watching the TV or browsing the web; they were device for saying, “don’t show me content I don’t want to see,” but people who were in the business of forcing their speech upon others made a noisy (if un-compelling) case that the mere existence of such technology was somehow restricting their right of free speech.

     •  Reply
  20. V  9
    freeholder1  almost 14 years ago

    Lew: More Like

    Meet the new boss Same as the old boss

    “Won’t get fooled again”

    The irony being that we always do so long as it gets warpped in warm and cozy in a flag of self-interest.

     •  Reply
  21. Hawaii5 0girl
    treered  almost 14 years ago

    Lucy has a strong constitution (would that be considered ‘profiling’?), but in panel 3, she looks like she’s just about at the end of her rope. lol! great strip and acr Wiley!

     •  Reply
  22. Turkey2
    MisngNOLA  almost 14 years ago

    Yes, the Republicans are trying to stifle free speech. That’s why it’s the Democrats who want to take talk radio off the air. And no you don’t have to be old enough to vote Republican apparently, but you don’t even have to be living to vote Democrat. Anyone who is foolish enough to believe that the Republicans are doing any more to take away your liberties than the Democrats are, deserves exactly what they’ll get from the Democrats, which is a big fat load of bovine excrement. (Same as from the GOP)

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    Lawrence Stetz Premium Member almost 14 years ago

    I think Danae could really use a dose of horse sense right now.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    WaitingMan  almost 14 years ago

    @Lewreader: If you’re going to quote The Beatles, PLEASE get it right. It’s “You’d better free your mind instead.”

     •  Reply
  25. Witch
    lin4869  almost 14 years ago

    I think Lucy is just adorable! :D

     •  Reply
  26. 104 2745
    Trebor39  almost 14 years ago

    Lucy knows more about the constitution than the rest of us.

     •  Reply
  27. Yellow pig small
    bmonk  almost 14 years ago

    OK, Danae can legislate all she wants–but who’s gonna enforce her new rules?

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    gfredrickson85  almost 14 years ago

    Yeah, you don’t have to be living or even a citizen to vote Democrat.

     •  Reply
  29. Cheryl 149 3
    Justice22  almost 14 years ago

    I used to bed our horses down all the time in the Winter.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur