Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for November 28, 2014

  1. Missing large
    Argythree  almost 10 years ago

    So what else is new?

     •  Reply
  2. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 10 years ago

    Very true ’toon.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Argythree  almost 10 years ago

    Nope. It’s ‘Capital Hill’. AKA Congress…

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    JoeStoppinghem Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    I’m surprised the Constituent entrance isn’t boarded up.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    strictures  almost 10 years ago

    Wiley spelled it “Le Capitol”

     •  Reply
  6. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    You can’t see it in the picture, but the other side of the dumpster has a label which reads: “Eat me”.It is a magical dumpster such as might be found in a Lewis Carroll story.Corporation is just another word for collective.And the Collective Loves You.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Hardthought  almost 10 years ago

    We can see Wiley doesn’t like corporations, but one has to wonder how big and lavish the entrance is for unions. Has to bigger than the corporate one.

     •  Reply
  8. Plumbbob wilson
    Plumbob Wilson  almost 10 years ago

    Capitol, capital, same thing.

     •  Reply
  9. 250
    ladykat  almost 10 years ago

    Steven Harper’s idea of paradise.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    drodr05  almost 10 years ago

    No. Capitol is a place. Capital is what you do with the first letter at the start of a sentence. Or, what happens to you after you have been tried and sentenced for capital crime.

     •  Reply
  11. Me 2015
    puddlesplatt  almost 10 years ago

    then who cares!

     •  Reply
  12. Ic6
    karanne  almost 10 years ago

    I’m surprised the light is so bright … and still lit!

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    coco8215 Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    so true so sad

     •  Reply
  14. New image
    NoCents  almost 10 years ago

    And true of both parties.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    dabugger  almost 10 years ago

    Oh yes, that’s right. Since the gods proclaimed that corporations are people it is altogether improper and unfitting that they have their privileges. Such as not paying taxes….

     •  Reply
  16. Inbox 4660
    goweeder  almost 10 years ago
    @strictures

    “Wiley spelled it “Le Capitol”"♦“Capitol” is correct.“’noun1. the building in Washington, D.C., used by the Congress of the U.S. for its sessions.”~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Part of that definition is correct; But there is some doubt about the Congress actually USING it for anything

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    luvdafuneez  almost 10 years ago

    That little door wasn’t necessary – the dumpster would’ve worked just fine.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    hippogriff  almost 10 years ago

    Hardthought: At the peak of union membership (long, long ago), all unions from local to international, had 5% the wealth of the single largest corporation (General Motors). You can’t buy many legislators with that inequity. And there was still a free press and no ALEC..And you are permitted to delete extra copies of your own post.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    zwilnik64  almost 10 years ago

    Capitol: Building. Capital: City.Hardthought, hahahahahahahah! No.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    jahoody  almost 10 years ago

    Just use “Big Money” or “Deep Pockets”……we’ll all know what that means……no spelling challenges there.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    Argythree  almost 10 years ago

    And some corporations donated to Democrats. Both corporations and unions hedge their bets. It would be interesting to learn the political affiliations of those who donated for the recent re-election of Rick Scott as Governor of Florida, for example. Especially since, as a billionaire, he didn’t actually need the money…

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    Argythree  almost 10 years ago

    In the fantasy universe. But we are stuck with the real thing…

     •  Reply
  23. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    The difference between the Collective and the Collective is that one is the Collective, and the other is the Collective. One serves the Collective while the other serves the Collective. Perhaps as an individual who has little to no representation or rights that were preserved under the Constitution, you were not made aware of this by the Collective Educational System.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    punslinger  almost 10 years ago

    That’s exactly right which is why we need to BURN this mother-fucking country DOWN with the rich in it and start OVER again!!!

     •  Reply
  25. Danae
    Wiley creator almost 10 years ago

    I suppose the irony is lost on some here as they go into their anti-union talking points on the day after a holiday, many of whom get both thursday and friday off to make it a 4-day weekend. Just where do you think the concept of a holiday, and even the weekend, came from? Generous industrialists?Many people literally died fighting for such things we take for granted today in the workplace. Think about it before you parrot the talking points of the 1%. I only wish they were anywhere near as powerful and influential on Congress as corporations. They’re simply not, almost irrelevant today, so why anyone fears them is beyond me.

     •  Reply
  26. Other7 brush
    Meh~tdology, fka Pepelaputr   almost 10 years ago

    You will find that what I implied was that “the sign remained the same”.-—————————-

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    watmiwori  almost 10 years ago

    There is NO difference whatsoever betweenDemoblicans and Republicrats. They are ALLpoliticians, every last one.

     •  Reply
  28. 11 06 126
    Varnes  almost 10 years ago

    Hardthought, I agree with Wiley What is this union thing you talk about? I remember something about them in history

     •  Reply
  29. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 10 years ago

    the United Mine workers was about safety, not salaries, and Koch Industries, like Murray, could care less about safety, or workers, or the planet. No, for those outside the corporate realm, it is NOT only about the money.

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    Argythree  almost 10 years ago

    Safety was the basic reason that the union movement actually got started. The Triangle Shirt Waist fire, where workers were burned alive because management kept doors locked to prevent workers from taking their fabric work home where they could take care of their children at the same time they worked, was a major stimulus to the union movement. -The destruction of federal inspection of mines has resulted in dangerous mines the have collapsed in West Virginia recently, but no increased funding provided to the federal Bureau of Mines to bring back federal inspection. If union foremen didn’t call for state inspections, there would be no inspections.-People fear unions in the US because they’ve been led to believe that unionizing workers is why jobs have gone overseas. Nothing could be further from the truth; jobs have gone overseas because federal tax laws provide incentives for them to do so. But it is convenient to keep telling US workers that unions are the real reason.-Meanwhile, take note of the way Walmart is advertising now, talking about its ‘true’ workers. This is because Walmart workers are trying to unionize. Who would have thunk it?

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    Argythree  almost 10 years ago

    Why is there a ‘smiley face’ on the sign telling us where the constituent entrance is?

     •  Reply
  32. Redfoxava
    reynard61  almost 10 years ago

    Hardthought said: “We can see Wiley doesn’t like corporations, but one has to wonder how big and lavish the entrance is for unions. Has to bigger than the corporate one.”

    Source

    Source

    No. It doesn’t. Maybe try to think a bit harder next time…

     •  Reply
  33. Missing large
    hippogriff  almost 10 years ago

    Hardthought: Corporations spend a minute portion of their income on bribing politicians, and that is chiefly done with funds legally belonging to the stockholders, but without their permission. Most of the funds are stolen by upper management for their personal use. Again with the real stockholders having no say (including being thrown out of stockholders’ meetings if they raise the issue), proxies from institutions who have no interest in the corporation, as long as they get some money without working for it, keeps them in power – which is why divestment campaigns scare them so.

     •  Reply
  34. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    Sounds like what we really need is a way to keep humans from running things, since they are so corruptible and liable to fail in their responsibilities to their fellows.I know! Machine overlords!

     •  Reply
  35. Missing large
    markjoseph125  almost 10 years ago

    Gee, a racist comment from rick scott. Now there’s a shocker! Not.

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    markjoseph125  almost 10 years ago

    As always, Wiley nails it. American democracy: “One dollar, one vote”.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur