Another Terry Pratchett or Carl Hiassen or. . .better do it today, mom. . .hm m m, maybe science can use this some way. . .what are those ants that move in a sheet and strip everything in their way??? Would they look better in pink? Anybody read the Vorkosigan saga: A Civil Contract which features butterbugs? Thanks, Wiley, for the opportunity to free associate!
That bird with the nest on top of the chimney in the first panel could be in trouble soon. Maybe sooner if Jack notices that he’s been raiding the roof for material for his nest. Also, Charlie’s got great bug eyes as well he should considering what his story is about.
this takes me back to my childhood. I didn’t imagine the ants becoming gigantic. I tended to imagine I shrunk and wandered in their world. Good times, playing in the back yard in the fresh air and sun and dirt with sticks, rocks and bugs.
I’ve been thinking about this all week. I am still disappointed that the original 2/10/19 comic was removed. If you review the original strip the COMPLETELY LEGIBLE text is debatable. I will post my initial impression of the text below. It would seem Wiley is being held responsible for us filling in the blanks of semi-legible scribble.
The reaction to a blurry expression so many thinking people feel at present in our “emergency” and the reaction of a press so either intimidated by, or part of, the right winged bird brains, indicates wherefrom fake fury comes.
Our comics are under assault. Boston Globe cut the comics in half, budget problems, yet they had 10 pages for Sports section. How many sports fans read the paper today? How many sports fans can read? New Bedford Standard, my Sunday paper, hacked their comics/TV section today, yet lots of sports. It makes me mad enough to koff up a hairball.
And the Birmingham News – the paper has removed this comic permanently, apparently because of some vulgar comment in last Sunday’s strip. I went back and for the life of me, even after enlarging to 200%, still could not read the words in the second panel.
Toronto Star had a whole column on the editorial page Saturday about how terrible the cartoonist was for doing something that might be read by children, especially as this was an inferred colouring book. I’m touched that they care so much but are still carrying the strip.
It wasn’t a crime…it was just bad taste and should be treated as such. Just give him a whack on the back of his hand with a ruler, and tell him not to do it again.
I am so angry that many newspapers, including “San Diego Union Tribune”, have dropped Non Sequitor due to the “vulgarity” in last Sunday’s strip. This is not the 1950’s, their indignation is phony, their prudery our-dated. I have written to the paper, suggest others do as well!
I think we’ve all known cowardly dishonest hypocrites who clutch their pearls over so-called “cuss words” who think nothing of reading, writing, saying, and bellowing ethnic slurs…………
The kerfuffle over the Non Sequitur message to Donald Trump is like the uproar a few years ago when Janet Jackson’s’ fabulous breast was exposed for a split second during the halftime entertainment of a Super Bowl game. The incident happened so quickly that very few people saw it as it occurred, so millions of people had to go to the internet to find a video of the incident, slow it down to see what happened, then registered a complaint about it. Virtually nobody saw the Non Sequitur scribbling to Trump until some eagle eye spotted it. Then after being told about it, many got upset. If any newspaper editor saw the message before publishing they could have blocked it out and there would be no controversy. They didn’t see it but got upset anyway.
Same here! The Reading Eagle is afraid children will get the wrong idea if he does it again! Too much kow-towing to the to the sensitivities of the insensitive.
The Wisconsin State Journal may be missing us soon as I have now found I can find you here! We had debated keeping our subscription for the paper in hand and it was always the Non Sequitur that I needed 1st thing with my coffee – they changed that….
Cheapskate0 almost 6 years ago
Darn. No marginal comments today.
Dtroutma almost 6 years ago
Gi- gant – ic story line
mr_sherman Premium Member almost 6 years ago
A good cartoon the Oregonian is missing today.
Superfrog almost 6 years ago
Antageddon.
sirbadger almost 6 years ago
Spielberg is old enough (72) that he may already have enough projects lined up to last the rest of his life.
Adiraiju almost 6 years ago
Oh no, it’s THEM…
DHBirr almost 6 years ago
I ant gonna remark on all these bad puns … oh, who am I kidding?
backyardcowboy almost 6 years ago
The ants you don’t want in your pants.
Aaberon almost 6 years ago
VIVID eye opening colors today!
vaughnrl2003 Premium Member almost 6 years ago
For a short while, when I was young, I wondered if Ants had a insect named after them, why didn’t Uncles?
JimValTen Premium Member almost 6 years ago
Great art work, great mind. Always enjoy your contribution to my daily well being.JimValTen
1953Baby almost 6 years ago
Another Terry Pratchett or Carl Hiassen or. . .better do it today, mom. . .hm m m, maybe science can use this some way. . .what are those ants that move in a sheet and strip everything in their way??? Would they look better in pink? Anybody read the Vorkosigan saga: A Civil Contract which features butterbugs? Thanks, Wiley, for the opportunity to free associate!
mattro65 almost 6 years ago
That bird with the nest on top of the chimney in the first panel could be in trouble soon. Maybe sooner if Jack notices that he’s been raiding the roof for material for his nest. Also, Charlie’s got great bug eyes as well he should considering what his story is about.
enigmamz almost 6 years ago
We’re gonna need a bigger shoe!
car2ner almost 6 years ago
this takes me back to my childhood. I didn’t imagine the ants becoming gigantic. I tended to imagine I shrunk and wandered in their world. Good times, playing in the back yard in the fresh air and sun and dirt with sticks, rocks and bugs.
Rev Phnk Ey almost 6 years ago
Haven’t seen a “go fund me” page for Wiley yet.
ArtieEl almost 6 years ago
I’ve been thinking about this all week. I am still disappointed that the original 2/10/19 comic was removed. If you review the original strip the COMPLETELY LEGIBLE text is debatable. I will post my initial impression of the text below. It would seem Wiley is being held responsible for us filling in the blanks of semi-legible scribble.
MichaelHelwig almost 6 years ago
Hey Wiley, we love ya. Don’t let all those RWNJ publishers get to you.
sandpiper almost 6 years ago
Given the unlimited imagination of the young, Grimm’s Fairy Tales could have turned out truly gruesome.
Display almost 6 years ago
Real men and women read real newspapers. And real newspapers do not censor! Gosh darn it!(/s). This is America! (no /s).
Dtroutma almost 6 years ago
The reaction to a blurry expression so many thinking people feel at present in our “emergency” and the reaction of a press so either intimidated by, or part of, the right winged bird brains, indicates wherefrom fake fury comes.
captastro almost 6 years ago
“THEM!”
dfdonnell almost 6 years ago
TulsaWorld banned Non-Sequitur for “f__k-trump” cartoon (which the readership never got to see)
DickNixon almost 6 years ago
Our comics are under assault. Boston Globe cut the comics in half, budget problems, yet they had 10 pages for Sports section. How many sports fans read the paper today? How many sports fans can read? New Bedford Standard, my Sunday paper, hacked their comics/TV section today, yet lots of sports. It makes me mad enough to koff up a hairball.
LarryLowe almost 6 years ago
And the Birmingham News – the paper has removed this comic permanently, apparently because of some vulgar comment in last Sunday’s strip. I went back and for the life of me, even after enlarging to 200%, still could not read the words in the second panel.
brick10 almost 6 years ago
All this “hoo-hah” makes me wonder if the local editors were fired for missing the “offensive” bit. And how many other things have been missed?
shirleyalice almost 6 years ago
Cow town Ohio Dispatch strikes again
the lost wizard almost 6 years ago
Toronto Star had a whole column on the editorial page Saturday about how terrible the cartoonist was for doing something that might be read by children, especially as this was an inferred colouring book. I’m touched that they care so much but are still carrying the strip.
bluemtnsophie almost 6 years ago
Here are the Lee Enterprise “markets,” including all the major cities in Montana except Great Falls. https://lee.net/markets/
WCraft Premium Member almost 6 years ago
That was the day picnics ended on earth
kathyfrieb almost 6 years ago
A good cartoon the Sacramento Bee is missing today…
magicwalnut almost 6 years ago
It wasn’t a crime…it was just bad taste and should be treated as such. Just give him a whack on the back of his hand with a ruler, and tell him not to do it again.
Bettyboop88 almost 6 years ago
I am so angry that many newspapers, including “San Diego Union Tribune”, have dropped Non Sequitor due to the “vulgarity” in last Sunday’s strip. This is not the 1950’s, their indignation is phony, their prudery our-dated. I have written to the paper, suggest others do as well!
Godfreydaniel almost 6 years ago
I think we’ve all known cowardly dishonest hypocrites who clutch their pearls over so-called “cuss words” who think nothing of reading, writing, saying, and bellowing ethnic slurs…………
Godfreydaniel almost 6 years ago
Personally, I would never tell a treasonous agent of an enemy foreign government to have self-pleasure, because he doen’t DESERVE to enjoy himself!
ThomasBonsell almost 6 years ago
The kerfuffle over the Non Sequitur message to Donald Trump is like the uproar a few years ago when Janet Jackson’s’ fabulous breast was exposed for a split second during the halftime entertainment of a Super Bowl game. The incident happened so quickly that very few people saw it as it occurred, so millions of people had to go to the internet to find a video of the incident, slow it down to see what happened, then registered a complaint about it. Virtually nobody saw the Non Sequitur scribbling to Trump until some eagle eye spotted it. Then after being told about it, many got upset. If any newspaper editor saw the message before publishing they could have blocked it out and there would be no controversy. They didn’t see it but got upset anyway.
pchemcat almost 6 years ago
THEM!
PlatoL almost 6 years ago
Same here! The Reading Eagle is afraid children will get the wrong idea if he does it again! Too much kow-towing to the to the sensitivities of the insensitive.
LindaMeek almost 6 years ago
The Wisconsin State Journal may be missing us soon as I have now found I can find you here! We had debated keeping our subscription for the paper in hand and it was always the Non Sequitur that I needed 1st thing with my coffee – they changed that….
Bushaw5931 almost 6 years ago
A wonderful comic the Tacoma News Tribune is missing. Glad there’s Gocomics!