“Sorry to burst anyone’s bubble, but you’re not very likely to change the world with your brilliant political commentary here on GoComics”~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I’m crushed!
It’s not the journalists I care about. It’s the elected officials who make decisions based on the politically-biased journalists instead of by reading the studies themselves.
But then again, that would require congressmen with an IQ large enough for them to be able to read a scientific paper without some journalist giving them the politically-biased executive summary.
@Alan Watkins – not at all. I work with a lot of engineers and I don’t know a one of them who subscribes to AGW. The political dimension is troubling as well – the participants follow political lines more closely than for any theory since Hitler’s “supreme race” claim. Legitimate science does not look like that. (I am a career scientist… 44 years.)
awgiedawgie Premium Member almost 10 years ago
Precisely why I avoid getting involved in political “discussions” (translate: arguments) here.
Not only will you not change the world, you’re not even likely to change any single person’s mind.
johnt204 almost 10 years ago
A short debate during a news broadcast would be a refreshing change from the usual argument with 2-3 people all talking at the same time.
rshive almost 10 years ago
It’s either that or listening to a speech by King Fink.
goweeder almost 10 years ago
“Sorry to burst anyone’s bubble, but you’re not very likely to change the world with your brilliant political commentary here on GoComics”~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I’m crushed!
alangwatkins almost 10 years ago
Isn’t it scientific fact, not a political debate? Politicians are a problem in themselves.
shamino almost 10 years ago
It’s not the journalists I care about. It’s the elected officials who make decisions based on the politically-biased journalists instead of by reading the studies themselves.
But then again, that would require congressmen with an IQ large enough for them to be able to read a scientific paper without some journalist giving them the politically-biased executive summary.
flagmichael almost 10 years ago
@Alan Watkins – not at all. I work with a lot of engineers and I don’t know a one of them who subscribes to AGW. The political dimension is troubling as well – the participants follow political lines more closely than for any theory since Hitler’s “supreme race” claim. Legitimate science does not look like that. (I am a career scientist… 44 years.)
mourdac Premium Member almost 10 years ago
Facts don’t seem to get in the way of politics anymore, if they ever really did.
David Huie Green ForceIsAUsefulFiction almost 10 years ago
If I haven’t convinced you, then I must not be yelling loudly enough.
GeorgeJohnson almost 10 years ago
See today’s “Non-Sequitur” for how GW got started.
http://www.uclick.com/client/spi/nq/
pschearer Premium Member almost 10 years ago
How much easier it is to dismiss everyone as a hack than to think about what they have to say.
matalupe over 9 years ago
matalupe over 9 years ago
Global warming has already been disproven.