Frazz’s comment suggests Caulfield’s rant lasted the exact length of time that the eclipse would take in any given location. And, he had to use science/math to calculate it.
Because there is no financial or political stake in denying the science this time.
The denial of global climate change comes from the fact that some companies make a lot of money by pouring toxins into the air. And they have deep pockets to spread propaganda.
They used to deny the science that said smoking was bad for your health, too. Same reason.
Because none of the “global warming” predictions have been accurate – that’s why the groups changed the term to “climate change” instead, so they can blame all kinds of weather on bad, bad, humanity. And, let’s not forget, that science says there are 2 sexes, known by their chromosomal patterns of XX or XY, but look how many people disregard that piece of science…
Nothing wrong with science…scientism is the problem. Why would anyone always trust scientists’ predictions? That in and of itself is not scientific. I hope no one is shocked by this, but…scientists, even the best and brightest, can be wrong from time to time.
Elmer Gantry Fudd about 7 years ago
Scientists predict eclipses accurately, therefore they can predict future weather accurately. Q.E.D.
Randy B Premium Member about 7 years ago
What object could eclipse Caulfield and his speech balloon?
A big black playground ball?
Masterskrain about 7 years ago
And I remember first hearing about the Eclipse about 3 years ago, date, time, and path!
Axeɫ handeɫ about 7 years ago
Because scientists are humans.
Dennis Nichols about 7 years ago
Even Mallett employs a straw man. Cheap.
sandpiper about 7 years ago
Frazz’s comment suggests Caulfield’s rant lasted the exact length of time that the eclipse would take in any given location. And, he had to use science/math to calculate it.
Kroykali about 7 years ago
One thing I’ll be doing today is checking Google Maps and seeing where all the traffic jams (red lines) are.
cabalonrye about 7 years ago
I am jealous. We won’t get anything in Europe and I missed the last one (clouds all the way to the horizon!!!)
Uncle Bob about 7 years ago
Please don’t stare at it, Caulie!
Ignatz Premium Member about 7 years ago
Because there is no financial or political stake in denying the science this time.
The denial of global climate change comes from the fact that some companies make a lot of money by pouring toxins into the air. And they have deep pockets to spread propaganda.
They used to deny the science that said smoking was bad for your health, too. Same reason.
Nick Danger about 7 years ago
Because none of the “global warming” predictions have been accurate – that’s why the groups changed the term to “climate change” instead, so they can blame all kinds of weather on bad, bad, humanity. And, let’s not forget, that science says there are 2 sexes, known by their chromosomal patterns of XX or XY, but look how many people disregard that piece of science…
JoeMartinFan Premium Member about 7 years ago
Nothing wrong with science…scientism is the problem. Why would anyone always trust scientists’ predictions? That in and of itself is not scientific. I hope no one is shocked by this, but…scientists, even the best and brightest, can be wrong from time to time.