Wizard of Id by Parker and Hart for May 09, 2019

Hey Wiz, it ain’t art until some pointy-headed critic in a high-falutin’ publication calls it art. Then it doesn’t matter how big a piece of crap it is, it is “art.”

great reference

We could call his work, “Zero inspiration and a lot of crap”.

Considering the source media, I would say ‘Potluck’ not Pollock.

It’s still terrible!

That’s more Cai Guo-Qiang than Pollock.

could brighten a dull room or make a bright room seem cluttered. But Pollock’s work can be considered at least colorful and upbeat compared to the works of Bosch, Munch, and other painters of humankind’s ‘dark’ side.

You will repair that crack in the floor before Blanche sees it, right, Wiz?

Sweet! Color on Thursday. I wonder what Wiz could do for a Picasso. I would be interested to see a painting of Rodney. Not buy it, just see it.

It really ties the room together.

It’s a little too neat for a Pollock!;o]

Arts beauty is in the eye of the beholder…..after a few glasses of wine!

I’m no artist, but as a college student, I took a black sheet and dribbled fluorescent paint on it in multiple colors. With a black light, it looked like a hallucinogic night sky. I’d never heard of Pollock at the time.

I wonder if the first person who came up with pour acrylic painting should be considered a great artist like Pollock.

There’s a story about a plumber who was working at a museum. He placed a bunch of old pipes on a table. He came back the next day to clean up his mess. You guessed it, the Artsy folks found the pile of junk and put it on display.

Messrs. Hart and Parker: Save that last panel and take the original to an art gallery in New York – it will bring big bucks!

Keep trying, Wiz! Someday, you might strike gold!

I think the end results of some of the Slo Mo Guys experiments are more interesting. :o)

I love Pollock…..