Justice is blind. Most often it’s those who are to administer justice who choose to look the other and exercise their personal values and not look at all the facts (true facts) and not what I want or feel.
Sometimes it’s just distracted by the idiotic interpretations of the law by people who are supposed to have spent their time in law school actually studying its actual applications and the judges who offer unique interpretations. ‘Affluenza’ comes to mind.
In the sixth grade we learned that the role of the judicial branch of the government is to interpret the laws. It took me many years before I understood what that meant. When I finally figured it out it did not make me happy. It simply means that judges. juries, lawyers and even policemen can interpret a law to mean about anything they want it to mean. When it gets to the Supreme Court the final interpretation is based on the popular vote of the judges. It does not matter what the original intent of the law was or how it is written. Only the opinion or desire of a majority of the judges matters.
Free human beings are very different from each other and therefore the legal/justice system is very difficult to manage. I think our system, which has flaws and needs to be constantly improved, is however better then any other.
oldpine52 about 4 years ago
The problem is that instead of a Justice system, we have a legal system.
wiatr about 4 years ago
We don’t even have to have a judge; sometimes politicians do the same thing.
SameAsOldFfred about 4 years ago
Now that is a great quote; almost worthy of Frederick Douglass.
Tn_reader about 4 years ago
Justice is blind. Most often it’s those who are to administer justice who choose to look the other and exercise their personal values and not look at all the facts (true facts) and not what I want or feel.
sandpiper about 4 years ago
Sometimes it’s just distracted by the idiotic interpretations of the law by people who are supposed to have spent their time in law school actually studying its actual applications and the judges who offer unique interpretations. ‘Affluenza’ comes to mind.
tkcoker about 4 years ago
In the sixth grade we learned that the role of the judicial branch of the government is to interpret the laws. It took me many years before I understood what that meant. When I finally figured it out it did not make me happy. It simply means that judges. juries, lawyers and even policemen can interpret a law to mean about anything they want it to mean. When it gets to the Supreme Court the final interpretation is based on the popular vote of the judges. It does not matter what the original intent of the law was or how it is written. Only the opinion or desire of a majority of the judges matters.
Jeffin Premium Member about 4 years ago
Makes me want to take the fifth or at least buy a quart.
1953Baby about 4 years ago
Not to mention “interpretation” and all its many twists and turns. . .
uniquename about 4 years ago
Sometimes I think our Justice system has ADHD.
bigplayray about 4 years ago
Profound Thaves. Very profound.
boydjb47 about 4 years ago
Free human beings are very different from each other and therefore the legal/justice system is very difficult to manage. I think our system, which has flaws and needs to be constantly improved, is however better then any other.
ajr58(1) about 4 years ago
if laws could talk they would complain about lawyers in the first place
quinones.felix about 4 years ago
The plea bargaining system that’s in play just amounts to horse trading.
Teto85 Premium Member about 4 years ago
Attorney General Fubar has basically decapitated Lady Justice. I am waiting for Lady Karma to get back to him about that. VOTE
kathleenhicks62 about 4 years ago
Justice wears a blind fold…….
Alberta Oil Premium Member about 4 years ago
Looking the other way.. to find loopholes to justify the crime.
Madzdad the bard about 4 years ago
In America, you get all the justice you can afford.
sandflea about 4 years ago
Bill Barr was the first thing that came to mind.
braindead Premium Member about 4 years ago
Now that we have a Ministry Of Justice, we have new improved concepts.
Especially, It’s OKAY If A Republican* Does It!
.
*Now the Party Of Trump.