Nothing wrong being fuzzy, Roscoe. You’re a good looking dog.
But you don’t want to get cropped…
Peeve: “you and me” not “you and I”.
Fuzziness is great for cuddly dogs, and not so great for pictures. No offense, Roscoe…
It’s a different kind of fuzzy, buddy. Don’t worry about it.
It’s “photo of you and me” in that sentence, Earl. Yes, I am an English teacher. :D
depends if fuzzy was on OPAL’S chin or not
Kipling called Sudanese people “fuzzy wuzzies”.
Why do I think in that picture they resemble Bonnie and Clyde?!
Fuzzy was he?
Did the enlarging yourself instead of having a professional do it, Earl?
Well, now you just need to go back to Lake Tahoe and retake the picture with a higher resolution camera.
Roscoe REWLS!!!
Fuzzy is okay if you’re a dog, but not if you’re a photograph.
Photo of you and ME. Would you say here’s a photo of I?
Simple rule. You and me = us. You and I = we. You and I went to the store. We went to the store. They would not let you and me in. They would not let us in.
Yeah… you and me both agree on that :-)
Correct, Ratkin. Why is this so difficult for people?
Humans are NOT supposed to be fuzzy…… maybe FLUFFY, but NOT fuzzy.
Fuzzy’s ok if you can get it. Ask Darby Conley.
Roscoe seems to frequently wrestle with self-doubt.
nothing, if you’re an impressionist painter
Sounds like it was Opalpixelated.
Call the grammar police.
Exactly my thought also!
Of you. Of me. Of you and me.
Unless there is someone named I as a personal name. That would be interesting.
Regardless, the dog has a valid point.
Ok we’re not talking about you! Who’s a good doggie!?
Nothing, Ros, if you are a dog
Must be a photo of Bigfoot as well
Unlike Fuzzy Wuzzy, he’s nicely fuzzy.
Yeah I get it. I’ve been looking at photos from my phone enlarged on the computer and the quality isn’t anywhere as good as those taken on my 35mm.
Or simply, " us".
I am he as you are he, as you are me and we are all together, Ok Fellow posters, I have to agree with you, I was, gulp, wrong!
Nothing at all, Roscoe, nothing at all!
allen@home about 1 year ago
Nothing wrong being fuzzy, Roscoe. You’re a good looking dog.
eromlig about 1 year ago
But you don’t want to get cropped…
Ratkin Premium Member about 1 year ago
Peeve: “you and me” not “you and I”.
Argythree about 1 year ago
Fuzziness is great for cuddly dogs, and not so great for pictures. No offense, Roscoe…
enigmamz about 1 year ago
It’s a different kind of fuzzy, buddy. Don’t worry about it.
californiamonty about 1 year ago
It’s “photo of you and me” in that sentence, Earl. Yes, I am an English teacher. :D
win.45mag about 1 year ago
depends if fuzzy was on OPAL’S chin or not
DavidWilliams1 about 1 year ago
Kipling called Sudanese people “fuzzy wuzzies”.
iggyman about 1 year ago
Why do I think in that picture they resemble Bonnie and Clyde?!
The Reader Premium Member about 1 year ago
Fuzzy was he?
jagedlo about 1 year ago
Did the enlarging yourself instead of having a professional do it, Earl?
DM2860 about 1 year ago
Well, now you just need to go back to Lake Tahoe and retake the picture with a higher resolution camera.
IWannaBeLerxst about 1 year ago
Roscoe REWLS!!!
ladykat Premium Member about 1 year ago
Fuzzy is okay if you’re a dog, but not if you’re a photograph.
notmoving Premium Member about 1 year ago
Photo of you and ME. Would you say here’s a photo of I?
Ishka Bibel about 1 year ago
Simple rule. You and me = us. You and I = we. You and I went to the store. We went to the store. They would not let you and me in. They would not let us in.
sid w about 1 year ago
Yeah… you and me both agree on that :-)
hnoii about 1 year ago
Correct, Ratkin. Why is this so difficult for people?
ANIMAL about 1 year ago
Humans are NOT supposed to be fuzzy…… maybe FLUFFY, but NOT fuzzy.
delennwen about 1 year ago
Fuzzy’s ok if you can get it. Ask Darby Conley.
w16521 about 1 year ago
Roscoe seems to frequently wrestle with self-doubt.
KEA about 1 year ago
nothing, if you’re an impressionist painter
Mike Baldwin creator about 1 year ago
Sounds like it was Opalpixelated.
Frank Salem Premium Member about 1 year ago
Call the grammar police.
diegot about 1 year ago
Exactly my thought also!
David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace about 1 year ago
Of you. Of me. Of you and me.
Unless there is someone named I as a personal name. That would be interesting.
Regardless, the dog has a valid point.
Zebrastripes about 1 year ago
Ok we’re not talking about you! Who’s a good doggie!?
Natarose about 1 year ago
Nothing, Ros, if you are a dog
DNCoyote about 1 year ago
Must be a photo of Bigfoot as well
zeexenon about 1 year ago
Unlike Fuzzy Wuzzy, he’s nicely fuzzy.
mleannw about 1 year ago
Yeah I get it. I’ve been looking at photos from my phone enlarged on the computer and the quality isn’t anywhere as good as those taken on my 35mm.
jensensteve165 about 1 year ago
Or simply, " us".
iggyman about 1 year ago
I am he as you are he, as you are me and we are all together, Ok Fellow posters, I have to agree with you, I was, gulp, wrong!
wlbr549 about 1 year ago
Nothing at all, Roscoe, nothing at all!