Coming Soon 👀 At the beginning of April, you’ll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
Simple rule. You and me = us. You and I = we. You and I went to the store. We went to the store. They would not let you and me in. They would not let us in.
Yeah I get it. I’ve been looking at photos from my phone enlarged on the computer and the quality isn’t anywhere as good as those taken on my 35mm.
allen@home about 1 year ago
Nothing wrong being fuzzy, Roscoe. You’re a good looking dog.
eromlig about 1 year ago
But you don’t want to get cropped…
Ratkin Premium Member about 1 year ago
Peeve: “you and me” not “you and I”.
Argythree about 1 year ago
Fuzziness is great for cuddly dogs, and not so great for pictures. No offense, Roscoe…
enigmamz about 1 year ago
It’s a different kind of fuzzy, buddy. Don’t worry about it.
californiamonty about 1 year ago
It’s “photo of you and me” in that sentence, Earl. Yes, I am an English teacher. :D
win.45mag about 1 year ago
depends if fuzzy was on OPAL’S chin or not
DavidWilliams1 about 1 year ago
Kipling called Sudanese people “fuzzy wuzzies”.
iggyman about 1 year ago
Why do I think in that picture they resemble Bonnie and Clyde?!
The Reader Premium Member about 1 year ago
Fuzzy was he?
jagedlo about 1 year ago
Did the enlarging yourself instead of having a professional do it, Earl?
DM2860 about 1 year ago
Well, now you just need to go back to Lake Tahoe and retake the picture with a higher resolution camera.
IWannaBeLerxst about 1 year ago
Roscoe REWLS!!!
ladykat Premium Member about 1 year ago
Fuzzy is okay if you’re a dog, but not if you’re a photograph.
notmoving Premium Member about 1 year ago
Photo of you and ME. Would you say here’s a photo of I?
Ishka Bibel about 1 year ago
Simple rule. You and me = us. You and I = we. You and I went to the store. We went to the store. They would not let you and me in. They would not let us in.
sid w about 1 year ago
Yeah… you and me both agree on that :-)
hnoii about 1 year ago
Correct, Ratkin. Why is this so difficult for people?
ANIMAL about 1 year ago
Humans are NOT supposed to be fuzzy…… maybe FLUFFY, but NOT fuzzy.
delennwen about 1 year ago
Fuzzy’s ok if you can get it. Ask Darby Conley.
w16521 about 1 year ago
Roscoe seems to frequently wrestle with self-doubt.
KEA about 1 year ago
nothing, if you’re an impressionist painter
Mike Baldwin creator about 1 year ago
Sounds like it was Opalpixelated.
Frank Salem Premium Member about 1 year ago
Call the grammar police.
diegot about 1 year ago
Exactly my thought also!
David Huie Green LikeNobody'sEverSeen about 1 year ago
Of you. Of me. Of you and me.
Unless there is someone named I as a personal name. That would be interesting.
Regardless, the dog has a valid point.
Zebrastripes about 1 year ago
Ok we’re not talking about you! Who’s a good doggie!?
Natarose about 1 year ago
Nothing, Ros, if you are a dog
DNCoyote about 1 year ago
Must be a photo of Bigfoot as well
zeexenon about 1 year ago
Unlike Fuzzy Wuzzy, he’s nicely fuzzy.
mleannw about 1 year ago
Yeah I get it. I’ve been looking at photos from my phone enlarged on the computer and the quality isn’t anywhere as good as those taken on my 35mm.
jensensteve165 about 1 year ago
Or simply, " us".
iggyman about 1 year ago
I am he as you are he, as you are me and we are all together, Ok Fellow posters, I have to agree with you, I was, gulp, wrong!
wlbr549 about 1 year ago
Nothing at all, Roscoe, nothing at all!