Frazz by Jef Mallett for March 22, 2025

  1. Twin commander 1000 ext
    MeanBob Premium Member 1 day ago

    You’re a jammy bright lad.

     •  Reply
  2. Pexels pixabay 278823
    Doug K  1 day ago

    Caulfield = Schrödinger or not Schrödinger or …

     •  Reply
  3. Funnies3 bright19 clarity100
    Kroykali  about 24 hours ago

    What are they looking and pointing at?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    goboboyd  about 23 hours ago

    Are you spending or saving? Or investing.

     •  Reply
  5. Note
    Slowly, he turned...  about 23 hours ago

    Annoying regardless…

     •  Reply
  6. Profile pic
    The Orange Mailman  about 22 hours ago

    Oh, it doesn’t matter what they say in the papers

    ‘Cause it’s always been the same old scene

    There’s a new band in town

    but you can’t get the sound

    From a story in a magazine

    Aimed at your average teen

     •  Reply
  7. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  about 22 hours ago

    News can be both current and dated at almost the same moment. Schrödinger’s cat tells the tale.

     •  Reply
  8. Img 0716
    bobtoledo Premium Member about 22 hours ago

    This kid’s a smart cat!

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    royq27  about 21 hours ago

    Yes, the same news day after day…for decades.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    BJDucer  about 21 hours ago

    I don’t buy lottery tickets until the the lottery gets to be a billion dollars or more. When I do, I instantly become a Schrödinger’s billionaire! It’s a shame I haven’t been able to spend much of the Schrödinger money, though.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Bruce1253  about 20 hours ago

    Possibly Heisenberg?

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    Mel-T-Pass Premium Member about 20 hours ago

    “Am I a pain? Or a noodge? Or both?”

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    Uncle Bob  about 19 hours ago

    excuse me, I gotta go and google something…

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    prrdh  about 19 hours ago

    “And I am sure that I never read any memorable news in a newspaper. If we read of one man robbed, or murdered, or killed by accident, or one house burned, or one vessel wrecked, or one steamboat blown up, or one cow run over on the Western Railroad, or one mad dog killed, or one lot of grasshoppers in the winter—we never need read of another. One is enough. If you are acquainted with the principle, what do you care for a myriad instances and applications?”

    —Henry David Thoreau

     •  Reply
  15. Hat large square
    Cactus-Pete  about 18 hours ago

    Not both – that was Schrödinger’s whole point. So, not sophisticated, just wrong again.

     •  Reply
  16. Picture
    Ontman  about 18 hours ago

    We would have called him a smart Alec, back in the day.

     •  Reply
  17. Bob 1
    moondog42 Premium Member about 18 hours ago

    In the true sense of Schrödinger’s Cat, you don’t know whether that weekly is alive or dead until you look at its publisher’s history

     •  Reply
  18. Bluedog
    Bilan  about 17 hours ago

    You don’t know if this week’s news is still true until you read next week’s news.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    cellodude1990  about 15 hours ago

    Call me a Luddite, but I am starting to warm to the idea of the pre-computerized forms of news information again. There is an argument to be had that the current twenty-four-hour news cycle, facilitated by cable television news channels, the Internet, and social media, is part of the reason for today’s societal anxieties.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    Smeagol  about 14 hours ago

    I hear the cat has an escape plan.

     •  Reply
  21. Whatever
    unfair.de  about 13 hours ago

    This is a rare case where I would like to correct Jef Mallet: Schrödingers cat was not about „both“ just about „uncertaincy“.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    Otis Rufus Driftwood  about 13 hours ago

    Current events don’t stay current, do they?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Frazz