My son was a Zoology major – his third major in 4 years at UW-Madison. He just had to take a couple extra classes and all the other classes overlapped with his other two pre-med majors (Biology and Microbiology & Immunology).
Unanswerable without further information. The poem tells us that he had no hair, but from that you can’t conclusively determine that he wasn’t fuzzy. First, it could be argued that he definitely was Fuzzy, since that’s part of his name; second, he might be in a state of confusion, so he could rightfully be described as fuzzy; third, perhaps the test included a blurry, or fuzzy, picture of him; finally, if he is making a weak argument, he could be described as using fuzzy logic. (I’m sure I haven’t exhausted all the possibilities.)
eromlig almost 3 years ago
I’m saving this one for Jason. You there, Jason?
Ratkin Premium Member almost 3 years ago
In the woods.
kingdiamond69 almost 3 years ago
Well I heard he was a bear and he had a lot of hair.
constantine48 almost 3 years ago
That’s cryptozoology, fake animals and where they don’t live!
Doug K almost 3 years ago
It’s kind of a trick question – He wuz and yet he wuzn’t.
DHBirr almost 3 years ago
“’E’s a daisy, ’e’s a ducky, ’e’s a lamb!
’E’s a injia-rubber idiot on the spree,
’E’s the on’y thing that doesn’t give a damn
For a Regiment o’ British Infantree!
So ’ere’s to you, Fuzzy-Wuzzy, at your ’ome in the Soudan;
You’re a pore benighted ’eathen but a first-class fighting man…."
— Rudyard Kipling, “Fuzzy-Wuzzy,” 1892
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy-Wuzzy
gopher gofer almost 3 years ago
A: “liddle lamzy divy”…
uniquename almost 3 years ago
He was a bare bear.
BearsDown Premium Member almost 3 years ago
I put down “Chair”
walstib Premium Member almost 3 years ago
My son was a Zoology major – his third major in 4 years at UW-Madison. He just had to take a couple extra classes and all the other classes overlapped with his other two pre-med majors (Biology and Microbiology & Immunology).
Lee26 Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear,Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair,Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn’t really fuzzy,Was he?
Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bearFuzzy Wuzzy had no hairFuzzy Wuzzy wasn’t fuzzyNo, by gosh, he wasn’t, was he?
Silly Willy was a wormSilly Willy wouldn’t squirmSilly Willy wasn’t sillyNo, by gosh, he wasn’t really
Iddy Biddy was a mouseIddy Biddy had no spouseIddy Biddy wasn’t prettyOh, by gosh, it was a pity
Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bearFuzzy Wuzzy had no hairFuzzy Wuzzy wasn’t fuzzyNo, by god, he wasn’t, was he?
Teto85 Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Before or after his visit to the barber chair.
MFRXIM Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Mairsey dotes.
The Orange Mailman almost 3 years ago
There was also a question about woodchucks. The Peter Piper question is in both botany and arithmetic.
paullp Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Unanswerable without further information. The poem tells us that he had no hair, but from that you can’t conclusively determine that he wasn’t fuzzy. First, it could be argued that he definitely was Fuzzy, since that’s part of his name; second, he might be in a state of confusion, so he could rightfully be described as fuzzy; third, perhaps the test included a blurry, or fuzzy, picture of him; finally, if he is making a weak argument, he could be described as using fuzzy logic. (I’m sure I haven’t exhausted all the possibilities.)