Baldo by Hector D. Cantú and Carlos Castellanos for January 22, 2016

  1. B986e866 14d0 4607 bdb4 5d76d7b56ddb
    Templo S.U.D.  almost 9 years ago

    Not bad if I do say so myself with Janet’s and Mario’s 3-D squares; they’re learning their best to draw.

     •  Reply
  2. Winslow4
    Quantum Leaper  almost 9 years ago

    Gracie should have drawn a hypercube.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    jgarrott  almost 9 years ago

    I certainly agree with Gracie’s observation.

     •  Reply
  4. Hekko
    hekko Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    Is this not called a “cube” in English?

     •  Reply
  5. Vicki rose is rose
    verticallychallenged Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    @Hekko, yes. I’m a teacher, btw.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Egrayjames  almost 9 years ago

    Gracie really is a blockhead.

     •  Reply
  7. 288880045 10221076520606585 8531060568730745726 n
    dlkrueger33  almost 9 years ago

    It’s all along the same line as telling kids they are great at something when they are terrible, or mediocre. That does them a disservice. Not everyone is a sports person, or an artist or a musician. How about giving these kids advice on how to make their drawings BETTER? You can still encourage them with words like “Good attempt. Good try”. Even, “good job….now how about we put this line HERE”, or something like that. You have to teach kids REALITY because otherwise they will be shocked when they get into the real world and find out they really ARE NOT GREAT.

     •  Reply
  8. Retired dude avatar
    Retired Dude  almost 9 years ago

    Janet and Mario are going to be so screwed when they get into the real world . . . but they will feel good about themselves.

     •  Reply
  9. Catinma
    BeniHanna6 Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    You can thank our, ‘protect the childrens self esteem’, BS society.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Comic Minister Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    Sorry Gracie.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    hippogriff  almost 9 years ago

    3D square isn’t even a good definition, and certainly is too long for a name. Names are “cube”, “d6”, and defined as a “regular polyhedron consisting of six sides”. It is one of the five “Platonic solids” (polygons whose sides are regular polygons): tetrahedron, four triangles; hexahedron, six squares; octahedron, eight triangles; dodecahedron, twelve pentagons; and icosohedron, twenty triangles.

     •  Reply
  12. Terror tim   copy
    Petemejia77  almost 9 years ago

    For once, I agree with you, Graice.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    abbybookcase  almost 9 years ago

    my niece and i both love the dodecahedron. it’s her favorite part of the phantom tollbooth. a wonderful book for encouraging learning, imagination, conquering the impossible, and driving back ignorance, looking at things from somebody else;s point of view,….

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    water_moon  almost 9 years ago

    or what to call a cube either…

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    gammaguy  almost 9 years ago

    This is the first time I’ve encountered the term “3-D square”. I think the teacher’s a blockhead..Would she call a sphere a “3-D circle”? Or would that be a cylinder? Does she even know the difference? Does she think a square is a “2-D line”?

     •  Reply
  16. Yakko
    TheBigPickle  almost 9 years ago

    Common core… everyone’s equal….

     •  Reply
  17. Screenshot  47
    tammyspeakslife Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    JB Beat me to the punch

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    lsheldon  almost 9 years ago

    Participation Trophy.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    lsheldon  almost 9 years ago

    And I do believe they are called “cubes” in old English.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Baldo