Prickly City by Scott Stantis for March 19, 2021

  1. Flash
    pschearer Premium Member over 3 years ago

    I miss the good old days when you almost never heard the word “trillion”.

     •  Reply
  2. E43f09f0 d9ab 4f55 b739 d75d4df15e24
    quixotic3  over 3 years ago

    …and the deficit hawks come out right on cue, now that a Democrat is in the White House.

     •  Reply
  3. 704fe3d1 4a7d 495f a742 2d8456861f60
    admiree2  over 3 years ago

    When I see the how a large segment of our population with children and grandchildren ignore or refuse to understand the consequences of decisions that effect the future of the economy and environment, I find myself saying things as Winslow does here. The thoughts have surfaced with actions taken by the right and left over the past 50 years.

    [As the oldest of six who decided in agreement with the wife to be DINKs.]

     •  Reply
  4. Sunset palm trees clip art 10
    dmsmithbsp  over 3 years ago

    Can’t be worse than the Voodoo Economics we’ve been using for the last 40 years.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    danielmkimmel  over 3 years ago

    Good point. Slash the defense budget and repeal the Trump/McConnell tax cuts.

     •  Reply
  6. Lifi
    rossevrymn  over 3 years ago

    Yep, and we need to be looking at the military spending, too.

     •  Reply
  7. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member over 3 years ago

    Might I suggest you educate yourself beyond the kitchen table, which is very inadequate illustrative metaphor for an economy.

     •  Reply
  8. Cheshirecat chandra complg 1024
    Silly Season   over 3 years ago

    President Barack Obama’s 2009 stimulus bill may have helped avoid a second Great Depression, but it was a political fiasco.

    As then-congressman Barney Frank liked to say: “Things Would’ve Sucked Even Worse Without Us” was an unappealing message for a Democratic bumper sticker.

    Republicans relentlessly mocked the $800 billion stimulus as a wasteful porkfest, while Democrats tried fervently to change the subject.

    Twelve years later, the politics of stimulus has flipped.

    Democrats are relentlessly hyping President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief bill, while Republicans are trying to change the subject to Dr. Seuss, Mr. Potato Head and the Mexican border.

    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, arguably the shrewdest Republican strategist in Washington, has started floating a half-hearted anti-stimulus message that the coming recovery would have happened anyway.

    “We are about to have a boom,” McConnell said last week after the Biden bill passed. “And if we do have a boom, it will have absolutely nothing to do with this $1.9 trillion.”

    As a message, this amounts to “Things Would’ve Been Just As Great Without It”—an even less appealing bumper sticker than Barney Frank’s.

    It may be an overstated political cliché that if you’re explaining, you’re losing.

    But you’re almost certainly losing if you’re explaining, ahead of time, why the economic boom you’re expecting on your opponent’s watch shouldn’t be attributed to your opponent.

    “We’re going to see some fairly amazing economic numbers, and I imagine for the next few years, people will look around and say: ‘This is pretty darn good!’” says American Enterprise Institute fellow James Pethokoukis, a conservative economist who believes the Biden stimulus is somewhat excessive. “I’m sure Republicans will try to spin this, and I have long-term concerns myself, but ✁ ✁ ✁

    ~

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/03/18/the-nightmare-politics-of-fighting-the-recovery-bill-476830

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    dotbup  over 3 years ago

    GQP: “I LOVE MY COUNTRY, but I don’t want to improve the infrastructure, consider education, healthcare, or the environment as infrastructure, modernize the economy, believe in science, or make multinational entities/individuals pay taxes and stop paying politicians”

     •  Reply
  10. Wallpapers hello kitty 28941604 1280 1040
    bxclent  Premium Member over 3 years ago

    since money is all smoke and mirrors – everyone just agrees to forgive all covid related expenses and start fresh

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    BRBurns1960  over 3 years ago

    If you want to reduce or eliminate deficits elect Democrats, if you don’t care about deficits and you want billionaires to have more money hoping they will share their largesse with the lesser beings vote Republican. Check out the last 40 years of history.

     •  Reply
  12. Ignatz
    Ignatz Premium Member over 3 years ago

    You should be calling Reaganomics by its real name, Carmen.

    “Reagan proved deficits don’t matter.” – Dick Cheney

     •  Reply
  13. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  over 3 years ago

    Lying cheating racist election rigging Republicans make American politics sick.

     •  Reply
  14. Screenshot 2020 12 31 at 9.22.22 am
    codak  over 3 years ago

    the so-called “infrastructure” bill will be a lessen in pork barrel spending. . .a real pork feast

    what they should actually do is ban city/state funding of pork barrel crap. . .especially pro sport stadiums

     •  Reply
  15. Kirby close up with poppies behind   close cropped
    mistercatworks  over 3 years ago

    The Republicans are the ones who like to overspend during good times to help corporations. Traditionally, the Democrats spend heavily during troubled times to help the people. It’s cyclical.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    waltkamp  over 3 years ago

    Brings to mind the Republican approach to climate change, and tax cuts for the 1%.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    Bradley Walker  over 3 years ago

    Carmen, may I direct your attention to “The Deficit Myth” by Stephanie Kelton.

    https://www.amazon.com/SUMMARY-Deficit-Myth-Stephanie-Kelton-ebook/dp/B08LNQ32Q5/ref=sr_1_2?crid=3PJM2S6980GK9&dchild=1&keywords=deficit+myth&qid=1616175106&sprefix=deficit%2Caps%2C207&sr=8-2

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    ferddo  over 3 years ago

    Neither major political party is innocent in this. Both of them pile on the debt. Republicans claim that the economy will boom if we follow their policies and that will pay off the debt (despite that not being the case when tried) – AND for that to work we need to collect more taxes, which the Republicans do not want to do…

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    Phillip Hicks Premium Member over 3 years ago

    Must have a democratic president now. Noticed no mention of a deficit during Trump administration.

     •  Reply
  20. Snoopy
    Pedmar Premium Member over 3 years ago

    Republicans say they want to run the country as a business, but they don’t see the value in increasing revenue. They just want to cut taxes.

    We could have the revenue to balance the budget by raising taxes on the wealthy and stop giving tax breaks to corporations. This isn’t about placing the burden on the middle class, but the wealthy who like to hide their wealth in tax shelters and off-shore bank accounts.

     •  Reply
  21. D34yd011pr76kiehfi3m
    ikini Premium Member over 3 years ago

    Restore funding to the IRS to go after millionaires who don’t pay their taxes and the deficit goes down. The rest of us will keep working and pay our taxes. New additions to the workforce will pay their taxes. Immigrants, illegal or otherwise will pay their taxes. Why does Stantis assume the deficit will not be paid down during his lifetime?

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    walfishj  over 3 years ago

    I love it when a non-economists comment on economics as they always get it wrong.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Prickly City