Michael Ramirez for July 10, 2022

Protecting your own kids, that someone elses job

I personally supervised my kid when we went down to the creek to skinny-dip… and he refused to have anything to do with the chlorinated pool, when we moved to town… for which I blame him not at all.

Aside from anecdotes, though, the false equivalence here is downright astounding.

The RWers would just complain they were being targeted by the life guards when they get removed for their dangerous content.

Some parents trusted the Catholic Church, unsupervised, with their sons as altar boys. Dare I go on?

No Michael, once again you show how limited your intellect is. Especially from a guy who supports a party that pushes to deregulate industry and everything that can poison the planet and its people. If you want to make an equivalence, it would be about letting your kids play unsupervised in your private home pool.

I’ll volunteer to be an internet lifeguard – but Mr. Ramirez won’t like the results.

fusilier

James 2:24

Good one. Something we all should agree with.

Last time I checked, you can’t drown on the Internet.

If you are a parent who doesn’t know how to set up parental controls, then you should be worried.

Conservatives complain about internet censorship but want internet censorship…? Confusing.

If you disagree with today’s comic, then you just have a chip on your shoulder, or you hate children. Our children are our greatest asset and greatest responsibility. Protect them at all cost. Even if it means you have to agree with your adversary.

Very good point Ramirez.

Notice there’s no lifeguard and no kid. Could that be because net neutrality is already dead?

No, but y’all seem quite comfortable with giving guns to unsupervised youth.

They used to way back when.

Not exactly sure how the kiddos get their eyes on social media outlets without parents saying yes and caving to the peer pressure of "everyone else’s kids " have a phone or pad. “No”, “none, and ’limited” meant more at one time for both parental units and children.

Sincerely, A Childless Curmudgeon

The caption to this cartoon might just as easily say: “Would you let your child go to a public school unprotected?”

Good call. Pleasant change.

Heaven forfend that an unaccompanied fetus was exposed to Ramirez’ confused drivel on the internet. That fetus would be marred for life.

I wouldn’t let children in the pool because Sleepy Joe is in there and he has a tendency to sniff children’s hair, and give them unwanted kisses etc. Total creep.