“Galactus was simply another in a long line of super-villains whom we loved creating. …[W]e felt the only way to top ourselves was to come up with an evil-doer who had almost godlike powers. Therefore, the natural choice was sort of a demi-god, but now what would we do with him? We didn’t want to use the tired old cliche about him wanting to conquer the world. There were enough would-be world conquerors in the Marvel Universe and in all the other comic book galaxies. That was when inspiration struck. Why not have him not be a really evil person? After all, a demi-god should be beyond mere good and evil. He’d just be (don’t laugh!) hungry. And the nourishment he’d require is the life force and energy from living planets!”7
Izzy Moreno almost 2 years ago
That was certainly productive.
MayCauseBurns almost 2 years ago
I don’t think those were micro doses we took…
lavender headgear almost 2 years ago
Did someone say “productive”?
Milady Meg almost 2 years ago
I might watch that.
Steve Dallas almost 2 years ago
The biggest villain in Marvel Comics is Dr Doom.
tarlrk Premium Member almost 2 years ago
You just KNOW someone’s going to draw a hungry Univerctus, and I can’t wait to see the results.
General Trelane (Ret.) Premium Member almost 2 years ago
Correction : Galactus devours worlds.
The Wolf In Your Midst almost 2 years ago
Kinda wonder what these guys think of Morbius….
Milady Meg almost 2 years ago
Doctor Manhattan… oops. Different universe.
Stephen Gilberg almost 2 years ago
How about Dormammu? He eats worlds too.
cmxx almost 2 years ago
Kudos to Mr. Meyer, who knows when to write “on to” and when to write “onto”!
ekke almost 2 years ago
Actually, they could milk the 50% trick many more times, until the population goes to 1.
mistercatworks almost 2 years ago
Properly maintained thought lines should never get derailed like this.
bonderenka almost 2 years ago
“Galactus was simply another in a long line of super-villains whom we loved creating. …[W]e felt the only way to top ourselves was to come up with an evil-doer who had almost godlike powers. Therefore, the natural choice was sort of a demi-god, but now what would we do with him? We didn’t want to use the tired old cliche about him wanting to conquer the world. There were enough would-be world conquerors in the Marvel Universe and in all the other comic book galaxies. That was when inspiration struck. Why not have him not be a really evil person? After all, a demi-god should be beyond mere good and evil. He’d just be (don’t laugh!) hungry. And the nourishment he’d require is the life force and energy from living planets!”7
Izzy Moreno almost 2 years ago
Wait a minute. Even if Kang kills 51% of all people, that’d be only half of the people Thanos didn’t kill, so 25.5%.
Percentages may increase, but the number of people killed will decrease.
If they milk that for 49 more movies, the villains will kill less and less people, so Baldie is right, they’ll never top Thanos.