So, if I understand Tracy correctly, Caxton’s grandparents and Libris’s grandparents worked together in a firm that they were all partners in. The explanation is a bit ambiguous, but that’s what I take from it.
Tracy is looking for a motive more than a hundred years old? Which, of course, has no bearing whatsoever on the three other murders we know about in order to acquire rare volumes. (Murder of backroom guy doesn’t count, it was murder to keep him silent – after he’d already announced he wasn’t saying anything more – which we all knew to be ironic prophetic.)
The current Ms Libris says she didn’t know Caxton well… Tracy is discovering their grandparents were in business together? Does he think that means Libris was lying? Heck, I don’t know the grandkids of anyone my grandparents were friends with. I would think he’d be spending his time on something more closely related to the murders.
Unless his ESP is kicking up again.
And I can see the DA in the courtroom, “Your Honor, I can prove that the grandfather of Ms Libris was in business with Robert Caxton!”
Courtroom, and jurors, gasp in astonishment… Or rather yawn in boredom.
The next day’s MCU Brainstorming Session. Tracy presents evidence that around 1919 a Caxton-Libris business partnership was founded at the instigation of Gordon Libris, “famed collector of books,” who persuaded “his chum” Bob Caxton to join him for the acquisition if a specific “beautiful item,” which we may assume, I think, is the 1290 Book of Hours called The Virgin’s Song.
But something seems to have gone sour in that partnership, with the book ending up in the Caxton famuly treasures and the Libris family—specifically, mega-collector Xaviera—feeling aggrieved.
Wow, this threw me off. Perhaps Caxton and Libris jointly owned some books as part of the company’s holdings as young men? The Libris insignia would then have been put on the book then. Many years later, the two men had a falling out. Caxton kept possession of the 1290 prayer book, because it fascinated his then-young granddaughter Wilhemina. I know, this is even a wilder theory than the last one…
Consider this: in the October 2nd strip, Caxton’s lawyer noted that the missing manuscript has not been displayed publicly since it was purchased. We now know (November 9th) from Mason & Woods, the auction house that sold the manuscript, that that was in 1919, over a century ago. Caxton’s lawyer also indicated the manuscript is not “described in the literature,” that is, it’s not been talked about in scholarly analyses. Information about the manuscript would thus be obscure. We know from the September 17th strip (as omniscient readers, though the MCU doesn’t know this) that the killer of Ms. Caxton knew of the manuscript that had belonged to Caxton’s grandfather. Certainly, outside of the missing diary, the MCU does know that the manuscript was the only thing stolen from Ms. Caxton, indicating the manuscript was likely a target of the killer. If the manuscript was not described in the literature, and had not been displayed publicly since 1919, how would the killer have known of the manuscript, and where it might be? The more so, since the gossip-column item from The Daily in 1919 doesn’t (in the portion we see) specifically identify the manuscript…
I realized today that I was wrong to think that it would be difficult for MCU to link Libris’ nameplate to the book stolen from the out-of-state cold case. It seems to me that in that plastic bag that Backroom Guy gave Lee (besides the nameplate) there were some pictures he took of the book. Once the book was known, the owner could be traced. That appears to be strong circumstantial evidence that Libris was in possession of an item stolen from a dead man. Time for a subpoena!
Now, the out-of-state case was 7 months ago and Libris turned up at the repair store with the book 6 months ago. I guess she could claim the book came into her possession during that month without knowledge of where it came from. Except…the true provenance of the book is known, thanks to Backroom Guy saving the evidence! All they need to do is have him testify…uh oh!
Neil Wick about 1 year ago
Good morning™, everyone!
So, if I understand Tracy correctly, Caxton’s grandparents and Libris’s grandparents worked together in a firm that they were all partners in. The explanation is a bit ambiguous, but that’s what I take from it.
Brian Premium Member about 1 year ago
“Book her, Sammo!”
GoComicsGo! about 1 year ago
And??
Gweedo -it's legal here- Murray about 1 year ago
Good morning™, pre kill partners !
I’m still in the dark as to how this chummy arrangement went bad and how so ?
avenger09 about 1 year ago
“Why, that lying little witch!!!”
avenger09 about 1 year ago
Fabulous illustration of a piece of paper WITH WRITING ON IT!! by Shelley today!
IvanB.Cohen about 1 year ago
Libris must have gone to “if I’m not asked, I won’t tell” academy. Probably was the head of her class. Always stayed on the honor roll.
IvanB.Cohen about 1 year ago
Is this storyline tied to theft of intellectual property?
The Reader Premium Member about 1 year ago
She was saving that for later in the strip.
tsull2121 about 1 year ago
“IN THE RED CORNER, THE TEAM OF CAXTON/LIBRIS…AND THEIR OPPONENTS, FIGHTING OUT OF THE BLUE CORNER, THE TEAM OF HATFIELD/McCOY”
LawrenceS about 1 year ago
Tracy is looking for a motive more than a hundred years old? Which, of course, has no bearing whatsoever on the three other murders we know about in order to acquire rare volumes. (Murder of backroom guy doesn’t count, it was murder to keep him silent – after he’d already announced he wasn’t saying anything more – which we all knew to be ironic prophetic.)
The current Ms Libris says she didn’t know Caxton well… Tracy is discovering their grandparents were in business together? Does he think that means Libris was lying? Heck, I don’t know the grandkids of anyone my grandparents were friends with. I would think he’d be spending his time on something more closely related to the murders.
Unless his ESP is kicking up again.
And I can see the DA in the courtroom, “Your Honor, I can prove that the grandfather of Ms Libris was in business with Robert Caxton!”
Courtroom, and jurors, gasp in astonishment… Or rather yawn in boredom.
Sisyphos about 1 year ago
The next day’s MCU Brainstorming Session. Tracy presents evidence that around 1919 a Caxton-Libris business partnership was founded at the instigation of Gordon Libris, “famed collector of books,” who persuaded “his chum” Bob Caxton to join him for the acquisition if a specific “beautiful item,” which we may assume, I think, is the 1290 Book of Hours called The Virgin’s Song.
But something seems to have gone sour in that partnership, with the book ending up in the Caxton famuly treasures and the Libris family—specifically, mega-collector Xaviera—feeling aggrieved.
MOTIVE.
Sporteric11 about 1 year ago
Maybe familiarity bred contempt and in this case MURDER !!!
iggyman about 1 year ago
As the tale unwinds…!
General Trelane (Ret.) Premium Member about 1 year ago
Good ! Sam is in on the case .
veldy about 1 year ago
I gotta say, I don’t know everyone my grandparents were in business with
Ken in Ohio about 1 year ago
I wonder if we will ever find out what was bothering Tracy about that first crime scene.
General Trelane (Ret.) Premium Member about 1 year ago
Just one , that’s all it will take , just one Sam Slam or stupid remark about Pastrami sammiches and you will feel the sting of my lash .
Ray Toler about 1 year ago
Lee slept in today and didn’t make the meeting.
orbenjawell Premium Member about 1 year ago
AND: wasn’t “chum” what they were all throwing in the water trying to lure "He Who Would Soon Become Known As ‘BRUCE’ in JAWS?………
JCunnngham Premium Member about 1 year ago
Those are some funky knuckles Dick has in p1…
Don Bagert Premium Member about 1 year ago
Wow, this threw me off. Perhaps Caxton and Libris jointly owned some books as part of the company’s holdings as young men? The Libris insignia would then have been put on the book then. Many years later, the two men had a falling out. Caxton kept possession of the 1290 prayer book, because it fascinated his then-young granddaughter Wilhemina. I know, this is even a wilder theory than the last one…
MuddyUSA Premium Member about 1 year ago
@Gweedo – I am in the dark as well……….
h.v.greenman about 1 year ago
What’s with the “chum”, are we going phishing here?
oakie817 about 1 year ago
at this point, i’m betting, it’s not her
[Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce] about 1 year ago
MOVIE QUOTE
“What,no Mickey Mouse?”
James Cagney(about to be fired as a theatre usher)
LADY KILLER—1933
Another Take about 1 year ago
1-DT: Lookee what I discovered…
2-…Now I need you two to tell me…
3-…why it’s important. SAM: I bet Lee would know! LIZ: Uhhh, yeah. Let’s give it to Lee!
[Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce] about 1 year ago
Lizz and Sam look like elementary school kids listening to the teacher
[Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce] about 1 year ago
Criminals always think that because “so much time has passed”, that nobody knows nuthin’
Actually,the info is there for anybody who cares to look.Cancel rich lady’s passport
EOCostello about 1 year ago
Consider this: in the October 2nd strip, Caxton’s lawyer noted that the missing manuscript has not been displayed publicly since it was purchased. We now know (November 9th) from Mason & Woods, the auction house that sold the manuscript, that that was in 1919, over a century ago. Caxton’s lawyer also indicated the manuscript is not “described in the literature,” that is, it’s not been talked about in scholarly analyses. Information about the manuscript would thus be obscure. We know from the September 17th strip (as omniscient readers, though the MCU doesn’t know this) that the killer of Ms. Caxton knew of the manuscript that had belonged to Caxton’s grandfather. Certainly, outside of the missing diary, the MCU does know that the manuscript was the only thing stolen from Ms. Caxton, indicating the manuscript was likely a target of the killer. If the manuscript was not described in the literature, and had not been displayed publicly since 1919, how would the killer have known of the manuscript, and where it might be? The more so, since the gossip-column item from The Daily in 1919 doesn’t (in the portion we see) specifically identify the manuscript…
[Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce] about 1 year ago
Ms.Libris has Daffy Duck Disease
“It’s mine,do you understand? Mine,Mine,MineOut,out out!!
Don Bagert Premium Member about 1 year ago
I realized today that I was wrong to think that it would be difficult for MCU to link Libris’ nameplate to the book stolen from the out-of-state cold case. It seems to me that in that plastic bag that Backroom Guy gave Lee (besides the nameplate) there were some pictures he took of the book. Once the book was known, the owner could be traced. That appears to be strong circumstantial evidence that Libris was in possession of an item stolen from a dead man. Time for a subpoena!
Now, the out-of-state case was 7 months ago and Libris turned up at the repair store with the book 6 months ago. I guess she could claim the book came into her possession during that month without knowledge of where it came from. Except…the true provenance of the book is known, thanks to Backroom Guy saving the evidence! All they need to do is have him testify…uh oh!