I wonder if the Turing test could be slightly modified for Senators and Congresspeople.
It would be designed to demonstrate to a normal person (IQ = 100 baseline, and not deranged which admittedly is getting harder to find) that the Senator/Congressperson is in fact not a robot controlled by lobbyists, displays free will and is prepared to act according to the oath of office rather than in their own (or their partys own) self-interest.
The robots behind today’s voice menus already assume they are smarter than you. I know there are people that call up and ask questions as a hobby (???) but I’m not one of them. If it was in the FAQs online, I would not be calling.
Called it. // BTW, for those other than JudyAz, a “Turing machine” is not a machine that can pass the Turing Test, it is a simple computing device (generally only created as a thought experiment) that illustrates the universality of coding within the limits of computability.
// Almost sounds like I know what I’m talking about, eh? Oh well, it was off the top of my head and it’s been awhile and I’m getting oldish.
FreihEitner Premium Member over 2 years ago
We always suspected… but to have proof!
crobinson019 over 2 years ago
is X-14-A related to Bucky?
LawrenceS over 2 years ago
“And I have further data! If you’re on the earth it appears the sun rises from the east!”
Perhaps Brewster is not the only one having problems seeing the obvious.
kantuck-nadie over 2 years ago
Gee, you think?
Chithing Premium Member over 2 years ago
I’d say the robot failed the Brewster test. Thought it was talking to a functioning intellect.
geese28 over 2 years ago
Wow finally someone admits it
chuckcork1 over 2 years ago
I wonder if the Turing test could be slightly modified for Senators and Congresspeople.
It would be designed to demonstrate to a normal person (IQ = 100 baseline, and not deranged which admittedly is getting harder to find) that the Senator/Congressperson is in fact not a robot controlled by lobbyists, displays free will and is prepared to act according to the oath of office rather than in their own (or their partys own) self-interest.
Lee26 Premium Member over 2 years ago
If he wasn’t we wouldn’t have such a funny cartoon.
carlzr over 2 years ago
This from a man who is wearing sunglasses and a trench coat indoors.
walk.rich over 2 years ago
That robot may be related to Elon Musk’s son X Æ A-12.
JudyAz over 2 years ago
Creating a Turing machine is not hard. We had to do that in CS class. Except for the infinite tape, that is.
oakie817 over 2 years ago
ka-zing
mistercatworks over 2 years ago
The robots behind today’s voice menus already assume they are smarter than you. I know there are people that call up and ask questions as a hobby (???) but I’m not one of them. If it was in the FAQs online, I would not be calling.
Patriot Dissenter over 2 years ago
Alan Turing
The Brooklyn Accent Premium Member over 2 years ago
Auto makers have been building Touring machines for a century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touring_car
random boredom over 2 years ago
Brewser is issued code: ID-10T
ars731 over 2 years ago
Brewster is an low bar to cross. Its like easy mode for AI
Plods with ...™ over 2 years ago
Pretty sure that was common knowledge
Bilan over 2 years ago
This disqualifies Brewster from being a captain. Make him a politician.
philwinn over 2 years ago
funny
Blaidd Drwg Premium Member over 2 years ago
Give him the real test: ‘person, woman, man, camera, TV’.
WCraft Premium Member over 2 years ago
Robot? Which one?
norphos over 2 years ago
An ANDROID could potentially fool people with good enough facial movement technologies, but a bucket head robot could not deceive a normal human.
SpammersAreScum over 2 years ago
Normally, I’d say a name like “X-14-A” should be a clue, but that was before Elon Musk became a dad.
David Huie Green LoveJoyAndPeace over 2 years ago
“….something nobody had ever suspected.”
DaBump Premium Member over 2 years ago
Called it. // BTW, for those other than JudyAz, a “Turing machine” is not a machine that can pass the Turing Test, it is a simple computing device (generally only created as a thought experiment) that illustrates the universality of coding within the limits of computability.
// Almost sounds like I know what I’m talking about, eh? Oh well, it was off the top of my head and it’s been awhile and I’m getting oldish.