The word “pant” is shortened from “pantaloon”, which was originally a single item separately placed on each leg. It took two pantaloons to cover both legs, so became a pair of pantaloons, or a pair of pants. Eventually, pants evolved to become a single piece garment, but the phrase still applies.
Very few children and NO adults should ever wear a “speedo” after the age of active competition… They fall under the same category of trying to reduce “drag” of water on the body and should really only be worn by those males willing to go to any lengths to win in a competition up to and including “depilation” of body hair.
The “scant” covering of the human body has traditionally been known as a way to “titillate” others sexually and should be avoided whenever possible – full nudity is preferable in almost all cases.
When I was just a tad youngster and belonged to the YMCA, our swimming class (all boys) didn’t use swimming suits at all. There were no more windows into the pool room than there were into the locker room, and nobody thot twice about it.
“Pair of pants” — more properly, of "trousers"— is a case of cultural lag. Quite a bit of lag, at that. Once, the legs of trousers were separate pieces, and were attached to an upper-body garment (usually “trunks”, also plural) with special laces called “points”. One’s privaties and a-hole were covered with yet another separate bit, a “breech-clout”. A royal pain, but the separate clout led the way to a fitting out the genital area with a purposefully prominent “cod-piece”. Ah, those were the days, when young men unblushingly followed their discreetly padded etceteras around, for the admiration of whomever appreciated masculine qualities.
GreasyOldTam over 1 year ago
WE wear nothing of the sort.
Sanspareil over 1 year ago
The blimeys wear trousers!
Erse IS better over 1 year ago
A pant was one leg of what we now call pants. As I recall it anyway. Think wrap-around chaps for folks who otherwise were bare-legged.
Kiba65 over 1 year ago
Is the plural of Speedo, Speedi?
Rhetorical_Question over 1 year ago
The word “pant” is shortened from “pantaloon”, which was originally a single item separately placed on each leg. It took two pantaloons to cover both legs, so became a pair of pantaloons, or a pair of pants. Eventually, pants evolved to become a single piece garment, but the phrase still applies.
MayCauseBurns over 1 year ago
Now I can’t get the image of Frazz in a Speedo out of my head.
lee85736 over 1 year ago
One pant by itself is pretty useless.
BlueNAL over 1 year ago
I was entertained to learn that the plural of kimono is kimono.
Michael Scott Premium Member over 1 year ago
Gallagher said that a woman wears a pair of panties but only one bra
Ignatz Premium Member over 1 year ago
Has anybody ever seen one sud?
Jhony-Yermo over 1 year ago
Speedo Swimming trunks OR a Speedo Swim Suit. Soooo . . . choices choices.
The Wolf In Your Midst over 1 year ago
Has any woman ever worn a singular knicker?
Totalloser Premium Member over 1 year ago
if you are at the beach and someone wears a speedo 99% they are not American
trainnut1956 over 1 year ago
Never worn a speedo in my life.
Bill D. Kat Premium Member over 1 year ago
The origin of pair of pants makes sense but ‘pair of underwear’?
unfair.de over 1 year ago
Multiple Speedie, I guess.
T Smith over 1 year ago
We have two arms, but wear “a” shirt.
wellis1947 Premium Member over 1 year ago
Very few children and NO adults should ever wear a “speedo” after the age of active competition… They fall under the same category of trying to reduce “drag” of water on the body and should really only be worn by those males willing to go to any lengths to win in a competition up to and including “depilation” of body hair.
The “scant” covering of the human body has traditionally been known as a way to “titillate” others sexually and should be avoided whenever possible – full nudity is preferable in almost all cases.
LJZ Premium Member over 1 year ago
Speedi!
Richard S Russell Premium Member over 1 year ago
When I was just a tad youngster and belonged to the YMCA, our swimming class (all boys) didn’t use swimming suits at all. There were no more windows into the pool room than there were into the locker room, and nobody thot twice about it.
AndrewSihler over 1 year ago
“Pair of pants” — more properly, of "trousers"— is a case of cultural lag. Quite a bit of lag, at that. Once, the legs of trousers were separate pieces, and were attached to an upper-body garment (usually “trunks”, also plural) with special laces called “points”. One’s privaties and a-hole were covered with yet another separate bit, a “breech-clout”. A royal pain, but the separate clout led the way to a fitting out the genital area with a purposefully prominent “cod-piece”. Ah, those were the days, when young men unblushingly followed their discreetly padded etceteras around, for the admiration of whomever appreciated masculine qualities.
billdaviswords over 1 year ago
No, we DON’T wear it/them here (in Southern California)!
MT Wallet over 1 year ago
No matter how little material there is, it’s a pair of panties.
magnus over 1 year ago
Pants cover both legs, a speedo covers neither buttock.
Seed_drill over 1 year ago
Well they often call me Speedo, but my real name is Mr. Earl.
Teto85 Premium Member over 1 year ago
The plural of moose, deer, lego and Jedi is moose, deer, lego and Jedi.