Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
People only want to make sure their children are reading age-appropriate books and that controversial topics are introduced by parents. Nobodyâs banning books or burning bookstores.
Perhaps I misinterpreted the artwork in yesterdayâs strip. I thought Ed was taking a copy of âFahrenheit 451â for himself. Another commenter pointed out that Ed was helping Lillian put all the studentsâ copies of the book on the shelf.
This makes very little sense. Batyuk doesnât know how in-store pickup orders work. Why take the books out of the boxes and arrange them on the store shelves? Why not just leave the books in the boxes near the cash register here the books can be quickly and discretely given to the students. During my college days, I worked a part-time job at an adult bookstore. A buyer would often make a special order for a magazine, book, video, or other merchandise. We didnât tell that person we took their special order out of the box and placed it on the store shelves where anybody could see it. That buyer expected a certain level of discretion. They didnât want any undue attention to their purchase.
In a similar vein, wouldnât it be better to leave the controversial books in the boxes and not draw any more attention to them? Seems like Lillian is daring the arsonist to do something. She may as well take out a full-page ad in the âSentinelâ.
Lillian: (singsong) â« âYoo-hoo! Arsonist. You failed again. Look at what we have here. Not a single damaged copy. â« Try again loser!â (blows raspberries)
And another thing, suppose a customer, not a student, came into Lillianâs bookstore and saw âFahrenheit 451â on the shelf. Imagine the awkwardness if they took a copy of the book to the cash register and wanted to buy it.
Lillian: âThat book is not for sale. Those books are for the students in Les Mooreâs class.â
Customer: âThis is a bookstore. The book was on the shelf. Iâm buying it.â
In closing, isnât it possible the inconsiderate Les Moore might want to move the books again? It would be a shame to have to pack up all those books again.
Les Moore: âI changed my mind. I want to move the books again. Theyâre not safe here.â
Books have not been âbannedâ. Anyone who wants to read these books can walk into the bookstores that choose to sell them, or order them online, and then read them. A school boardâs deciding that certain books should not be taught, or a libraryâs deciding not to carry certain books, is NOT âbanningâ them. It is merely making a selection, which is their job.
Knowledge is important, but sexually explicit content in our schools is unnecessary. Leave it to the parents to teach their children about sexual things.
I was reading xkcd this morning, and the âalt-textâ pop-up was a quantum theory joke. Which caused me to think about the quantum nature of the arsonist in this story. We know nothing about the arsonist beyond the fact that he/she had two hands (or was two people using one hand each⊠Skippy and Becks?) and isnât very good at starting fires. I think there is a reason for this. For all his desire to be seen as âprovocative,â Batiuk writes as if heâs terrified heâll anger one or more of his readers. As long as the arsonist is unknown, readers can make their own assumptions about who he/she is, and more importantly what his/her motives were. We see that on this board, where some people assume the âbanningâ is coming from conservative politicians and some assume itâs the work of liberals. As soon as Batiuk identifies the arsonist, he collapses the both-at-once quantum waveform and identifies the personâs motives⊠which are likely to PO some part of his readership.
In other words, the arsonist is Schroedingerâs cat. Who, in the context of the FunKrankyverse, can only be Le Chat Bleu, the sometimes-here, sometimes-not talking cat that Les hallucinates from time to time.
Iâm bored this morning, so I started thinking of how a competent writer might construct a plausible book-banning/bookstore-burning story in the universe of this strip. Consider, if you will, the following:
In his class, Les mentions in passing the existence of the book Fahrenheit 451, says it is a provocative book about censorship and a good read. When a student asks where he/she can find it, Les says the school library has a copy.
Student borrows the book from the library, is fascinated, shows it to another kid, who tells his parents, who are outraged and demand the school remove this offensive book. When the school refuses, said parent gathers up a few like-minded parents (none of whom have read the book), forms an organization with a dumb name and bombards their state representative with angry letters.
Eventually, the representative holds hearings and the Worstview school board caves to pressure and has the book removed from the library. By now, of course, the âforbidden fruitâ has become more attractive than ever, and when kids ask where they might obtain a copy now that the school libraryâs copy is gone, he suggests Lizard Lilâs bookstore. A plot device might be needed to explain why Les doesnât just suggest they buy the book online.
Upon discovering that dozens of Worstview students are now reading this offensive book, the angry parent organization goes to picket Lillianâs store. Their pet state representative gives an inflammatory speech, realizing this might just be what he needs to assure re-election and a desirable committee chairmanship. Tempers are hot, one thing leads to another and the bookstore is torched, in broad daylight, by an angry mob.
Afterward, the mob and the town have to come to grips with what happened, and hopefully learn some lesson.
This is a thing that can happen in the real world (and probably has). Donât expect Batty to do anything like it, though.
Letâs apply the same logic to smoking and drinkingâŠwe allow adults but not kids, so there must be something good about them and thatâs why weâre banning them.
And if people havenât learned that by protesting a thing, they just make it more desirable, then thereâs no hope. Thanks Tipper Gore. Now kids just look for the Parental Advisory label on their music.
I totally agree. Thanks for highlighting an important discussion.The state where I live has banned numerous books in the last two years and itâs heartbreaking. Literature, in itâs many forms, is the reflection of life at that time and the thoughts they had.
J.J. O'Malley 5 months ago
At which point an enraged Mookie threw a trashcan through the Village Booksmith window.
billsplut 5 months ago
Aww, Tom writing a character praising a Tom avatar! How totally normal for an author to do, and not a sign of megalomania!
Kitty Queen 5 months ago
Thatâs the spirit Ed! Knowledge is important.
wherescrankshaft 5 months ago
Books are also banned because theyâre pornographic. Is Ed going to ask Lillian for a copy of Fanny Hill next?
Cabbage Jack 5 months ago
Canât wait for the sideways Sunday with Ed reading Mein Kampf
scote1379 Premium Member 5 months ago
Outstanding !
French Persons' Treasury of Self-Applauding Batty Premium Member 5 months ago
More of Batty being in âthe pantheon of lofty ambition and clueless execution.â
platinumboy7 5 months ago
People only want to make sure their children are reading age-appropriate books and that controversial topics are introduced by parents. Nobodyâs banning books or burning bookstores.
sueb1863 5 months ago
âEd, GO HOME!â
Fetzee 5 months ago
Like JJ said yesterday, Ed wouldnât be able to comprehend Fahrenheit 451. Nice try Batty
Mopman 5 months ago
Lillian sure is brave. Selling a book that 99% of bookstores in the US carry.
rockyridge1977 5 months ago
AffirmationâŠâŠâŠemotional support or encouragement.
ladykat Premium Member 5 months ago
Yes, Lillian, you are! Ed is right.
lemonbaskt 5 months ago
nobody wants to see cranky talking sense maybe he will make paper planes with the pages
mountainclimber 5 months ago
I donât follow the logic, but I agree with the principle.
GojusJoe 5 months ago
Oh, go fire up your barbeque, Ed.
BeniHanna6 Premium Member 5 months ago
Anyone have a clue as to how much longer this crusade will go on?
Liam Astle Premium Member 5 months ago
âWell I was wrong. There was nothing worth reading in that book.â
MuddyUSA Premium Member 5 months ago
Attaboy CrankyâŠâŠyou still got it!!
Surly Squirrel Premium Member 5 months ago
Perhaps I misinterpreted the artwork in yesterdayâs strip. I thought Ed was taking a copy of âFahrenheit 451â for himself. Another commenter pointed out that Ed was helping Lillian put all the studentsâ copies of the book on the shelf.
This makes very little sense. Batyuk doesnât know how in-store pickup orders work. Why take the books out of the boxes and arrange them on the store shelves? Why not just leave the books in the boxes near the cash register here the books can be quickly and discretely given to the students. During my college days, I worked a part-time job at an adult bookstore. A buyer would often make a special order for a magazine, book, video, or other merchandise. We didnât tell that person we took their special order out of the box and placed it on the store shelves where anybody could see it. That buyer expected a certain level of discretion. They didnât want any undue attention to their purchase.
In a similar vein, wouldnât it be better to leave the controversial books in the boxes and not draw any more attention to them? Seems like Lillian is daring the arsonist to do something. She may as well take out a full-page ad in the âSentinelâ.
Lillian: (singsong) â« âYoo-hoo! Arsonist. You failed again. Look at what we have here. Not a single damaged copy. â« Try again loser!â (blows raspberries)
And another thing, suppose a customer, not a student, came into Lillianâs bookstore and saw âFahrenheit 451â on the shelf. Imagine the awkwardness if they took a copy of the book to the cash register and wanted to buy it.
Lillian: âThat book is not for sale. Those books are for the students in Les Mooreâs class.â
Customer: âThis is a bookstore. The book was on the shelf. Iâm buying it.â
In closing, isnât it possible the inconsiderate Les Moore might want to move the books again? It would be a shame to have to pack up all those books again.
Les Moore: âI changed my mind. I want to move the books again. Theyâre not safe here.â
Cartoondog 5 months ago
He couldâve made this a much shorter speech from ed
Cartoondog 5 months ago
Or at least make it take up less days.
Liam Astle Premium Member 5 months ago
âWhy would anyone want to ban this âMein Kampfâ? There must be something worth reading in it.â
seismic-2 Premium Member 5 months ago
Books have not been âbannedâ. Anyone who wants to read these books can walk into the bookstores that choose to sell them, or order them online, and then read them. A school boardâs deciding that certain books should not be taught, or a libraryâs deciding not to carry certain books, is NOT âbanningâ them. It is merely making a selection, which is their job.
l.d.bailey 5 months ago
Knowledge is important, but sexually explicit content in our schools is unnecessary. Leave it to the parents to teach their children about sexual things.
puddleglum1066 5 months ago
I was reading xkcd this morning, and the âalt-textâ pop-up was a quantum theory joke. Which caused me to think about the quantum nature of the arsonist in this story. We know nothing about the arsonist beyond the fact that he/she had two hands (or was two people using one hand each⊠Skippy and Becks?) and isnât very good at starting fires. I think there is a reason for this. For all his desire to be seen as âprovocative,â Batiuk writes as if heâs terrified heâll anger one or more of his readers. As long as the arsonist is unknown, readers can make their own assumptions about who he/she is, and more importantly what his/her motives were. We see that on this board, where some people assume the âbanningâ is coming from conservative politicians and some assume itâs the work of liberals. As soon as Batiuk identifies the arsonist, he collapses the both-at-once quantum waveform and identifies the personâs motives⊠which are likely to PO some part of his readership.
In other words, the arsonist is Schroedingerâs cat. Who, in the context of the FunKrankyverse, can only be Le Chat Bleu, the sometimes-here, sometimes-not talking cat that Les hallucinates from time to time.
puddleglum1066 5 months ago
Iâm bored this morning, so I started thinking of how a competent writer might construct a plausible book-banning/bookstore-burning story in the universe of this strip. Consider, if you will, the following:
In his class, Les mentions in passing the existence of the book Fahrenheit 451, says it is a provocative book about censorship and a good read. When a student asks where he/she can find it, Les says the school library has a copy.
Student borrows the book from the library, is fascinated, shows it to another kid, who tells his parents, who are outraged and demand the school remove this offensive book. When the school refuses, said parent gathers up a few like-minded parents (none of whom have read the book), forms an organization with a dumb name and bombards their state representative with angry letters.
Eventually, the representative holds hearings and the Worstview school board caves to pressure and has the book removed from the library. By now, of course, the âforbidden fruitâ has become more attractive than ever, and when kids ask where they might obtain a copy now that the school libraryâs copy is gone, he suggests Lizard Lilâs bookstore. A plot device might be needed to explain why Les doesnât just suggest they buy the book online.
Upon discovering that dozens of Worstview students are now reading this offensive book, the angry parent organization goes to picket Lillianâs store. Their pet state representative gives an inflammatory speech, realizing this might just be what he needs to assure re-election and a desirable committee chairmanship. Tempers are hot, one thing leads to another and the bookstore is torched, in broad daylight, by an angry mob.
Afterward, the mob and the town have to come to grips with what happened, and hopefully learn some lesson.
This is a thing that can happen in the real world (and probably has). Donât expect Batty to do anything like it, though.
Robert Miller Premium Member 5 months ago
Letâs apply the same logic to smoking and drinkingâŠwe allow adults but not kids, so there must be something good about them and thatâs why weâre banning them.
Robert Miller Premium Member 5 months ago
Anyone else getting tired of this story line?
heligoland 5 months ago
A very good point. Itâs worrying that some people canât abide encountering information they donât agree with.
oakie817 5 months ago
words of wisdom
tcayer 5 months ago
And if people havenât learned that by protesting a thing, they just make it more desirable, then thereâs no hope. Thanks Tipper Gore. Now kids just look for the Parental Advisory label on their music.
sincavage05 5 months ago
I totally agree. Thanks for highlighting an important discussion.The state where I live has banned numerous books in the last two years and itâs heartbreaking. Literature, in itâs many forms, is the reflection of life at that time and the thoughts they had.
pamela welch Premium Member 5 months ago
Brilliant!
Teto85 Premium Member 5 months ago
If you are afraid that reading a book might change someoneâs way of thinking, you are not afraid of books, you are afraid of thinking.
[Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce] 5 months ago
Most of the book banners havenât read what they want banned.They depend on their oiuja board