Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for December 19, 2011
Transcript:
Professor: So as our last troops pull out of Iraq, perhaps some cost-benefit analysis of the war is in order. Nine years, 4,484 American lives, 100,000 Iraqi lives, $1 trillion - 62% now say it wasn't worth it! So was it? Anyone disagree? B.D.: Yes, sir. If we hadn't stayed, the terrorists would've followed us home. Professor: really. So why haven't they? B.D.: They hate the TSA as much as we do. Ray: Gotta be that.
BE THIS GUY about 13 years ago
TSA- keeping America safe at $8 per hour.
margueritem about 13 years ago
TSA- feeling America up for $8 per hour.
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
âRemembering 4,500 servicemen and women and 100,000 Iraqis who died for a lie.â Letâs see now, 100,000 Iraqis who died for the Bush lie divided by 4,500 U.S. servicepeople who died for the Bush lie = more than 22 Iraqis who died for every 1 American who died! Whoopie yay-ki-yay! Donât you see, my fellow Americans? We won! This is a BODY COUNT victory in our favor! A âbody countâ victory is the standard established by the great Vietnam War and the great victory we won in Vietnam. The great Ronald Ray-Gun said it best when he said that Vietnam was a ânobleâ enterprise. And in Vietnam it was the body count ratio that determined the standard of victory.Thus also in Iraq. Whatâs good for victory in Vietnam is also good for victory in Iraq: meaning the reason why we won in Iraq is the body count ratio in our favor: Twenty-two Iraqis died for every American warrior who did. Whoopie! Yippie yay-ki-yay for our side! In terms of body counts, the ancient Roman Empire had nothing on us. Weâre much better killers than they were â what with our high-tech smart bombs and all. Hallelujah Fallujah! Now is the time to rejoice. Now is the time for theBush-Cheney-neocon New American Century to kick in at last. What sitting-cuck country is next? Iran! Obviously. Kick their glasses! Kick their brasses! Kick their molasses! Then on to Russia. Gosh darn it all to heck, we got more nukes than they do! Then China. With 22-to-1kill-ratios in our favor established in Iraq, we can rule the world in a 1000-year-reich far better than Hitlerâs Germany ever could. Today Iraq, tomorrow the world! Bombs away!
BE THIS GUY about 13 years ago
It was all a lie.
TURTLE about 13 years ago
I get the distinct impression that many of you commenting would not fight even to protect you and yours. I thank our troops who served and are serving anywhere they are.
Bill the Butcher about 13 years ago
The actual Iraqi body count was much closer to one million, so Sonny can feel even better about himself.
Mike31g about 13 years ago
RSR,Likewise, I can only see half the final panel.PS.As a non-American what is TSA an ancronym for?Thanks
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
âTo Western eyes, it seemed inconceivable that Ho would make the tremendous sacrifices he did. But in 1946, as war with the French loomed, he cautioned them, âYou can kill 10 of my men for every one I kill of yours, yet even at those odds, you will lose and I will win.â The French, convinced of their superiority, ignored his warning and suffered grievously as a result. Senior American officers similarly nurtured the illusion that their sophisticated weapons would inevitably break enemy morale. But, as Hoâs brilliant commander, General Vo Nguyen Giap, told me in Hanoi in 1990, his principal concern had been victory. When I asked him how long he would have resisted the U.S. onslaught, he thundered, âTwenty years, maybe 100 yearsâas long as it took to win, regardless of cost.â The human toll was horrendous. An estimated 3 million North and South Vietnamese soldiers and civilians died.â âTime Magazine. Read more at: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,988162,00.html#ixzz1gxf0iQHj
luckylouie about 13 years ago
Every time rich white billionaires want young working-class people to die to protect their profits, they say weâre fighting for our freedom. And every time, theyâre lying. The last time we fought to protect our freedom was World War II. The time before that was the War of 1812.
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
We still donât know what President Obamaâs up to except stay âin the regionâ. To protect profits. I feel betrayed by him. I went from passionate supporter to disillusioned. Yet I fear a GOP President, such as M.Romney, could be 10 times worse! So I could end up holding my nose and voting for Obama once more.
ChukLitl Premium Member about 13 years ago
We knew Saddam had (past tense) chemical weapons, because we sold them to him for his war against Iran. We didnât know heâd used them all up there & keeping his Kurdish minority & Shia majority in line. His lie kept everyoneâs intelligence believing he still had some, was developing more, & was willing to use them, because it was the only thing keeping him in power. He was our mess & needed cleaning up.
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
âWe didnât know [Saddam had] used them [our chemical weapons] all up there & keeping his Kurdish minority & Shia majority in line.â What excrement! We didnât know, huh? Whatever happened to our intelligence (in both senses of the word)?
ChukLitl Premium Member about 13 years ago
It was weak. The cost benefit analysis of supporting Iraq against Iran turns out to have been as bad as supporting the Taliban against the Soviets.
palos about 13 years ago
The moral high ground was lost with the adoption of a means justify the end policy. Unfortunately, this policy, and the resultant decision not to disclose or prosecute those that committed those acts, has further shamed this country.
Varnes about 13 years ago
lucklouie, gotta disagree with you about the war of 1812. That was our attempt to take Canada away from the British. It was the United States getting cocky and full of itself, thinking it could confront, and beat England again. The trouble was, the Canadian British were much better soldiers, and had much better commanders, the dudes from EnglandâŚ..We were lucky to get out of that one with a tieâŚ.
Varnes about 13 years ago
âthan the dudes from England.â Seriously, is supplying an editing function that hard?
albertonencioni about 13 years ago
The conclusion is: USA has never been so hated and despised all over the world in all its history. Ironically enough, the most faithful (surviving) allies are the âEnglish dudesâ.
PS If the "detention without trial " law passes, USA will be the first and only Country in the world to officially abolish the Magna Charta since 1215. And this, in addition to re-introducing torture on prisoners, is one of the greatest accomplishments of USA 2.0
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
âThis ainât conspiracy theory, itâs history.â It lacks evidence. Itâs rubbish.
vwdualnomand about 13 years ago
if you live to be 1000 years old, and looking back to this time, what was the damn point?
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
Evidence.
Citing websites â providing evidence.
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
Carl Sagan: âExtraordinary claims require extraordinary evidenceâ47Â 47 âEncyclopaedia Galacticaâ. Carl Sagan (writer/host). Cosmos. PBS. December 14, 1980. No. 12. 01:24 minutes in. Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Sagan
Coyoty Premium Member about 13 years ago
Your journalism has yellowed a bit.
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
In my comment immediately above, the first graf presents the evidence â a comment by Carl Sagan that makes a relevant point regarding conspiracy theories. The second graf presents the location where I got the piece of evidence.
Starrman69 about 13 years ago
I sincerely hope that the next step is to being our troops home from Afghanistan
mesmh about 13 years ago
It may have cost $1 trn, but ask where the money went. Back through the Pentagon and a nine year beanfeast for dozens of US corporations, no doubt many that had bankrolled George Dubbya and Co into power. This Iraq war was all about BUSINESS! Where did the $1 trn come from? US Tax payers, US Treasuries, US Debt that will eventually be paid by the US tax payer. This was just a giant exercise tranferring funds from the pockets of many to the pockets of few, those that control the levers of power in USA Inc. Spin off benefits? Enhancing the skills and professionalism of the US Military machine. As for the head counts no record was made of Iraqi lives lost or numbers displaced.
ajnotales about 13 years ago
I believe the the war MAY have served the Bush administration perfectly: while the countryâs attention was focused on Iraq, Bush released his cronies into the US treasury like a fox guarding the henhouse. Mission Accomplished!
Doughfoot about 13 years ago
âThere never was a good war, or a bad peace.â â Benjamin Franklin, in a letter to Sir Joseph Banks, July 27, 1783. And Iâll bet General Sherman would agree. War is never justified, in the sense that it is never good. But it is, sometimes, the lesser of evils. Sherman said there was no glory in war. He knew that no war was ever fought honorably. War is about murder, not honor. And that is why war should never be fought because it is to your advantage to fight it, it should never be fought because you want to fight it. War should not be used as an instrument of state policy, or to protect ones âinterests.â It should only be fought because you have no other choice. There is a difference between killing a burglar who has entered your house in the night and therefore threatens you and your family, and learning after a burglary the name and address of the burglar, and going to his house to murder him to ensure he never burgles again. But even if you buy âthere is not such thing as a good warâ how can you possibly buy âthere is no such thing as a bad peaceâ? If you think that âpeaceâ is nothing more than the absence of active war, I donât think you can. But peace is not the absence of war, but rather the presence of law, and law cannot exist outside the consent (if grudging consent) of the governed. War is rather the state that exists outside of law. But that is another taleâŚ
asa4ever about 13 years ago
The military industrial complex won just like it won in Viet Nam and will continue to win. What I mean is win=profits.
wcorvi about 13 years ago
People, the 62% figure means that a third of Americans do NOT think it WAS worth it, and SOME of them probably donât even work for Halliburton. So, cut sonny1 some slack. He may SOUND like an idiot, but, uhhh, well, I mean, look at all the positives to come out of it. Thereâs, uhhh, well, uhhh, ⌠, and then thereâs â uhhhâŚ. Uhhhhh!
starthrower50 about 13 years ago
There are actually two sizes of the comic stored in GoComicsâ system and the smaller one appears to be sized wrong for the panel. Someone fuh-upped in preparing todayâs page. I would expect that to all be automated, but perhaps not.
puddleglum1066 about 13 years ago
From one of Chad Mulliganâs classics like âYou: Beastâ or âYouâre an Ignorant Idiot,â I presumeâŚ?.I havenât re-read Brunnerâs masterpiece in years. I suspect if I picked it up today Iâd be disappointed at how 2010 turned out to be even worse than a 70âs-vintage sci-fi dystopia (sigh)âŚ
bevgreyjones about 13 years ago
Oh for crying out loud! Zionists want to take over the world? What century are you living in?
gromitsperson about 13 years ago
Wow. That kind of money could have allowed us to have decent healthcare, schools that work, and an infrastructure that isnât falling apart.
Alabama Al about 13 years ago
4,484 American lives lost.Estimated 100,000 Iraqi lives lost.God only knows how many injured.`Eh . . . big deal. No one I know.(And, for the vast majority of the readers, no one you know.)
Craigj3534 about 13 years ago
I agree with âDylanThomasâ. Viet Nam was a waste, as the best that could have been obtained was a Korean war type standoff. Again, based on the faulty âdomino theoryâ of communism.Iraq was an even worse f-up by our leaders â based on faulty information (no WMDâs after all) and Bushâs burning desire to eliminate Saddam (whoâs impact had been, and could have continued to have been, contained) in retribution for threatening the life of Bush senior.
Afghanistan was/equally a waste â a knee-jerk reaction 9/11 with no underlying proof to support, in essence, an invasion.
So what has been accomplished? Lost lives, a ton of money, further support for terrorists, further distrust and bad relations in the Mideast, and an Iraq in anarchy.
And why the hell is the US still sending financial aid to Egypt, Pakistan, et al?
fritzoid Premium Member about 13 years ago
âhmmm, As I remember it, WWII started with Hitlers big lie!â
World War! Parts 1 & 2 (Boxed Set edition now available on Blu-Ray for Christmas) started long before that. The lengthy gap between the original and the sequel (More and crazier villains! Bigger and better weapons! And it ends with a BANG!) was because both sides needed to breed a new generation of extras.
Paladin39 about 13 years ago
@sonny1, your âimpressionâ has no basis in fact.
BE THIS GUY about 13 years ago
I see the anti-Semites- Dandwriter1- and racists- helloimjohnnycat- are out today. They are not worthy of a response or any form of engagement.
BE THIS GUY about 13 years ago
You can also go to Doonesbury.com to read the strip.
Curtmeister about 13 years ago
Daddy Bush didnât finish the job. My thought, not necessarilly popular, is that we had every right to go finish the job. Remember what Sadam did, right?
WOMD evidence: I believe this is no conspricy. This is just a case, common in business, of the underlings knowing what answer their boss wants, finding nothing substantial either way, and each spins the data toward the ârightâ answer, assuming that others will have hard confirming data.
It seems like recent US history in foreign affairs amounts to 1) Going into a country with a despot, toppling the government, despot gets replaced with someone worse. 2) Supporting a despot as a âbetter dead than redâ option, despot is replaced with someone worse, and the US is blamed for having supported a repressive regime.
BE THIS GUY about 13 years ago
Correction: W said, âbring them on,â referring to the attacks on US troops.
Raijin about 13 years ago
Greetings, Everyone, from one of the âpoor schmecksâ in the US military.
One of the things I fight for is to preserve Your Constitutional Right to free speech. I, for one, shall NOT âslink awayâ for treasonous comments. As a person who truly appreciates the American foundation, I love it so much that I WILL do whatever it takes to protect my family, my friends, and the country as a whole.
Believe what you want. Call it âThe Great Lieâ. You have the right to voice your opinions about whomever you wish. Thatâs what Iâve sacrificed MY freedoms for. I may not have lost MY life, or even been wounded, but until youâve actually gone through the hardships of military life, then you simply DO NOT UNDERSTAND what it means to be away from your family for a year, if not years at a time. You donât know what itâs like for your family to wonder if youâre okay whenever they hear a news report of an IED explosion somewhere in the Middle East.
Yes, there were over 4,000 American soldiersâ lives lost in the war in Iraq. There were over 3,000 lives lost on 9/11. Was the reason of âWMDâ THE legitimate reason to go into Iraq? Probably not. Was the war in Iraq tied to the war against Al Qaeda? Probably, and more than the average American knows.
But you go ahead, bitch about the Great Lie, but be thankful that the actual war being fought against those who wish to do harm to you and your family is being done on THEIR soil, not OURS. Be grateful that I and my soldier buddies willfully spend months away from our wives, our children, our lives here in the US, so that you can sleep well at night, and be well-rested to coherently bitch about the powers that be. Try spending some time doing research about the way of life in OTHER countries, and see what happens if you bad-mouth the government. Even though Jong-il is dead, if you had made your statements in N. Korea, they would have not only imprisoned you, they would have imprisoned your entire family one generation in either direction. Sounds harsh and unbelievable? Sorry, it isnât. FACT.
Hereâs the bottom line: You want the War to be fought on THEIR soil or YOURS? Do you want to be able to go to work every day, and NOT be fearful if your commuter train, or bus could get blown up, or your car get hit with an IED? Would you like to go to work every day and wonder if YOUR office is going to get hit with some type of attack?
Why donât you spend some time perusing through some of the radical anti-US sites out there, and see what we are up against. I think you might be taking a different position if you truly understood what types of enemies we have. But, I highly doubt you will spend that time as I have suggested, and I instead believe you shall continue to spout your left-wing dribble that does nothing more than cause division within your American brethren.
Please accept my apologies if this post was not directed at you. And if you, for some reason, took offense to anything Iâve said, then I apologize for your hurt feelings, but I do not apologize for MY patriotism and love for MY country.
Thank you, and God Bless.
Potrzebie about 13 years ago
How many war supporters here never went to the sandtrap?!
jimpow about 13 years ago
The TSA is a bunch of goons and bullies.
mjpankr about 13 years ago
Kudos to Trace Gillaspy! I feel much the way you do. Banana Oil to DylanThomas and his âgreatest intel in the world blather.â
I was a linguist in the Air Force when the first Gulf War began. For 45 years our intelligence agencies were largely focused on one target: the Soviet Union. In the linguist field Russian speakers were royalty. Everyone else mopped the floors. There were Arabic linguists, but their numbers were small compared with the Russian linguists and nobody cared about what they did.
Then came the war to free Kuwait. Suddenly commanders were fighting each other to get Arab linguists to help them carry out their missions. Some people thought you could send a Russian linguist to a two-week course and they would come out of it a fluent Arab speaker (Iâm not kidding about this).
At the No Such Agency the people in charge were astonished at the small amount of Iraqi Order of Battle information that was readily available. Untold tons of data about the Soviet Union had long been loaded into easily accessible computerized files. Much of the information about Iraq was not even on paperâit was in somebodyâs head.
After the First Gulf War things settled down. In the ensuing years Saddam would test the Air Force and Navy planes keeping him âin his boxâ every year (usually around Christmas), but he more or less faded off the radar screen as a threat worth worrying about. Based on my experience, I believe it is quite possible that intelligence about WMD or other matters was weak.
Dtroutma about 13 years ago
I contributed to the âbody countâ in Viet Nam. I also had a wise old Vietnamese man, who was with Ho fighting for us, against the Japanese, tell or Captain, "You arenât here to âsave usâ from Communism, weâve been communists for 3,000 years, weâre small village farmers itâs our lifestyle. Weâre NOT âMarxistsâ and you donât know the difference. You leave us alone, we leave you alone."
My son helped build the body count in Iraq. One day he was on the sat phone when an IED went off, it sounded all too familiar, as Iâd sent a tape home from âNam where I didnât stop talking just because of a mortar attack. My dad said, âDonât send any more tapes!â
Both these âcurrentâ wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, were fraudulently entered into by our administrations, as was Viet Nam. We do NOT need to look for a fight with Iran, period.
That both my son and I are combat disabled vets, I reflect today on the death of Kim Jung Il. I am reminded of wars, and despots as âfamily heritageâ. There is indeed the Kims, the Husseins, the Assads, and Bushes. Descending lines of nuts to chickenhawks are not unique, in many nations. When I hear support for war, I hear the ka-kaw! of the chickenhawk, ready to send others, while they buy stock in the âmilitary industrial complexâ.
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
From Sharuniboy to @D.T.Pi: All of the opinions above. From DT3.14159265 . . . . . infinity to Sharuniboy: I havenât a clue why you addressed your remarks to me. Happy Holidays anyway!  dtĎ
kaffekup about 13 years ago
Iâm one of the ones who does think Bush was evil, as well as incompetent. While Saddam posed no threat to us, and in fact, had abu Nidal murdered to show us he no longer harbored terrorists, Bush wanted to attack Iraq from day one of his reign. Meanwhile, when he received a CIA document saying âbin Laden determined to attack within USâ, he said, âYouâve covered your ass, now get outâ. Too bad he couldnât have protected us from that, but then we wouldnât have had two wars to enrich the already wealthy.
ghretighoti about 13 years ago
Paul Newman as Cool Hand Luke said it best: What we have here is a failure to communicate. People on both sides of the issue of whether the war was worth it are not communicating. And we and Al Qaeda donât communicate. Rather than body counts or oil or whatever, we could maybe justify our presence in Iraq as a chance to somehow get some communication going.
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
ââWell âsirâ, the reason the terrorists havenât followed us back is because we blew a large number of them to Hell THERE before they could do the same to us here, AGAIN.ââ You donât seem to know where âthereâ is. As Gertrude Stein said (about her childhood home in Oakland), âThere is no there thereâ. Source: Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gertrude_Stein
kaffekup about 13 years ago
" From 1954-1956 I lived in the French colony of Morocco and then independent Morocco."I was there then, too, Baslim. We lived in Port Lyautey, now again know by its name Kenitra. My father was at Sidi Slimane AB near there.The rest of your comment is spot-on, also.
Mickey 13 about 13 years ago
Patriotic Americanâs have always answered the call of their Commander in Chief, regardless of his political persuasion. In battle soldiers fight to protect their brotherâs in arms, not for some noble cause that carries them through. Regardless of what your sentiment is on the war and who got us into it, the people who answered the call of their country do not deserve the denigration displayed here. Now with many heaping criticism on the war and the loss of lives, the money spent and the gains from our efforts we cheapen their sacrifice. It saddens me to see Americans so polarized that they are seemingly unable to compromise and come together for our common good, regardless of their political affiliation.
DylanThomas3.14159 about 13 years ago
âThose Americans who went to Vietnam fought for freedom, a truly noble cause. It is a cause that continues.â⨠â¨âRonald Reagan, Chicago Tribune http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1988-06-01/features/8801030826_1_vietnam-lessons-watching-full-support-and-understanding/3 In a very real sense, then, President Reagan began to set the stage for George W. Bush to have the mindset to invade a country that POSED NO THREAT WHATSOEVER TO US. History has proven Reagan wrong: his misperception of the world and freedom. Befuddled with the domino theory he perceived the world world (except our closest allies) to be a threat to our freedom. Thus we could invade anywhere we wanted and, even if we lost (as in Vietnam), we were still righteous defenders of OUR FREEDOM to body-count our way into an earth made new just for us. In other words, to destroy the freedom of others in the name of protecting our own freedom. Big problem: asymmetric warfare tends to balance the equation. We only âget outâ when forced out. In Vietnam, it was the ever-increasing flood of Vietcong from the north. In Iraq, it was impending financial collapse. Â
BE THIS GUY about 13 years ago
I think the professor dyed his hair. Check the November 4 strip.
TheSkulker about 13 years ago
âOnce Americans were respected. Now we are blamed. Weâre not blamed because we are Americans, we are blamed because our leaders have made it official policy to try to organize other nations as they want.â
Extremely well said sir! As well as the rest of your post.Uncle Joe about 13 years ago
First, my thanks to all of you who served our nation. Regardless of the politics of any particular military operation, the men & women in uniform are serving the noble cause of freedom.
As far as Iraq goes⌠there is plenty of evidence showing that GW Bush was placing a lot of faith in what was obviously suspect evidence. I havenât seen anyone mention Hans Blix, who was in Iraq at the time & was saying that it looked like the WMDs were gone before we invaded. Saddam was allowing the inspectors access that they had been denied previously. He seemed to have come to the same conclusion that Gaddaffi had reached: if he didnât cooperate, he was a goner.
The âwar on terrorismâ is not a war that should be fought with uniformed troops. Bush made a huge mistake in trying to confront Al Qaeda with troops on the ground & completely missed the mark by invading Iraq. Saddam was hardly an ally of Al Qaeda. They hated him & saw him as a secular despot, which is exactly what he was. Saddam saw them as pawns to be used against the US and Iran, but knew they would cut his throat at the first opportunity. He certainly was not giving them any substantial support.Bush managed to squander all of the International good-will we received after 9/11. Terrorism is going to continue to be one of the biggest problems facing the world, but it needs to be confronted for what it is: organized crime. Our military is ill equipped to manage the task. Eradicating terrorism requires a combination of espionage, small scale covert operations and working political angles to remove popular support for terrorist acts. That method actually worked pretty well in Al Anbar once we realized that convincing the Sunni to worry more about the Shia & Iran than our forcesâŚ
maskdown about 13 years ago
The USA military machine did not kill the majority of the Iraqis killed; the Sunnis killed Shiites, the Shiites killed Sunnis, they killed Kurds, Kurds fought back and the Taliban just killed. And yes, 1 million is closer to the truth. Most non-American media are saying 300,000 and there are over 500,000 unaccounted.
WarBush about 13 years ago
âOne of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief. My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it. If I have a chance to invadeâ-if I had that much capital, Iâm not going to waste it. Iâm going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and Iâm going to have a successful presidency.â
-War Shrub
trixnnort about 13 years ago
sounds like we should have done iran instead
Tin Can Twidget about 13 years ago
There was no LEADERSHIP at the highest level.
Whitecamry about 13 years ago
And if you believe that then youâll be interested in unclaimed Nigerian fortunes.