Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for August 03, 2017

  1. Download
    locoboilerguy  over 7 years ago

    I’ll drink to that.

     •  Reply
  2. Rick o shay
    wiatr  over 7 years ago

    The thing can be set to eliminate any explosives or weapons too, thus sending a terrorist onto his target unarmed.

     •  Reply
  3. Wyvern darth tux maul 1942
    darth_geekboy  over 7 years ago

    travel wouldn’t matter anyway. dRUMPf and a couple of RETHUG/TBAGGER/BIGOT senators want to ban LEGAL immigrants as well.

     •  Reply
  4. Avatar3
    brain Les  over 7 years ago

    ‘shoe fetish’? I have been crotch groped!

     •  Reply
  5. Picture
    KennethJohnson  over 7 years ago

    The down side is lawyers arguing the transportee is not the same as the transported, thus legal death.

     •  Reply
  6. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member over 7 years ago

    California and the Northeast lose residents by the tens of millions as many decide to move to the South and Midwest and commute from there.

     •  Reply
  7. Large tv test pattern  color
    Lyons Group, Inc.  over 7 years ago

    Every once in while, Wiley comes up with a good one!

     •  Reply
  8. Desron14
    Masterskrain  over 7 years ago

    I have the solution right now! If I can’t DRIVE THERE, I DON’T GO! Simple.

     •  Reply
  9. Little b
    Dani Rice  over 7 years ago

    There was an article on the Internet about a man whose $40,000 customized wheelchair was destroyed – the airline says TSA did it, and TSA claims the airline was responsible.

    http://people.com/human-interest/united-airlines-destroy-wheelchair-valentin-duthion/

     •  Reply
  10. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Package delivery would become quite interesting.

    Danae should talk to Amazon and Google about funding her research.

    Google for the app side and Amazon for the practical application after success.

     •  Reply
  11. Desron14
    Masterskrain  over 7 years ago

    Lest we forget…Thanks, George W. Shrub and Ashcroft, for inflicting the Thug Security Agency on us IN THE FIRST PLACE!!

     •  Reply
  12. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  over 7 years ago

    Beaming would also eliminate bumping, overbooking, lack of seat room, arbitrary re-seating, lost luggage, etc. etc.

    On the other hand, if the beamer blew, untold numbers of ‘passengers’ could be lost forever but without the crash or debris or possibly their intermingled atoms would combine to form very interesting ‘new’ life forms.

    Possibilities are infinite

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    DanFlak  over 7 years ago

    Yes, but to use the beam, you have to squeeze yourself into a space about the size of the glove compartment of the average car – in other words: the space of a premium seat in coach on American Airlines.

     •  Reply
  14. Psx 20180717 164642
    Watcher  over 7 years ago

    And other industries would go defunct, Fedex, UPS, USPS, the trucking industry, automobile industry, rail industry, drones. Air pollution would be cut immediately as would global warming and borrowing from James Cameron, Danae could say, “I’m Queen of the World.”

     •  Reply
  15. Citizens for a canadian republic
    A Hip loving Canadian...  over 7 years ago

    Didn’t they have those on Star Trek?

     •  Reply
  16. Pirate63
    Linguist  over 7 years ago

    “Beam me up, Scotty. There’s no intelligent life left, down here ! "

     •  Reply
  17. Profile 6
    dot-the-I  over 7 years ago

    A day started with Joe barside with bro is always a good day. (A Bob team-up with Duh!-man would be a hoot.)

     •  Reply
  18. Image
    magicwalnut  over 7 years ago

    I thought that if you teleported, you arrived with no clothes on.

     •  Reply
  19. Waddleeagle
    Waddling Eagle  over 7 years ago

    Frankly, I don’t give a fig for the jobs of people who rip me off, charge extra for my shaving kit, treat me as if I’m a dangerous psychopath, herd me down a chute like cattle, strap me into a chair that is too small to comfortably seat an eight year old, and then subject me to a ride not unlike a third world bus ride, only less pleasant. And they act like they are doing you a huge favor.

     •  Reply
  20. Joliet jake blues
    Joliet Jake  over 7 years ago

    Shoe fetish is right. Back in the early days after 9/11, I was once pulled aside for “extra screening.” The guy had literally ZERO interest in the cell phone, camera, Sony Discman or water bottle in the backpack I was carrying on the plane. But he sure was fascinated by my smelly old sneakers.

     •  Reply
  21. Piggy
    BubbleTape Premium Member over 7 years ago

    one bomb transported to your front door. take that TSA.

     •  Reply
  22. Sheet faced man color small
    erniejpdx  over 7 years ago

    Joe’s comment about the economy reflects a common misunderstanding. New technologies, especially sudden technological breakthroughs, generally expand economies, not depress them. Railways replaced long-distance travel and transport, The former, mainly stagecoaches, were not missed. The general opinion was “good riddance.”

    The automobile wiped out a giant economic force, horse transport and its huge support base, from breeding stables to inns and livery stables. Millions of jobs in America, highly-skilled and professional down to casual labor, were wiped out almost overnight. Tens of millions of jobs replaced them. The economy exploded with wealth creation and new jobs as society came to grips with cars. Beam transport would do the same.

     •  Reply
  23. Photopictureresizer 190623 022710789 crop 2695x2695 1347x1347
    jvo  over 7 years ago

    One problem with this idea. . . . . . If it is like a star trek transporter then anyone who has one could go anywhere and do anything. There would be no security and nothing and no one would be safe. Any such transporter would never be released for public use. . . . . . . If it needs two terminals then what’s to stop a group smuggling a terminal in pieces to make a clandestine one? The you would need TSA like security around each terminal and constant sweeps for illegal ones.

     •  Reply
  24. Bearfront
    paranormal  over 7 years ago

    Beam me to Hawaii, Scotty!!!

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    kjeffus  over 7 years ago

    Simple seems the proper descriptor.

     •  Reply
  26. Sam and ralph clock
    alangwatkins  over 7 years ago

    How about it would eliminate the 30" seat pitch!

     •  Reply
  27. Clipboard 1
    Rista  over 7 years ago

    Last time I flew I stood in line longer to get on the flight than I was in the air. I think it’s time to bring back the dirigible airship. I recall reading about a dirigible pilot who was asked why he preferred dirigibles over regular air planes. He was preparing to land his ship at the time. He thought about it, said Wait and I’ll demonstrate" then left the helm walked back, poured himself a cup of coffee, took a long look back out over the landing area while sipping from his cup, when back in and landed the ship. Asked the reporter, “Did you get that?”

     •  Reply
  28. 100004141235862
    ord2koa Premium Member over 7 years ago

    The economy would readjust property by airports would become valuable.

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    falcon_370f  over 7 years ago

    @Ord2koa: Invention of the Transporter will in-turn facilitate the invention of the Replicator, and the Replicator in conjunction with the impending invention of Nuclear Fusion generators will REALLY destroy the economy. It will make Capitalism on the premise of “Working for a living” insustainable. Capitalism will have to reform to “Work for Luxury” or Capitalist nations become 3rd world as over 60% the workforce will lose their jobs and have no replacement. Of the lucky 40%, half of them (i.e. 20% of the whole) will earn incomes substantially lower than the Cost of Living. That equates to a poverty rate of 80%. When I get access to my personal computer I’ll publish a full explanation on FB.

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    water_moon  over 6 years ago

    phu-lease, it’d take so much power only the rich could afford it

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur