B.C. by Mastroianni and Hart for May 20, 2023

  1. Missing large
    David_the_CAD  over 1 year ago

    Sorry, too late.

     •  Reply
  2. Don martin 1
    Farside99  over 1 year ago

    Once you get to the price/demand curve, you can stop. If the price of a global thermonuclear war is too great, the demand falls off very rapidly.

     •  Reply
  3. Trollspry
    Enter.Name.Here  over 1 year ago

    Don’t stop yet at splitting the atom and inventing a fission bomb. Wait until we reach the invention of Jewish Space lasers! I wanna see what they look like.

     •  Reply
  4. P1010004
    KA7DRE Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Yes . . . the resonant wavelength looks like a very good place to stop.

     •  Reply
  5. Wile e. coyote free fall
    Botulism Bob  over 1 year ago

    It was a sine of the times.

     •  Reply
  6. Pexels pixabay 278823
    Doug K  over 1 year ago

    Easier said than done.

     •  Reply
  7. Nc201206
    some idiot from R'lyeh Premium Member over 1 year ago

    There’s a long time between 3 and 4, and next to none comparatively speaking for the rest.

     •  Reply
  8. Blunebottle
    blunebottle  over 1 year ago

    I vote for stopping before vector analysis.

     •  Reply
  9. Hot beverage 2615
    More Coffee Please! Premium Member over 1 year ago

    If only.

     •  Reply
  10. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Old sci fi story in which an alien race stops the ability of uranium/plutonium to be used in this fashion until/unless mankind changes so use of such weapons is no longer considered.

     •  Reply
  11. Nollanav
    DaBump Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Nah, some of the worst atrocities happened when the cutting-edge technology was still swords and catapults. A lot of wonderful things came along with the jets and atom bombs, or later.

     •  Reply
  12. Screenshot 20231128 222147 samsung internet
    Frank Burns Eats Worms  over 1 year ago

    That’s the oldest trig in the book.

     •  Reply
  13. 20210517 082929
    flagmichael  over 1 year ago

    I think the big question, especially with nuclear weapons being part of the world forever more, is “how do we deal with the underlying problem of national aggression?” 95 years ago, US Secretary of State Frank Kellogg and French foreign minister Aristide Briand wrote the “General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy” a.k.a. the Pact of Paris or the Kellogg-Briand pact. In essence, it outlawed aggressive war – wars of conquest. China happily signed, and a couple years later invaded Manchuria. Germany and Japan signed, and within a decade broke the treaty to ignite WW2. Lies outrank promises.

    It appears the worst threats at any particular time are happy to assure everybody they are no threat at all. The sucker punch is a prelude to so many wars. Right, Mr. Putin?

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    goboboyd  over 1 year ago

    Can’t put the Gennie back in the cave.

     •  Reply
  15. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  over 1 year ago

    Once carved in stone, never to be erased, ignored, or avoided.

     •  Reply
  16. 250
    ladykat  over 1 year ago

    Stop at fire.

     •  Reply
  17. Picture 001
    rshive  over 1 year ago

    The sophistication of the artwork mushrooms as at progresses.

     •  Reply
  18. Helmet
    xSigoff Premium Member over 1 year ago

    He left out steam power between 1+1=2 and E= mc²

     •  Reply
  19. Bill the cat
    Bill D. Kat Premium Member over 1 year ago

    E= mc² should go just before the nuclear blast.

     •  Reply
  20. 689 6897683 blue rebel alliance logo png transparent png
    KEA  over 1 year ago

    In HHGG it’s posited that even coming down out of the trees was a mistake

     •  Reply
  21.  1ja2870 dxo av dxo
    andersjg Premium Member over 1 year ago

    I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

    Albert Einstein

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    dpatrickryan Premium Member over 1 year ago

    If we’re getting picky you might want to swap the positions of the sine wave and general relativity.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    Bruce1253  over 1 year ago

    Without making ANY assumptions or circular logic, prove 1+1=2. It does because we say it does. We have built a civilization that rests on an unprovable assumption. That might be why we are in such a mess? Perhaps 1+1= Kumquat, would have been better???

     •  Reply
  24. Profile msn
    vaughnrl2003 Premium Member over 1 year ago

    The RMS calculation seems to be a bit off in your wave. Still, well time lined.

     •  Reply
  25. Stinker
    cuzinron47  over 1 year ago

    But the writing is on the wall.

     •  Reply
  26. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  over 1 year ago

    He’s HAM-ing it up a bit, like this Amateur … and how would I have gotten to those countless meetings all over the U.S.?

    I’s like to hear him whistle that frequency, including its DC component … I phase you not.

     •  Reply
  27. T
    T...  over 1 year ago

    Funny…

     •  Reply
  28. Iroh
    jim_pem  over 1 year ago

    Human nature being what it is, once Pandora’s Box is opened, there’s no stopping it. Someone is going to take it and run with it.

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    beany54  over 1 year ago

    If only we had stopped there.

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    yip yip yip   over 1 year ago

    Too late, yip yip yip yip yip

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    ckeller  over 1 year ago

    About a million Allied soldiers or would-have-been soldiers would heavily disagree with this strip.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From B.C.