Clay Jones for November 03, 2023

Yeah….

…the innocent bystander citizens (both sides) end up as collateral damage…

Oh gee….oh well ….s**t happens…

Ummm…maybe don’t throw bombs???

The Yayhoo and his party don’t WANT to avoid collateral damage and deaths. They’re in a war of hate and escalation which Bibi uses to cement his power. Of course Hamas does something very similar, only — as is expected in this part of the world — just somewhat worse, to pay them back properly!

Ummm…maybe don’t stand next to terrorists?

The Israeli government claims that it values life but seems to think that some lives are more important than others via their actions which are a combo of tone deaf, condescending, overkill, elitist and many are beginning to think genocidal. This is not an “eye for an eye” anymore and could explode into something much, much worse globally if cooler heads do not prevail.

I am sooooooo glad Pizza rat isn’t there. Bibi is an a"#¤%&/

All terrorists use civilians as shields. All terrorists are cowards. Hamas must be wiped out.

What if the Palestinian people overthrew the tyrannical, war-mongering Hamas dictatorship themselves? Then Israel wouldn’t have to do it for them. But they won’t or can’t. So Hamas will continue to lob primitive, indiscriminate rockets into Israel cities while the IDF launches guided missiles to surgically take out Hamas. Which side is producing the most collateral damage?

That’s what happens when the terrorists hide behind civilian human shields.

Slaughter breeds slaughter.

If only there was a reliable proven omnipotent ideology-destroying weapon that completely eliminated intolerance, hate, envy, and lust for power … and did not harm the innocents. The world’s religions seem only to exacerbate the differences between sects rather than bringing love and brotherhood.

Yanno, yesterday late, I got asked when it was admitted under oath that DT people had weekly contacts with Russians. I did answer that, but it’s worth repeating:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-1369/221382/20220419132156933_Page%20v.%20Oath%20Inc.%20Appendix.FILE%20COPY.pdf

We affirm the Superior Court’s judgment. The Isikoff Article describes a federal investigation into a report about Page—an investigation that existed and was being pursued by the FBI. At a minimum, the article is substantially true, and as such, Page did not state a claim for defamation based on that article. Page also fails to state a claim for defamation with respect to the remaining articles. At oral argument, Page conceded that if the Isikoff Article is not defamatory, he loses on his remaining claims. Page also failed to allege that the individuals responsible for publication of those articles acted with actual malice. Finally, Page does not contest the Superior Court’s holding that the Employee Articles were true. Because these grounds dispose of Page’s defamation claims, we do not address any of the Superior Court’s other grounds for dismissal.

* * *When you admit under oath that an article saying you had frequent contacts with Russians is true, then you’ve admitted to frequent contacts with Russians.

Yeah, I know the FAUX talking heads are DESPARATE to pretend that this never happened. But there it is, straight from the online SCOTUS records.

Clay and the left love the terrorists.

Netanyahu has made his intentions clear, he’s gonna level Gaza.

Could be worse, IDF could be using Napalm.

Read the graphic journal of Joe Sacco’s: “Footnotes in Gaza”. If you want to learn what was going on in Gaza from ‘48 through the 50’s. Then ask yourself why the cycle of violence will never end, and why the USA shouldn’t be supporting one side with endless military equipment.

Ya, …the innocent bystander citizens (both sides) end up as collateral damage…, because coward Hamas hide there instead of facing the IDF directly like real soldiers.

Hamas terrorists have never been “real soldiers” any more than the 9/11 hijackers were.

Why can’t The Republicans be like Groucho Marx and refuse to belong to any club that would have them as a member?

So, if one of our nutjobs went to Israel and executed a major terrorist act, would that justify Israel destroying New York City if there happened to be terrorist cell located there? Or would it make more sense and be more humane to root out the individuals responsible instead of killing thousands of innocent people who really had nothing whatsoever to do with the attack?

The hew and cry that has arisen is exactly why Hamas shields themselves with innocents. Hamas would just love to have/hopes to have Israel’s military shutdown so that they can get away with minimal damage to their organization despite having complete responsibility for having started the war in the first place with a brutal attack on Israeli civilians.

Netanyahu has been delaying his fraud case, “a litany of bribery, fraud and breach of trust charges” for four years. He has been trying to overhaul the judicial system, sparking protests throughout Israel. Now, Hamas terrorizes the country… could he?… would he use this to delay his own jeopardy?

Brings to mind papal legate and Cistercian abbot Arnaud Amalric’s edict: “Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.” (Kill them. The Lord knows those that are his own.)

Or some of the histories and commentaries in the Old Testament.

The blood is on the hands of Hamas for using these people as shields.

Maybe don’t start wars, don’t hide behind civilians and civilian structures (by design), don’t massacre 1400 men, women, children and babies, don’t torture them, don’t gauge their eyes out, don’t rape them, don’t behead them, don’t burn them in ovens, don’t kidnap 240 civilians, don’t injure thousands more…and then we can talk.Am Yisroel Chai. We’ve survived Nazi propaganda, we’re going to survive yours to.