Whether sold by the pound or by the dozen, you’d probably have to spend $3.99 because, in most places, you have to buy the whole “unit” (dozen or pound).
Eggs are sold in dozens. Eggs have a certain density. You can use density and individual egg volume x 12 to get the price per pound, or you can say “thank you teacher for doing half of the problem for me”.
At some point, eggs were measured by the pound: “pound cake” was so named because the recipe consisted of a pound of flour, a pound of sugar, a pound of butter, and a pound of eggs.
Ten ounces, or indeed a pound, may or may not equal a whole number of eggs. Do you weigh before or after removing the eggs from their shells? Clearly that math problem was devised by a person lacking relevant experience. Caulfield for President!
But Doug K and Caulfield both have a good point, though as I remember from a little time spend in Europe, where housewives shopped pretty much every day (at least once), the habit was to buy enough eggs for a planned recipe, “enough” being defined as “as many as you’ll need plus one”, just in case.
If I did the math right, it comes to 7.5 eggs. An interesting logistics problem dividing one gooey raw egg in half. Unless I can just choose to use either the yolk or the white part?
A chef might use them by weight. When I worked in a kitchen, we would crack 4 flats at a time (a total of 10 dozen eggs) and then measure them out by liquid volume; which would allow for the ounces, but not the pounds. I do not know how they were purchased though
This is a great example of why the System Internationale/Metric System is better. The comments about the practicality of the problem are also spot on. It reminds me of a physics problem involving a train approaching the station at 9/10 the speed of light.
I’m with Caulfield - he needs some more parameters before he can answer. If the eggs are sold by the pound, then he’s going to need to know how many you’re allowed to buy at a time. I mean, is the correct answer just “$3.99” since they’re sold by the pound, not by the each or by the dozen? Or does Caulfield have to know what size egg we’re talking about here? The most common size is large, which happens to weigh a smidge over two ounces, assuming we have to pay for the shell as well. (This gets more complicated if we’re asking whether this is whole eggs or liquid eggs; a recipe that asks for eggs by weight is WEIRD and I’d be suspicious it was looking for liquid eggs, not whole eggs. And then Caulfield is restricted to whatever size the cartons come in.) In our world, you can get those by a the half-dozen, which would weigh twelve ounces. If Caulfield has been taught algebra, he could figure out what that would cost by calculating the ounce cost. Or does this world let you buy them bulk, where you can precisely as many as you want, so he can buy the five eggs? Again, assuming these are large eggs, so I think Caulfield can absolutely stall his teacher until lunchtime on this problem. :)
When I was young I learned a rhyme that: A pint’s a pound, the world around. In other words, they are both 16 ounces. Recognizing that one is weight and one is volume, so they are not really equivalent. That was before metric was as universal as it is today. I’m sure my mother learned the rhyme in the 1930s.
thevideostoreguy almost 2 years ago
…he’s out of line, but he’s right.
Erse IS better almost 2 years ago
Strangely, some European cook books DO measure eggs by weight. Though I doubt they sell ’em that way.
Sanspareil almost 2 years ago
Eggsactly!!
Yakety Sax almost 2 years ago
Depends on the size of the eggs.
https://www.reference.com/science-technology/many-eggs-make-pound-7b04ab09fa9638d8
zmech13 Premium Member almost 2 years ago
Maybe it’s a carton of liquid eggs. Those would be sold by weight.
Also, about $2.49
Doug K almost 2 years ago
Whether sold by the pound or by the dozen, you’d probably have to spend $3.99 because, in most places, you have to buy the whole “unit” (dozen or pound).
JaneCl almost 2 years ago
Add about $.40 for tax.
Theseus2 almost 2 years ago
Ok, could you now please ask the question in normal metric measures? Who calculates in ounces?Oo
markkahler52 almost 2 years ago
Egg Beaters
P51Strega almost 2 years ago
Eggs are sold in dozens. Eggs have a certain density. You can use density and individual egg volume x 12 to get the price per pound, or you can say “thank you teacher for doing half of the problem for me”.
ewaldoh almost 2 years ago
Is “if” too short of a word to be noticed in the frenzy of reading a question? Or does it just get ignored as the first one?
cervelo almost 2 years ago
If an average chicken egg weighs 60 grams, how many pounds does the average egg carton weigh?
greavill53 Premium Member almost 2 years ago
$3.12, rounded up from 3.11875
BadCreaturesBecomeDems almost 2 years ago
$2.49 for 10 oz.
BadCreaturesBecomeDems almost 2 years ago
Her eggs are expensive: a dozen XL weighs approx 1.7 lb which would be $6.76 a dozen.
I don’t know Soufflé, but my girlfriend is busy making me, my wife, and herself a Quiche with cheese, onion, bacon, and I don’t know what else.
poppacapsmokeblower almost 2 years ago
$3.99 / 16 = 0.249375 * 10 = $0.25 (rounded to the penny)
Too many years of math problems, I now solve them compulsively. Same thing with eating everything on my plate.
The Brooklyn Accent Premium Member almost 2 years ago
At some point, eggs were measured by the pound: “pound cake” was so named because the recipe consisted of a pound of flour, a pound of sugar, a pound of butter, and a pound of eggs.
FireAnt_Hater almost 2 years ago
I’m really hungry so “my souffle” will be bigger than the typical “a souffle.” So – $3.99.
Talon_1968 almost 2 years ago
Eggs are sold by the Kilo in Mexico
SofaKing Premium Member almost 2 years ago
European cooks have a hard time with American recipes that call for a “stick” of butter.
Ooten Aboot almost 2 years ago
Ten ounces, or indeed a pound, may or may not equal a whole number of eggs. Do you weigh before or after removing the eggs from their shells? Clearly that math problem was devised by a person lacking relevant experience. Caulfield for President!
tpkelly777 Premium Member almost 2 years ago
https://www.peteandgerrys.com/blog/egg-size-guide# By weight
pantalone almost 2 years ago
“You most certainly do get hints in the real world.” I love that.
AndrewSihler almost 2 years ago
I know! I know! $2.49! (Hooray for me!!)
But Doug K and Caulfield both have a good point, though as I remember from a little time spend in Europe, where housewives shopped pretty much every day (at least once), the habit was to buy enough eggs for a planned recipe, “enough” being defined as “as many as you’ll need plus one”, just in case.
Kidon Ha-Shomer almost 2 years ago
I get 2.50$. Round up the price to 4.00. A pound is 16 oz. 10 oz over 16 oz = 5/8. 8 divides into 4.00 to .50 an eigth. 5 × .50= 2.50.
SarahZelan almost 2 years ago
If I did the math right, it comes to 7.5 eggs. An interesting logistics problem dividing one gooey raw egg in half. Unless I can just choose to use either the yolk or the white part?
EdBear445 almost 2 years ago
Reminds me of a strip where she was asking the cost to drive from A to B which were X miles apart and band gas cost .29 cents per gallon.
DM2860 almost 2 years ago
A chef might use them by weight. When I worked in a kitchen, we would crack 4 flats at a time (a total of 10 dozen eggs) and then measure them out by liquid volume; which would allow for the ounces, but not the pounds. I do not know how they were purchased though
anomaly almost 2 years ago
You’ll be spending whatever the cost of a dozen eggs is, since they don’t sell by the ounce.
eced52 almost 2 years ago
3.99/16*10=2.50$
Billy Yank almost 2 years ago
This is a great example of why the System Internationale/Metric System is better. The comments about the practicality of the problem are also spot on. It reminds me of a physics problem involving a train approaching the station at 9/10 the speed of light.
john eastman almost 2 years ago
I remember when eggs were 3.99 a dozen. Barely
calliarcale almost 2 years ago
I’m with Caulfield - he needs some more parameters before he can answer. If the eggs are sold by the pound, then he’s going to need to know how many you’re allowed to buy at a time. I mean, is the correct answer just “$3.99” since they’re sold by the pound, not by the each or by the dozen? Or does Caulfield have to know what size egg we’re talking about here? The most common size is large, which happens to weigh a smidge over two ounces, assuming we have to pay for the shell as well. (This gets more complicated if we’re asking whether this is whole eggs or liquid eggs; a recipe that asks for eggs by weight is WEIRD and I’d be suspicious it was looking for liquid eggs, not whole eggs. And then Caulfield is restricted to whatever size the cartons come in.) In our world, you can get those by a the half-dozen, which would weigh twelve ounces. If Caulfield has been taught algebra, he could figure out what that would cost by calculating the ounce cost. Or does this world let you buy them bulk, where you can precisely as many as you want, so he can buy the five eggs? Again, assuming these are large eggs, so I think Caulfield can absolutely stall his teacher until lunchtime on this problem. :)
DaBump Premium Member almost 2 years ago
They sell eggs (without the shells) by the pound in the real world, too.
alien011 almost 2 years ago
$3.99. And then I’d get a better recipe with decent measures. But the $3.99 eggs should be enough.
tcviii Premium Member over 1 year ago
When I was young I learned a rhyme that: A pint’s a pound, the world around. In other words, they are both 16 ounces. Recognizing that one is weight and one is volume, so they are not really equivalent. That was before metric was as universal as it is today. I’m sure my mother learned the rhyme in the 1930s.