Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson for February 27, 2024

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  4 months ago

    I think Calvin grew up to be a social media influencer.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    codycab  4 months ago

    In the future, Calvin continues to follow via Internet.

     •  Reply
  3. Asdf
    JïllDérs(TOMGF)  4 months ago

    I think Calvin is only reading the news from the newspaper because of the charts

     •  Reply
  4. Badger 4 360
    sirbadger  4 months ago

    I should go back to TV news so I can get all my news in 30 minutes. I have a problem with local news. If they say “Coming up in the next half hour”, I will never watch them again, because I don’t want to watch more than 30 minutes of local news.

     •  Reply
  5. 20071112 einstein
    hariseldon59  4 months ago

    Must be USA Today.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    cracker65  4 months ago

    Social media

     •  Reply
  7. Groucho
    Jayalexander  4 months ago

    KISS the secret sauce

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    snsurone76  4 months ago

    People have wondered why I’ve sometimes called Bill Watterson “Sam”.

    I’m afraid I may have mistaken him for the actor who starred in LAW & ORDER.

    Sorry, Bill.

     •  Reply
  9. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  4 months ago

    And just think, in the 80s most “journalists” could spell!

     •  Reply
  10. Man with x ray glasses
    The Reader Premium Member 4 months ago

    No chart, I guess this strip is a fluff piece.

     •  Reply
  11. Bluedog
    Bilan  4 months ago

    Calvin should see the news today. Not too much news included in the news these days.

     •  Reply
  12. Img 20230511 134023590 portrait 5
    markkahler52  4 months ago

    Thirty years on, not a lot’s changed, really

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    mac04416  4 months ago

    Now that Calven is about 38, the new hasn’t changed a bit.

     •  Reply
  14. Thumbnail img 0108
    Jeffin Premium Member 4 months ago

    Common taters.

     •  Reply
  15. Braveheart
    Free or Not? Premium Member 4 months ago

    Some things never change. The Newspapers remain mere narrative machines….

     •  Reply
  16. Fb img 1516982044221
    jagedlo  4 months ago

    And that’s just the regular news… today, we have “entertainment news”, “sports news”, etc…

     •  Reply
  17. Download
    artegal  4 months ago

    Just think: that was 30 years ago, and it’s gotten so much worse since then.

     •  Reply
  18. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  4 months ago

    Yep, Cal, and all that medical advice. Something to ‘tell your doctor.’ And guarantee you’ll wish you hadn’t.

     •  Reply
  19. 20210517 082929
    flagmichael  4 months ago

    A few years ago I saw a television news item about an automobile accident that closed an intersection in the afternoon rush hour in a fairly small community. The reporter reported, and the anchor goaded him to speculate, but the reporter stuck to the facts. It was so unusual I still remember it.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    posse1 Premium Member 4 months ago

    I may be overthinking it, but shouldn’t it be “it’s got a chart next to the article.”?

     •  Reply
  21. Cowboy
    Robert4170  4 months ago

    Calvin is looking at a newspaper, but the same sarcastic comments can be applied to broadcast news. That’s why I never watch it.

     •  Reply
  22. Picture 001
    rshive  4 months ago

    Probably an in-depth soap opera.

     •  Reply
  23. 250
    ladykat  4 months ago

    Not a bad definition of today’s politics, Calvin.

     •  Reply
  24. Dscn1573
    Vgrift85  4 months ago

    Last Panel: That about sums it up.

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    gregcomn  4 months ago

    I just call everybody “Chester”. . . .

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    dflak  4 months ago

    I get my news from the internet news services. I can pick from the various news services to get information on the same event. I could not do that with a newspaper, and I’d have to switch channels and hope to catch the same story on TV.

    Lately I’ve been turning to AI and asking questions like “Give me the exact wording of judge so-and-so ruling on such-and-such a case.” News services usually summarize and if the quote the ruling at all, it’s only parts of it. So the AI goes out to some obscure law library to look it up.

    I trust but verify. I rarely take a single news source as gospel.

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    old_geek  4 months ago

    A person that engages his brain, analyzes information and considers the news story thoughtfully.

    NPR’s worse nightmare…

     •  Reply
  28. Rwljlogo2
    The Wolf In Your Midst  4 months ago

    The problem with the media is that it gives us exactly what we want.

     •  Reply
  29. Giphy downsized
    Angry Indeed Premium Member 4 months ago

    I used to read the WAPO in the late ’60s to early ’70s when it was more factual and indepth. Now, it would only make a great liner for the bird cage. Even the local newspaper has diminished in quality and size as it slowly creeps to oblivion. Definitely not the future I thought it would be.

     •  Reply
  30. Gidney
    sperry532  4 months ago

    Considering the Copywrite date is 1994, it’s clear that little has changed in the intervening thirty years.

     •  Reply
  31. Greg backlit
    mindjob  4 months ago

    Don’t forget the made up terminology from time to time

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    kamoolah  4 months ago

    Calvin does well for going to a segregated school.

    (And yes, there are no children of color in Miss Wormwood’s class).

     •  Reply
  33. Triscele
    txmystic  4 months ago

    More prescience from C&H…

     •  Reply
  34. Missing large
    John Jorgensen  4 months ago

    Sometimes I have a hard time remembering this strip is thirty years old. I like to think these depressing developments it was already calling out back then are recent developments and will prove to be passing aberrations. Guess not.

     •  Reply
  35. Chicken
    evoroadster Premium Member 4 months ago

    A comic from 1994 that is still relevant today, maybe more so.

     •  Reply
  36. Photo
    MartinPerry1  4 months ago

    Thirty years old and still relevant.

     •  Reply
  37. Kirby close up with poppies behind   close cropped
    mistercatworks  4 months ago

    Love it. Article beside the chart. Sometimes they don’t even bother to put a legend on the chart.

     •  Reply
  38. Avatar200
    Izzy Moreno  4 months ago

    I wonder what Sam thinks about Twitter.

     •  Reply
  39. Wolf
    Mediatech  4 months ago

    Why bother with an accurate and in depth explanation, when you can make your point with a vague and deliberately misleading graph.

     •  Reply
  40. Missing large
    g04922  4 months ago

    Calvin was way ahead of the curve when it came to the MSM…

     •  Reply
  41. Missing large
    Otis Rufus Driftwood  4 months ago

    And this was all 30 years ago

     •  Reply
  42. Missing large
    john_chubb  4 months ago

    Must be USA Decay he’s reading.

     •  Reply
  43. Win 20210604 06 54 44 pro
    baraktorvan  4 months ago

    We thought it was bad back then, it pales in comparison to today. Americans (using a generalized voice) tend to just look at headlines when they read news online, and rarely sit through the evening news.

     •  Reply
  44. 2020 11 30
    pixiekitten Premium Member 4 months ago

    I feel like the media could learn a thing or two by reading a 30 year old Calvin and Hobbes cartoon.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Calvin and Hobbes