As designated Beadle, whenever Sebastian was put in temporary charge of his class in the teacher’s absence, he turned into a literal ‘Enfant Terrible’, dressing in scarlet cherkeska as a full-on Junior Cossack.
A younger version of one of the men from yesterday’s painting before he had learned to make his stick stand upright on its own (not a double entendre, but I suppose it could be).
Leroy did marry in 1889, but I haven’t run down information about his children, if any. This painting is 1918, so 29 years after his marriage. This model might be late teens? A late-ish son?
(syntax supported by the Google, Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, and Brave search engines) in the browser address bar (or search for it using one of those search engines) and choose the first Category: found, and once there find the text string enfant, and click its link for info and links that point to more info (perhaps best viewed by the Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox browsers, which can automatically translate most webpages if necessary) about this roughly jumbo envelope size painting.
Again, a larger strip image is shown by (Ctrl- or right-) clicking the image in Mr. Melcher’s MASTERPIECE #3451 (January 28, 2025) blog entry, accessible by the Check out the blog! box after the last comment, and using the dropdown menu (even larger if you crop what’s after .png from the URL). I’ve added a comment there pointing to the info about this artist I used to point to here. So far, first work by him used here.
How could anyone, even back then, think this looked masculine? The parents must’ve really wanted a girl, but were stuck with a boy. BTW, it was only small children, more like toddlers, who were dressed alike regardless of gender. It stopped long before this kid’s age. That’s for sure. Very funny caption, thanks!
Solstice*1947 9 days ago
/// Paul Leroy used his oil paints to render
”Alfred Leroy, child,” in scarlet splendor.
The same last name, (Leroy),
clues this may be Paul’s boy,
but it’s hard to be sure of the gender.
Say What Now‽ Premium Member 9 days ago
“I’m more fabulous than The Blue Boy.”
Call me Ishmael 9 days ago
But where’s Amos ?
Call me Ishmael 9 days ago
That Andy’s a typical man-/
he has moved on from raggedy Ann/
You can tell from his threads/
That he’s now turning heads:/
He oozes esprit and élan…
Eric Kegels 9 days ago
Peter Pan with Daltonism
PraiseofFolly 9 days ago
As designated Beadle, whenever Sebastian was put in temporary charge of his class in the teacher’s absence, he turned into a literal ‘Enfant Terrible’, dressing in scarlet cherkeska as a full-on Junior Cossack.
Exasperated999 9 days ago
Wilkommen in Kabarett.
MS72 9 days ago
“It’s a hard-knock life” immediately came to mind.
Reader 9 days ago
Young Alex DeLarge before his droogs.
No 6 9 days ago
The Red Teapot.
By Picasso.
No 6 9 days ago
Picasso is very abstract,
That’s not an opinion, that’s fact.
Critics aspire,
His work they admire,
But you and l know it’s all cr@p.
chaosed2 9 days ago
…Soon after this portrait was revealed the Stark family painter disappeared without a trace. Arya was never asked to sit for another.
Econ01 9 days ago
A younger version of one of the men from yesterday’s painting before he had learned to make his stick stand upright on its own (not a double entendre, but I suppose it could be).
jdculhane46 9 days ago
Ok, who was the idiot who picked our clothes for the running of the bulls?
ekw555 9 days ago
not the cane!
wincoach Premium Member 9 days ago
His parents never figured out how he paid his own way through college.
prrdh 9 days ago
“My pronouns are they/them, and don’t you forget it!”
Linguist 9 days ago
" You’ve been a very naughty boy, Mr. Leroy. It’s time for punishment! "
mokspr Premium Member 9 days ago
“It’s 3:05 and you are late for your scheduled afternoon perversion SIR!”
Holden Awn 9 days ago
A plate from: “Early Twentieth Century Transgender History Illustrated”.
Calvins Brother 9 days ago
“Anyone for a little S&M?”
rugeirn 9 days ago
Leroy did marry in 1889, but I haven’t run down information about his children, if any. This painting is 1918, so 29 years after his marriage. This model might be late teens? A late-ish son?
Csaw Backnforth 8 days ago
No you doofus – for Halloween this year, I’m going as the Scarlet Pimpernel – not the Scarlet Pumpernickel.
NolaMan 8 days ago
“Oh stop! Im a boy, really!”
mabrndt Premium Member 8 days ago
Alfred Leroy as a child:
Paste (including the quote marks)
"Category:Canes in art" Wikimedia
(syntax supported by the Google, Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, and Brave search engines) in the browser address bar (or search for it using one of those search engines) and choose the first Category: found, and once there find the text string enfant, and click its link for info and links that point to more info (perhaps best viewed by the Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox browsers, which can automatically translate most webpages if necessary) about this roughly jumbo envelope size painting.
Again, a larger strip image is shown by (Ctrl- or right-) clicking the image in Mr. Melcher’s MASTERPIECE #3451 (January 28, 2025) blog entry, accessible by the Check out the blog! box after the last comment, and using the dropdown menu (even larger if you crop what’s after .png from the URL). I’ve added a comment there pointing to the info about this artist I used to point to here. So far, first work by him used here.
Khatkhattu Premium Member 8 days ago
Although he is proud of his progeny, his fondness for androgyny, causes Mr. Leroy, to state this is a boy, don’t accuse me of misogyny.
d1234dick Premium Member 8 days ago
Chris is studying how to join the military under trumps plan, boy or girl or other.
chriscc63 8 days ago
gender confused Andy.
JH&Cats 8 days ago
Christopher Robin’s French Adventure.
Solstice*1947 8 days ago
/// Once again, “That Is Priceless” is late.
On GoComics there is no update.
I just saw it appear
on Steve’s blog, but when here?
I’m afraid I’m too sleepy to wait.
Call me Ishmael 8 days ago
Pour demain:
Geographers, working in tandem:/
it’s easy to understand ‘em../
Claimed for Europe the rights/
to far distant sites-/
if they hadn’t, their kings would have canned’em.
Aimless Melissa 6 days ago
How could anyone, even back then, think this looked masculine? The parents must’ve really wanted a girl, but were stuck with a boy. BTW, it was only small children, more like toddlers, who were dressed alike regardless of gender. It stopped long before this kid’s age. That’s for sure. Very funny caption, thanks!