Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for March 01, 2019

  1. Avatar02
    Kim Metzger Premium Member almost 6 years ago

    Any ladyfingers on that boat?

     •  Reply
  2. Picture
    MalcolmMacLeod  almost 6 years ago

    This comic strip is my favorite since Pogo and Dick Tracy.

     •  Reply
  3. Psx 20180717 164642
    Watcher  almost 6 years ago

    Well Wiley Bears with Climate Change all of you will be moving into the cities for meals and what a variety you will have.

     •  Reply
  4. 654px red eyed tree frog   litoria chloris edit1
    Superfrog  almost 6 years ago

    Looks like it’s MacDarwinbergers for lunch.

     •  Reply
  5. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 6 years ago

    That’s a boat load that never evolved.

     •  Reply
  6. Photo
    CharlesJ.O'Kelly  almost 6 years ago

    If you fly, drive, buy anything not made/grown within walking distance, bathe, or breed, then you, yes you! are on the boat. Welcome to the cruise.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Gary Fabian  almost 6 years ago

    I don’t care who you are, if you get on a boat titled S.S. Darwin, you deserve what you get. Hopefully you take the whole family to make it truly legitimate.

     •  Reply
  8. Hold still i gotcha homie 28918 1250050600 0
    Aussie Down Under  almost 6 years ago

    I think the people on the boat will out last the polar bears given there are more people than polar bears. We are destroying their habitat faster than their non existent impact on ours.

     •  Reply
  9. Desron14
    Masterskrain  almost 6 years ago

    “A 3 hour tour, a 3 hou….AAAAUUUUGGGGGHHHHHHHH! “Chomp…Chomp…Chomp….”

     •  Reply
  10. Profile msn
    vaughnrl2003 Premium Member almost 6 years ago

    Civilizations rise and fall. Things change and people change them. For better or worse it is the way it is. Do the best you can to do the best you can is the best you can do.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    scpandich  over 5 years ago

    Funny, but in the real world this is what tends to happen:

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/08/27/another-ship-of-fools-gets-stuck-in-arctic-ice-needs-rescue/

     •  Reply
  12. Forbear
    Qiset  over 5 years ago

    It’s not that this is climate change, it’s about it being man-made.

     •  Reply
  13. Img 4591
    Say What? Premium Member over 5 years ago

    This is the first time I have seen Shit’s Creek pictured with ice floes, and I don’t see any paddles.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    LadyPeterW  over 5 years ago

    We are ALL on the same boat, it’s named “Planet Earth”. And everything we do has negative or positive effects on the whole orb. But I figure every little or big thing we do for the good of Earth, is a help towards saving it. Just do what you can, to the extent you can and be mindful of how you can do better!!! And please, don’t get all holier-than-thou about how much you can do, but maybe try and help others do better too?

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    DanFlak  over 5 years ago

    The naysayers point to the fact that there is debate about climate change among scientists and they are partly right. There is debate, but the debate isn’t about whether it is real, it’s about how severe it is.

    And while we argue whether man caused it or not, it is still happening and nobody in power is considering that.

    What fools these mortals be.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    tnt219  over 5 years ago

    This is drawn just off the California coast.

     •  Reply
  17. Cheshirecat chandra complg 1024
    Silly Season   over 5 years ago

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

    Exxon remained publicly convinced that the science was still controversial.

    Furthermore, experts agree that Exxon became a leader in campaigns of confusion.

    By 1989 the company had helped create the Global Climate Coalition (disbanded in 2002) to question the scientific basis for concern about climate change.

    ~~

    “We included a memo of a coalition of fossil-fuel companies where they pledge basically to launch a big communications effort to sow doubt,” says union president Kenneth Kimmel.

    “There’s even a quote in it that says something like ‘Victory will be achieved when the average person is uncertain about climate science.’ So it’s pretty stark.”

    ~~

    Since then, Exxon has spent more than $30 million on think tanks that promote climate denial, according to Greenpeace.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    WaitingMan  over 5 years ago

    Coal lobbyist Andrew Wheeler confirmed in the senate as Trump’s new head of the Environmental Protection Agency yesterday. Well, of course he was. Keep it up, Republicans and we will all be passengers in the S.S. Darwin before long.

     •  Reply
  19. Tor johnson
    William Bednar Premium Member over 5 years ago

    There is more to this than Wiley’s caption states.

     •  Reply
  20. Anarcho syndicalismvnnb   copy
    gigagrouch  over 5 years ago

    Denial is not a river in Egypt.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    wdgnas  over 5 years ago

    DD Wiz: how do you power your house when the sun goes down? wind or batteries?

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    Scorpio Premium Member over 5 years ago

    I’m in favour of that. I have a list of other categories that should have a cruise on their own.

     •  Reply
  23. 100px battle flag of the us confederacy svg
    euthuno  over 5 years ago

    Time to fire up the snow blower and fight global cooling.

     •  Reply
  24. Cheshirecat chandra complg 1024
    Silly Season   over 5 years ago

    http://www.climatefiles.com/shell/1988-shell-report-greenhouse/

    This 1988 Shell report, discovered by Jelmer Mommers of De Correspondent, shines light on what the company knew about climate science, its own role in driving global CO2 emissions, the range of potential political and social responses to a warming world.

    The confidential report, “The Greenhouse Effect,” was authored by members of Shell’s Greenhouse Effect Working Group and based on a 1986 study, though the document reveals Shell was commissioning “greenhouse effect” reports as early as 1981. Report highlights include:

    A thorough review of climate science literature, including acknowledgement of fossil fuels’ dominant role in driving greenhouse gas emissions.

    More importantly, Shell quantifies its own products’ contribution to global CO2 emissions.

    A detailed analysis of potential climate impacts, including rising sea levels, ocean acidification, and human migration.

    A discussion of the potential impacts to the fossil fuel sector itself, including legislation, changing public sentiment, and infrastructure vulnerabilities.

    Shell concludes that active engagement from the energy sector is desirable.

    A cautious response to uncertainty in scientific models, pressing for sincere consideration of solutions even in the face of existing debates.A warning to take policy action early, even before major changes are observed to the climate.

    In short, by 1988 Shell was not only aware of the potential threats posed by climate change, it was open about its own role in creating the conditions for a warming world.

    Similar documents by ExxonMobil, oil trade associations, and utility companies have emerged in recent years, though this Shell document is a rare, early, and concrete accounting of climate responsibility by an oil major.

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    dennisodoyle  over 5 years ago

    This is no longer funny. The strip has just become a political forum for leftist drivel. So long!

     •  Reply
  26. 690904ef 1e7c 4d36 a98a f46b185ca15f
    DCBakerEsq  over 5 years ago

    Hey, we had a nice run. Now, it’s the cockroaches’ turn.

     •  Reply
  27. George jetson
    Bicycle Dude  over 5 years ago

    Why on Earth do we even consider the colonization of another planet such as Mars, or even the moon for that matter, when we have done such a miserable job of taking care of this one?

     •  Reply
  28. Phydeux
    Phydeux  over 5 years ago

    For all the reality deniers, Scott Adams blogs are that way -—>

     •  Reply
  29. Pirate63
    Linguist  over 5 years ago

    Just remember, when you begin to have ice floe tsunamis, Wiley Bears can’t be far behind…

     •  Reply
  30. Img 20140309 081158
    Herb L 1954  over 5 years ago

    Is that the tug from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest?Moon over Mar A Lago ;(

     •  Reply
  31. Picture 1
    Pisces  over 5 years ago

    Oh boy, here’s dem Wiley Bears. Hope they enjoy their meal, LOL! Sad topic, though.

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    1JennyJenkins  over 5 years ago

    I wonder if this is the article from Washington Post, Feb. 11, 2019, which Wiley references:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/02/11/mass-invasion-polar-bears-is-terrorizing-an-island-town-climate-change-is-blame/?utm_term=.154b245a8777

     •  Reply
  33. Avatar 3
    pcolli  over 5 years ago

    Pollution? https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/feb/25/concrete-the-most-destructive-material-on-earth

     •  Reply
  34. Stinker
    cuzinron47  over 5 years ago

    Hey, aren’t you supposed to be hibernating? Guess that’s something else we got wrong.

     •  Reply
  35. Avatar
    justalurkr  over 5 years ago

    Sweet, juicy justice

     •  Reply
  36. George jetson
    Bicycle Dude  over 5 years ago

    I believe this video says it best. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JhaVNJb3ag

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    lordhoff  over 5 years ago

    Deniers and the polar bears in the comic are thriving. Dude, think!

     •  Reply
  38. Img 1754  2
    GiantShetlandPony  over 5 years ago

    Shouldn’t that be: SS Darwin Award

     •  Reply
  39. Toughcat
    bakana  over 5 years ago

    “Stupidity cannot be cured. Stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death. There is no appeal, and execution is carried out automatically and without pity.”

    ― Robert Heinlein

     •  Reply
  40. Missing large
    whelan_jj  over 5 years ago

    It’s the climate alarmists who always go to the arctic to see that the ice has all melted only to have their boat ice-bound.

    Most deniers wouldn’t bother going except to see the aurora.

    BTW. I’m a denier. I deny the Earth is flat. I deny the Earth is only a few thousand years old and I deny that there is some kind of catastrophic climate change going on due to human fossil fuel burning. In all cases the reason is simple: actual SCIENCE says otherwise.

     •  Reply
  41. Sheet faced man color small
    erniejpdx  over 5 years ago

    Strictly speaking the ship should be the SS Samuel Wilberforce, in honor of the Anglican minister who led the British war on evolution by natural selection from the beginning to his death. Denial of the reality of evolution goes hand-in-hand with denial of climate change, as several posters here have demonstrated. Regressives are the heart and soul of the GOP, capable of putting an imbecile into the Oval Office because he shares their ignorance and prejudices.

     •  Reply
  42. Img 1610
    WCraft Premium Member over 5 years ago

    Oh boy…

     •  Reply
  43. Missing large
    slowtrain  over 5 years ago

    Climate change is the biggest scam since the Y2K bug scam.

     •  Reply
  44. Missing large
    flpmlp  over 5 years ago

    Question. In the climate change religion is there any time to study what the Creator has to say about the weather?

     •  Reply
  45. Picture
    MichaelCorpier  over 5 years ago

    You do realize this is 10,000 years in the future. As well as we are now just coming off the last fourth ice age. Things change. The world will turn, we will adapt. At least those of us who do not panic.

     •  Reply
  46. Cathy aack
    lindz.coop Premium Member over 5 years ago

    Thank you, Wiley.

     •  Reply
  47. Missing large
    jackie59141  over 5 years ago

    Love that you all have so much time to spend on a comic strip comment thread. However, the main problem is and always will be overpopulation.

     •  Reply
  48. Missing large
    gsteele531  over 5 years ago

    Grilled polar bears. Problem solved.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur