I am often offended by the lack of proofreading in published books. Where are the proofreaders? I’m talking homophones that make no sense, or subject/verb agreement errors an elementary school aged child wouldn’t make.
That sounds like an easy job. Just get a stamp that says “Offensive”, and stamp every book with it. I doubt that there’s a book anywhere that doesn’t offend somebody.
Mark Meadows’ publishers are suing him for a million dollars because his “factual” book is full of lies that he refuted in a court of law. Well, DUH . . .
Offensive to anyone except those offended by sloppy usage or spelling. People like that deserve no consideration whatsoever. Hence the mass layoffs of copy editors.
He’s got a point. Bland books make people want to read a lot less. If you think the level of public discourse is low now, wait till we’re all semi-literate ignorami.
I hate to get all logical here, but if a book is offensive to someone, they shouldn’t read it. Ditto boring. Just move on. Someone else might like it and should not be deprived of the option to find out.
BE THIS GUY about 1 year ago
Glad to see Rat dress appropriately for his job.
BasilBruce about 1 year ago
Now that’s the kind of book-checking that we need.
Bilan about 1 year ago
They hired Rat because they know that if there’s nothing offensive, it won’t sell.
Hello Everyone about 1 year ago
Bland is offensive too. Grow a Spine already!
orinoco womble about 1 year ago
I am often offended by the lack of proofreading in published books. Where are the proofreaders? I’m talking homophones that make no sense, or subject/verb agreement errors an elementary school aged child wouldn’t make.
terrapin6000 Premium Member about 1 year ago
Rat works 80 hour work weeks in 2023.
In 2003 this job didn’t even exist.
Imagine about 1 year ago
If it offends you,
don’t read it.
And get some help.
You need it.
iggyman about 1 year ago
Would any book pass?
iggyman about 1 year ago
The “offended” today are looking for attention!
minty_Joe about 1 year ago
It’s only a matter of time, Rat. Then, we’ll be burning books a la Farenheit 451 (Ray Bradbury).
Gandalf about 1 year ago
I’m offended there was nothing offensive in the book!
Purple People Eater about 1 year ago
That sounds like an easy job. Just get a stamp that says “Offensive”, and stamp every book with it. I doubt that there’s a book anywhere that doesn’t offend somebody.
cmerb about 1 year ago
I just love the Rat in those glasses and that tie : )
Steve Dallas about 1 year ago
Heh. The cartoonist who thinks he’ll move to Canada worries about censorship
Ellis97 about 1 year ago
Banned books are always the best.
Croc Holliday about 1 year ago
It’s 2023. It’s pretty much a given that no matter what is said or written, someone will take offense at it.
Goat from PBS about 1 year ago
These days, you can offend someone by saying, “It looks like a nice day today.”
It’s pathetic, really.
SALUDADOG about 1 year ago
I am offended by his bowtie.
monya_43 about 1 year ago
Mark Meadows’ publishers are suing him for a million dollars because his “factual” book is full of lies that he refuted in a court of law. Well, DUH . . .
jel354 about 1 year ago
Where is that “Censor” character when you need him?
prrdh about 1 year ago
Offensive to anyone except those offended by sloppy usage or spelling. People like that deserve no consideration whatsoever. Hence the mass layoffs of copy editors.
pheets about 1 year ago
What IS with this trend of needing to be offended by … ANYthing/E VERYthing, before one even leaves the house?! It’s …. offensive >D
Count Olaf Premium Member about 1 year ago
Yes… The❤️Count and ❤️Rat are both well known for Our Sensitivity.
mindjob about 1 year ago
That’s a job I’d like, but I’m too busy hiding
zwilnik64 about 1 year ago
If you pique no ire, no interest will be piqued?
whelan_jj about 1 year ago
“Fahrenheit 451” is here!
ladykat about 1 year ago
Nobody had better try and censor my books!
CitizenOfTheValley about 1 year ago
The mere fact that such a job exists offends me.
Guybrush Threepwood about 1 year ago
I love you, Rat.
dlaemmerhirt999 about 1 year ago
Evil, nasty Rat is SO STINKIN’ ADORABLE with glasses and a bowtie!!!!
John Jorgensen about 1 year ago
He’s got a point. Bland books make people want to read a lot less. If you think the level of public discourse is low now, wait till we’re all semi-literate ignorami.
AndromedaMike about 1 year ago
Rat made an excellent editorial decision. The best reason for censoring a book is because it’s so boring it just plain sucks.
willie_mctell about 1 year ago
I’m sensitive to literary blandness too.
Moonkey Premium Member about 1 year ago
I hate to get all logical here, but if a book is offensive to someone, they shouldn’t read it. Ditto boring. Just move on. Someone else might like it and should not be deprived of the option to find out.
eddi-TBH about 1 year ago
It will be required reading in Florida and Texas. And the sole approved work for PhD theses in all majors.
Sisyphos about 1 year ago
Rat and Sensitivity do not belong in the same sentence—or in the same universe, for that matter!
[Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce] about 1 year ago
Please review THE ART OF THE DEAL and leave nothing but blank pages
christelisbetty about 1 year ago
All this reminds me of when we were kids. One joke we found hilarious:“Want to hear a dirty joke?”……“OK”….“A Pig fell in the mud”
Otis Rufus Driftwood about 1 year ago
That would be offensive in its own way.
misterblister 5 months ago
rat should be the one MAKING the offensive content