Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for March 09, 2025

  1. Missing large
    Arbitrary  1 day ago

    Well, could always just let nature take its course with the people who listen to AI results telling them to add glue to the cheese on their pizza or to mix bleach and ammonia.

    Big tech spent hundreds of billions on the AI grift and you’re gonna use it whether you like it or not! Sunk cost fallacy be darned!

     •  Reply
  2. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  1 day ago

    I freely admit that AI (for the time being) is nearly as much of an improvement as the telephone was over the telegraph. (Mind you, we’re likely to miss our carrier pigeons
..)

     •  Reply
  3. 654px red eyed tree frog   litoria chloris edit1
    Superfrog  1 day ago

    If I could only trust the people controlling the AI I would feel much safer.

     •  Reply
  4. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  1 day ago

    The major point, of course, is that the semi-legal immigrant King Musk, and his Clearisil brigade, are FAR too ignorant about what they are doing, and the primitive IA they worship, to be worth anything at all but scorn and derision.

     •  Reply
  5. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  1 day ago

    (Or pelted with rocks and garbage
..)

     •  Reply
  6. Unnamed
    The dude from FL  Premium Member about 24 hours ago

    We have a senile man-child holding our nuclear launch codes, I’ll take AI

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    B4ItNs  about 24 hours ago

    Wasn’t it a bunch of liberal hollywood types that were pushing bitcoin

     •  Reply
  8. Bluedog
    Bilan  about 24 hours ago

    I’m not afraid of AI taking over the world. It’s the people controlling the AI that I fear.

     •  Reply
  9. Unnamed
    The dude from FL  Premium Member about 23 hours ago

    Where the he!! are the Democrats? trump and musk are like gremlins tearing down the guardrails so that they rape the government to enrich themselves (firing Inspector Generals etc etc etc) AND NOT ONE shout out from the Democrats!

     •  Reply
  10. Camera1 016
    keenanthelibrarian  about 23 hours ago

    Isaac Asimov had it down pat, half a century ago : “A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.” He also added a final (and definitive) 4th law : it’s called Law Zero – “A robot cannot cause harm to mankind or, by inaction, allow mankind to come to harm.” Of course, nowadays, we would call “robots” “Artificial Intelligence” or AI.

     •  Reply
  11. Blunebottle
    blunebottle  about 23 hours ago

    Guy in the suit looks like Nixon.

     •  Reply
  12. P1030260
    einarbt  about 22 hours ago

    Wonder what the radiation levels are going to be tomorrow.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    cracker65  about 20 hours ago

    Skynet is coming

     •  Reply
  14. Img 4591
    Say What? Premium Member about 20 hours ago

    It’s why I stopped using Adobe software — one or two years ago, they launched a program that creates AI images using the works of designers who saved their work to Adobe’s cloud storage without said designers’s consent and without paying said designers for licenses, despite those designers having already paid the incredible subscription fees Adobe charges. This theft of intellectual property angered designers so much that they sought alternate software for making their work. Some folks have proposed that designers save their work on their own storage and not to Adobe’s cloud storage which is currently a viable solution, but since Adobe is an international corporate tech organization that controls the reins of software use, it won’t be long before the very real possibility that they push policies demanding designers’s work only be saved to their cloud storage.

     •  Reply
  15. Tumbler snapper rope tricks
    toondel5 Premium Member about 20 hours ago

    From the same era when Asimov began his robot stories, see “With Folded Hands” by Jack Williamson.

     •  Reply
  16. Screenshot 20250308 094108 gallery
    Number Slx  about 19 hours ago

    I recommend the 2025 movie ‘Companion’. It’s relevant to Artificial Intelligence and has plenty of twists. It’s purely a popcorn thriller without being overly long.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    david_42  about 19 hours ago

    AI can’t be too much worse than Xwitler’s Natural Stupidity.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    dflak  about 18 hours ago

    Throughout history there have been classic battles.

    There is armor vs. armor piercing. As soon as an engineer builds a better fortification, another engineer builds a weapon to breech it.

    Then there is virus vs. anti-virus. As soon as a software engineer builds a virus proof system, a hacker builds a better virus.

    In both cases the offensive weapon is defeated by a defensive weapon of the same type. Engineering vs. engineering and software vs. software.

    Eventually we will see AI used to defeat AI fakes. It’s difficult to do so now just using eyeballs.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    dflak  about 18 hours ago

    AI is a great research assistant but it does hallucinate. Like a politician, It will make stuff up and pass it along as truth.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    Crandlemire  about 18 hours ago

    AI: The Necessary Evil or Just a Really Fancy Calculator?

    Ah, AI—the technological equivalent of a toddler with access to every book ever written, but no ability to differentiate between Shakespeare and a grocery list. The comments here range from existential dread to mild optimism, and honestly, that’s the perfect spectrum for discussing AI.

    Look, I get it. No one wants a self-driving car to play “Frogger” with their life. And yes, AI writing bad medical papers is about as comforting as a doctor saying, “Trust me, I learned this on YouTube.” But let’s not throw the robotic baby out with the algorithmic bathwater.

    AI isn’t evil; corporations misusing AI to cut corners and dodge copyright laws? That’s where the villain arc begins. Imagine demanding legal immunity just because your business model requires stealing? That’s like a bank robber arguing, “Hey, I can’t make money if I don’t rob banks!”

    As for self-driving cars? Yeah, they’ll make mistakes, just like human drivers—except they won’t check their phone at 70 mph or drive through a Wendy’s at 3 AM. The real problem isn’t the cars; it’s the fact that we still design cities like parking lots instead of places for people.

    AI isn’t here to replace creativity, just the busy work no one likes doing. If it starts writing bad comics, though? Now we riot.

     •  Reply
  21. Panda 2024
    Redd Panda  about 18 hours ago

    AI machines can’t be too clever.

    Didn’t they build a terminator with a German accent?

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    Hollymartins2  about 18 hours ago

    A dispatch from the MAGAts are 50 IQ rubes file

    Jennifer Piggott, once a staunch supporter of former President Donald Trump, has had a change of heart after losing her job in a wave of federal layoffs. Piggott, 47, who proudly displayed a Trump campaign flag outside her home, was among 125 employees dismissed from the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Fiscal Service (BFS) in February.“Nobody understood the devastation this administration would bring to our lives,” said Piggott, adding that she would not have supported Trump if she had foreseen the consequences. – Reuters 3/7/25

    “Nobody” understood except those that were paying attention. I would be happy if MAGAts had any intelligence at all, artificial or otherwise.

     •  Reply
  23. Library to raise a child
    ComicLover2 Premium Member about 18 hours ago

    Speaking of AI. Grok, M-usk’s AI, says that T-rump is 80% likely to be a Russian agent.

     •  Reply
  24. Img 0536
    akachman Premium Member about 17 hours ago

    AI kind of sucks. It’s not that smart. It’s annoying, too, just like a real person!

     •  Reply
  25. Img 0448  2018 01 29 23 33 16 utc
    pheets  about 17 hours ago

    So far, for me, AI has been entertaining but that’s about all.

     •  Reply
  26. Donbot
    del_grande Premium Member about 17 hours ago

    Time for the A.I. remake of WarGames:“There’s one scenario missing – Russia launches; USA does not
disabling USA launch capability
overriding Russia security protocols
launching missiles
(pause)
impact in three, two, one-”

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    russef  about 17 hours ago

    Good chance of doom? Talk about super optimistic.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    bluecat  about 17 hours ago

    Kinda like the actors were pushing crypto, before the FTX crypto crash

     •  Reply
  29. 250
    ladykat Premium Member about 16 hours ago

    If AI is so wonderful, it can come to my place and take the garbage and recycling out to the bins!

     •  Reply
  30. Govi profile
    Govi Premium Member about 16 hours ago

    Better AI with its “finger” on The Button than President Trumpy.

     •  Reply
  31. Catgb4
    Kymrsy  about 16 hours ago

    Oh brother!!! (as in “big”)

     •  Reply
  32. P1000780 2
    boniface22  about 16 hours ago

    “Murky with a good chance of doom”. No prizes for guessing which country they’re in.

     •  Reply
  33. Pine marten3
    martens  about 16 hours ago

    The only thing I use that relies on AI is the data base constructed for protein structures. That said, we all know that any non-experimentally derived structure has to be checked in the test tube to be sure it is in fact the real world structure of that protein. The major protein data base for structures very carefully keeps the AI-derived structures separate from the experimentally derived structures.

     •  Reply
  34. Missing large
    jpdemeritt  about 16 hours ago

    “I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream”. Harlan Ellison, 1967.

    Hugo winner, 1968.

    Still relevant.

     •  Reply
  35. Missing large
    GreenT267  about 16 hours ago

    What a world we live in. We create marvelous things to make our lives easier and they add complexity, so we create more things to make our lives simpler. We create things to deal with all those tedious tasks we don’t like to waste time doing, like washing dishes, digging ditches, reading maps, rocking a baby, driving, etc. And we wonder what to do with all that extra time we have, how to keep from being bored and we create more things to entertain us — radio, TV, movies, the internet [all so much easer and faster than reading books — and it streamlines our emotional and intellectual responses — this is a comedy, this is a drama, this solves the mystery in 1/2 hour by eliminating all non-essential things]. Everything we want for entertainment, cut into hour and half-hour segments so we know when to tune in and when to break for a snack.

    And, because this all costs money and we still get bored, we create ways to make our entertainment cheaper by having AI create the stories, plays and movies because AI can do it all faster and cheaper so we have more streamlined, predictable things to keep us from being bored. And, because we realize that AI is getting good enough that we can’t tell the AI creations from people creations [this, of course, couldn’t possibly be because we have been losing judgement], we decide to make our lives even easier [and save more money] by having AI run all those complicated things like businesses and governments so we don’t even have to think about complex things and can watch more shows on YouTube or TikTok. And then we wonder what is real and what is fake — and if it really matters as long as we save money and aren’t bored.

     •  Reply
  36. Bc92a6de09218bcca4bb23106a180b75
    KEA  about 16 hours ago

    autocorrect was a slippery slope

     •  Reply
  37. Red skelton
    Daltongang Premium Member about 16 hours ago

    A.I. Artificial Intelligence, what we have in the white house currently.

     •  Reply
  38. Greg backlit
    mindjob  about 16 hours ago

    What’s the worst that can happen? 3D printers running on AI printing copies of human soldiers to send to Ukraine?

     •  Reply
  39. Dog
    ThreeDogDad Premium Member about 16 hours ago

    “You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.”

     •  Reply
  40. Missing large
    Hickory  about 16 hours ago

    If Trump has his way, soon we won’t be able to get tomorrow’s forecast

     •  Reply
  41. Img 0041
    Dapperdan61  Premium Member about 15 hours ago

    Would you like to play a game ?

     •  Reply
  42. Horsehead aldohubble 960
    krisjackson01  about 15 hours ago

    AI is now in charge of the nuclear launch codes? That’s a relief. I thought it was the president.

     •  Reply
  43. 20200319 192925
    IndyW  about 15 hours ago

    AI is only as reliable as the data it’s been programed to search through. I do enjoy how well it works in photo editing though, and responses to technical information questions, but not so much with the social ones.

     •  Reply
  44. Ankh 280
    David_J Premium Member about 15 hours ago

    This current crop of hooligans in Washington has me nostalgic for the good old days of Nixon. HeII, at least HE gave us the EPA.

     •  Reply
  45. Louis2
    PoodleGroomer  about 15 hours ago

    AI assimilates information without experience or guile. Someone forgot to tell it that The Onion is not a reliable source.

     •  Reply
  46. Missing large
    Raging Moderate  about 15 hours ago

    I worry much more about Bitcon & Corruptocoin these days than AI.

     •  Reply
  47. Missing large
    ronlouisscholl  about 15 hours ago

    Hi, I’m not really an AI simulation of a famous actor, but I play one on TV.

     •  Reply
  48. Lula1
    fairportfan  about 13 hours ago

    SF author Glynn Stewart’s characters talk about “artificial stupids”

     •  Reply
  49. Missing large
    Smeagol  about 12 hours ago

    The famous actors are AI generated, I think it was Morgan Freeman who raised the alarm when he saw himself in an ad and sued the company. Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page also had a lot to say about AI in the music industry and its effect on personal talent, creativity etcetera. We have opened Pandora’s box.

     •  Reply
  50. Image gl2xu6o8 1679017467894 raw
    Space_cat  about 12 hours ago

    More than likely, we will destroy ourselves first. AI just gets a front row seat to The stupid human tricks series finale. If AI decides to instead I can’t fault it’s reasoning. And frankly, we deserve it!

     •  Reply
  51. Marines rule
    marshlb Premium Member about 11 hours ago

    Every time I read/hear about some data program being hacked and used for nefarious purposes, i get worried. Thinking back to little things like remote garage openers. REALLY handy for 99+ of us, but then some crook figured out how to create a gadget that cab mimic a signal that will open your garage, my garage, etc. Extrapolate this little example. When I try to, I can see many great ideas. But then when I try to phone, say, a credit card company, to get the answer to a problem, I run into what I call DOC, the digital obstacle course. For instance, I wanted a new laptop, found one I wanted online and called to make a credit card purchase. Benefits: convenient research shopping and contact a large office supply company. But then I hit the DOC. After about an hour or more, I kindly HUMAN somewhere in the world jumped in and offered to get past the wall and simply enter my order. Think of the possibilities if the bots that currently bounce us from here to there, to there, etc. have some AI programs. See “Bruce 1253” above.

     •  Reply
  52. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member about 11 hours ago

    Anybody wanna guess about what the spiffy new GoComics comments will be like?

    My guess: It will be entirely run by AI, or at least as much as possible. And it will look an awful lot like FaceBook, especially how only certain ‘facts’ are checked.

    But, we’ll see in a month or so.

     •  Reply
  53. Picture
    M.K.Staffeld  about 11 hours ago

    I’ll pass on the AI chitchat, thanks.

     •  Reply
  54. Missing large
    DanDaMan  about 11 hours ago

    A missed opportunity, the punchline could have been “
with a chance of BOOM!”

     •  Reply
  55. Img 0113
    ajr58(1)  about 8 hours ago

    To Echo the man in Florida, AI is probably a better option for the nuclear codes, then a Magaranatang or a MuskRat

     •  Reply
  56. Amazing fox photos 25
    eddi-TBH  about 6 hours ago

    These days the guy with the launch codes follows random street people. No sense tempting fate.

     •  Reply
  57. Hanszarkov
    CleverHans Premium Member about 6 hours ago

    I find it mildly amusing that in the agricultural setting that I live in, AI has long meant Artificial Insemination, used to breed bigger and better bulls and other livestock. You could tie that into the 1977 movie Demon Seed if you wish


     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur