The is the same Calvin who has no trouble graphing his farther’s performance. BTW, the diagonal would be more like 6.7, but it’s still the wrong answer.
The answer is a square number. If you grab opposite corners of the square at the ends of the dotted line and stretch it out until it’s flat, you’ll get the correct answer.
Hobbes declared what I’ve been calling for ages. Let the unknown quantity be called Y from now on, and let’s give X some rest from being hounded by everybody.
I am good in the new math, so I can try explaining it better. Basically that line Y makes a triangle, so this is a geometry problem. First discovered by Pythagoras. He discovered that the square of the sides gives you the answer. So 6 squared plus 3 squared equals 45. Now the next step, 4 plus 5 equals 9, and there is your answer.
Hobbes’s math is certainly more imaginative than Calvin’s. He proves at the end of this 3-week story arc that he is actually better at Math than Calvin as well. He’s better at most things than Calvin is, of course.
That diagonal would have to measure as the square root of 45 (a2 + b2 = 36+9, so c2 = 45, in this case), or approximately 6.7, but Hobbes didn’t draw it right, since a right triangle with legs of 6 and 3 units is half of a rectangle, not a square. ;)
Pythagoras just called in and said that no way is the diagonal equal to two In fact it’s three times the square root of five. Both Calvin and Hobbes give up.
Guess you have to do this in 3 steps or phases “why” I don’t know. A “delta” connected transformer winding is connected between phases of a three-phase system. A (Y) “wye” transformer connects each winding from a phase wire to a common neutral point. A single three-phase transformer can be used, or three single-phase transformers.
Hobbes represents Calvin’s imaginary friend. Considering the complexities of Hobbes’s interactions, he may actually be representing Calvin’s underlying schizophrenic tendencies. Of course, we all treat Calvin as a real child. He ain’t; and that’s a good thing. He’s entertaining; and that’s a great thing.
When I was in grade school, every kid 1-8 was given a Numberaid abacus. I was in first grade. Second grade they took them away and started some rubbish called New Math New Math, as Harvard mathematician Tom Leher declared, “was so simple, so very simple that only a child could do it.” Watterson rediscovered it thirty five years ago. I was so glad for the advent of the pocket calculator to replace my long lamented abacus. My check book ledger always reconciles with my bank statement.https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/search/object/nmah_1761888
When I was younger, I tried this. I used a ruler and measured out 6 inches on one side and 3 on the other. The diagonal measured 6.75. Next, I tried dividing both numbers by 2 (since the opposite side would make the full number.) So I measured out 3 inches on one side and 1.5 on the other. The diagonal measured 3.7 – which is actually close to 6 MINUS 3!
I remember how difficult I found “higher math” to be in high school and college. At least when going for my current degree I worked harder and kept on practicing and studying, and I got a B+ in my college algebra class. (When going for said degree I got all As and Bs, including all As for a couple semesters.) And yes, I know math well enough to know Hobbes’s explanation is a bunch of baloney.
I don’t exactly know why, but this stupid homework solution really made me laugh this morning. Damn right, if you’re going to try and deal with higher numbers, you’d better use that higher math. Right on, Hobbes.
There came a point, sometime over 50 years ago, when I learned that if I did my homework, all the Bla-bla-bla of the teacher in class made sense. If I was called on, I could answer correctly. It was an epiphany. I wish somebody had told me that a little sooner.
I was always taught that unknown variables are at the end of the alphabet, like w,x,y,z; known variables at the beginning, such as a,b,c,d, and invariant constants in the middle, like k.
BE THIS GUY about 4 years ago
Here’s hoping Calvin’s parents check his homework.
The Calvinosaurus That Calvin Wanted To Discover about 4 years ago
The Pythagorean Theorem should come in handy here.
Templo S.U.D. about 4 years ago
9
Kymberleigh about 4 years ago
Cue Tom Lehrer’s “New Math”.
Space_Owl on GoComics about 4 years ago
Ah yes, I totally remember all of this from school. Lol, no I don’t. I swept everything under the rug after graduation.
Renatus Profuturus Frigeridus Premium Member about 4 years ago
I would say 9. But my school memories are too far away and something may have changed since then.
Robert4170 about 4 years ago
The is the same Calvin who has no trouble graphing his farther’s performance. BTW, the diagonal would be more like 6.7, but it’s still the wrong answer.
jimrh74 about 4 years ago
Y=approx. 6.7
Robin Harwood about 4 years ago
Calvin, don’t listen to Hobbes! You have to draw both diagonals, add them together, and then divide by ten.
sirbadger about 4 years ago
The answer is a square number. If you grab opposite corners of the square at the ends of the dotted line and stretch it out until it’s flat, you’ll get the correct answer.
mi_sbs about 4 years ago
Everyone knows the answer is 63
nosirrom about 4 years ago
In “New Math” they estimate the answer, so the answer is 10.
thepinkbaroness about 4 years ago
Why would they change math? Math is math.
su43dipta about 4 years ago
Hobbes declared what I’ve been calling for ages. Let the unknown quantity be called Y from now on, and let’s give X some rest from being hounded by everybody.
Charliegirl Premium Member about 4 years ago
That’s pretty much the technique I used in Algebra class. Never could get the hang of it.
Topcat05 Premium Member about 4 years ago
If they are going to make this a pathagorean calculation; the answer is Sq Rt of 45
Bob. about 4 years ago
Use your fingers, Calvin.
MelanieAltheaMoore Premium Member about 4 years ago
Well, Hobbes is right about one thing. If y=6+3, then y actually IS a square.
jpayne4040 about 4 years ago
Well, if you can get to the right answer in the end…
dcdete. about 4 years ago
I am good in the new math, so I can try explaining it better. Basically that line Y makes a triangle, so this is a geometry problem. First discovered by Pythagoras. He discovered that the square of the sides gives you the answer. So 6 squared plus 3 squared equals 45. Now the next step, 4 plus 5 equals 9, and there is your answer.
Troglodyte about 4 years ago
Higher Math, all right. This is the kind of mathematics you can dream up when you’re “high”…
Mr_Cool about 4 years ago
I love the fact that BW actually shows us the “working”.
Little Caesar about 4 years ago
Think about it, there must be higher math,
Down in the heart or hidden in the stars above
Calvinist1966 about 4 years ago
Hobbes’s math is certainly more imaginative than Calvin’s. He proves at the end of this 3-week story arc that he is actually better at Math than Calvin as well. He’s better at most things than Calvin is, of course.
Guilty Bystander about 4 years ago
So THIS is how Common Core got started. Nobody could figure it out then, either.
belgarathmth about 4 years ago
That diagonal would have to measure as the square root of 45 (a2 + b2 = 36+9, so c2 = 45, in this case), or approximately 6.7, but Hobbes didn’t draw it right, since a right triangle with legs of 6 and 3 units is half of a rectangle, not a square. ;)
VegaAlopex about 4 years ago
Pythagoras just called in and said that no way is the diagonal equal to two In fact it’s three times the square root of five. Both Calvin and Hobbes give up.
joegeethree about 4 years ago
Hobbes invented Common Core math. Who woulda thunk it?
Pet about 4 years ago
I had a flashback to my dad trying to teach me maths at age 9!
A Hip loving Canadian... about 4 years ago
This higher math is like the Chinese philosopher… very Confucius.
dflak about 4 years ago
1 is approximately equal to 2, especially for large values of 1.
kartis about 4 years ago
A real world example of fuzzy logic.
Billys mom2022 about 4 years ago
My grandson had math like that. It is called common core.
Diat60 about 4 years ago
This is the same math used by governments to work out their budgets.
Norris66 about 4 years ago
Guess you have to do this in 3 steps or phases “why” I don’t know. A “delta” connected transformer winding is connected between phases of a three-phase system. A (Y) “wye” transformer connects each winding from a phase wire to a common neutral point. A single three-phase transformer can be used, or three single-phase transformers.
Calvins Brother about 4 years ago
42
chick485 about 4 years ago
I don’t get why y’all are having so much trouble with this one. It makes perfect sense when compared with “new math”.
mountainclimber about 4 years ago
“god invented the integers. the rest is the work of man.” (Kronecker)
gantech about 4 years ago
You mean, that’s not the right answer??
JoJoline about 4 years ago
Yo Pythagoras! How could the diagonal be under 2 in any universe? It’s 6.7.
vaughnrl2003 Premium Member about 4 years ago
Ah yes. New math. I hear all who want to be executives on Wall Street have to take intense classes to learn it.
kathleenhicks62 about 4 years ago
Just count fingers and toes.
assrdood about 4 years ago
Pi are round, cake are square!
sonnygreen about 4 years ago
Hobbes represents Calvin’s imaginary friend. Considering the complexities of Hobbes’s interactions, he may actually be representing Calvin’s underlying schizophrenic tendencies. Of course, we all treat Calvin as a real child. He ain’t; and that’s a good thing. He’s entertaining; and that’s a great thing.
countoftowergrove about 4 years ago
When I was in grade school, every kid 1-8 was given a Numberaid abacus. I was in first grade. Second grade they took them away and started some rubbish called New Math New Math, as Harvard mathematician Tom Leher declared, “was so simple, so very simple that only a child could do it.” Watterson rediscovered it thirty five years ago. I was so glad for the advent of the pocket calculator to replace my long lamented abacus. My check book ledger always reconciles with my bank statement.https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/search/object/nmah_1761888
jsimpso1 about 4 years ago
No, the Diagonal of 6 & 3 is approximately 6.7Hobbes does need to draw a bigger square.
jmac60 about 4 years ago
Looks like common core math
swanridge about 4 years ago
If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS.
mistercatworks about 4 years ago
Work it out with cans of tuna.
BiggerNate91 about 4 years ago
When I was younger, I tried this. I used a ruler and measured out 6 inches on one side and 3 on the other. The diagonal measured 6.75. Next, I tried dividing both numbers by 2 (since the opposite side would make the full number.) So I measured out 3 inches on one side and 1.5 on the other. The diagonal measured 3.7 – which is actually close to 6 MINUS 3!
johndifool about 4 years ago
√45 ?
DanWolfie about 4 years ago
I remember how difficult I found “higher math” to be in high school and college. At least when going for my current degree I worked harder and kept on practicing and studying, and I got a B+ in my college algebra class. (When going for said degree I got all As and Bs, including all As for a couple semesters.) And yes, I know math well enough to know Hobbes’s explanation is a bunch of baloney.
tims145 about 4 years ago
Why would they need to when you have an actual tiger giving you the answer!
Earnestly Frank about 4 years ago
He should ask Lou Costello to explain it:
https://youtu.be/xkbQDEXJy2k
chromosome Premium Member about 4 years ago
Purple, because aliens don’t wear hats.
su43dipta about 4 years ago
At least Calvin remembers something from the class!
delennwen about 4 years ago
Calvin does polls and graphs, writes great poems, has an amazing vocabulary for his age. . . but can’t do 6 + 3?
DCBakerEsq about 4 years ago
Finally, math made simple.
ridenslide65 about 4 years ago
Common Core techniques being employed here…..
KEA about 4 years ago
Believe it or not, I had students who used stranger “reasoning” than that.
garysmigs about 4 years ago
with a lot of fudging you can almost make man-made climate change seem a wee bit possible…
hagarthehorrible about 4 years ago
Hobbes into higher order pythagoras theorem. This feline is way ahead of Calvin’s academics.
TheCoosBayBachelor about 4 years ago
I don’t exactly know why, but this stupid homework solution really made me laugh this morning. Damn right, if you’re going to try and deal with higher numbers, you’d better use that higher math. Right on, Hobbes.
rogredford about 4 years ago
New math works this way, doesn’t it?
Ray about 4 years ago
Reminds me of my days struggling with Integral Calculus.
Ka`ōnōhi`ula`okahōkūmiomio`ehiku Premium Member about 4 years ago
Nein!
willie_mctell about 4 years ago
The square root of 45 is between 6 and 7. Calvin can’t measure either. :-)
admiree2 about 4 years ago
Hey Hobbes, call the guys who wrote the US Tax Code and explain to them what they meant but did not write.
GreggW Premium Member about 4 years ago
This is how “A Beautiful Mind” should have started.
Charlie Fogwhistle about 4 years ago
There came a point, sometime over 50 years ago, when I learned that if I did my homework, all the Bla-bla-bla of the teacher in class made sense. If I was called on, I could answer correctly. It was an epiphany. I wish somebody had told me that a little sooner.
spaced man spliff about 4 years ago
I was always taught that unknown variables are at the end of the alphabet, like w,x,y,z; known variables at the beginning, such as a,b,c,d, and invariant constants in the middle, like k.
mendedpunk333 about 4 years ago
wait is hobbes imaginary or is he real? just a question…
queenoftut about 4 years ago
It’s that d@*^ed common core math!!!
spaced man spliff about 4 years ago
Once upon a time sine and cosine were about math. Later on they alluded to new car loans. Now they bring to mind releases to do medical procedures.
Thinkingblade about 4 years ago
The really funny thing – at least to me – is that in fact 9 is a perfect square. :-)
Sailor46 USN 65-95 about 4 years ago
Mathematics is made of formulas, proofs, and in Calvin’s and Hobbs’s case 90 percent imagination
John Jorgensen about 4 years ago
Hobbes is right, the answer IS a square number.
gawkface about 4 years ago
Every answer is the correct answer if we agree to disagree
leopardglily about 2 years ago
This is me learning algebra. I’m in math right now actually. So boring.