The real reason is that reality shows are cheap to make. And as H.L.Mencken wrote, nobody went broke by underestimating the taste of the American public.
So-called “reality shows” feature people who can’t act trying futilely to act, people who can’t write, the same, people who can’t direct, the same, and people who can’t produce, the same. FUTILE. And watched by people who can’t think …..
That’s how I assume David Zaslav got his position. Still wonder what dirt he has on the board members because nobody that incompetent should have that job otherwise.
Reality TV came about when networks needed to fill airtime during a writers strike, so they needed unscripted shows. Unfortunately, it showed how much cheaper it was to make dreck like that and we haven’t been able to get rid of them.
I’ve only seen the commercials for those shows. Seems they have gone out of their way to include the ‘less well’ equipped. They remind me of Candid Camera, but include more people with hat sized IQ’s
I trace it back to supermarket tabloids. Clever to put them in supermarkets, near checkout stands. The supermarket/grocery story is a place that people rely on and generally feel good about — the products are safe, the environment clean, etc. They provide seasonal items in time for the seasons. They have things you need, when you need them. And, while you may grip about the costs, you trust the products. If the ground beef package says 94%, you know it only has 6% fat. Packaged products show ingredients, calories, ‘use by’ dates, etc. You can feel [please don’t squeeze] produce and select what you want. The store provides [well, until recently] a lot of service — carts to put your purchases in, bags for your purchases and people to pack them and even help you load your car. So, a ‘newspaper’ at the check-out stand seems like something you should be able to trust.
Ergo, “reality” shows, shown during family-friendly time [7-9 pm], on your friendly local station [following its coverage of state and ‘local’ news, school football scores [and featuring high school football or basketball game every Friday night], should be just as trustworthy. . . [Yes, I know that family-friendly time was not made a policy until ’75, but it was a common practice before that.]
Hello Everyone about 9 hours ago
There’s no “fact checking” anymore anyway…
just-passing-by about 9 hours ago
And canceled Firefly.
chassimmons Premium Member about 9 hours ago
The real reason is that reality shows are cheap to make. And as H.L.Mencken wrote, nobody went broke by underestimating the taste of the American public.
Bilan about 9 hours ago
To be fair, AI would probably come up with the same conclusion. Whatever makes money without taking any chances.
Godfreydaniel about 9 hours ago
So-called “reality shows” feature people who can’t act trying futilely to act, people who can’t write, the same, people who can’t direct, the same, and people who can’t produce, the same. FUTILE. And watched by people who can’t think …..
MY DOG IS MY CO PILOT about 9 hours ago
Actually, this makes perfect sense.
Arbitrary about 9 hours ago
That’s how I assume David Zaslav got his position. Still wonder what dirt he has on the board members because nobody that incompetent should have that job otherwise.
Superfrog about 9 hours ago
If it wasn’t true then it should be.
Scorpio Premium Member about 9 hours ago
I believe that – explains so much
The dude from FL Premium Member about 8 hours ago
Both Meta and X are trump friendly now
Can't Sleep about 8 hours ago
Yeah. Whoever thought of following the Kardashians around with a camera didn’t have a brain, but sure made money.
blunebottle about 8 hours ago
I’ll believe it. My son was in one…the director told him: “Stand here and look like you’re doing this.”
crosscompiler Premium Member about 8 hours ago
TV free since ’82; pray tell, has humanity destroyed TV, or has TV destroyed humanity? My working theory has been “yes”.
boneroller42 about 8 hours ago
Ummm actually, that explains a whole lot about “reality” television.
breathfreshair Premium Member about 7 hours ago
Sounds about right.
danielmkimmel about 6 hours ago
Is Zuckerberg an alien looking to conquer Earth? Gosh, I don’t know. If only there was a way to fact check such claims.
Hidden-in-the-Trees Premium Member about 5 hours ago
TBH, I don’t think Wiley is wrong.
Egrayjames about 3 hours ago
Reality shows are just modern Village Idiot Parades.
zmech13 Premium Member about 3 hours ago
Reality TV came about when networks needed to fill airtime during a writers strike, so they needed unscripted shows. Unfortunately, it showed how much cheaper it was to make dreck like that and we haven’t been able to get rid of them.
No 6 about 3 hours ago
Now who else do we know who wears a blue suit and a red tie?
Hmmmmm…
dflak about 3 hours ago
Reality TV is like spam: cheap to produce and there are people gullible enough to fall for it.
CountOlaf2.0 Premium Member about 3 hours ago
Perfectly explains all those baking and cooking shows.
Tresix about 2 hours ago
Probably heartless as well.
Hogryder about 2 hours ago
I wondered how they came up with ‘Survivor’ and all the dreck that has followed!
sandpiper about 2 hours ago
I’ve only seen the commercials for those shows. Seems they have gone out of their way to include the ‘less well’ equipped. They remind me of Candid Camera, but include more people with hat sized IQ’s
rickseg about 2 hours ago
Our TV broke down 5 years ago. We didn’t bother to replace it. From the comments here it looks like we didn’t miss much.
baskate_2000 about 2 hours ago
Sadly, this fits.
Redd Panda about 1 hour ago
We have a TV. There are some great programs, if you look for them. Sadly the ratio of crap to good is 95/5. Oh well.
Anything with Richard Attenborough, always top shelf.
Kilrwat Premium Member about 1 hour ago
“Reality” shows are nauseating.
GreenT267 about 1 hour ago
I trace it back to supermarket tabloids. Clever to put them in supermarkets, near checkout stands. The supermarket/grocery story is a place that people rely on and generally feel good about — the products are safe, the environment clean, etc. They provide seasonal items in time for the seasons. They have things you need, when you need them. And, while you may grip about the costs, you trust the products. If the ground beef package says 94%, you know it only has 6% fat. Packaged products show ingredients, calories, ‘use by’ dates, etc. You can feel [please don’t squeeze] produce and select what you want. The store provides [well, until recently] a lot of service — carts to put your purchases in, bags for your purchases and people to pack them and even help you load your car. So, a ‘newspaper’ at the check-out stand seems like something you should be able to trust.
Ergo, “reality” shows, shown during family-friendly time [7-9 pm], on your friendly local station [following its coverage of state and ‘local’ news, school football scores [and featuring high school football or basketball game every Friday night], should be just as trustworthy. . . [Yes, I know that family-friendly time was not made a policy until ’75, but it was a common practice before that.]
tee929 about 1 hour ago
I would just change the last line by Captain Eddie to “Reality Politician’s” …..
JosephShriver about 1 hour ago
I would agree. The only “reality” shows I watch are “Who do you think you are”, “Relative Race” and “Finding Your Roots”
hawkeye1201 about 1 hour ago
I have only one channel…Fox News!
Cerabooge 7 minutes ago
When I see a misreality show, I miss reality.