Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for September 05, 2021

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 3 years ago

    We could have round robin match if we had couple more viable parties.

     •  Reply
  2. Ding a ling
    BasilBruce  about 3 years ago

    Looks like Red Guy doesn’t know where Blue Guy’s face is. That’s nuts.

     •  Reply
  3. Cane immagine animata 0071
    Renatus Profuturus Frigeridus Premium Member about 3 years ago

    We have many parties. And every day it is a fight against everyone.

     •  Reply
  4. Gocomicsluna2
    Leojim  about 3 years ago

    Wow, that pretty much sums it up……..unfortunately.

     •  Reply
  5. Badger 4 360
    sirbadger  about 3 years ago

    The best way to get work done is to filibuster.

     •  Reply
  6. Ttle caesar 1931 behind the scenes making film 01
    Little Caesar  about 3 years ago

    “I’m for the 2 party system… One on Friday night, one on Saturday night.”

     •  Reply
  7. Gt r at vmi jdp
    salakfarm Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Manchin, the killer.

     •  Reply
  8. Egil skallagrimsson
    Kveldulf  about 3 years ago

    There is only one system worse than a two-party system and that is a one-party system. Much of the world can attest to that. Having three or more parties (Canada has five parties with seats in Parliament right now, plus a slew of fringe parties whose candidates seldom get more than a hundred votes) does allow for a more graduated approach to voting but the violent lunatic fringe is now making its appearance even here.

    The real solution is to have people of good will on each side willing to compromise with each other. “Compromise” has been a slur ever since the Tea Party ousted the Republicans.

    Forgive the gaps in my logic. I need to go to bed.

     •  Reply
  9. B986e866 14d0 4607 bdb4 5d76d7b56ddb
    Templo S.U.D.  about 3 years ago

    ain’t US politics grand?

     •  Reply
  10. Img 3705
    Jesy Bertz Premium Member about 3 years ago

    We want to Fill potholes but all we get are Filibusters.

     •  Reply
  11. Ann margaret
    Caldonia  about 3 years ago

    There’s already so much stuff that shouldn’t be considered political issues that freaks have made into political issues. Let’s just bring back the zeebas.

     •  Reply
  12. Noodleman 2  2
    Cornelius Noodleman  about 3 years ago

    Let prison chain gangs fix the roads.

     •  Reply
  13. Eveningledger connie
    Johnny Q Premium Member about 3 years ago

    The two-party system serves the two parties, and that’s it. What the USA needs (and Canada) is a system of proportional representation. The best one is Germany’s mixed system, under which most MPs are still elected directly, but a third of the seats are allotted so that overall representation is as close to the popular vote as possible.

     •  Reply
  14. Img 1289
    Zykoic  about 3 years ago

    A one party system is very EFFICIENT. Many historical examples. Some day we will all be Democrats* and be happy. No more bickering. Ruled my science and guided by the ideals of the great party leaders! /s

    *Feel free to substitute the party of your choice.

     •  Reply
  15. 2006 afl collingwood
    nosirrom  about 3 years ago

    They forgot because serving the country is a lower priority than serving the party.

     •  Reply
  16. Grandbudapesthotel cr alamy
    Imagine  about 3 years ago

    Not realistic. There is not even agreement on what is needed (such as a new road). And, typically, if blue does agree with red on something then red will turn around and block it or deny it.

     •  Reply
  17. 100 3924
    jessie d.  about 3 years ago

    When you see a parity between the GOP and the Democrats, it is time to hang up your drawing pencil Pastis.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    juicebruce  about 3 years ago

    Pig what part of the punching did you like ?

     •  Reply
  19. Rays
    TampaFanatic1  about 3 years ago

    The red guy dropped a kick in the cojones to the guy in blue. Reminds me of how Merrick Garland was treated when he was up for SCOTUS consideration.

     •  Reply
  20. Rays
    TampaFanatic1  about 3 years ago

    Where are the lobbyists from Big Oil, Pharmaceutics, Healthcare conglomerates and the banking and criminal justice institutions? These are the one percenters who have probably bought out the guys (also one percenters thanks to the conglomerates) who are kicking the crap out of each other in this Pastis cartoon. In the end run the lobbyists seem to deem what bills make it through congress not what is common sense and good for society in general.

     •  Reply
  21. Gentbear3b1a
    Gent  about 3 years ago

    Yeah, you can enjoys more in a multi party system. All the hung parliaments, unstable governments, horse trading, etc etc.

     •  Reply
  22. Forbear
    Qiset  about 3 years ago

    I can’t wait until the Aaron Burr inspired episode.

     •  Reply
  23. Mrpeabodyboysherman
    iggyman  about 3 years ago

    Get rid of the parties, elect individuals on their merit, but how many voters would take the time to check them out? Probably have “pretty boys and girls” running the country!

     •  Reply
  24. 6bb13e58 cb3c 48af a666 62de44194956
    Pgalden1 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Pig…I’m thinking you mean Pun-Ching Like cha-Ching, or ba-da-boom Seems out of your character to like violence…with hearts! is this a Pastis set-up???

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    Zoturdley Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Term limits, people. Power corrupts. It doesn’t matter which party you speak of.

     •  Reply
  26. Animal bird feathers 158087
    jimchronister2016  about 3 years ago

    So Sad, that politics are the norm now and for the most part controlled by big money, not your vote, only because too many lazy withdrawn people DO NOT VOTE!

     •  Reply
  27. Peppermint
    Sir Ruddy Blighter, Jr.  about 3 years ago

    “Let’s just agree to disagree…no wait: let’s just agree, THEN disagree!”

     •  Reply
  28. Zero
    zerotvus  about 3 years ago

    you forgot the part when they pocket the money for the job.

     •  Reply
  29. Boston
    MS72  about 3 years ago

    Why don’t the road builders start their own party?

     •  Reply
  30. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  about 3 years ago

    Why are we so divided?

     •  Reply
  31. Ignatz
    Ignatz Premium Member about 3 years ago

    The Electoral College creates a two-party system, since you need a majority – not a plurality – of the College to win the Presidency. Three strong parties means that Congress picks the President.

    Both the Republicans and the Democrats are coalitions of smaller groups that have joined together to get 51%. And since the Electoral College is enshrined in the Constitution, good luck getting rid of it. You would need the approval of the people who benefit from it to do that.

    Remember when everybody thought the American system was the best in the world?

     •  Reply
  32. 1017207 10200214106421862 492754112 n
    Cameron1988 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Hey, it’s Terrance and Phillip!

     •  Reply
  33. E5aac87a 4e79 4600 9ffd 2cb871ca96db
    David in Webb Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Yes, our roads need fixed. However, a $1 trillion (or $3.5 trillion) infrastructure bill is such a lie. Only a fraction of it went to infrastructure. The rest went to pet projects. It’s kinda like a gas tax hike in Missouri that failed. The title of the hike was for roads. Reading the bill showed the majority went to the highway patrol. It failed at the ballot box. I would have voted for it if ALL of it went to its intended purpose.

     •  Reply
  34. Hopper oneal mini
    YippiKiAyMofo  about 3 years ago

    Frankly, I despise both parties and identify with neither. Unless we somehow find a middle ground in this nation then we are doomed. And, tbh, call it a waste of a vote if you want, I’ll write in the name of my neighbor’s dog before I vote for a dem or repub again. I don’t identify with the policy and planks of the democratic party/platform and the repubs have turned into a bunch of stark raving loons! Yep, color me done with the 2-party system.

     •  Reply
  35. Img 20230721 103439220 hdr
    kaffekup   about 3 years ago

    The strip has it all wrong, but I know there are space limitations. Here’s how it really went:

    “We need road repairs. Let’s float a bond to pay for them.”

    “We need road repairs. Let’s let billionaires pay for it, in exchange for making it a toll road for forty years. Despite the fact that the taxpayers paid to have it built in the first place, now they can pay to drive on it, too!”

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    Brian Collis  about 3 years ago

    forgot the part where the blue party tries to actually fix the road, but the red party steals all the funds and gives them to rich people to hoard

     •  Reply
  37. Huckandfish
    Huckleberry Hiroshima  about 3 years ago

    Excellent point, Stephan.

     •  Reply
  38. 05a762eb aaea 4e9f 8ff2 c6c8a7f85ba9
    kartis  about 3 years ago

    A two party systems is like having two dirty shirts. You are always choosing between the less dirty one without ever cleaning them. (Piet Hein – I may have the quote somewhat wrong).

     •  Reply
  39. Photo 1501706362039 c06b2d715385
    Zebrastripes  about 3 years ago

    Problem is some people who have the knowledge don’t have the money to run!

     •  Reply
  40. Image
    diskus Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Two parties is even worse with social media added

     •  Reply
  41. Image
    diskus Premium Member about 3 years ago

    I watch absolutly zero news and that helps alot. Unfortunately it spills over to comics sometimes, you can run but not hide

     •  Reply
  42. Td icon60
    hmofo813 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    It’s always nice when it’s a Sunday and it isn’t another of those stupid forced-“pun” strips.

     •  Reply
  43. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 3 years ago

    A certain group won’t do the right thing.

     •  Reply
  44. 3540301777 e380648263
    bbbmorrell  about 3 years ago

    Infrastructure week! Two enter, none come out!

     •  Reply
  45. Screenshot 2021 01 02 at 5.26.24 pm  1
    paragon  about 3 years ago

    Y’know, I think maybe everyone should listen to him.

     •  Reply
  46. Yakko
    TheBigPickle  about 3 years ago

    No no no, this is all wrong… the first panel is unrealistic. They never would have both agreed on something.

     •  Reply
  47. Missing large
    RussHeim  about 3 years ago

    Red guy will tell you taxes are too high and that government wastes too much money, so taxes shouldn’t be raised to pay for road repair. Blue guy will tell you that we are too reliant on cars and the internal combustion engine and are harming the environment, so we should pay for transit instead of fixing roads.

     •  Reply
  48. Humphrey the bear
    Spence12 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    “But I’ll only give the people their needed road if I can also get funded for a special commission counting hedgehogs in West Nigeria. I suppose you, too, have similar funding needs so we can finally agree on this bill. Then we can proudly say we’re serving the people.”

     •  Reply
  49. 6892211ffa124d5d1e5f7ae1bbce02db  pearls google images
    _lounger_  about 3 years ago

    oh, trust me, you’re so lucky having just two…

     •  Reply
  50. 96480   copy  2
    Goat from PBS  about 3 years ago

    Why must politics be so divided? Can we not agree on something else?

     •  Reply
  51. Img 4475
    carlosrivers  about 3 years ago

    Forget the politicians, I’d love to see a knock down, drag out debate between Conservative radio and progressive radio. Together on live TV. Make it pay-per-view, with 100% of the fee going to the veterans committee. Each side tells their story, but only to one side, theirs. I would love to se a show where Fox News “reporters” presents their version of a subject, and maybe, Thom Hartman presents the progressive side, and vice versa. Because these are the sources of what every politician says in public…

     •  Reply
  52. Gameguy49
    Gameguy49 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    The “two-party” system is supposed to be what provides the checks and balances to get the road fixed at the lowest cost and with the superior quality to make it last. (“supposed to be”)

     •  Reply
  53. Missing large
    wongo  about 3 years ago

    Why don’t we just have a monarchy and get it over with,(I will be the King)

     •  Reply
  54. Rustfungus2a
    Cerabooge  about 3 years ago

    While it’s obvious that they’re talking about repairing an existing road, they both agree that a new road is needed. That’s the LAST thing that’s needed. New roads take money away from maintenance of existing roads, they wreck neighborhoods and ecosystems, and they generate pollution and more CO2 both in their construction and use.

    Too bad the two parties never disagree when it comes to paving more of the planet..

     •  Reply
  55. Desron14
    Masterskrain  about 3 years ago

    PASTIS NAILS IT AGAIN!!!!

     •  Reply
  56. N1495118875 241922 2408
    Ermine Notyours  about 3 years ago

    Okay, Stephen. Don’t start dragging Danny Donkey and Ella Elephant into this too.

     •  Reply
  57. Missing large
    christelisbetty  about 3 years ago

    How many times must I say it ? There are 3 things wrong with party politics.—-#1 Money—-#2 Money—-#3 Money.

     •  Reply
  58. Ezgif.com crop
    mpolo11 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Much of the world’s 2 party system. Sadness.

     •  Reply
  59. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  about 3 years ago

    And evolving to never agree with anything anyone else says.

     •  Reply
  60. Millionchimps1
    tripwire45  about 3 years ago

    Nine years after Hurricane Sandy, New York still didn’t do anything about their failing drainage system and now flooding from Ida has been the result. Two-party system = two cheeks on the same…

     •  Reply
  61. Cthulhu p1xg
    gorbag  about 3 years ago

    We have computers. Why do we even need politicians anymore?

     •  Reply
  62. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Whattsa big deal? That’ what Continuous Campaigning is all about.

     •  Reply
  63. Missing large
    johnny5678910  about 3 years ago

    reminds me of Terence & Phillip from south park. I was expecting a fart joke….

     •  Reply
  64. Bob 1
    moondog42 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    In Omaha, they just tear out the old asphalt and either put down gravel or just plain dirt. Saves a ton on maintenance, and if people complain, I understand the city tells them “too bad, so sad”

     •  Reply
  65. Pupil
    Ka`ōnōhi`ula`okahōkūmiomio`ehiku Premium Member about 3 years ago

    I’m impressed by the enhanced border around the ‘episode’ boxes.

     •  Reply
  66. Froggy with cat ears
    willie_mctell  about 3 years ago

    It’s a reality show that’s gone stale. They need to add more excitement.

     •  Reply
  67. Missing large
    Just Enjoying It  about 3 years ago

    That’s funny, but the real fight is over, “Who is going to pay for our new road?”

     •  Reply
  68. Missing large
    ekke  about 3 years ago

    We have an interstate bridge that was out of date 60 years ago. At one point the politicians on both sides, in both states, agreed to a viable plan. It got nixed by the environmentalists, who just don’t like cars. Or people. Or, well, pretty much of anything.

     •  Reply
  69. Missing large
    Otis Rufus Driftwood  about 3 years ago

    What we need is to know how to swallow our pride, and work on problems that affect us all because that is what being a community, even a society, means.

     •  Reply
  70. Missing large
    Display  about 3 years ago

    And yet RandAl-Boor thinks the elections were stolen or doctored. With ReThuglican gerrymandering, yes. But there has been virtually no findings to satisfy many court cases and in fact ReThuglican lawyers are being sued to recover frivolous court costs by judges who have dismissed cases. Oops! I take part of that back, and apologize – there were a few cases. One was the man accused of killing his wife, and weeks after he reported her missing he cast her ballot for Rumpy the Clown. Nothing suspicious there eh, Boor? Oh, and the other guy whose mom died quite a while ago but managed to have her ballot cast with his, again for the Bulbous Buttwhistle. Y’all got any cases that’ll stand up to more than about a minute of fact checking there, bub? Let’s hear what ya got?

     •  Reply
  71. Edb4beaa 19ab 437d a460 cf4fba2a5e74
    syzygy47  about 3 years ago

    The name calling and the punching is what happens when one (or more) of the parties become obstructionist, their brains and opinions calcified (I’m a-lookin’ at you, Moscow Mitch!). Then, out of frustration, the ‘other party’ becomes belligerent. Doesn’t help when the GOP/tRump/George W say and do things verifiably wrongheaded and dunb.

     •  Reply
  72. 20160720 184148 1
    Ammo hates the comment policy  Premium Member about 3 years ago

    You are on a Roll Stephen, keep’em coming

     •  Reply
  73. Thinker
    Sisyphos  about 3 years ago

    Pig delivers a lame punchline, so to speak. The system hurts….

     •  Reply
  74. Missing large
    calmom75 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    I find the mind-numbing adherence of voters to the 2 party system in this country to be frightening; I always vote farther down the ballot….. To imagine that every 4 years we have only a hand-full of special interest fueled candidates to choose from is a travesty.

     •  Reply
  75. Picture
    EricS.Harris  about 3 years ago

    As long as the statutory duopoly parties maintain the advantage they gave themselves a century ago, we will not see any new political parties compete successfully for votes.

    That’s overly pessimistic. Slightly.

    The voters could reject those parties at the ballot box to a greater degree. They already reject to a large and increasing degree the use of those two labels to describe themselves.

    Changing to Ranked Choice Voting (aka Immediate Runoff Voting) might induce the two old parties to behave better, both in campaigning and in office. Or if not, facilitate their replacement. (I’m somewhat doubtful. They aren’t opposing it as strongly as I expected.) Links.1. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ranked.choice.voting2. https://www.facebook.com/search/groups/?q=ranked%20choice%20voting

    Initiative petitioning allows the people to circumvent the legislature and governor. That’s a possible path to more competitive elections in some states.

    The largest voting bloc in the country is “I don’t bother to vote”.

     •  Reply
  76. Missing large
    johnschutt  about 3 years ago

    There would be no issue if it were just about roads. But, when you stuff a lot of pork into the roads…

     •  Reply
  77. Missing large
    John Jorgensen  about 3 years ago

    I take the point of the cartoon but we’re well beyond the point where we can afford false equivalency.

     •  Reply
  78. Missing large
    aussie399 Premium Member about 3 years ago

    Oh how true, sadly. They give America a bad name

     •  Reply
  79. Large screenshot 2022 08 19 7.45.40 am
    Ed  about 2 years ago

    Why is this comic so political

    (Not that i want an answer, let this comment be unanswered)

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine