Among the books being banned are the Bible, because it has words like “adultery” and “d@mnation,” and the Dictionary, because it has all the words of the English language including the bad ones.
OMFG!!!! Looks like books everywhere will to find a way to get revenge on Stephan Pastis for exposing their evil conspiracy this whole time that they had since printing presses were invented in the Middle Ages!!!! Whoa!!!! Dan aka…
All they have to do is get King James, Moffatt and Byington to change the word “adultery” to The Hokey Pokey" and they got it made…. Thou shalt not commit The Hokey Pokey."
1974 – the middle school librarian sent a letter to parents stating that Stephen King’s “Carrie” was not appropriate reading for young ladies. Within a week we all had it tucked into our book bags and were reading it in study hall.
People ban books because they’re just a bunch of whiny, ignorant, self righteous jerks who have nothing better to do, except complain about everything.
Making book availability age appropriate is not the same as banning a book. However, if any state is actually really banning a book i would not agree with it.
No one is trying to ban books for adults. Some books, however, are not appropriate for younger children, and thus should not be in elementary school libraries. If parents want their children to have them, Amazon will oblige.
That’s my philosophy for many things: don’t like a book don’t read it. Don’t agree with abortion dont have one. Against same sex marriage don’t participate in that.
What people don’t seem to understand or perhaps want to understand is that most childeren don’t learn about things like homosexuality and other sexual things from reading about it. They hear and observe adults talking (including their parents), or talk to their equally misinformed peers. I’m 81 years old and can remember hearing about “h0m0s” (usually as a pejorative) etc. when I was in elememtary school which was well before any of the current books under discussion now were even written.
Kind of like school where the teachers make a book reading assignment but you can’t force the kids to read it. That’s why God invented Cliff’s Notes (before the internet, of course).
Goat is idealistic, but idealistic solutions mean nothing to reactionaries. The problem is that the banners are afraid of ideas that they fear getting into other people’s head- kids’ heads especially. They really, truly, naively and foolishly believe that they can make the bogeymen they fear go away if no one ever hears or reads about them.
Unfortunately, this only represents an incomplete picture of the story. I don’t support banning books, but I do support not having some material available for children without controls over the age of access.
While I am against banning books from public access, I do believe that there are a select number of books we should take a more active approach in parental guidance. Any book I read through (before my kids get their hands on it) will be checked for appropriateness. If something is questionable, yet being assigned as part of the literary curriculum, I will at least sit down with my kids and guide them through the comprehension. I am more concerned that the kid isn’t deeply disturbed or traumatized by what they take in. But if they are aware it’s just a book and doesn’t reflect their own personal beliefs, I’ll be at least assured reading something won’t lead them to influence bad behavior.
Again, maybe I’m just jumping to conclusions too soon. We don’t give our own kids the credit to their intelligence and conscience they have. I’m still amazed at their wisdom, which far exceeds us older folks.
“They” are not “banning” books. “They” are removing inappropriate materials from school libraries. If you want your children to be able to read such material, go to your local public library to check such materials out. If the public library doesn’t have what you are looking for, request an Inter-Library-Loan. If the public library refuses, get on Amazon and order it yourself. Geeze, use your brains for once!
“How to make bombs” “How to torture other people” “hot to kill someone and get away with it” “subplots of any Stephen King book involving minors and adult situations” ..yeah, those books SHOULD be banned, as well as anything promoting child perversions, sexual situations (IT, Ritual of Chud) etc etc.
BE THIS GUY about 1 year ago
How about sneaking into people’s beds at night? They will assume they fell asleep reading the books and feel obliged to finish them.
BasilBruce about 1 year ago
Among the books being banned are the Bible, because it has words like “adultery” and “d@mnation,” and the Dictionary, because it has all the words of the English language including the bad ones.
DanielRyanMulligan1 about 1 year ago
OMFG!!!! Looks like books everywhere will to find a way to get revenge on Stephan Pastis for exposing their evil conspiracy this whole time that they had since printing presses were invented in the Middle Ages!!!! Whoa!!!! Dan aka…
Bilan about 1 year ago
1984 is one of the books that Texas is banning. Why? it doesn’t mention gays, drag shows or diversity.
The dude from FL Premium Member about 1 year ago
Tsars and dictators etc do that to stifle education. Expect more after 20 Jan 2025
sirbadger about 1 year ago
I sort of wish books would do that because I need to catch up on my reading.
Johnny Q Premium Member about 1 year ago
The book-banners claim they’re protecting children, but this is really about controlling them…
blunebottle about 1 year ago
I would just a soon not had been forced to read the assigned books in high school and college.
John Smith about 1 year ago
Would the purple book be considered a book binder?
Jeff0811 about 1 year ago
All they have to do is get King James, Moffatt and Byington to change the word “adultery” to The Hokey Pokey" and they got it made…. Thou shalt not commit The Hokey Pokey."
John Smith about 1 year ago
What’s the point of banning books that Dick and Jane don’t know how to read?
iggyman about 1 year ago
That’s some pretty bad books in the last panel, miscreants from the library I’ll bet!
herdocow about 1 year ago
The real reason is because it’s dated. It’s too old to be relevant.
Keno21 about 1 year ago
I think the philosophy is; ‘I refuse to open my mind to facts, reason, or truth, and I DEMAND that everyone else do the same!’
Gent about 1 year ago
Walking talking books? Ah they is must be fiction eh.
daveoverpar about 1 year ago
No body is banning books.
GregerLhd about 1 year ago
That is not 1984, it’s Animal Farm
RobinHood about 1 year ago
How do you know you don’t like a book if you haven’t read it?
markkahler52 about 1 year ago
I still have my copy of Catcher in the Rye. Come pry it from my collection!
Huckleberry Hiroshima about 1 year ago
Maggot types don’t want anybody to read what they don’t agree with. Re: Censorship in Nazi Germany.
SquidGamerGal about 1 year ago
What is wrong with people these days? If you don’t like the book, DO NOT READ IT!!
aerotica69 about 1 year ago
1974 – the middle school librarian sent a letter to parents stating that Stephen King’s “Carrie” was not appropriate reading for young ladies. Within a week we all had it tucked into our book bags and were reading it in study hall.
Tom about 1 year ago
It’s not that liberals are ignorant. It is just that they know so much that isn’t true. >
Tom about 1 year ago
>
old_geek about 1 year ago
ALERT: TRIGGERING STRIP INCOMING
Ellis97 about 1 year ago
People ban books because they’re just a bunch of whiny, ignorant, self righteous jerks who have nothing better to do, except complain about everything.
Croc Holliday about 1 year ago
Some deluded fools believe books are a bigger threat to schoolkids than are guns.
KageKat about 1 year ago
Amazing how two books with no faces can look genuinely disappointed!
smithsilverstrea about 1 year ago
Did they ban Fahrenheit 451 too? (snicker) ;D
Goat from PBS about 1 year ago
Because there are books kids should not be reading.
T Smith about 1 year ago
Goat has unlocked the conservative mind.
wongo about 1 year ago
Book em Dano!
Serial Pedant about 1 year ago
Because it prophesied the beginning of another Trump administration.
morningglory73 Premium Member about 1 year ago
Book banning should be banned.
fjames01 about 1 year ago
Making book availability age appropriate is not the same as banning a book. However, if any state is actually really banning a book i would not agree with it.
Newenglandah about 1 year ago
Acceptable: I can’t do X because my religion says not to.
Unacceptable: YOU can’t do X because my religion says not to.
wdtabordds about 1 year ago
No one is trying to ban books for adults. Some books, however, are not appropriate for younger children, and thus should not be in elementary school libraries. If parents want their children to have them, Amazon will oblige.
bunrabbit99 about 1 year ago
exactly, stephan! if people don’t want their kids reading certain books, don’t let them…but don’t take them away from other people’s kids.
jfh0555 about 1 year ago
I think that was Animal Farm, not 1984
SusieB about 1 year ago
That’s my philosophy for many things: don’t like a book don’t read it. Don’t agree with abortion dont have one. Against same sex marriage don’t participate in that.
JohnTheFoole about 1 year ago
Ideas. They want make sure that the li’l childs don’t get ideas…..
rshive about 1 year ago
Only the nasty books make you read them.
oakie817 about 1 year ago
i grew up in the great state of RI, and most of the banned books were required freshman high school reading, like 1984…
CaveCat87 about 1 year ago
I suppose “You can’t judge a book by its cover” would be an understatement by this point.
ladykat Premium Member about 1 year ago
I read what I want to read. If you don’t like it, stay away from my bookcases and my kindle!
mike75035 about 1 year ago
The objective should merely be to make availability of explicit literature age appropriate.
mindjob about 1 year ago
Those books have seen No Country For Old Men
mousefumanchu Premium Member about 1 year ago
Animal Farm & 1984 are what we’re becoming. Have you read them? Do you remember?
Larry S about 1 year ago
If you can buy it, it ain’t banned. Some books are inappropriate for children. I would describe the content here but I would be censored. Ironic, huh?
Otis Rufus Driftwood about 1 year ago
Goat has a point. Pastis has to end it weird though.
withaG43 about 1 year ago
What people don’t seem to understand or perhaps want to understand is that most childeren don’t learn about things like homosexuality and other sexual things from reading about it. They hear and observe adults talking (including their parents), or talk to their equally misinformed peers. I’m 81 years old and can remember hearing about “h0m0s” (usually as a pejorative) etc. when I was in elememtary school which was well before any of the current books under discussion now were even written.
Count Olaf Premium Member about 1 year ago
Kind of like school where the teachers make a book reading assignment but you can’t force the kids to read it. That’s why God invented Cliff’s Notes (before the internet, of course).
mwksix about 1 year ago
The books do need a new plan. Clearly they’re losing!
zeexenon about 1 year ago
The master plan is all detailed in Mein Kampf.
Thomas Scott Roberts creator about 1 year ago
Goat is idealistic, but idealistic solutions mean nothing to reactionaries. The problem is that the banners are afraid of ideas that they fear getting into other people’s head- kids’ heads especially. They really, truly, naively and foolishly believe that they can make the bogeymen they fear go away if no one ever hears or reads about them.
mfrasca about 1 year ago
In Tamika Flynn’s hands, books become lethal weapons.
dimndno about 1 year ago
Some books have content the controlling powers don’t you to see so they are banned. Do we need to ban computers too?
marilynnbyerly about 1 year ago
Books are culled from libraries all the time to make room for other books. Sad, but true.
Zebrastripes almost 1 year ago
Freedom of speech,
freedom of the press
All you loons nuts and whack jobs could shove it
happyinvenice23 almost 1 year ago
Sounds like one of trumps school chums nut job Ron desatines at work again!
bergerronald Premium Member almost 1 year ago
Unfortunately, this only represents an incomplete picture of the story. I don’t support banning books, but I do support not having some material available for children without controls over the age of access.
dontcare1911 almost 1 year ago
Book bans, proof that new idiots are being born all the time.
Robert Miller Premium Member almost 1 year ago
People still read books? Wow!
wildlandwaters almost 1 year ago
A-HA!! Just as I thought!!
jim_duprey almost 1 year ago
Can we ban ‘Art Of The Deal’?
Cameron1988 Premium Member almost 1 year ago
I hear that Floridumb is now banning the Colgate Dictionaries. The governor really wants the residents to forever remain ignorant
pamela welch Premium Member almost 1 year ago
LOLOL — Good one Stephan!
minty_Joe almost 1 year ago
While I am against banning books from public access, I do believe that there are a select number of books we should take a more active approach in parental guidance. Any book I read through (before my kids get their hands on it) will be checked for appropriateness. If something is questionable, yet being assigned as part of the literary curriculum, I will at least sit down with my kids and guide them through the comprehension. I am more concerned that the kid isn’t deeply disturbed or traumatized by what they take in. But if they are aware it’s just a book and doesn’t reflect their own personal beliefs, I’ll be at least assured reading something won’t lead them to influence bad behavior.
Again, maybe I’m just jumping to conclusions too soon. We don’t give our own kids the credit to their intelligence and conscience they have. I’m still amazed at their wisdom, which far exceeds us older folks.
Colonel B almost 1 year ago
Not at my house lately…..
jamie almost 1 year ago
“They” are not “banning” books. “They” are removing inappropriate materials from school libraries. If you want your children to be able to read such material, go to your local public library to check such materials out. If the public library doesn’t have what you are looking for, request an Inter-Library-Loan. If the public library refuses, get on Amazon and order it yourself. Geeze, use your brains for once!
Andrew Bosch Premium Member almost 1 year ago
Fahrenheit 451
DaBump Premium Member almost 1 year ago
Sheer nonsense, but that does make it amusing.
Scott S 12 months ago
In our elementary school the library had PT 109: An American Epic of War, Survival, and the Destiny of John F. Kennedy (PT-109 for short).
They had the copies behind the check-out desk & you needed a note from your parents to check it out.
wordsmeet 12 months ago
Banning books is uncomfortably but not surprisingly close to burning books.
[Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce] 12 months ago
Let’s send Ron De Santis and Jim Abbott to the knackers.
Eric S 12 months ago
“How to make bombs” “How to torture other people” “hot to kill someone and get away with it” “subplots of any Stephen King book involving minors and adult situations” ..yeah, those books SHOULD be banned, as well as anything promoting child perversions, sexual situations (IT, Ritual of Chud) etc etc.
Swirls Before Pine 12 months ago
Only state officials that listen to the idiots.
alantain 12 months ago
People never learn, do they? Has banning books ever really accomplished anything?