Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for February 04, 2024

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 1 year ago

    How about sneaking into people’s beds at night? They will assume they fell asleep reading the books and feel obliged to finish them.

     •  Reply
  2. Ding a ling
    BasilBruce  about 1 year ago

    Among the books being banned are the Bible, because it has words like “adultery” and “d@mnation,” and the Dictionary, because it has all the words of the English language including the bad ones.

     •  Reply
  3. Aoh14ggnpr0bjht13a1u9vlhky2idrnlstoohaw9irxd=s96 c
    DanielRyanMulligan1  about 1 year ago

    OMFG!!!! Looks like books everywhere will to find a way to get revenge on Stephan Pastis for exposing their evil conspiracy this whole time that they had since printing presses were invented in the Middle Ages!!!! Whoa!!!! Dan aka…

     •  Reply
  4. Bluedog
    Bilan  about 1 year ago

    1984 is one of the books that Texas is banning. Why? it doesn’t mention gays, drag shows or diversity.

     •  Reply
  5. Unnamed
    The dude from FL  Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Tsars and dictators etc do that to stifle education. Expect more after 20 Jan 2025

     •  Reply
  6. Badger 4 360
    sirbadger  about 1 year ago

    I sort of wish books would do that because I need to catch up on my reading.

     •  Reply
  7. Eveningledger connie
    Johnny Q Premium Member about 1 year ago

    The book-banners claim they’re protecting children, but this is really about controlling them…

     •  Reply
  8. Blunebottle
    blunebottle  about 1 year ago

    I would just a soon not had been forced to read the assigned books in high school and college.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    John Smith  about 1 year ago

    Would the purple book be considered a book binder?

     •  Reply
  10. Grandpa hef
    Jeff0811  about 1 year ago

    All they have to do is get King James, Moffatt and Byington to change the word “adultery” to The Hokey Pokey" and they got it made…. Thou shalt not commit The Hokey Pokey."

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    John Smith  about 1 year ago

    What’s the point of banning books that Dick and Jane don’t know how to read?

     •  Reply
  12. Mrpeabodyboysherman
    iggyman  about 1 year ago

    That’s some pretty bad books in the last panel, miscreants from the library I’ll bet!

     •  Reply
  13. Umbellacorp
    herdocow  about 1 year ago

    The real reason is because it’s dated. It’s too old to be relevant.

     •  Reply
  14. Tumble
    Keno21  about 1 year ago

    I think the philosophy is; ‘I refuse to open my mind to facts, reason, or truth, and I DEMAND that everyone else do the same!’

     •  Reply
  15. Gentbear3b1a
    Gent  about 1 year ago

    Walking talking books? Ah they is must be fiction eh.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    daveoverpar  about 1 year ago

    No body is banning books.

     •  Reply
  17. Cocktailglass
    GregerLhd  about 1 year ago

    That is not 1984, it’s Animal Farm

     •  Reply
  18. 1djojn
    RobinHood  about 1 year ago

    How do you know you don’t like a book if you haven’t read it?

     •  Reply
  19. Img 20230511 134023590 portrait 5
    markkahler52  about 1 year ago

    I still have my copy of Catcher in the Rye. Come pry it from my collection!

     •  Reply
  20. Huckandfish
    Huckleberry Hiroshima  about 1 year ago

    Maggot types don’t want anybody to read what they don’t agree with. Re: Censorship in Nazi Germany.

     •  Reply
  21. Squid icon
    SquidGamerGal  about 1 year ago

    What is wrong with people these days? If you don’t like the book, DO NOT READ IT!!

     •  Reply
  22. Chief wahoo
    aerotica69  about 1 year ago

    1974 – the middle school librarian sent a letter to parents stating that Stephen King’s “Carrie” was not appropriate reading for young ladies. Within a week we all had it tucked into our book bags and were reading it in study hall.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    Tom  about 1 year ago

    It’s not that liberals are ignorant. It is just that they know so much that isn’t true. >

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    Tom  about 1 year ago

    >

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    old_geek  about 1 year ago

    ALERT: TRIGGERING STRIP INCOMING

     •  Reply
  26. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  about 1 year ago

    People ban books because they’re just a bunch of whiny, ignorant, self righteous jerks who have nothing better to do, except complain about everything.

     •  Reply
  27. Gators
    Croc Holliday  about 1 year ago

    Some deluded fools believe books are a bigger threat to schoolkids than are guns.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    KageKat  about 1 year ago

    Amazing how two books with no faces can look genuinely disappointed!

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    smithsilverstrea  about 1 year ago

    Did they ban Fahrenheit 451 too? (snicker) ;D

     •  Reply
  30. 96480   copy  2
    Goat from PBS  about 1 year ago

    Because there are books kids should not be reading.

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    T Smith  about 1 year ago

    Goat has unlocked the conservative mind.

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    wongo  about 1 year ago

    Book em Dano!

     •  Reply
  33. Sevasleeping
    Serial Pedant  about 1 year ago

    Because it prophesied the beginning of another Trump administration.

     •  Reply
  34. Reading cat
    morningglory73 Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Book banning should be banned.

     •  Reply
  35. Missing large
    fjames01  about 1 year ago

    Making book availability age appropriate is not the same as banning a book. However, if any state is actually really banning a book i would not agree with it.

     •  Reply
  36. Pilgrim
    Newenglandah  about 1 year ago

    Acceptable: I can’t do X because my religion says not to.

    Unacceptable: YOU can’t do X because my religion says not to.

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    wdtabordds  about 1 year ago

    No one is trying to ban books for adults. Some books, however, are not appropriate for younger children, and thus should not be in elementary school libraries. If parents want their children to have them, Amazon will oblige.

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    bunrabbit99  about 1 year ago

    exactly, stephan! if people don’t want their kids reading certain books, don’t let them…but don’t take them away from other people’s kids.

     •  Reply
  39. Missing large
    jfh0555  about 1 year ago

    I think that was Animal Farm, not 1984

     •  Reply
  40. Img 20190428 152052 hdr kindlephoto 2072758
    SusieB  about 1 year ago

    That’s my philosophy for many things: don’t like a book don’t read it. Don’t agree with abortion dont have one. Against same sex marriage don’t participate in that.

     •  Reply
  41. 20150510 141915
    JohnTheFoole  about 1 year ago

    Ideas. They want make sure that the li’l childs don’t get ideas…..

     •  Reply
  42. Picture 001
    rshive  about 1 year ago

    Only the nasty books make you read them.

     •  Reply
  43. Win 20201204 12 32 23 pro
    oakie817  about 1 year ago

    i grew up in the great state of RI, and most of the banned books were required freshman high school reading, like 1984…

     •  Reply
  44. Cave cat
    CaveCat87  about 1 year ago

    I suppose “You can’t judge a book by its cover” would be an understatement by this point.

     •  Reply
  45. 250
    ladykat Premium Member about 1 year ago

    I read what I want to read. If you don’t like it, stay away from my bookcases and my kindle!

     •  Reply
  46. Yosemite  sam 1
    mike75035  about 1 year ago

    The objective should merely be to make availability of explicit literature age appropriate.

     •  Reply
  47. Greg backlit
    mindjob  about 1 year ago

    Those books have seen No Country For Old Men

     •  Reply
  48. Missing large
    mousefumanchu Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Animal Farm & 1984 are what we’re becoming. Have you read them? Do you remember?

     •  Reply
  49. Photo
    Larry S  about 1 year ago

    If you can buy it, it ain’t banned. Some books are inappropriate for children. I would describe the content here but I would be censored. Ironic, huh?

     •  Reply
  50. Missing large
    Otis Rufus Driftwood  about 1 year ago

    Goat has a point. Pastis has to end it weird though.

     •  Reply
  51. Bela full face
    withaG43  about 1 year ago

    What people don’t seem to understand or perhaps want to understand is that most childeren don’t learn about things like homosexuality and other sexual things from reading about it. They hear and observe adults talking (including their parents), or talk to their equally misinformed peers. I’m 81 years old and can remember hearing about “h0m0s” (usually as a pejorative) etc. when I was in elememtary school which was well before any of the current books under discussion now were even written.

     •  Reply
  52. Th 9
    Count Olaf Premium Member about 1 year ago

    Kind of like school where the teachers make a book reading assignment but you can’t force the kids to read it. That’s why God invented Cliff’s Notes (before the internet, of course).

     •  Reply
  53. Wb
    mwksix  about 1 year ago

    The books do need a new plan. Clearly they’re losing!

     •  Reply
  54. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  about 1 year ago

    The master plan is all detailed in Mein Kampf.

     •  Reply
  55. Menew
    Thomas Scott Roberts creator about 1 year ago

    Goat is idealistic, but idealistic solutions mean nothing to reactionaries. The problem is that the banners are afraid of ideas that they fear getting into other people’s head- kids’ heads especially. They really, truly, naively and foolishly believe that they can make the bogeymen they fear go away if no one ever hears or reads about them.

     •  Reply
  56. Avatarpic l  1
    mfrasca  about 1 year ago

    In Tamika Flynn’s hands, books become lethal weapons.

     •  Reply
  57. Missing large
    dimndno  about 1 year ago

    Some books have content the controlling powers don’t you to see so they are banned. Do we need to ban computers too?

     •  Reply
  58. Mbsils
    marilynnbyerly  about 1 year ago

    Books are culled from libraries all the time to make room for other books. Sad, but true.

     •  Reply
  59. Img 1609
    Zebrastripes  almost 1 year ago

    Freedom of speech,

    freedom of the press

    All you loons nuts and whack jobs could shove it

     •  Reply
  60. 900360b0 2acd 4dc8 8200 0c83636d2d85
    happyinvenice23  almost 1 year ago

    Sounds like one of trumps school chums nut job Ron desatines at work again!

     •  Reply
  61. Missing large
    bergerronald Premium Member almost 1 year ago

    Unfortunately, this only represents an incomplete picture of the story. I don’t support banning books, but I do support not having some material available for children without controls over the age of access.

     •  Reply
  62. Missing large
    dontcare1911  almost 1 year ago

    Book bans, proof that new idiots are being born all the time.

     •  Reply
  63. Bob blue
    Robert Miller Premium Member almost 1 year ago

    People still read books? Wow!

     •  Reply
  64. Missing large
    wildlandwaters  almost 1 year ago

    A-HA!! Just as I thought!!

     •  Reply
  65. Missing large
    jim_duprey  almost 1 year ago

    Can we ban ‘Art Of The Deal’?

     •  Reply
  66. 1017207 10200214106421862 492754112 n
    Cameron1988 Premium Member almost 1 year ago

    I hear that Floridumb is now banning the Colgate Dictionaries. The governor really wants the residents to forever remain ignorant

     •  Reply
  67. 1968 avatar 1
    pamela welch Premium Member almost 1 year ago

    LOLOL — Good one Stephan!

     •  Reply
  68. Unnamed3
    minty_Joe  almost 1 year ago

    While I am against banning books from public access, I do believe that there are a select number of books we should take a more active approach in parental guidance. Any book I read through (before my kids get their hands on it) will be checked for appropriateness. If something is questionable, yet being assigned as part of the literary curriculum, I will at least sit down with my kids and guide them through the comprehension. I am more concerned that the kid isn’t deeply disturbed or traumatized by what they take in. But if they are aware it’s just a book and doesn’t reflect their own personal beliefs, I’ll be at least assured reading something won’t lead them to influence bad behavior.

    Again, maybe I’m just jumping to conclusions too soon. We don’t give our own kids the credit to their intelligence and conscience they have. I’m still amazed at their wisdom, which far exceeds us older folks.

     •  Reply
  69. Resized 20200918 152826 1231
    Colonel B  almost 1 year ago

    Not at my house lately…..

     •  Reply
  70. Missing large
    jamie  almost 1 year ago

    “They” are not “banning” books. “They” are removing inappropriate materials from school libraries. If you want your children to be able to read such material, go to your local public library to check such materials out. If the public library doesn’t have what you are looking for, request an Inter-Library-Loan. If the public library refuses, get on Amazon and order it yourself. Geeze, use your brains for once!

     •  Reply
  71. 42day
    Andrew Bosch Premium Member almost 1 year ago

    Fahrenheit 451

     •  Reply
  72. Nollanav
    DaBump Premium Member almost 1 year ago

    Sheer nonsense, but that does make it amusing.

     •  Reply
  73. Klingon crest a
    Scott S  12 months ago

    In our elementary school the library had PT 109: An American Epic of War, Survival, and the Destiny of John F. Kennedy (PT-109 for short).

    They had the copies behind the check-out desk & you needed a note from your parents to check it out.

     •  Reply
  74. Gato landru  fondo rojo
    wordsmeet  12 months ago

    Banning books is uncomfortably but not surprisingly close to burning books.

     •  Reply
  75. Missing large
    [Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce]  12 months ago

    Let’s send Ron De Santis and Jim Abbott to the knackers.

     •  Reply
  76. Bill murray drink
    Eric S   12 months ago

    “How to make bombs” “How to torture other people” “hot to kill someone and get away with it” “subplots of any Stephen King book involving minors and adult situations” ..yeah, those books SHOULD be banned, as well as anything promoting child perversions, sexual situations (IT, Ritual of Chud) etc etc.

     •  Reply
  77. Missing large
    Swirls Before Pine  12 months ago

    Only state officials that listen to the idiots.

     •  Reply
  78. Missing large
    alantain  12 months ago

    People never learn, do they? Has banning books ever really accomplished anything?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine