Coming Soon đ At the beginning of April, youâll be
introduced to a brand-new GoComics! See more information here. Subscribers, check your
email for more details.
The sad reality is that it doesnât work that way in todayâs dominant culture. Itâs OK to insult right-wingers and Christians. Itâs terrible to say anything that leftists and nones and Muslims choose to find offensive.
Trigger warnings arenât a new concept and theyâre there to give people with specific sensitivities to things like SA or animal abuse a headâs up if they canât handle them.
Theyâre a warning for people that youâre about to show or say something that they might not be able to handle, not a restriction on speech.
Seems to me that all this bickering amongst ourselves mean our democracy is due for a course correction. A majority of our voters are dissatisfied with too many unanswered issues and problems. Iâll site the reaction of some to the murder of the health care CEO as an example of the general dissatisfaction with some health insurance practices that prioritizes shareholder profits over patients health care coverage. And voters electing a con artist who gets their vote by saying he alone can fix it, are due for major disappointment. Example, now itâs going to be very hard to get those grocery prices down, even though he said he would. Or wait until his voters on Social Security find out how he wants to lower the cost of government. (He has to find a way to afford all this tax cuts for the rich), IMHO,
They donât bother me at all, I can still read the article. And Iâm even occasionally glad theyâre there, like if thereâs going to be a picture of a tortured animal or something.
Rat is sensitive to anything that corrects or disagrees with him. If someone claims heâs wrong, theyâre easily the worst person in the world. Thatâs the problem with the world.
Because you can say something doesnât mean you should. Ad hominem attacks (by anyone) do nothing to move discourse forward. Ultimately, I believe what Lewis Carroll wrote in âThrough the Looking Glassâ:
âWhen I use a word,â Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, âit means just what I choose it to mean â neither more nor less.â
âThe question is,â said Alice, âwhether you can make words mean so many different things.â
âThe question is,â said Humpty Dumpty, âwhich is to be master â thatâs all.â (Lewis)
Projecting power, âowningâ people is the goal-thatâs all. (Havel)
This actually goes to the base concept of free speech: can we actually have the right not to be offended? The answer is, emphatically, no. If youâre offended by whatâs said, respond with a cogent argument as to why itâs incorrect, not with a demand that the speaker be silenced. The correct response to speech is more speech.
This Great Nation was founded by Liberals, and based on Liberal principles, Liberal ideals and Liberal values. But of the original 13, 6 would not free their slaves. Women could not vote. As time went on we corrected those, and many other wrongs that needed to be made rights. I grew up with all the ethnic jokes, the âLong, hot summersâ in the 1960s, bra burning, the Gay Pride parades, and even the âItalian-American Civil Rights League brought to make a better image for the Mafia.
Now comes âwokeâ, which is much like âpolitically correctâ, and is simply showing consideration for your fellow American. The idea being that people should be aware of what insults others. conservatives try to demonize those terms. Do conservatives find it offensive to not be offensive? Why do conservatives need to retain their perceived right to use misogyny, ethnic slurs, bigoted slander, and racist hatred?
I never knew Rat was a snowflake. I may have had a hint that George was, but he does have a point. I think the loonies on the left and the loonies on the right just love to be offended because they both keep overreacting and insulting each other which they know is a never ending circle. Unless, of course, they are too dumb to realize that they will get the insults right back.
I wish they would go away and have intimate relations with themselves and leave the rest of us alone.
BasilBruce 2 months ago
How about we test Ratâs âsensitivityâ by hitting him with a hammer?
Hello Everyone 2 months ago
Well, this is much better than yesterdayâs rip off of an old joke with 3 bands playing: The Who, Guess Who and Yes. A parody on Whoâs on 1st?
I love Pearls, but I didnât like yesterdayâs strip.
sirbadger 2 months ago
It is difficult to watch the news and comment on the news without triggering someone.
GeorgeInAZ 2 months ago
The sad reality is that it doesnât work that way in todayâs dominant culture. Itâs OK to insult right-wingers and Christians. Itâs terrible to say anything that leftists and nones and Muslims choose to find offensive.
Bilan 2 months ago
How do you give a trigger warning to people to say that you donât like trigger warnings?
Tachyon the Samurai Premium Member 2 months ago
Trigger warnings? I wonder what Roy Rogersâ horse thinks about that.
iggyman 2 months ago
Rat is as sensitive as an anvil!
orinoco womble 2 months ago
Goat is a hippie?
blunebottle 2 months ago
Being mindful does not translate to being responsible for.
Keno21 2 months ago
âFreedom of speechâ only applies to what I want to hear; all else is hate speech.
Arbitrary 2 months ago
Trigger warnings arenât a new concept and theyâre there to give people with specific sensitivities to things like SA or animal abuse a headâs up if they canât handle them.
Theyâre a warning for people that youâre about to show or say something that they might not be able to handle, not a restriction on speech.
franki_g 2 months ago
Berkeley Breathed (Bloom County) called it offensensitivity.
win.45mag 2 months ago
Get a bat and give goat an attitude adjustment.
ChukLitl Premium Member 2 months ago
They didnât used to give trigger warnings when they shot Presidential candidates on live TV.
phobos 2 months ago
Its too bad that doesnât work. Left wingers spew the most vile nonsense while claiming they are the party of peace, love, and tolerance.
Doug K 2 months ago
Please be sensitive to my disrespectfulness
⊠and respectful of my insensitivity.
milnerdd2 Premium Member 2 months ago
Maybe well intentioned but really it has gotten so ridiculous. Humorless folks run amok.
CountOlaf2.0 Premium Member 2 months ago
Bidenomics
Green New Deal
Climate Change
Illegal Immigrant (yeah, thatâs two)
DEI
CackleCackleCackle
Commie
Etc etc ets
mrwiskers2008 2 months ago
Seems to me that all this bickering amongst ourselves mean our democracy is due for a course correction. A majority of our voters are dissatisfied with too many unanswered issues and problems. Iâll site the reaction of some to the murder of the health care CEO as an example of the general dissatisfaction with some health insurance practices that prioritizes shareholder profits over patients health care coverage. And voters electing a con artist who gets their vote by saying he alone can fix it, are due for major disappointment. Example, now itâs going to be very hard to get those grocery prices down, even though he said he would. Or wait until his voters on Social Security find out how he wants to lower the cost of government. (He has to find a way to afford all this tax cuts for the rich), IMHO,
ladykat Premium Member 2 months ago
What about you respecting the sensitivities of those around you, Rat?
Twelve Badgers in a Suit Premium Member 2 months ago
If this is a trick to get people to stop taking to him, itâs a pretty good one.
aerotica69 2 months ago
The older I get the more I am triggered (i.e. pi$$ed off) by sensitivity awareness (i.e. millennial psychobabble).
Ignatz Premium Member 2 months ago
They donât bother me at all, I can still read the article. And Iâm even occasionally glad theyâre there, like if thereâs going to be a picture of a tortured animal or something.
Ellis97 2 months ago
Rat is sensitive to anything that corrects or disagrees with him. If someone claims heâs wrong, theyâre easily the worst person in the world. Thatâs the problem with the world.
wirepunchr 2 months ago
Rat, kiss my tuchus!
Bob Smith 2 months ago
Harvard study shows that trigger warnings are fruitless and anxiety-inducing.
I canât put a link here, so google it, I guess
artegal 2 months ago
And while weâre at it, take your âpreferred pronounsâ and cram them.
pheets 2 months ago
If we could just lessen the perceived need to hold everybody ELSE accountable for ourselvesâŠ
Havel 2 months ago
Because you can say something doesnât mean you should. Ad hominem attacks (by anyone) do nothing to move discourse forward. Ultimately, I believe what Lewis Carroll wrote in âThrough the Looking Glassâ:
âWhen I use a word,â Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, âit means just what I choose it to mean â neither more nor less.â
âThe question is,â said Alice, âwhether you can make words mean so many different things.â
âThe question is,â said Humpty Dumpty, âwhich is to be master â thatâs all.â (Lewis)
Projecting power, âowningâ people is the goal-thatâs all. (Havel)
klapre 2 months ago
BTW, what is this âHowâ we click on to submit comments now?
RadioDial Premium Member 2 months ago
..yes it is Goat, yes it is..
Maswartz 2 months ago
Oh someone 100% complained to an editor about something in his comic.
IndyW 2 months ago
Good toon today!
Otis Rufus Driftwood 2 months ago
Another social trend Rat will test the limits of.
stevesasleep Premium Member 2 months ago
Hippie? âŠâŠâŠ. Hippie??
dpatrickryan Premium Member 2 months ago
This actually goes to the base concept of free speech: can we actually have the right not to be offended? The answer is, emphatically, no. If youâre offended by whatâs said, respond with a cogent argument as to why itâs incorrect, not with a demand that the speaker be silenced. The correct response to speech is more speech.
ncorgbl 2 months ago
This Great Nation was founded by Liberals, and based on Liberal principles, Liberal ideals and Liberal values. But of the original 13, 6 would not free their slaves. Women could not vote. As time went on we corrected those, and many other wrongs that needed to be made rights. I grew up with all the ethnic jokes, the âLong, hot summersâ in the 1960s, bra burning, the Gay Pride parades, and even the âItalian-American Civil Rights League brought to make a better image for the Mafia.
Now comes âwokeâ, which is much like âpolitically correctâ, and is simply showing consideration for your fellow American. The idea being that people should be aware of what insults others. conservatives try to demonize those terms. Do conservatives find it offensive to not be offensive? Why do conservatives need to retain their perceived right to use misogyny, ethnic slurs, bigoted slander, and racist hatred?
mindjob 2 months ago
Those hippies want to leave the country now, but they donât have enough gas money
SquidGamerGal 2 months ago
Pfft! If you ask me, if youâre bothered by something, just ignore it and leave it be instead of ruining it for everybody!
Fuz 2 months ago
People should grow a spine.
moondog42 Premium Member 2 months ago
the ones who complain about âtrigger warningsâ will also complain that kids [insert old people complaint about the kids today here]
Radish... 2 months ago
The rat is a fascist.
Goat from PBS 2 months ago
I do not respect trigger warnings. Itâs censorship.
Cameron1988 Premium Member 2 months ago
The far left, and the far right have very sensitive trigger warnings. Itâs a lose, lose
eclectic1 2 months ago
I never knew Rat was a snowflake. I may have had a hint that George was, but he does have a point. I think the loonies on the left and the loonies on the right just love to be offended because they both keep overreacting and insulting each other which they know is a never ending circle. Unless, of course, they are too dumb to realize that they will get the insults right back.
I wish they would go away and have intimate relations with themselves and leave the rest of us alone.
Emmett Wayne 2 months ago
Until I read the past few daysâ comics, I had no idea that trigger warnings were even a thing. I am kind of with Rat on this one.
bob but I spell it backwards 2 months ago
I seem to remember this all started when someone decided to say it was us against them. But who are they. Just us.