Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for June 30, 2024

  1. Ding a ling
    BasilBruce  4 days ago

    What we need are some First Amendment Crusaders.

     •  Reply
  2. 249388 10150321651104762 7561861 n
    TaliesinWI  4 days ago

    Reminds me of the stoning scene in Life of Brian.

     •  Reply
  3. Zooey girl
    ronaldspence  4 days ago

    Idiocracy

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    cmxx  4 days ago

    I was going to point to a YouTube URL for that Life of Brian scene, but it was instantly followed by an anti-constipation commercial and I just can’t do that to anyone even though it might not happen every time. ::gack::

     •  Reply
  5. Fb img 1539673502205
    GeorgeInAZ  4 days ago

    It’ll be interesting to see how some regulars deny this is happening and when it does its all Reps’ fault.

     •  Reply
  6. New badger avatar
    tudza Premium Member 4 days ago

    Would semaphore be too Euro-centric?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    cmxx  4 days ago

    In my neck of the woods “homeless” has been replaced by “houseless.” That seems pointless to me.

     •  Reply
  8. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  4 days ago

    Around here, last I heard, those folks were “unhoused” from the folks who aren’t… and “sidewalk chateau” from at least one of the ones who is.

     •  Reply
  9. Crankyc
    franki_g  4 days ago

    Good thing they were just penciled in.

    The use of graphite language has always had a negative connotation.

     •  Reply
  10. Img 4741
    El-Kabong  4 days ago

    Cultural appropriation, Pastis. Pal: From Romani phal ‘brother, mate’, based on Sanskrit bhrātṛ ‘brother’.

     •  Reply
  11. Mrpeabodyboysherman
    iggyman  4 days ago

    Yes, all the time once common sayings are all of a sudden not politically correct, hard to stay on top !

     •  Reply
  12. Bluedog
    Bilan  4 days ago

    I’m still trying to figure out why it’s offensive to name a football team after Indians.

     •  Reply
  13. Catapult3
    SameAsOldFfred  4 days ago

    White slavery. That got me fired.

     •  Reply
  14. Flag
    c001  4 days ago

    May I point out that “Stephan” reads very un-American?

    I’m not supposed to use the N-, the I-, the Z- and the E-word anymore.And plenty of others, of course.

     •  Reply
  15. A common  tater
    A Common 'tator  4 days ago

    Oh look, Stephan’s using a rubber…

     •  Reply
  16. Tumble
    Keno21  4 days ago

    I’d leave a thumbs-up emoji, but those are now banned.

     •  Reply
  17. Gentbear3b1a
    Gent  4 days ago

     

     

     

     

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    KageKat  4 days ago

    I’m sure this will be a delightful comment section today.

     •  Reply
  19. Laundry
    Sue Ellen  4 days ago

    I’d like to know who came up with the banned words list for GoComics. You can’t use the plural of spice or the breed of the big Maine cats. There have been times that I couldn’t even figure out which word I was trying to post was banned so I ended up just not posting any comment at all. So much depends on context. I know the abbreviation for raccoon has been used as a racial slur, but it is not a racial slur when referring to a recognized breed of cats. And the plural of spice is not the same spelling as the plural of the racial slur that they think they are banning by banning spîces.

     •  Reply
  20. Fencie icon
    fencie  4 days ago

    Stephan unalived his own creations.

     •  Reply
  21. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  4 days ago

    You should see what they did to you a hundred years ago for using certain words. Heck, during World War I, you could get arrested just for not showing enough patriotic enthusiasm.

    And of course, if you were, say, black, you could get arrested or worse just for looking at someone the wrong way. Not saying people aren’t over sensitive these days (I even saw people freak out over “Happy Holidays”, but it’s not as different from the past as we like to think.

     •  Reply
  22. Ignatz
    Ignatz Premium Member 4 days ago

    You will notice that every one of those phrases is in this comic, and being printed in newspapers, with no consequences.

     •  Reply
  23. 23 asterix with sword
    up2trixx  4 days ago

    I once got Zucc’d on Facebook for saying that I used to ride a Crazy Carpet down a local hill. A Crazy Carpet was a type of child’s toboggan – it was literally just a large piece of smooth flexible plastic with two holes cut out at the front for handles. There was absolutely no way to steer or control it: Once you started moving you were at the mercy of gravity and fate. They were also very cheap, costing somewhere around two dollars in the 1980’s.

    The logarithm didn’t care. I said the C word. 30 days in the hole.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    old_geek  4 days ago

    When the inflamed amygdalas take over…

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    Rowlajj  4 days ago

    One of the best yet…

     •  Reply
  26. E5aac87a 4e79 4600 9ffd 2cb871ca96db
    David in Webb Premium Member 4 days ago

    George Orwell’s 1984 – a good read if you want to know where our country is headed.

     •  Reply
  27. Gators
    Croc Holliday  4 days ago

    If only we could eliminate ‘like’ (1) and ‘right?’ (2)

    I think nearly 100% of meetings would be improved by this.

    1 – unless used in its intended sense, such as “I really like that idea” or “….much like the time we did this……” But when you, like, insert like, into your conversation, like, nonstop, it’s like, really annoying and you should really, like, have duct tape, like, placed over your mouth.

    2 – once or twice is okay, but I’ve listened to presentations recently in which the speaker ended every 3rd or 4th comment with “right?” (with that upward inflection at the end, often stretching it into two syllables) and it gets to be where you cringe in anticipation of the next use. If you can’t give a talk without doing this, don’t talk.

     •  Reply
  28. Pexels pixabay 278823
    Doug K  4 days ago

    Stephan should have to erase himself.

     •  Reply
  29. Gameguy49
    Gameguy49 Premium Member 4 days ago

    Progressivism has proved to be very regressive. Someone decides that some ordinary words are “just not nice” and out they go!

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    possumqueen Premium Member 4 days ago

    YES!!! YES YES YES!!!!! Thank you Stephan! The word police have gone WAAY off the deep end!

     •  Reply
  31. Squid icon
    SquidGamerGal  4 days ago

    Bullplop! How are all those words racists?!

     •  Reply
  32. Chief wahoo
    aerotica69  4 days ago

    I wonder if they sell those erasers at Walgreens.

     •  Reply
  33. Cave cat
    CaveCat87  4 days ago

    Way to show Rat a thing or two, Stephen.

     •  Reply
  34. Lifi
    rossevrymn  4 days ago

    Let the old people complaints commence.

     •  Reply
  35. C7569a47 06c6 4124 a730 0c7404d6c365 1 105 c
    Judy Ford Premium Member 4 days ago

    “Perfect”… and any “ly” adverb, badly, goodly….

     •  Reply
  36. Nollanav
    DaBump Premium Member 4 days ago

    When you’re a cartoon, you REALLY have to be careful about cancel culture!

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    royq27  4 days ago

    I have no words…

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    caw Premium Member 4 days ago

    Stephan Pastis sounds like Jerry Seinfeld. “This is the result of the extreme left and PC crap, and people worrying so much about offending other people,’ Seinfeld said in a interview. Stephan has been repeating this censorship complaint for years in different variations, some funny, today’s not. He had a slow day and couldn’t think of a funny cartoon to draw.

     •  Reply
  39. 96480   copy  2
    Goat from PBS  4 days ago

    Why this is still a thing… I have no idea. Words cannot hurt you, unless you let them hurt you.

     •  Reply
  40. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  4 days ago

    Stephan finally uses his cartoonist power to punish Rat for his insolence. Too bad Pig and Goat have to suffer, too.

     •  Reply
  41. Missing large
    Stocky One  4 days ago

    I happen to be tone deaf. What’s wrong with that expression?

     •  Reply
  42. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  4 days ago

    Maybe they should’ve used sticks and stones instead of words.

     •  Reply
  43. Missing large
    Otis Rufus Driftwood  4 days ago

    I believe the point here is to be reasonable with each other.

     •  Reply
  44. Dsc 0101
    Happy Tinkerbelle Premium Member 4 days ago

    How about this one: You can’t call a person a "pedi file " (spelled that way because of, ironically. the censors) you are supposed to call them Minor Attracted Person!!!!!!!

     •  Reply
  45. Missing large
    klapre  4 days ago

    I thought “homeless” people were just “unhoused”.

     •  Reply
  46. Missing large
    klapre  4 days ago

    And then we have the secret list maintained by the Comics Censor.

     •  Reply
  47. 533e
    oish  4 days ago

    I find the intolerance of tolerance to the intolerant intolerable

     •  Reply
  48. Missing large
    Chrisstopher  4 days ago

    Words are Words.Use them appropriately and try to not be an A-Hole.

     •  Reply
  49. Snoopy
    The Fly Hunter  4 days ago

    We’ve all disappeared….

     •  Reply
  50. Missing large
    Flossie Mud Duck  4 days ago

    The news-speak that currently bothers me most is “we’ll discuss it on the other side”.

     •  Reply
  51. The rings
    Liam Astle Premium Member 4 days ago

    ‘Person Experiencing Homelessness’ makes it sound like a temporary thing.

     •  Reply
  52. Img 3684
    Lord King Wazmo Premium Member 4 days ago

    Oh please. Enough with the “Right To Be Rude” stuff.

     •  Reply
  53. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  4 days ago

    Come to think of it, what do they do with the giant pink eraser leftovers when they chop them down to pencil size?

     •  Reply
  54. Missing large
    paullp Premium Member 4 days ago

    Last night my wife and I were watching a DVD of old TV commercials. It was an interesting combination of pop culture history and nostalgia. But I found myself cringing at the Cheerios Kid (anyone remember him?) in an Old West scenario fighting an Indian chief who was, not surprisingly, an over-the-top stereotype.

     •  Reply
  55. Noh8 tw
    socalvillaguy Premium Member 4 days ago

    Language evolves faster than reactionary minds do.

     •  Reply
  56. Tink
    snowedin, now known as Missy's mom  4 days ago

    I don’t give a rat’s (sorry, Rat) patoot who bans which word or this person. That’s idiotic.

     •  Reply
  57. Missing large
    JoeMartinFan Premium Member 3 days ago

    Keep in mind that employers, sponsors, and the general public don’t have to put up with everything that comes out your mouth. You really want free speech? Get your own podcast, or self-publish your own books. Nobody has to pay you to be a jerk.

     •  Reply
  58. Th 9
    Count Olaf Premium Member 3 days ago

    Pal… gone. Derogatory term for MFWB (male friend with benefits). Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

     •  Reply
  59. August 024
    tomfromthe50s  3 days ago

    We’re living at the sensitivity level of a 13-year-old girl, who makes a game of catching people making “mistakes”. (“Oh, you said duty!”)

     •  Reply
  60. Missing large
    Mark Epple  3 days ago

    Reality does not offend!

     •  Reply
  61. Amazing fox photos 25
    eddi-TBH  3 days ago

    Tomorrow! An all new Pearls starring PC Pig, Righteous Rat, Giddy Goat and a host of ethnically and socially sensitive characters beating each other up about word usage.

     •  Reply
  62. Photo
    AndrewSihler  3 days ago

    I think the term now is unhoused, not to be confused with “unhouseled”.

     •  Reply
  63. Missing large
    jbruins84341  3 days ago

    I used to love to ride my bike all over the back roads of our county. Even fancied calling myself a cyclist. No, I was not like Jef. One day, my sister, who lives in Woke-ington state, asked me if I considered the term, “cyclist” offensive. Some people in her group were saying the term should be, “people who cycle.” I told her I had never before heard such nonsense. She agreed it was over the top.

     •  Reply
  64. Shoe avi
    ajt526 Premium Member 1 day ago

    I’m clearly in the minority here, but I don’t think evolving as people to be more selective about what we say is inherently bad. If some people would prefer we not so freely toss around words that have historically been used to marginalize them, what’s the issue? When we know better, we do better.

     •  Reply
  65. Voo smaller
    chriscc63  1 day ago

    GOOD ONE TODAY.

     •  Reply
  66. Missing large
    Bryan Smith Premium Member 1 day ago

    I recently saw the article on the web that had these exact words on it. Learning the origins of the words was interesting, and I see the point that’s trying to be made. But for the vast majority of these words, their original meaning has faded over time (as happens to all words) and their current usage has shifted to mean something different entirely and not hurtful. That made the article feel pedantic.

     •  Reply
  67. Giphy  6   1
    razzledazzle295  about 12 hours ago

    If it’s a good, everyday word, you’re okay.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine