It has long been my contention that Jesus being real would be the worst nightmare of the so-called “Christian” right, because if there was a Second Coming, there would be a fearful judgment upon them.
The Bible, and even more the New Testament, are among the most liberal, leftist and even “Communist” books ever written -with some expections regarding women, I admit. Some of the more “literal” Catholic monastic orders were so “leftist” that the Pope had to ban them as heretics before they gave all the Church treasures to the poor.
PS. Sodoma was destroyed (and Gomorra with it) not because of their sexual preferences but because they had NOT given hospitality to a couple of Angels in disguise – practically for touristic reasons, a kind of Bibical Tripadvisor.
Yeah. I guess that’s part of the Bible they threw out. What’s that old saying about the Devil quoting Scripture?
And I’ve heard of a Christian Nationalist group that wants to bring back stoning. Literally. The kind with real stones. No mere 1950’s Regressives here, no sir.
“Conservative Christian” is an oxymoron. What passes as “conservative” these days (at least in the US) is antithetical to the teachings of Christ.
They even go so far as to idolize political figures in their churches. They preach authoritarianism in all certainty that God is a respecter of men. They know He is because the Bible explicitly states the opposite.
They even dispute the morality of charitable works out of the countermorality preached by avowed atheist Ayn Rand.
In real life (not myth or fable) how many people were the models for the Biblical character of Jesus? In the absence of any real evidence, we’re stuck with probabilities:
0 — 15%
1 — 35%
2 or more — 50%
Supporting the 3rd hypothesis are anomalies such as “the Nazarene” being born in Bethlehem (a conflation of the divine-savior and political-savior traditions); dueling genealogies in Matthew 1:1-16 and Luke 3:23-38; the “Prince of Peace” stating “I come to bring not peace but a sword” and trashing the money-changer tables in the temple; the friend of the common people also recommending that “these enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them — bring them here and slaughter them in my presence”; the same guy who said “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” supposedly also saying “Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.”, thus creating the ongoing controversy over whether man is saved by works or grace; and the bringer of a new covenant claiming to uphold “every jot and tittle” of the old one.
These differences are what we’d expect if two or more itinerant preachers — probably illiterate themselves and certainly working in an illiterate society — were each delivering somewhat different messages, and word-of-mouth transmission confused who said what, much the same way as modern people will attribute quotations of unknown origin to William Shakespeare, Benjamin Franklin, Mark Twain, or George Carlin.
Not everything in that book is so benign…“No one whose te$ticles are crushed or whose male organ is cut off shall enter the assembly of the Lord.” — Deuteronomy 23:1
a bit different than helping the needy (noting the distinction) but.. 2 Thessalonians 3:10New International Version“10 For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.” "
I work as a volunteer at a food pantry at a local church, supported by that house of worship and 3 others. Yet some of the parishioner committee members in the church want us to close the pantry because they believe it’s an “unnecessary expense.”
Do I need to even tell you what generation the naysayers belong to (hint: rhymes with “rumor”)? And do I also need to tell you that church’s population of members/parishioners continues to decrease, and that they are not attracting many younger folks to take over from the older ones? And they wonder why they can’t get the younger generation to, in their minds, “commit to Jesus.”
That guy in front of Scott’s church would probably be at the front of the line to kill Jesus if he returned preaching the same thing he did 2,000 years ago.
Ah, but does the “anti-woke” version say which side of the hand one is to give to one’s brother, the needy, and the poor? The greatest argument that I see against Christianity is Christians. Having spent decades in Baptist and later Evangelical churches, it seems to me that for most it’s just a social club and for the right-wing “church” it’s more of a political club where the Bible is used as a weapon while it’s heart (particularly the 4 gospels) is ignored. (Then there’s all the televangelist scammers but that’s getting off-topic.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosperity_theology This has nothing to do with real Christianity. But The Right, the further right you go, choose to be rich in money rather than in spirit.
IMHO wokeness is an extrapolation of political correctness which IMHO is itself an extrapolation of basic civility. Rarely have I encountered a conservative who had any use for civility.
I’ve always wondered – how is it so many of these people automatically know what a grooming center looks like? I mean, you normally only know things you’ve directly seen or been a part of.
Are they telling us they were groomed? Or were part of a grooming group? Are they former groomers (or current groomers)? I mean, they seem to know a lot about how it supposedly works – something only an insider would know.
Straw man argument. Republicans donate more of their own income to charity than Democrats do. Progressives love to confiscate other people’s money and claim to be charitable when they give a small portion of it to the needy to gain their allegiance.
Flashaaway over 1 year ago
A long outdated book adhered to by misogynists, racists and wanna be slave owners.
Davis D Danizier (3D) over 1 year ago
The grooming center is where priests, pastors and bishops groom altar boys to perform a very different kind of sacrament.
Religious conservatives have been targeting the wrong men in dresses.
Sinéad O’Connor had it right: Fight the real enemy. (But then she escaped Catholicism by … converting to Islam. Frying pan, meet fire.)
thevideostoreguy over 1 year ago
Someone ought to point Scot in the direction of 2 Thessalonians 3:10. B.D., you’re up.
baraktorvan over 1 year ago
If you pay close attention to Christ’s worlds and less about Pauls words you woud undertsand Christianity,
SHIVA over 1 year ago
Not surprised, it was bound to happen!!
Uncle Kenny over 1 year ago
That’s my kind of church and my kind of Christian.
Ravenswing over 1 year ago
It has long been my contention that Jesus being real would be the worst nightmare of the so-called “Christian” right, because if there was a Second Coming, there would be a fearful judgment upon them.
braindead Premium Member over 1 year ago
Don’t expect a lot of so-called ‘conservatives’ comments on this one. They cannot deny its accuracy.
albertonencioni over 1 year ago
The Bible, and even more the New Testament, are among the most liberal, leftist and even “Communist” books ever written -with some expections regarding women, I admit. Some of the more “literal” Catholic monastic orders were so “leftist” that the Pope had to ban them as heretics before they gave all the Church treasures to the poor.
PS. Sodoma was destroyed (and Gomorra with it) not because of their sexual preferences but because they had NOT given hospitality to a couple of Angels in disguise – practically for touristic reasons, a kind of Bibical Tripadvisor.
FreyjaRN Premium Member over 1 year ago
Looks about right. As if it were a bad thing.
The grooming didn’t work on me for decades, as I was a GOP member until Obama.
shanen0 over 1 year ago
Is it good enough to share? Can’t tweet anymore, but maybe (if Musk doesn’t censor it) I can X-crete the link over on X-critter?
Geophyzz over 1 year ago
The Bible also says, "…we gave you this rule: The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.” 2nd Thessalonians 3:10
Radish... over 1 year ago
Christ was the most woke person ever, republicans hate that.
dwdl21 over 1 year ago
Church is liberal now? Since when?
ladykat over 1 year ago
It doesn’t seem like that bad of a sermon topic.
Bob Blumenfeld over 1 year ago
Yeah. I guess that’s part of the Bible they threw out. What’s that old saying about the Devil quoting Scripture?
And I’ve heard of a Christian Nationalist group that wants to bring back stoning. Literally. The kind with real stones. No mere 1950’s Regressives here, no sir.
bobpeters61 over 1 year ago
“Conservative Christian” is an oxymoron. What passes as “conservative” these days (at least in the US) is antithetical to the teachings of Christ.
They even go so far as to idolize political figures in their churches. They preach authoritarianism in all certainty that God is a respecter of men. They know He is because the Bible explicitly states the opposite.
They even dispute the morality of charitable works out of the countermorality preached by avowed atheist Ayn Rand.
johnschutt over 1 year ago
Proper hermeutics: To whom was this written? Under what covenant? Otherwise, it’s eisegesis.
Richard S Russell Premium Member over 1 year ago
In real life (not myth or fable) how many people were the models for the Biblical character of Jesus? In the absence of any real evidence, we’re stuck with probabilities:
0 — 15%
1 — 35%
2 or more — 50%
Supporting the 3rd hypothesis are anomalies such as “the Nazarene” being born in Bethlehem (a conflation of the divine-savior and political-savior traditions); dueling genealogies in Matthew 1:1-16 and Luke 3:23-38; the “Prince of Peace” stating “I come to bring not peace but a sword” and trashing the money-changer tables in the temple; the friend of the common people also recommending that “these enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them — bring them here and slaughter them in my presence”; the same guy who said “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” supposedly also saying “Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.”, thus creating the ongoing controversy over whether man is saved by works or grace; and the bringer of a new covenant claiming to uphold “every jot and tittle” of the old one.
These differences are what we’d expect if two or more itinerant preachers — probably illiterate themselves and certainly working in an illiterate society — were each delivering somewhat different messages, and word-of-mouth transmission confused who said what, much the same way as modern people will attribute quotations of unknown origin to William Shakespeare, Benjamin Franklin, Mark Twain, or George Carlin.
daisypekin01 over 1 year ago
GODis a socialist.
dlaemmerhirt999 over 1 year ago
Hmmmmm . . . last time I checked the list, child r_pists on the right outnumbered the ones on the left by roughly 50-1.
alanoodle over 1 year ago
. . . says the people who call themselves good Christians.
mistercatworks over 1 year ago
Liberal is not a dirty word. It is an attitude about life and others. There are degrees of liberal; just as there are degrees of conservative.
prrdh over 1 year ago
How is that liberal? It doesn’t say, “You shall have Caesar open wide his hand to your brother…”
Liam Astle Premium Member over 1 year ago
Until the needy and the poor are sent to a rich enclave.
hogbung over 1 year ago
Not everything in that book is so benign…“No one whose te$ticles are crushed or whose male organ is cut off shall enter the assembly of the Lord.” — Deuteronomy 23:1
ira.crank over 1 year ago
The bible can be bent to support most liberal or conservative views. That’s what makes it such fun reading and discussion.
Eric S over 1 year ago
a bit different than helping the needy (noting the distinction) but.. 2 Thessalonians 3:10New International Version“10 For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.” "
dbradway1 over 1 year ago
Jesus was a liberal groomer and the Beatitudes were his manual.
Teto85 Premium Member over 1 year ago
As Carlin the Great said, “Religion is [REDACTED]”
dickanders Premium Member over 1 year ago
Many small c religious people see it only as a tool for mass condemnation for people who don’t agree with them.
lsnrchrd.1 Premium Member over 1 year ago
Perhaps the most harmful Christian grooming directive ever (it has competition):
Hebrews 11:1, “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.”
Authorization for absolute credulity, and the history of negative outcomes resulting from that.
drbethdance over 1 year ago
I work as a volunteer at a food pantry at a local church, supported by that house of worship and 3 others. Yet some of the parishioner committee members in the church want us to close the pantry because they believe it’s an “unnecessary expense.”
Do I need to even tell you what generation the naysayers belong to (hint: rhymes with “rumor”)? And do I also need to tell you that church’s population of members/parishioners continues to decrease, and that they are not attracting many younger folks to take over from the older ones? And they wonder why they can’t get the younger generation to, in their minds, “commit to Jesus.”
As the comedian says, “Here’s your sign…”
The Wolf In Your Midst over 1 year ago
Jesus wouldn’t get a foot in the door of the modern Republican party. A brown guy who won’t shut up about the poor? Get him outta here!
TexTech over 1 year ago
That guy in front of Scott’s church would probably be at the front of the line to kill Jesus if he returned preaching the same thing he did 2,000 years ago.
David_J Premium Member over 1 year ago
News Flash: it’s all fantasy… and Tolkien did it better.
chinook12345 over 1 year ago
Trump will win! Sorry leftist communists!
shamiehg over 1 year ago
Some portion of the population — ehem! — seems to have lost sight of ’What Jesus Would Do". =8-o
sisterea over 1 year ago
What is sad this is true.
RichardHubbard over 1 year ago
So, if the government uses my tax dollars to help the poor do I get to go to heaven?
willie_mctell over 1 year ago
Another reason the OT is superseded by the NT.
Dooley 425 over 1 year ago
Trudeau making a common sense political comment. How refreshing!
dpatrickryan Premium Member over 1 year ago
At this point, cruelty is a core Republican value.
SteveRB511 over 1 year ago
Ah, but does the “anti-woke” version say which side of the hand one is to give to one’s brother, the needy, and the poor? The greatest argument that I see against Christianity is Christians. Having spent decades in Baptist and later Evangelical churches, it seems to me that for most it’s just a social club and for the right-wing “church” it’s more of a political club where the Bible is used as a weapon while it’s heart (particularly the 4 gospels) is ignored. (Then there’s all the televangelist scammers but that’s getting off-topic.)
chinook12345 over 1 year ago
should Christianity be illegal in USA i think so!
dadoctah over 1 year ago
Help me out here. Do we still have Pharisees running around loose?
eced52 over 1 year ago
For you were slave in the land of Egypt from which I brought you out, so help the stranger, the orphan, and the widow.
rwg1957rwg over 1 year ago
And I guarantee they were both wearing red hats displaying 4 letters.
banjoAhhh! over 1 year ago
Yeah, those evangelical “Christians” sort of ignore what He taught if it contradicts their politics and desires to make the U.S. of A. a theocracy.
eddi-TBH over 1 year ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosperity_theology This has nothing to do with real Christianity. But The Right, the further right you go, choose to be rich in money rather than in spirit.
jrlind55 over 1 year ago
The Bible recommends the actions of individuals with their own money, not government with other people’s money.
GaryCooper over 1 year ago
Yeah, the Bible has a liberal bias.
RonaldByrd over 1 year ago
IMHO wokeness is an extrapolation of political correctness which IMHO is itself an extrapolation of basic civility. Rarely have I encountered a conservative who had any use for civility.
Timothy Madigan Premium Member over 1 year ago
I’ve always wondered – how is it so many of these people automatically know what a grooming center looks like? I mean, you normally only know things you’ve directly seen or been a part of.
Are they telling us they were groomed? Or were part of a grooming group? Are they former groomers (or current groomers)? I mean, they seem to know a lot about how it supposedly works – something only an insider would know.
198.23.5.11 over 1 year ago
Me,I’m getting hungry just looking at those cheeseburgers
198.23.5.11 over 1 year ago
“What is the biblical evaluation of sex?”
“It is considered original sin”
“And all these holy people got themselves begat through original sin?? All that sinning make them any less holy?”
INHERIT THE WIND—1960
erinurse2000 over 1 year ago
So…so many Christians are so horrified by actual Christianity
PinkFudd over 1 year ago
Straw man argument. Republicans donate more of their own income to charity than Democrats do. Progressives love to confiscate other people’s money and claim to be charitable when they give a small portion of it to the needy to gain their allegiance.