Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for October 06, 2024

  1. Ding a ling
    BasilBruce  about 1 month ago

    Can I cast my vote for Mint Chocolate Chip?

     •  Reply
  2. Zooey girl
    ronaldspence  about 1 month ago

    i vote for asteroid!

     •  Reply
  3. Bluedog
    Bilan  about 1 month ago

    The vote is like the cable channels, you have options, but you can’t find anything you like.

     •  Reply
  4. Unnamed
    The dude from FL  Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Voting is very easy, just do it!

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Hello Everyone  about 1 month ago

    Lots of Cable Systems have virtual monopolies, or at least they used to.

     •  Reply
  6. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  about 1 month ago

    The independent candidates never get elected. There was a guy who went to my college (perpetual student) who always wanted people to write him in for President. Everyone said they would, no one ever did because you see—we knew him personally.

     •  Reply
  7. Eveningledger connie
    Johnny Q Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Anyone who tries to give the voters an extra choice gets called a traitor!

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    tomevansphd  about 1 month ago

    Grateful it’s only two – imagine trying to get voters across the country to decide which of the Baskin Robbins 31 flavors is the best

     •  Reply
  9. Avatar2
    Walrus Gumbo Premium Member about 1 month ago

    If you’re still undecided in this election, you’re beyond hope!!!

     •  Reply
  10. Fb img 1539673502205
    GeorgeInAZ  about 1 month ago

    It wouldn’t work any better. Reps would run a few different ones. Dems would do as they did this time: the bosses would agree on one individual and sell her as the messiah.

     •  Reply
  11. Img 20240406 192803
    badeckman  about 1 month ago

    When it was Dump vs Biden I was waiting for some celeb or real billionaire to jump in.

     •  Reply
  12. Tumble
    Keno21  about 1 month ago

    Is it really freedom of choice, when someone else gets to decide what the choices are? I’m going with Bill & Opus.

     •  Reply
  13. Edb4beaa 19ab 437d a460 cf4fba2a5e74
    syzygy47  about 1 month ago

    Two choices? You can do like Batman’s villain, two face. Flip a coin. The virtuous Harvey Dent law and order moral decision on one side, and Trump on the other.

     •  Reply
  14. Calvins
    Algolei I  about 1 month ago

    I only have one option for cable these days, and it sucks.

     •  Reply
  15. Blunebottle
    blunebottle  about 1 month ago

    Illusion of choice. One of the oldest sales tricks in the book.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    Ichner  about 1 month ago

    Fun fact: You don’t have to choose among only two, there are usual several other parties on the ballot (like Libertarian or Green), and you’re even able to do a write-in vote for absolutely anyone you please. The choices are actually unlimited. No one’s forcing you to choose between only A or B.

     •  Reply
  17. 20686948 happy fat man with big smile
    SteveHL  about 1 month ago

    But despite a groundswell of support, Pogo never won.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    sergioandrade Premium Member about 1 month ago

    I know who I am NOT voting for.

     •  Reply
  19. Gentbear3b1a
    Gent  about 1 month ago

    This complete false equivalence. For more numbers of politicians ain’t gooder than less numbers of em.

     •  Reply
  20. Mrpeabodyboysherman
    iggyman  about 1 month ago

    I am paying for cable channels I will never watch, no choice bundles they call it! We should have ala carte!

     •  Reply
  21. Img 20230511 134023590 portrait 5
    markkahler52  about 1 month ago

    Mocha!! A double which makes for a great combination!!

     •  Reply
  22. Fox picture avatar  2
    phritzg Premium Member about 1 month ago

    I’m wondering if the last panel reminded anyone else of Pete Seeger’s “Where Have All the Flowers Gone”.

     •  Reply
  23. Large 1699141985732
    shanen0  about 1 month ago

    The Constitution is hard-coded for the presidency to reduce the electoral system to two parties. Or one. No other equilibrium states are stable. I don’t think there is any easy or good solution for the single point at the top, but that’s why I think the presidency should be weakened except for REAL crises—not the fake crises the wolves are constantly shouting about.

    If the House elections were fixed (mostly to stop the partisan gerrymandering) and the House itself was strengthened, then it could do a lot to improve the situation in America. So are you interested in “guest voting”? Starts with an option to vote next door if your own district is too gerrymandered for you.

     •  Reply
  24. Steven 4
    workjobb Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Great-Pastis opened a hornet’s nest in the comments section.

     •  Reply
  25. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  about 1 month ago

    It’s the same with baseball and football. The Super Bowl only allows two teams. In the World Series, only two teams get to play. It’s unfair, I say!

    Our political system is designed like sports leagues. There are two “divisions” and lots of competition within those divisions, but there can only be one winner. If we want something different, where coalitions form at the highest levels, where multiple parties work together in actual governance, then we have to change the entire system, probably to a parliamentary system. Good luck.

     •  Reply
  26. 900360b0 2acd 4dc8 8200 0c83636d2d85
    happyinvenice23  about 1 month ago

    Actually you only have 1 choice, if you want to live free, with a Constitution.

     •  Reply
  27. Image
    Lenavid  about 1 month ago

    People nowadays would then elect Gilligan.

     •  Reply
  28. Booby
    Snolep  about 1 month ago

    When will they ever learn. Oh when will they ever learn?

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    donlackie  about 1 month ago

    There ARE more than two, but until the sheeple wake up and stop voting for the two major parties that is all we will ever get

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    bradford.j.hamilton Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Our ballot has six choices – the two main ones are smack in the middle, and on the bottom. Which is which?

    : – )

     •  Reply
  31. A0aa4143 088c 4296 85af e0065b6a9fee
    mrwiskers  about 1 month ago

    Does anyone remember the Monty Python skit about the numerous silly political parties found in England?

     •  Reply
  32. Huckandfish
    Huckleberry Hiroshima  about 1 month ago

    Tired of old white guys? Good news, we have none running for President this time. Just one woman of color (what color I don’t know, I’m confused about that), and one orange guy (well he’s old, but his orange tint somehow helps with that). Take your pick, that’s it folks.

     •  Reply
  33. Missing large
    gokar 4,la  about 1 month ago

    Not saying who I’m voting for.

     •  Reply
  34. Me4
    Hoosier Guy  about 1 month ago

    As for third party candidates here is a cautionary tale: in the tight 2000 election, Al Gore would have won Florida, its 25 Electoral College votes, and therefore the presidency if Ralph Nader (running as the Green Party candidate) had not run as a presidential candidate. George W. Bush defeated Al Gore by 537 votes. Nader received 97,421 votes in Florida, which led to a general consensus that Nader’s campaign took enough votes from Gore in Florida to cost him the election.

     •  Reply
  35. Missing large
    Egrayjames  about 1 month ago

    Sorry, but there is only “one” candidate that is giving us a choice. We have been “told” to who to vote for by the Democratic Party.

     •  Reply
  36. Picture
    Dirtfarmer  about 1 month ago

    In Massachusetts there are three official political parties: Democrats, Republicans, and Libertarians. In addition, there are 29 political designations, not considered official parties but a voter can enroll in any of them and the political designations can field candidates for state offices.

    I suspect other states have similar things.

    However, since the constitution requires that the president be elected by a majority of the Electoral College, there is an effective limit of two parties. Failure of the EC to achieve a majority leads to throwing the vote to the house for president and the senate for vice president just to confuse things further (per the 12th amendment).

    >

     •  Reply
  37. Image
    diskus Premium Member about 1 month ago

    None of the above

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    Betsy Miranda Premium Member about 1 month ago

    There are 11 choices on the Louisiana ballot.

     •  Reply
  39. Missing large
    Waittilnxyr  about 1 month ago

    And if you are a Democrat, you didn’t even get to vote for your nominee.

     •  Reply
  40. Image
    Vermont Premium Member about 1 month ago

    There’s only one choice. Choose the one of the two primary candidates (Putin employee Jill Stein and brain-starved Bob Kennedy are just grotesquries) who hasn’t been found guilty of multiple felonies — vote for KAMALA HARRIS.

     •  Reply
  41. Missing large
    wongo  about 1 month ago

    There is only one logical choice “Taylor Swift”!

     •  Reply
  42. Missing large
    david_42  about 1 month ago

    There are two major party candidates and four minor ones. Plus, 18 others who dropped out for lack of support.

     •  Reply
  43. Img 20190428 152052 hdr kindlephoto 2072758
    SusieB  about 1 month ago

    Eliminating the Electoral College would help solve this problem

     •  Reply
  44. Lifi
    rossevrymn  about 1 month ago

    Ted Rall and Scott Stantis will be crying about this very subject here today.

     •  Reply
  45. Missing large
    T Smith  about 1 month ago

    It does make voting easy… vote for democracy or vote Republican.

     •  Reply
  46. Missing large
    cunning.p.al  about 1 month ago

    Considering the quality of the contenders, it’s a good thing there are only two. Going down, from here.

     •  Reply
  47. Missing large
    kevinclark  about 1 month ago

    Imagine if we voted for ice cream flavors and TV channels. Everyone would be stuck with vanilla and the NFL no matter their personal preferences.

     •  Reply
  48. Missing large
    davidthoms1  about 1 month ago

    As recent history proves, most voters can’t tell the difference between the truth and a lie.

     •  Reply
  49. Picture
    Maester Brow Premium Member about 1 month ago

    You all know that the framers of the constitution were dead set against political parties. That lasted all the way to Washington’s second term!

     •  Reply
  50. Andi   silhouette
    JudyAz  about 1 month ago

    Just remember that in some countries there’s only one candidate to vote for.

     •  Reply
  51. Missing large
    hrhitter  about 1 month ago

    Saw this coming in the first panel.

     •  Reply
  52. Pirate63
    Linguist  about 1 month ago

    We have 16 candidates in Ecuador vying for the presidential role in our upcoming 2025 elections. Of those, there are 6 that are serious contenders. Unless one of them wins by more than 50% of the vote on the first ballot, a run-off election will be held featuring the top 3 vote-getters. Like him/her or not, the president will be elected by a democratic popular vote, not some arcane Electoral College system!

    BTW Voting is mandatory for citizens of Ecuador aged 18 – 65. For Seniors and incapacitated individuals who can’t get to the polls, the voting registrars will come to them, and they can vote in their own homes.

    When you vote, the picture on your cedula( national identification card) and signature is matched to the picture and signature on the voting roles, eliminating voter fraud.

     •  Reply
  53. 96480   copy  2
    Goat from PBS  about 1 month ago

    I’m not sure I’d want dozens of options for political candidates. It’s hard enough trying to choose non-essential things, like what kind of chocolate I want to eat.

     •  Reply
  54. 5821
    SheMc  about 1 month ago

    Decisions, decisions!!!

     •  Reply
  55. Missing large
    johnschutt  about 1 month ago

    People get the leaders that they deserve.

     •  Reply
  56. Resized 20210528 163948
    Queen of America  about 1 month ago

    True dat!

     •  Reply
  57. 2019063095133708
    rs0204 Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Yes, there are only two real choices for the President. However, if you believe women should have sanctity over their bodies and you believe in the Constitution and the peaceful transfer of power, then Harris is the only choice. Plus, Employment is up, Inflation is down, and markets are doing great.

     •  Reply
  58. Gators
    Croc Holliday  about 1 month ago

    57 channels and there’s nothing on.

    I swear whenever I flip on the TV, well more than half the time any given channel is showing a commercial. I’d cancel it altogether, but my wife likes TCM and the music channels.

     •  Reply
  59. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  about 1 month ago

    Democracy is practically nonexistent these days.

     •  Reply
  60. Yin yang
    Havel  about 1 month ago

    Clearly, this years election is very significant. Why anyone would support Trump, who failed miserably in his first term is beyond my comprehension. What I do wish is that more people would show as much enthusiasm for the down-ballot races. As I used to tell my students, the closer the race (and office) to you the more it can potentially impact your lives.

     •  Reply
  61. Lion in sunglasses 66265386 1
    Ishka Bibel  about 1 month ago

    There are about 1100 people running for president this year, down from recent previous years.

     •  Reply
  62. Img 1610
    WCraft Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Excellent!

     •  Reply
  63. All mad avatar
    darthopper Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Ranked choice voting will get more candidate on the ballot.

     •  Reply
  64. Comics 2022
    Skeptical Meg  about 1 month ago

    The choices are mostly A or B, Yes or No, but there are 39 items on my ballot this year.

     •  Reply
  65. Missing large
    raybarb44  about 1 month ago

    Gone to flowers everyone. When will they ever learn?…..

     •  Reply
  66. Noh8 tw
    socalvillaguy Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Get rid of the Electoral College, and then you can have a functional multi-party system.

     •  Reply
  67. Bob blue
    Robert Miller Premium Member about 1 month ago

    I’m getting so tired of all the political ads in the comics, in my streaming programs…I’m starting to miss all the Big Pharma ads! Whichever side you are on, if you want a 3rd party, start at the local level, get 3rd parties in your city, county, and state. Now, on to more of Bill and Opus 24!!!

     •  Reply
  68. 319312 412581075444989 1358740700 n crop
    waes-hael  about 1 month ago

    UGH… Historiographer, here. With two parties, the winner has the support of about half of the population. When a third party steps in, the winner represents, by default, a minority (about one-third). In US history, this is seldom a good thing.

     •  Reply
  69. Anarcho syndicalismvnnb   copy
    gigagrouch  about 1 month ago

    Freedom of Choice -is what you got…

    Freedom from Choice- is what you want.

    -Devo.

     •  Reply
  70. Missing large
    Spoinkle  about 1 month ago

    There’s more than two choices. You also have, including but not limited to, the Green Party, Marijuana Party, Libertarian Party, Communist Party…..

     •  Reply
  71. Biflag
    Flatlander, purveyor of fine covfefe  about 1 month ago

    I seem to recall the last two WWs that America hid under the blanket until they had no choice, That’s not leadership.

     •  Reply
  72. Missing large
    VICTOR PROULX  about 1 month ago

    “If you can’t put your values into your vote, then democracy is lost at sea.” – Dr Jill Stein.

     •  Reply
  73. Missing large
    Hello Sweetie  about 1 month ago

    Funny, on my ballot I have eight presidential candidates to choose from. Perhaps Rat should actually look at his ballot rather then stabbing blindly? If he bothers to vote at all.

     •  Reply
  74. Hat large square
    Cactus-Pete  about 1 month ago

    Apparently he completely missed the primaries.

     •  Reply
  75. Missing large
    kendavis09  about 1 month ago

    The simple solution to voting is get rid of the electoral completely and go with the popular vote only with an IN-COUNTRY network not connected to the Internet in any way. Then other countries couldn’t hack into our elections. And whoever gets the most votes wins.

     •  Reply
  76. 1
    ncorgbl  about 1 month ago

    In just the two major parties there were 27 candidates for president. Through the processes installed by each party, primary voting, that’s been narrowed down to the two we have now. We only have one president at a time.

     •  Reply
  77. Missing large
    mousefumanchu Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Took me 3 years to decide on the tile for my backsplash.

     •  Reply
  78. John wayne
    The Duke  about 1 month ago

    Nobody voted for Harris, there was no primary. The only reason she is the democrat’s choice is because she’s the only person that can get the campaign funds from Biden’s war chest. The democrats didn’t want to lose the 200 million.

     •  Reply
  79. Urban lakshmi
    Bucinka  about 1 month ago

    I don’t know where Stephan votes, but in my state, we have five choices this year, as we did in 2020.

     •  Reply
  80. Missing large
    jc.stukes  about 1 month ago

    Crest or Colgate.

     •  Reply
  81. Bob 1
    moondog42 Premium Member about 1 month ago

    Bill Hicks: “I like the puppet on the right”

    “Well, I prefer the puppet on the left”

    Hey look, it’s THE SAME GUY HOLDING BOTH PUPPETS

     •  Reply
  82. Missing large
    ChazNCenTex  about 1 month ago

    So you have to vote for the lesser of two evils. IMHO, one candidate personifies “lesser” and “evils” above the other. But those two qualities serendipitously sink that candidate to the bottom of the list.

     •  Reply
  83. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  about 1 month ago

    Not really, you do not vote for President, the Electoral College does. No shenanigans in between, we swear.

     •  Reply
  84. Missing large
    michael3114  30 days ago

    I wonder what would happen if we threw out the Primaries and just put everyone who signed up to run on the November ballot. Whoever gets the most votes wins. It might be a surprising outcome.

     •  Reply
  85. Img 0634
    Beowulf 406 Premium Member 30 days ago

    2 viable airlines left, most people choose vanilla or cholate, seams most people paint grey exteriors with white interiors, and 1000 channels with nothing to watch except bad news. So yeah, two parties are about all we can handle. That’s provided we don’t have to look up from our phones.

     •  Reply
  86. Missing large
    olds_cool63  30 days ago

    Ummm…there are SEVERAL candidates. Unfortunately, because of the out-dated and out-moded duoply, most people are only concerned with the 2 major parties.

     •  Reply
  87. Img 2005
    justanudderpeeon  30 days ago

    I must have too much time on my hands for I read through all of these comments, and it proved to me once and for all that old saying about peoples opinions and their szamár lyukak, everyone has one…

     •  Reply
  88. Froggy with cat ears
    willie_mctell  30 days ago

    Gone to psychopaths, every one. When will they ever learn?

     •  Reply
  89. Missing large
    John Jorgensen  30 days ago

    Presidential systems really aren’t a good fit, though there are some countries (France and Mexico come to mind offhand) where the election happens in two stages, with the first being a knockout round and the second being between the top two finishers, thus ensuring that the president won with a majority of the vote. A ranked choice ballot would have the same effect.

    It’s a bit of a paradox, though. We’re not going to have more than two viable candidates without a system like that, and we’re not going to get a system like that without more than two viable candidates. As long as the two party system is firmly established, there’s not much point to ranked choice voting.

    Though it did make Lisa Murkowski bulletproof two years ago and gave her the courage she needed to stand up to maga bullies, as much as she was going to anyway. It might help other Republicans emancipate themselves.

     •  Reply
  90. 23795412 10214101132344360 1674995198857089249 n
    davidp05201  30 days ago

    The only Independent to win the presidential election was George Washington.

     •  Reply
  91. Curious cat
    Curiosity Premium Member 30 days ago

    I have no clue at this point which book this was in, but many years ago I read a Science Fiction Book by an author who probably counted as being in the original definition of Libertarian. In the book there was an election and the ‘winner’ was -——-“none of the above is acceptable”.

     •  Reply
  92. Saurichia
    Saurischia  30 days ago

    And there is likely one cable company. And you have to pay for the sports package whether you want it or not. We had cable to watch TCM only – finally let it go a few months ago and don’t miss it one bit and saved $150 per month as well.

     •  Reply
  93. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  30 days ago

    Lying insurrectionist Republicans want to take your rights away so that they can be dictators.

     •  Reply
  94. Missing large
    Rich Douglas  30 days ago

    You only have one. If you want democracy, that is.

     •  Reply
  95. Coachroy1
    Roy Lamberton  30 days ago

    Democracy is 5 wolves and a sheep taking a vote to decide what to have for dinner. We have a representative Republic, if, as Franklin was supposed to have said, “if we can keep it..”

     •  Reply
  96. Don1
    DonCoyote®  30 days ago

    In every election, you get TWO choices:…

    1) Get hit in the head with a golf club.

    2) Get hit in the head with a baseball bat.

    ……… Choose wisely.

     •  Reply
  97. Missing large
    wildlandwaters  30 days ago

    or, if one in particular gets his way, you’ll never hafta worry about who to vote for ever again… lol!

     •  Reply
  98. Fun o meter
    ZBicyclist Premium Member 30 days ago

    It’s worse than that. Due to gerrymandering by both parties, few congressional seats are competitive. There’s really only one choice. My congressperson got 71% of the vote in 2022, 71% in 2020, 73% in 2018. Now, I’m OK with her, but those favoring the other party really won’t have a voice in Congress the way the district is drawn.

     •  Reply
  99. Missing large
    dpatrickryan Premium Member 30 days ago

    Canadian here. What are these “airline options” of which you speak? Our airline options are generally “fly” and “don’t fly”.

     •  Reply
  100. 1483913226
    MacII  30 days ago

    Sometimes I think Stephan throws these strips out there and then kicks back to watch the wolves tear each other apart. I guess every job has it perks.

     •  Reply
  101. Amazing fox photos 25
    eddi-TBH  30 days ago

    When the USA was formed the more common choice was one. And nobody voted. Two seemed like a giant step up. Later democracies and republics expanded the numbers. But ultimately it comes down to a majority coalition and minority coalition. And the elections just get more complicated.

     •  Reply
  102. Missing large
    sisterea  30 days ago

    Yeah well make sure you get it right, because if you don’t you might never get another chance. VOTE BLUE signed Childless Cat Lady

     •  Reply
  103. Img 0230
    kevin87031  30 days ago

    With regards to George Carlin.

     •  Reply
  104. King david lane logo jpg 2
    KingDavidLane  30 days ago

    There’s usually a minimum of 4 but sometimes more. You just probably haven’t heard of several or don’t want to.

     •  Reply
  105. Flag
    c001  29 days ago

    In Germany, we have more than 40 parties to choose from but only 4 of them ever came to power, in combinations of 2-3.

     •  Reply
  106. Missing large
    woodvale22  29 days ago

    Why does the USA only have two candidates? Is it not possible to have more? In the UK, it’s rare for any election to have less than 4 different candidates/parties to choose from.

     •  Reply
  107. Missing large
    serial232  29 days ago

    Not true. You have more than two choices. There is the Independent Party, the Green Party, the Communist Party, (oops, that is democrat party). Well there are more than two.

     •  Reply
  108. American gothic  from art institute
    MatthewJB  29 days ago

    Ballotpedia lists dozens of presidential candidates. We have many choices. I’m voting for Vice President Harris, since she is likely to be a good president and she has the best chance of keeping Trump out of the White House.

     •  Reply
  109. Bunnypancakehead
    DarkHorseSki  29 days ago

    Vote Libertarian. It has the best aspects of both major parties. Fiscally responsible while for social liberties.

     •  Reply
  110. Hello big
    joebaxter  29 days ago

    Thanks for the earworm. “…when will they ever learn, when will they ever learn.”

     •  Reply
  111. Missing large
    Masked Avenger  29 days ago

    You have plenty of choices. It just got narrowed down to two, sometimes three.

     •  Reply
  112. 20190826 170156
    Treedodger  27 days ago

    Get rid of the electoral college and mutiple parties will work. Until then….

     •  Reply
  113. Avatar
    DanMercer  25 days ago

    Only true if you don’t vote in the primary. In 2016, there were at least 37 Democrats on ballots in at least one state, and hundreds more who filed papers to run. The Republicans only had 22. That’s more choices than you get with Baskin-Robbins (31).

     •  Reply
  114. Missing large
    Swirls Before Pine  12 days ago

    “Democracy” does not mean having many choices. It means having many choosers.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine