It’s called being a voracious reader. So far this year I’ve read 110 books. Full length novels or nonfiction books. That’s considerably lower than pre-pandemic. In those days I suffered from terrible insomnia and only slept 4-5 hrs a night, max. The pandemic killed my job but I learned to sleep again, so even though I have a lot more free time I sleep more and read less.
Text-based books (paper or digital) are best for using your imagination. The tools (search, dictionary, etc.) that come with e-readers make them a better choice than paper, IMHO. Audiobooks are best for reading in bed — no light to keep you up. Some of the narrators are great — real performers. That makes audiobooks a collaborative art form, like movies.
I had the captioning on on a TV show so I wouldn’t mistake certain words. This toon brings to an audio book with closed captioning, which would basically be…a book
The satisfaction of being able to read printed copy of a book or magazine is hugely satisfying, in a way that I cannot see how looking at a screen could ever be.How does a person know, or find a book that one once read, a book that was printed long before the ‘electronic version’ was even thought of.The books I read were written and published by authors long dead, or haven’t written in years, OR, like some, John Grisham comes to mind, have found that repetition, with only slight changes in plot, or storyline, will still sell. Tom Clancy was another whose later writings were basically the same, with only the “names changed to protect the innocent”.
One advantage of printed books over audiobooks is: when you fall asleep, at least you know where you last part you read is. If you fall asleep while you listen to an audio book, you could be chapters and chapters away from what you last remember.
That’s like saying you read a book by watching the movie! No, you did not! You were passive, you did not participate, you made no effort. The only person reading here is the narrator! Listening is NOT reading!
It does count goat. Since my eyesight has deteriorated, I can’t read books like I used too. I listen to audio books on the way to work and on the way home.
What if, when you read a book, you read it out loud in your head? Some people say that indicates a poor reader, others say that it greatly adds to the experience.
I’m quite a bit older than Stephan Pastis, and I immediately thought, “Tape?” Books on tape haven’t been a thing for what, a couple of decades? I’m sure someone still has a cassette player for their books, but in the USA it can’t be many.
Though nothing will ever take the place of reading a physical book, open your mind (and ears) to all the wonderful books on audio out there. I’m a librarian, and my opinion has always been – books in any form – THEY’RE ALL GOOD! And, as long as you’re listening to an unabridged audiobook – why shouldn’t it “count”? My husband and I commute together, and we’re listening to the Orphan X series by Greg Hurwitz. We cringe, gasp, and laugh together at Evan Smoak’s exploits. There’s something very special about this shared experience. It would not be the same if we had to take turns reading the book.
30 years ago I had a long road trip ahead of me, by myself, and a friend recommended books on tape. I first reaction was “how lame,” but I tried it. I was amazed at how time seemed to fly and the trip was way less boring (across Kansas even). Now I’m hooked.
Three ways to do this: reading, reading out loud to someone, and listening. These are all different forms. Not a neurologist, but my experience is that these each engage different regions of the brain. Someone reading braille might get still another experience. None of these are objectively best or worst. They are different.
If someone asks you if you read a book and you say yes, that’s gonna be about the end of it. No one knows how or much cares. It’s not like they’re going to hit you with the ‘God knows’ thing.
The thing is LISTENING to a story being told is not actually READING the story. Just not the same. If the grid ever goes down I will be thankful for my very large stash of hard copy books. Ah, “time enough at last”.
I definitely prefer bound books to E-books. However, I think audio books are a wonderful option that I can see myself using as I and my eyes get older.
I don’t opt for audiobooks very often, but I have to say that the audiobook version of Barbara Kingsolver’s Demon Copperhead is terrific, with a great narrator.
My preference is a real BOOK. But, I have a hour and a half (each way) commute usually three days a week. I usually have one audiobook and one or two print books in progress at any given time. Can’t keep up with Bob though, average about 100 a year.
Who cares if you define it as “reading” or “not really reading” You ingest the words, you learn, you are entertained, you wonder, you laugh, you cry. I partake of books with my eyes and ears and I love both. I would rather listen to music than read the notes; I would rather look at a painting rather than listen to a description of it.How does Mr. Pastis define “book”? Maybe he thinks we should only look at his cartoons on paper rather than our screens.
“books on tape” – a blast from the past! Storytelling is storytelling – it doesn’t matter how your brain absorbs it. I’m a book or kindle person but I have a friend who can only process books audibly. We both read the book as far as I’m concerned.
People who read know how words are spelled, but not how they’re pronounced. People who listen to books know how words are pronounced, but not how they’re spelled.
Given how poorly people spell nowadays, they must be selling a lot of audiobooks.
The world of books is the most remarkable creation of man. Nothing else he does ever lasts. Monuments fall. Civilizations grow old and die…. after an era of darkness, new races build others. But in the world of books are volumes that have this happen again and again, and yet live on… still as fresh and young as the day they were written, still telling men’s hearts of the hearts of men centuries dead. (Clarence Darrow 1874-1935)
Regardless of how you swing regarding paper vs audio, listening to audio on long drives and commutes when you can’t hold a physical book adds value to time that would otherwise be wasted.
I started listening to audio books during my commute back when they were on cassette tapes. Then came CDs. Now I download to my cell phone and bluetooth to the car. I’m now retired but still listen in the car. Helps control my road rage.
Audio books are real books and I’ll die on that hill. Plus at least I’m reading while driving and cleaning and cooking and walking. Book summaries on the other hand….
Semantics, Goat. Your brain (and imagination) is engaged similarly no matter how you read, whether books are made of dead trees or bytes (at least mine is). And, by the way, tell sight-impaired people that they’re not reading books, especially those who relied on audiobooks to help them obtain college degrees.
I agree. I listen to books all the time while I’m doing something else. It’s not the same as giving your full attention to a book and getting lost in it!
Librarians encourage the pleasure of gaining information and joy of research, fiction, nonfiction films cds, ebooks. Format doesn’t matter. Blind people read with braille and audio. Don’t blame us if you’re a luddite
I like books on tape, but my mind wanders too much. I only re-read er… re-listen a book on tape if I’ve already experienced it in the flesh, or physical form.
“reading” comprehension of audio books is generally far below that for print. Might work for easy fiction but not so great for history, science, and other non-popular nonfiction.
I can read a novel in 1-4 hours, depending on length. I have several audio books that take 10-25 hours. How can anyone get through more audio books than paperbacks or hard cover novels?
Don’t say you listen while driving, that is unsafe, and ensures you aren’t paying enough attention to either activity.
This is the way I feel, though I’ve never said it out loud. Many of my friends only “read” books via Audible. They can fall asleep and still the book gets read.
I read constantly as a young person, and as a single person. My first and favorite job was in the local library.
But since I became a housewife, I can’t sit and read. It’s like working from home. All the things that need doing “call” me, and the older I get, the more prone I am to falling asleep if I sit and am not engaged in a task or conversation. If not for audio books, there would be no books.
But i still stick to older and classic material. Like today’s tv and movies, modern books are too much about dead bodies.
BasilBruce 3 months ago
It took a long time, but GOAT STRIKES AGAIN!
Hello Everyone 3 months ago
Goat must be a Librarian! Or my English Teacher…
carlsonbob 3 months ago
Did Goat borrow Rat’s baseball bat?
orinoco womble 3 months ago
It’s called being a voracious reader. So far this year I’ve read 110 books. Full length novels or nonfiction books. That’s considerably lower than pre-pandemic. In those days I suffered from terrible insomnia and only slept 4-5 hrs a night, max. The pandemic killed my job but I learned to sleep again, so even though I have a lot more free time I sleep more and read less.
tudza Premium Member 3 months ago
I call BS pig.
OBBWG 3 months ago
Meanwhile, Rat is visiting Dark Side of the Horse, sans bat.
Robin Harwood 3 months ago
Good work, Goat.
Arbitrary 3 months ago
Don’t see why it isn’t. It’s the same information and in audio book form it’s delivered in a way that I can retain easier.
Ink blot Premium Member 3 months ago
Text-based books (paper or digital) are best for using your imagination. The tools (search, dictionary, etc.) that come with e-readers make them a better choice than paper, IMHO. Audiobooks are best for reading in bed — no light to keep you up. Some of the narrators are great — real performers. That makes audiobooks a collaborative art form, like movies.
syzygy47 3 months ago
I had the captioning on on a TV show so I wouldn’t mistake certain words. This toon brings to an audio book with closed captioning, which would basically be…a book
Sanspareil 3 months ago
Goat finally channeled Rat! Good show!
blunebottle 3 months ago
Pig gets it right!
jonnytest 3 months ago
Print is dead.
Ermine Notyours 3 months ago
Goat is jealous that there aren’t in Pearls Before Swine audio books.
CementerAD5 3 months ago
The satisfaction of being able to read printed copy of a book or magazine is hugely satisfying, in a way that I cannot see how looking at a screen could ever be.How does a person know, or find a book that one once read, a book that was printed long before the ‘electronic version’ was even thought of.The books I read were written and published by authors long dead, or haven’t written in years, OR, like some, John Grisham comes to mind, have found that repetition, with only slight changes in plot, or storyline, will still sell. Tom Clancy was another whose later writings were basically the same, with only the “names changed to protect the innocent”.
Croc Holliday 3 months ago
Goat is right; definitely does not count.
shanen0 3 months ago
If my eyes get much worse I’m going to have to go with audio books.
iggyman 3 months ago
Some people hav no time to read, so audio books in the car on commute is the only way they can get to know about them!
Purple People Eater 3 months ago
Book him!
minty_Joe 3 months ago
I wonder how a scenario like Fahrenheit 451 would play in this with books on tape.
jaydogg187 3 months ago
No matter the pastime, someone, somewhere, will be a snob over it.
donlackie 3 months ago
I love my audible while driving
Indiana Guy Premium Member 3 months ago
One advantage of printed books over audiobooks is: when you fall asleep, at least you know where you last part you read is. If you fall asleep while you listen to an audio book, you could be chapters and chapters away from what you last remember.
[Unnamed Reader - 641507] 3 months ago
I can’t believe that Rat donated his bat to Goat?
bignatefantic2.0 3 months ago
I’d expect this type of behavior from Rat but not Goat
The Fly Hunter 3 months ago
Wow! Violence from Goat. I always thought he was the calm, rational, pensive type.
Gent 3 months ago
This time me is with Goat. Goat is 100% correct about it.
Walrus Gumbo Premium Member 3 months ago
That’s like saying you read a book by watching the movie! No, you did not! You were passive, you did not participate, you made no effort. The only person reading here is the narrator! Listening is NOT reading!
cracker65 3 months ago
It does count goat. Since my eyesight has deteriorated, I can’t read books like I used too. I listen to audio books on the way to work and on the way home.
TekoaMT 3 months ago
Goat chose violence! Goat chose violence! Wow!
_lounger_ 3 months ago
is that Rat’s bat? just curious…
jonescientific 3 months ago
What if, when you read a book, you read it out loud in your head? Some people say that indicates a poor reader, others say that it greatly adds to the experience.
Carl Fink Premium Member 3 months ago
I’m quite a bit older than Stephan Pastis, and I immediately thought, “Tape?” Books on tape haven’t been a thing for what, a couple of decades? I’m sure someone still has a cassette player for their books, but in the USA it can’t be many.
Procat Premium Member 3 months ago
I wonder if Bob’s ear is bleeding?
Melki Premium Member 3 months ago
Though nothing will ever take the place of reading a physical book, open your mind (and ears) to all the wonderful books on audio out there. I’m a librarian, and my opinion has always been – books in any form – THEY’RE ALL GOOD! And, as long as you’re listening to an unabridged audiobook – why shouldn’t it “count”? My husband and I commute together, and we’re listening to the Orphan X series by Greg Hurwitz. We cringe, gasp, and laugh together at Evan Smoak’s exploits. There’s something very special about this shared experience. It would not be the same if we had to take turns reading the book.
MS72 3 months ago
downsized the house, gave away the books
SquidGamerGal 3 months ago
Books on tape? Pfft! Where’s the fun in that?
[Traveler] Premium Member 3 months ago
30 years ago I had a long road trip ahead of me, by myself, and a friend recommended books on tape. I first reaction was “how lame,” but I tried it. I was amazed at how time seemed to fly and the trip was way less boring (across Kansas even). Now I’m hooked.
ComicsDad5 3 months ago
Give him a break, Goat! (Oops! Sorry!) He’s listening to books…on cassette tape! He’s still charmingly retro!
Dom999 3 months ago
morning commute? i thought we all telework
Ellis97 3 months ago
An audiobook is no substitute for the real thing.
GumbyDammit223 3 months ago
Goat is the one with the bat and yet he???
uniquename 3 months ago
Goat went a little batty here.
Benhamean 3 months ago
So Goat is no better than Jeff the Cyclist when it comes to elitism. Who knew?
Ignatz Premium Member 3 months ago
I have almost 1500 physical books, and I can’t BELIEVE that any sane person opposes audio books or Kindle. They’re great. So are paper books.
DiminishedFirst 3 months ago
Three ways to do this: reading, reading out loud to someone, and listening. These are all different forms. Not a neurologist, but my experience is that these each engage different regions of the brain. Someone reading braille might get still another experience. None of these are objectively best or worst. They are different.
Out of the Past 3 months ago
If someone asks you if you read a book and you say yes, that’s gonna be about the end of it. No one knows how or much cares. It’s not like they’re going to hit you with the ‘God knows’ thing.
david_42 3 months ago
Listening to a book takes five times as long as reading it – BORING!
CaveCat87 3 months ago
Someone needs to get Neighbor Bob to read Ray Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451”, and not on tape, but actually read it.
Chris 3 months ago
even goat can get violent. :j
chris_o42 3 months ago
The thing is LISTENING to a story being told is not actually READING the story. Just not the same. If the grid ever goes down I will be thankful for my very large stash of hard copy books. Ah, “time enough at last”.
SusieB 3 months ago
I definitely prefer bound books to E-books. However, I think audio books are a wonderful option that I can see myself using as I and my eyes get older.
rossevrymn 3 months ago
What if the author never read the book, such as, “The Art of the Deal?”
Carl Rennhack Premium Member 3 months ago
This is the ONLY time I’ve seen Paris act like Rat! I hope it’s the LAST time!
rugeirn 3 months ago
As one who makes a few thousand a year from audiobook royalties, I beg to differ, O Goat.
strick9 3 months ago
I write banned books
Count Olaf Premium Member 3 months ago
Goat must be subbing for Rat on his day off with the bashing with a bat thing.
diskus Premium Member 3 months ago
Im ok with counting them both, but thise abridged versions dont get full credit. I do prefer the old fashion way. Much faster as well for me
ladykat 3 months ago
I still read quite a bit, but not as much as I used to.
SpicyNacho Premium Member 3 months ago
Neighbor Bob needs to move! Too many wild bats around.
Goat from PBS 3 months ago
What I mind most offensive: He listens to them on tape. TAPE! This isn’t 2004 anymore!
Newenglandah 3 months ago
I feel the same way about people who skip the book and just see the movie.
Brian007 3 months ago
I don’t opt for audiobooks very often, but I have to say that the audiobook version of Barbara Kingsolver’s Demon Copperhead is terrific, with a great narrator.
Lynnjav 3 months ago
Of course it counts.
jharrington3 Premium Member 3 months ago
My preference is a real BOOK. But, I have a hour and a half (each way) commute usually three days a week. I usually have one audiobook and one or two print books in progress at any given time. Can’t keep up with Bob though, average about 100 a year.
rshive 3 months ago
I’ve never listened to taped books. But I kinda think Neighbor Bob’s doings qualify.
royq27 3 months ago
Goat going to bat for all we readers who love books!
bbbmorrell 3 months ago
Boo. I love both. How does Goat feel about e-books? You do read them.
bittenbyknittin 3 months ago
I’m almost done with The Power Broker, audio version. I’d never make it through the dead tree version.
Snoopy Copter 3 months ago
How many times has GOAT batted people?
skientist 3 months ago
I am sort of with Goat here, though I am far more likely to keep my opinion to myself and let Neighbor Bob think he has “read” those books.
Big Garfield and Hobbes the Brave Before Swine 3 months ago
Just over the summer I read 116 books
rebroxanna 3 months ago
Who cares if you define it as “reading” or “not really reading” You ingest the words, you learn, you are entertained, you wonder, you laugh, you cry. I partake of books with my eyes and ears and I love both. I would rather listen to music than read the notes; I would rather look at a painting rather than listen to a description of it.How does Mr. Pastis define “book”? Maybe he thinks we should only look at his cartoons on paper rather than our screens.
halvincobbes Premium Member 3 months ago
“books on tape” – a blast from the past! Storytelling is storytelling – it doesn’t matter how your brain absorbs it. I’m a book or kindle person but I have a friend who can only process books audibly. We both read the book as far as I’m concerned.
fritzoid Premium Member 3 months ago
People who read know how words are spelled, but not how they’re pronounced. People who listen to books know how words are pronounced, but not how they’re spelled.
Given how poorly people spell nowadays, they must be selling a lot of audiobooks.
Snuffles [Previously Helikitty] 3 months ago
He’s not reading them he’s listening to them, the cheater.
newsbb 3 months ago
I’m with Goat aka. The GOAT
Diane Lee Premium Member 3 months ago
The world of books is the most remarkable creation of man. Nothing else he does ever lasts. Monuments fall. Civilizations grow old and die…. after an era of darkness, new races build others. But in the world of books are volumes that have this happen again and again, and yet live on… still as fresh and young as the day they were written, still telling men’s hearts of the hearts of men centuries dead. (Clarence Darrow 1874-1935)
kjnrun 3 months ago
Does goat dislike Kindles? So easy to travel with, too.
jonescientific 3 months ago
Regardless of how you swing regarding paper vs audio, listening to audio on long drives and commutes when you can’t hold a physical book adds value to time that would otherwise be wasted.
CitizenOfTheValley 3 months ago
I started listening to audio books during my commute back when they were on cassette tapes. Then came CDs. Now I download to my cell phone and bluetooth to the car. I’m now retired but still listen in the car. Helps control my road rage.
mousefumanchu Premium Member 3 months ago
A book is a book is a book! Any way you can get it!
amaneaux 3 months ago
“What is a book?” seems to be the new “what is a sandwich?” Audio books, comic books, etc. might or might not be, depending who you ask.
brick10 3 months ago
I’ve seen a number of drivers (mostly women) zoom by me on the interstate with a paperback opened on their steering wheel.
Jeffin Premium Member 3 months ago
Try putting a book on tape over your eyes to nap.
Lara Fabans Premium Member 3 months ago
Audio books are real books and I’ll die on that hill. Plus at least I’m reading while driving and cleaning and cooking and walking. Book summaries on the other hand….
socalvillaguy Premium Member 3 months ago
Semantics, Goat. Your brain (and imagination) is engaged similarly no matter how you read, whether books are made of dead trees or bytes (at least mine is). And, by the way, tell sight-impaired people that they’re not reading books, especially those who relied on audiobooks to help them obtain college degrees.
stamps 3 months ago
Isn’t that distracted driving? Book him!
[Unnamed Reader - 14b4ce] 3 months ago
Reading an E-book doesn’t count, and the print is so small I’m amazed anybody CANread it
Ishka Bibel 3 months ago
Multi-tasking is a myth. You cannot listen to a book and drive.
zeexenon 3 months ago
No way, I read with a yellow highlighter in one hand. To think, I had to use ink and a quill pen in c. ’60s university.
John Jorgensen 3 months ago
I updated my count the other day. I’m up to 45. Though that’s including some pretty light reading in there.
rjarchuleta 3 months ago
Pastis, have you seen this? >
leannwoo 3 months ago
I agree. I listen to books all the time while I’m doing something else. It’s not the same as giving your full attention to a book and getting lost in it!
Bilan 3 months ago
Bob must have a helluva commute to have time for 175 audiobooks.
fritzoid Premium Member 3 months ago
“Outside of a dog, a book is man’s best friend. Inside of a dog, you probably need an audiobook.” – Groucho Updated
Gordo4ever 3 months ago
I’m with Goat on this: no Kindles, e-readers, et al for me.
old_geek 3 months ago
Reading Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy was funny. Listening to it was hilarious…
Nobody_Important 3 months ago
You go Goat!!!
Retliblady Premium Member 3 months ago
Librarians encourage the pleasure of gaining information and joy of research, fiction, nonfiction films cds, ebooks. Format doesn’t matter. Blind people read with braille and audio. Don’t blame us if you’re a luddite
nicholasbonnie3 3 months ago
Some of Rat’s influences have definitely rubbed off Goat for the worst.
willie_mctell 3 months ago
I need to read print. I like audio drama and comedy but I sometimes get distracted, especially when I’m driving. With print I can backtrack easily.
andrew.scharnhorst 3 months ago
So out of character for Goat to be so physical! Mayhaps he’s been hangin’ around Rat too much.
Lafsalot 3 months ago
I once read a book that wasn’t a book. I fergit what it was. I think it might have been a pastry.
Mentor397 3 months ago
I like books on tape, but my mind wanders too much. I only re-read er… re-listen a book on tape if I’ve already experienced it in the flesh, or physical form.
Arghhgarrr Premium Member 3 months ago
“reading” comprehension of audio books is generally far below that for print. Might work for easy fiction but not so great for history, science, and other non-popular nonfiction.
Buoy 3 months ago
Yawn
sew-so 3 months ago
I can read a novel in 1-4 hours, depending on length. I have several audio books that take 10-25 hours. How can anyone get through more audio books than paperbacks or hard cover novels?
Don’t say you listen while driving, that is unsafe, and ensures you aren’t paying enough attention to either activity.
Cameron1988 Premium Member 3 months ago
What’s Goat’s problem?!
eddi-TBH 3 months ago
We were listening to stories long before we could read. Both historically and personally.
Otis Rufus Driftwood 3 months ago
Goat has been hanging around Rat too long.
Oakguy 3 months ago
This is the way I feel, though I’ve never said it out loud. Many of my friends only “read” books via Audible. They can fall asleep and still the book gets read.
TwilightFaze 3 months ago
I see he learned a few things from Rat.
LrdSlvrhnd 3 months ago
Audio books count as books. They do not count as reading books. You listen to them, you don’t read them.
franki_g 3 months ago
I read constantly as a young person, and as a single person. My first and favorite job was in the local library.
But since I became a housewife, I can’t sit and read. It’s like working from home. All the things that need doing “call” me, and the older I get, the more prone I am to falling asleep if I sit and am not engaged in a task or conversation. If not for audio books, there would be no books.
But i still stick to older and classic material. Like today’s tv and movies, modern books are too much about dead bodies.
Swirls Before Pine 3 months ago
Anyone with a higher count that Goat MUST be cheating. Or it’s Rat is trying out his Halloween costume.
Swirls Before Pine 3 months ago
Don’t tell Goat that you listen to recorded music instead of live performances, or movies instead of live theatre.