It’s called being a voracious reader. So far this year I’ve read 110 books. Full length novels or nonfiction books. That’s considerably lower than pre-pandemic. In those days I suffered from terrible insomnia and only slept 4-5 hrs a night, max. The pandemic killed my job but I learned to sleep again, so even though I have a lot more free time I sleep more and read less.
Text-based books (paper or digital) are best for using your imagination. The tools (search, dictionary, etc.) that come with e-readers make them a better choice than paper, IMHO. Audiobooks are best for reading in bed — no light to keep you up. Some of the narrators are great — real performers. That makes audiobooks a collaborative art form, like movies.
I had the captioning on on a TV show so I wouldn’t mistake certain words. This toon brings to an audio book with closed captioning, which would basically be…a book
The satisfaction of being able to read printed copy of a book or magazine is hugely satisfying, in a way that I cannot see how looking at a screen could ever be.How does a person know, or find a book that one once read, a book that was printed long before the ‘electronic version’ was even thought of.The books I read were written and published by authors long dead, or haven’t written in years, OR, like some, John Grisham comes to mind, have found that repetition, with only slight changes in plot, or storyline, will still sell. Tom Clancy was another whose later writings were basically the same, with only the “names changed to protect the innocent”.
One advantage of printed books over audiobooks is: when you fall asleep, at least you know where you last part you read is. If you fall asleep while you listen to an audio book, you could be chapters and chapters away from what you last remember.
That’s like saying you read a book by watching the movie! No, you did not! You were passive, you did not participate, you made no effort. The only person reading here is the narrator! Listening is NOT reading!
It does count goat. Since my eyesight has deteriorated, I can’t read books like I used too. I listen to audio books on the way to work and on the way home.
What if, when you read a book, you read it out loud in your head? Some people say that indicates a poor reader, others say that it greatly adds to the experience.
I’m quite a bit older than Stephan Pastis, and I immediately thought, “Tape?” Books on tape haven’t been a thing for what, a couple of decades? I’m sure someone still has a cassette player for their books, but in the USA it can’t be many.
Though nothing will ever take the place of reading a physical book, open your mind (and ears) to all the wonderful books on audio out there. I’m a librarian, and my opinion has always been – books in any form – THEY’RE ALL GOOD! And, as long as you’re listening to an unabridged audiobook – why shouldn’t it “count”? My husband and I commute together, and we’re listening to the Orphan X series by Greg Hurwitz. We cringe, gasp, and laugh together at Evan Smoak’s exploits. There’s something very special about this shared experience. It would not be the same if we had to take turns reading the book.
30 years ago I had a long road trip ahead of me, by myself, and a friend recommended books on tape. I first reaction was “how lame,” but I tried it. I was amazed at how time seemed to fly and the trip was way less boring (across Kansas even). Now I’m hooked.
Three ways to do this: reading, reading out loud to someone, and listening. These are all different forms. Not a neurologist, but my experience is that these each engage different regions of the brain. Someone reading braille might get still another experience. None of these are objectively best or worst. They are different.
If someone asks you if you read a book and you say yes, that’s gonna be about the end of it. No one knows how or much cares. It’s not like they’re going to hit you with the ‘God knows’ thing.
The thing is LISTENING to a story being told is not actually READING the story. Just not the same. If the grid ever goes down I will be thankful for my very large stash of hard copy books. Ah, “time enough at last”.
I definitely prefer bound books to E-books. However, I think audio books are a wonderful option that I can see myself using as I and my eyes get older.
BasilBruce about 7 hours ago
It took a long time, but GOAT STRIKES AGAIN!
Hello Everyone about 7 hours ago
Goat must be a Librarian! Or my English Teacher…
carlsonbob about 7 hours ago
Did Goat borrow Rat’s baseball bat?
orinoco womble about 7 hours ago
It’s called being a voracious reader. So far this year I’ve read 110 books. Full length novels or nonfiction books. That’s considerably lower than pre-pandemic. In those days I suffered from terrible insomnia and only slept 4-5 hrs a night, max. The pandemic killed my job but I learned to sleep again, so even though I have a lot more free time I sleep more and read less.
tudza Premium Member about 7 hours ago
I call BS pig.
OBBWG about 7 hours ago
Meanwhile, Rat is visiting Dark Side of the Horse, sans bat.
Robin Harwood about 7 hours ago
Good work, Goat.
Arbitrary about 6 hours ago
Don’t see why it isn’t. It’s the same information and in audio book form it’s delivered in a way that I can retain easier.
Ink blot Premium Member about 6 hours ago
Text-based books (paper or digital) are best for using your imagination. The tools (search, dictionary, etc.) that come with e-readers make them a better choice than paper, IMHO. Audiobooks are best for reading in bed — no light to keep you up. Some of the narrators are great — real performers. That makes audiobooks a collaborative art form, like movies.
syzygy47 about 6 hours ago
I had the captioning on on a TV show so I wouldn’t mistake certain words. This toon brings to an audio book with closed captioning, which would basically be…a book
Sanspareil about 6 hours ago
Goat finally channeled Rat! Good show!
blunebottle about 6 hours ago
Pig gets it right!
jonnytest about 6 hours ago
Print is dead.
Ermine Notyours about 5 hours ago
Goat is jealous that there aren’t in Pearls Before Swine audio books.
CementerAD5 about 4 hours ago
The satisfaction of being able to read printed copy of a book or magazine is hugely satisfying, in a way that I cannot see how looking at a screen could ever be.How does a person know, or find a book that one once read, a book that was printed long before the ‘electronic version’ was even thought of.The books I read were written and published by authors long dead, or haven’t written in years, OR, like some, John Grisham comes to mind, have found that repetition, with only slight changes in plot, or storyline, will still sell. Tom Clancy was another whose later writings were basically the same, with only the “names changed to protect the innocent”.
Croc Holliday about 4 hours ago
Goat is right; definitely does not count.
shanen0 about 4 hours ago
If my eyes get much worse I’m going to have to go with audio books.
iggyman about 4 hours ago
Some people hav no time to read, so audio books in the car on commute is the only way they can get to know about them!
Purple People Eater about 4 hours ago
Book him!
minty_Joe about 4 hours ago
I wonder how a scenario like Fahrenheit 451 would play in this with books on tape.
jaydogg187 about 4 hours ago
No matter the pastime, someone, somewhere, will be a snob over it.
donlackie about 3 hours ago
I love my audible while driving
Guy from southern Indiana about 3 hours ago
One advantage of printed books over audiobooks is: when you fall asleep, at least you know where you last part you read is. If you fall asleep while you listen to an audio book, you could be chapters and chapters away from what you last remember.
[Unnamed Reader - 641507] about 3 hours ago
I can’t believe that Rat donated his bat to Goat?
bignatefantic2.0 about 3 hours ago
I’d expect this type of behavior from Rat but not Goat
The Fly Hunter about 3 hours ago
Wow! Violence from Goat. I always thought he was the calm, rational, pensive type.
Gent about 3 hours ago
This time me is with Goat. Goat is 100% correct about it.
Walrus Gumbo Premium Member about 2 hours ago
That’s like saying you read a book by watching the movie! No, you did not! You were passive, you did not participate, you made no effort. The only person reading here is the narrator! Listening is NOT reading!
cracker65 about 2 hours ago
It does count goat. Since my eyesight has deteriorated, I can’t read books like I used too. I listen to audio books on the way to work and on the way home.
TekoaMT about 2 hours ago
Goat chose violence! Goat chose violence! Wow!
_lounger_ about 2 hours ago
is that Rat’s bat? just curious…
jonescientific about 2 hours ago
What if, when you read a book, you read it out loud in your head? Some people say that indicates a poor reader, others say that it greatly adds to the experience.
Carl Fink Premium Member about 2 hours ago
I’m quite a bit older than Stephan Pastis, and I immediately thought, “Tape?” Books on tape haven’t been a thing for what, a couple of decades? I’m sure someone still has a cassette player for their books, but in the USA it can’t be many.
Procat Premium Member about 2 hours ago
I wonder if Bob’s ear is bleeding?
Melki Premium Member about 1 hour ago
Though nothing will ever take the place of reading a physical book, open your mind (and ears) to all the wonderful books on audio out there. I’m a librarian, and my opinion has always been – books in any form – THEY’RE ALL GOOD! And, as long as you’re listening to an unabridged audiobook – why shouldn’t it “count”? My husband and I commute together, and we’re listening to the Orphan X series by Greg Hurwitz. We cringe, gasp, and laugh together at Evan Smoak’s exploits. There’s something very special about this shared experience. It would not be the same if we had to take turns reading the book.
MS72 about 1 hour ago
downsized the house, gave away the books
SquidGamerGal about 1 hour ago
Books on tape? Pfft! Where’s the fun in that?
[Traveler] Premium Member about 1 hour ago
30 years ago I had a long road trip ahead of me, by myself, and a friend recommended books on tape. I first reaction was “how lame,” but I tried it. I was amazed at how time seemed to fly and the trip was way less boring (across Kansas even). Now I’m hooked.
ComicsDad5 about 1 hour ago
Give him a break, Goat! (Oops! Sorry!) He’s listening to books…on cassette tape! He’s still charmingly retro!
Dom999 about 1 hour ago
morning commute? i thought we all telework
Ellis97 about 1 hour ago
An audiobook is no substitute for the real thing.
GumbyDammit223 about 1 hour ago
Goat is the one with the bat and yet he???
uniquename 41 minutes ago
Goat went a little batty here.
Benhamean 36 minutes ago
So Goat is no better than Jeff the Cyclist when it comes to elitism. Who knew?
Ignatz Premium Member 35 minutes ago
I have almost 1500 physical books, and I can’t BELIEVE that any sane person opposes audio books or Kindle. They’re great. So are paper books.
DiminishedFirst 27 minutes ago
Three ways to do this: reading, reading out loud to someone, and listening. These are all different forms. Not a neurologist, but my experience is that these each engage different regions of the brain. Someone reading braille might get still another experience. None of these are objectively best or worst. They are different.
Out of the Past 26 minutes ago
If someone asks you if you read a book and you say yes, that’s gonna be about the end of it. No one knows how or much cares. It’s not like they’re going to hit you with the ‘God knows’ thing.
david_42 22 minutes ago
Listening to a book takes five times as long as reading it – BORING!
CaveCat87 22 minutes ago
Someone needs to get Neighbor Bob to read Ray Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451”, and not on tape, but actually read it.
Chris 17 minutes ago
even goat can get violent. :j
chris_o42 11 minutes ago
The thing is LISTENING to a story being told is not actually READING the story. Just not the same. If the grid ever goes down I will be thankful for my very large stash of hard copy books. Ah, “time enough at last”.
SusieB 5 minutes ago
I definitely prefer bound books to E-books. However, I think audio books are a wonderful option that I can see myself using as I and my eyes get older.
rossevrymn 1 minute ago
What if the author never read the book, such as, “The Art of the Deal?”