Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for February 16, 2025

  1. Missing large
    cmxx  5 days ago

    History lesson #1: It doesn’t have to make sense to be history.

     •  Reply
  2. 20130202 084632
    Plumb.Bob Premium Member 5 days ago

    Well according to the new curriculum the slaves liked it and learned things and everyone was happy. Florida was the testing ground, soon to go nation-wide. Larry Elder the GOP candidate for governpor in the last California election said the descendants of slave owners are the ones who deserve reparations. It is a brave new world indeed.

     •  Reply
  3. Ding a ling
    BasilBruce  5 days ago

    My understanding is that releasing his slaves would have bankrupted him, which is the only reason he didn’t do it. He hated slavery, but I guess he hated being broke more.

     •  Reply
  4. Dragon
    Asharah  5 days ago

    Ben Franklin came up with “self-evident” Jefferson had written “sacred & undeniable”

     •  Reply
  5. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  5 days ago

    He probably didn’t think slaves were fully human. Most wealthy white men didn’t. Shoot a lot of them held the same view of women.

     •  Reply
  6. Unnamed
    The dude from FL  Premium Member 5 days ago

    And yet, trump burned the Constitution EXCEPT to hide from his felonies. Only took him about 2 days…a new record

     •  Reply
  7. Eveningledger connie
    Johnny Q Premium Member 5 days ago

    The Jefferson tragedy is the American tragedy…

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    joyisanroman  5 days ago

    The answer to rat’s question is independence is the enemy of freedom.

     •  Reply
  9. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member 5 days ago

    It’s because they were not thought of as human beings.

    Magats still don’t think they are.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    halibaitor  5 days ago

    Some people are more equal than the others.

     •  Reply
  11. Me
    Indiana Guy Premium Member 5 days ago

    Never underestimate man’s ability to rationalize anything. Rationalize = rational lies.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    jonnytest  5 days ago

    It was a whole twisted economy that spun around slavery back then. It took 100 years for the culture to grow out of that dark abyss so that Lincoln could finally put the last nail in that coffin by sacrificing 360,000 union lives. Never forget that.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    Arbitrary  5 days ago

    Funnily enough the hypocrisy of that line was called out at the time as well.

    Jefferson did say that the constitution should be rewritten every few decades because the dead should not govern the living. He wasn’t wrong especially since the interpretation of it seems to be extremely loose now. Doesn’t help that our constitution is harder to add amendments to than almost any other.

     •  Reply
  14. 8fbc3980561df8c73607d1fb424029ab
    Aimless Melissa   5 days ago

    Rich people owned slaves. Not just in Jefferson’s time, but for millennia before his birth. It wasn’t unthinkable, like today. For them, and through most of known history around the world, slavery it was normal and accepted. Context is crucial to those who want to understand the past.

     •  Reply
  15. Purplepeopleeater small
    Purple People Eater  5 days ago

    People thought it was okay to own slaves because they didn’t consider them to be fully human. The same type of reasoning was used by the Nazis about Jews and has been used in a number of other cases as well.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    PearlsFan88 Premium Member 5 days ago

    I remember when he was funny. Enough of this.

     •  Reply
  17. Bluedog
    Bilan  5 days ago

    Maybe Jefferson didn’t like slavery. But you know how it is. When somebody in the neighborhood gets a slave, suddenly everybody has to have one. /s

     •  Reply
  18. Mrpeabodyboysherman
    iggyman  5 days ago

    A long gone, thankfully, way of life.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    becida  5 days ago

    Slavery was how things were for thousands of years…if you were really unlucky.

     •  Reply
  20. Aliedited
    Dorothy Sieradzki Premium Member 5 days ago

    It continues with the sex trade today.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    smartty cat Premium Member 5 days ago

    He felt that only privileged White people like him should own slaves. He bore children of Sally Hemings the half sister of his wife’s. Not much of a President to be proud of. I’m a graduate of the University of Virginia and I feel that be the case.

     •  Reply
  22. Photo
    JohnBeatty  5 days ago

    He didn’t, but there was no way out of it at the time.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    mrwiskers2008  5 days ago

    History is made up of the actions of people. And people are contradictory creatures. Therefore, history will always be contradictory.

     •  Reply
  24. Squid icon
    SquidGamerGal  5 days ago

    Now, now. There were no proof of that!

     •  Reply
  25. Logo
    TwilightFaze  5 days ago

    Who said he was ok with it? We don’t actually know. Historically, some owned the slaves as a means to save them from cruel owners who treated them like property, not people, and helped better their lives on the down low as much as possible. From what I recall, a few of the Founding Fathers had this mindset too. They had to fight one battle at a time and establishing the country was a huge one they needed to win first.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    odoactor Premium Member 5 days ago

    As my handle might suggest, I’m an actor. Among other things I perform a solo play as Thomas Jefferson. Of course I tell the story of the Declaration, but I also do a long section on his repeated failures to end slavery, starting with his first term in the House of Burgesses. He was finally able to stop (at least on paper) the importation of slaves in 1808 when he was president.

     •  Reply
  27. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member 5 days ago

    Well, Jefferson probably didn’t consider the people he owned to be “people”. All the beautiful writing was for rich, white men only.

     •  Reply
  28. 3540301777 e380648263
    bbbmorrell  5 days ago

    We are in another period of history like that.

     •  Reply
  29. 2019063095133708
    rs0204 Premium Member 5 days ago

    Don’t think slavery could happen again? Don’t bet on it. Too many people never learn from history; case in point, giving Trump a second chance at destroying our country. And he’s doing it.

    Fun fact: The food that USAID sends overseas to help starving people is bought from our small farmers, helping sustain the small farms across the country. President Musk and his idiot Trump are going to bankrupt hundreds of small farmers.

     •  Reply
  30. Screenshot 20250221 044219 gallery
    No6  5 days ago

    I watched ‘The Butler’ (2013) for the first time recently. A true story starring Forest Whitaker as Cecil Gaines, a black American born into slavery and then serving (literally) several Presidents in the White House.

    The Civil Rights movement is a powerful chapter in the movie.

     •  Reply
  31. Lifi
    rossevrymn  5 days ago

    How much truth can people handle?

     •  Reply
  32. Yakko
    TheBigPickle  5 days ago

    Stop snorting the kool-aid and pick up a different book, Rat. Jefferson, in an early draft of the Declaration of Independence, included a passage condemning slavery. He blamed England for perpetuating the slave trade, but for legal and financial reasons, he could not simply declare the immediate emancipation of enslaved people. The passage was ultimately removed because the Colonies were deeply divided on the issue and would not have presented a united front against England.

     •  Reply
  33. Pirate63
    Linguist  5 days ago

    It is hard to think of human beings in terms of commodities but that is exactly what slaves were. Without such human commodities the Roman Empire, for example, would never have thrived for as long as it did. The Roman economy was completely dependent on slavery.

    Throughout the ages, slavery was an acceptable practice and a necessary evil until civilizations realized that it was more economically feasible to pay workers a pittance and force them to fend for themselves.

    Freedom meant freedom from responsibility for the rich. They no longer were responsible for feeding, clothing, and sheltering their workers.

    I am not trying to be an apologist for slavery but it has been historically proven that slaves, by and large, because they were such a valuable commodity, were treated better by their owners, who wanted to protect their assets, than the poor freedman.

     •  Reply
  34. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  5 days ago

    Wait till you hear about Ronald Regan. He used to have a monkey.

     •  Reply
  35. Popeye
    Rick Parkhurst Premium Member 5 days ago

    I think that Stephan just likes to poke the hornet’s nest sometimes.

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    VICTOR PROULX  5 days ago

    Using the norms of today, to judge people and events that are 250 years old, is cheap, and indeed, misleading history.

     •  Reply
  37. Ignatz
    Ignatz Premium Member 5 days ago

    He actually wasn’t okay with slavery, and owned them anyway. There’s a character like that in “Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” Augustine St. Clair. Opposed to slavery and owns slaves. I suspect that sort of total dissonance wasn’t all the uncommon, and people came up with tortured justifications for why, in their case, it was a “regrettable but necessary.” (“This is a big estate and can’t be maintained without staff, I treat them well,” etc.)

    This was in Jefferson’s original Declaration. It was removed because the South refused to accept the Declaration if it wasn’t:

    “He [King George] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the Christian King of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where Men should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or restrain this execrable commerce. And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he has obtruded them: thus paying off former crimes committed again the Liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another.”

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    timinwsac Premium Member 5 days ago

    Time to tear somemore statues.

     •  Reply
  39. Huckandfish
    Huckleberry Hiroshima Premium Member 5 days ago

    Well, he, and other founding parents of the country, were writing about idealism. Great way to make hypocrites of us all.

     •  Reply
  40. Missing large
    [Unnamed Reader - 641507]  5 days ago

    He should have let the slave go & go on a book tour.

     •  Reply
  41. Missing large
    filops  5 days ago

    Same way cartoonists talk big about liberty and independence, then slave away for the party of statist totalitarianism and thought-control.

     •  Reply
  42. Note
    Slowly, he turned...  5 days ago

    Money (and its power) is the cause of a lot of immorality. True then. Just as true today. The Gulf of America has changed very little.

     •  Reply
  43. Img 4475
    carlosrivers  5 days ago

    I disagree; you did need the megaphone…

     •  Reply
  44. Durandal
    Durandal_1707  5 days ago

    The fact that he had slaves doing all the work for him is a big part of why he was able to do all those things.

    A lot of us could be that “brilliant” if we had unlimited free time to dabble in whatever we wanted.

     •  Reply
  45. Img 0113
    ajr58(1)  5 days ago

    I wonder what Rat’s descendants 200 years hence will think of where we are now?

     •  Reply
  46. Greg backlit
    mindjob  5 days ago

    In those days slaves weren’t considered to be humans

     •  Reply
  47. 96480   copy  2
    Goat from PBS  5 days ago

    I heard he hated slavery, and he pointed the way out of it.

     •  Reply
  48. T rump2
    ira.crank  5 days ago

    Perhaps he was both morally and financially bankrupt—trapped in denial and unwilling to face the consequences.

     •  Reply
  49. Img 1612
    Zebrastripes  5 days ago

    Back in the day, it’s what they all did, unfortunately. A very big stain on human history, to say the least. ☹️

    But mean while, today in DC, Nazism, Fascism is taking hold and it seems no one is doing anything to stop it…everyone is bought and paid for including the NOT so Supreme Court.

    And “they” said it should never happen again…..☹️

     •  Reply
  50. Zdesertinutah
    desertinutah1951  5 days ago

    It’s about economics: Economics—money—will trump morality nearly every single time. If the peoples of the world who eventually embraced Christianity actually believed in Christian values, slavery would have disappeared from those countries by, the latest, 1000 AD. But, no: too much wealth to be made on slave labor, even today.

     •  Reply
  51. Missing large
    grocks  5 days ago

    We were actually learning about the whole of history – the good and the ugly. They can and do co-exist, and understanding both could make us better people. All too soon, we’re back to learning just one very lopsided view. Sad.

     •  Reply
  52. Missing large
    MJ Weber Premium Member 5 days ago

    It’s complicated Rat. As the former Governor of Virginia, he was following the culture of the times. Does that stiil mean it was OK? No, but a little easier to understand. Different times and culture.

     •  Reply
  53. Missing large
    bunrabbit99  5 days ago

    Ephesians 6:5–8: Paul instructs slaves to obey their masters with fear and trembling, and to do God’s will.

     •  Reply
  54. Avatarpic l  1
    mfrasca  5 days ago

    Black History IS America’s History.

     •  Reply
  55. 1306946534966
    Spacetech  5 days ago

    KEEP ABORTION FREE!!!!

     •  Reply
  56. Img 0041
    Dapperdan61  Premium Member 5 days ago

    We don’t have a proud history which is why MAGA is whitewashing our history

     •  Reply
  57. Missing large
    Otis Rufus Driftwood  5 days ago

    Rat is late to the party. And Pastis went after some low hanging fruit. Overall, not one of his best.

     •  Reply
  58. Missing large
    jerwag389  5 days ago

    The only “resource” we’ve carelessly & cruelly exploited as much as our fellow humans is the fragile living veneer on our 3rd rock from the sun, akin to no more than the skin of an apple. We need the wisdom of 3 lifetimes to understand what we’re doing.

     •  Reply
  59. 14
    GojusJoe  5 days ago

    This is how many people envision Reparations: The rich white people will give money to the blacks and native Americans.How it will actually work:Tax Rules for Reparations – No rich person of any race gets any dough. Blacks and Native Americans can recoup the portion of their taxes that go to reparations. If they don’t pay taxes, then they get a “reparations tax credit.” Mixed-race people get a “reparations tax credit.” If you are a poor white person, you get some free money, but that’s a different issue. Now where was I. Oh yes, if you emigrated from Africa after 1870, you don’t get anything unless you were abused somewhere along the line, which during the Jim Crow era was almost certainly the case. Blacks and native Americans who have committed felonies don’t get any dough. If you are black or native American and you were married 5 years or more to a white person, you don’t get any dough. For clarification, see Section 501c(iii) of the Reparations pamphlet.

     •  Reply
  60. Me4
    CitizenOfTheValley  5 days ago

    Jefferson himself admitted that his wealth was his slaves – worth more than his land and estate, Monticello. Raising a child, teaching him/her a skill such as blacksmith or cloth weaving, then selling that person brought in more money than raising a crop of wheat or cotton.

     •  Reply
  61. Odin
    Holden Awn  5 days ago

    The pre-industrial world required a great deal of hard daily human labor. Much / most of that labor was performed by people who had no choice in the matter. There were many ways one could find oneself in slavery, and virtually all human societies had some form of it.

     •  Reply
  62. Missing large
    ronlouisscholl  5 days ago

    The Founding Fathers didn’t include Founding Mothers (no sufferage), Founding Slaves, Founding Indians (genocide), or Founding Poor People (no property). Happy Mattress Sale Day.

     •  Reply
  63. 1
    ncorgbl  5 days ago

    In 1776 slavery was legal in the Americas and around most of the world. It came with the very first conquest of one people over another people. In 342 A.D. when the Christian Bible was assembled, owning slaves and the manner with which they are to be treated was in writing. In the middle of the 15th century Gutenberg’s press made the Bible available to the masses. Everyone who had one had the directions for owning slaves, and those that didn’t could get lessons on Sunday. Slavery was common, accepted practice. It was Biblical.

    Many of our Founders wanted ‘all men are created equal’ to apply to American slaves as well. John Adams was on record, Jefferson, himself a slave owner, supported including slaves in our Declaration by freeing them. Slavery was a financial issue. The Southern states would not support ending slavery for our independence. Our Founders knew that all 13 colonies were not likely to win a war with the world’s super power, let alone do it with just 7 colonies. The end of slavery was sacrificed for the greater good.

    Equality was announced in the U.S. 249 years ago. Slavery in the U.S. has been stopped for 164 years. It is well past time that we in the U.S. put into practice that with which we so love to boast about, and treat all as created equal.
     •  Reply
  64. 20200319 192925
    IndyW  5 days ago

    “Indentured servitude” is something I think that is similar to what at some point in our life we had to do for the sake of paying a debt. But I always wondered about the concept of that line as Rat did.

     •  Reply
  65. Missing large
    joe.altmaier  5 days ago

    He tried to free some slaves. They panicked and begged to stay. They had been institutionalized their entire lives, and feared the world beyond the confines of Mount Vernon.Younger people would probably have done better – they were older folks. So not a free pass. But yes it occurred to him that owning people was wrong.

     •  Reply
  66. Avatar
    DanMercer  5 days ago

    Before everyone starts virtue signaling HOW they would have behaved had they been Jefferson, I am reminded of the wise words of a historian (might have been Hannah Arendt) who said (I’m paraphrasing): “Everyone likes to think that if they lived in NAZI Germany, they would have been in the resistance, they would have sheltered Jews. If they had been Jefferson, they would have freed their slaves. Statistics, unfortunately, argue elsewise.”In fifty years time your descendants will probably be telling each other: “If I had lived then, I would have resisted cancel culture” just as members of my generation said: “I would have resisted McCarthyism.” Statistics, unfortunately, argue elsewise.

     •  Reply
  67. Hummer
    AZPhinFan  5 days ago

    People can convince themselves of whatever they want

     •  Reply
  68. Missing large
    browntb3  5 days ago

    Don’t even get me started about that guy.

     •  Reply
  69. Missing large
    vickie.105  5 days ago

    This is, unfortunately, true. He was a living contradiction.

     •  Reply
  70. Bill murray drink
    Eric S   5 days ago

    I think what’s worse is that the people who sold the slaves were their own FAMILIES.

     •  Reply
  71. Fb img 1687795270514
    Dogouse Reilly  5 days ago

    It’s a cinch once you deny their humanity.

     •  Reply
  72. Bob blue
    Robert Miller Premium Member 5 days ago

    Just because we are “created equal” doesn’t mean we stay equal. Look at corporations whose owners make millions while their employees make just enough to get buy. Look at governments where the leaders make $$$ while the people are taxed way too much. Look at slavery that still goes on in parts of the world, even here in the US with the sex trade. It was a different time back then, and it’s easy to judge them from our perspective, but also hypocritical when we just ignore the problem in our own back yard.

     •  Reply
  73. Missing large
    John Jorgensen  5 days ago

    He believed that all men are created equal, and endowed with an inalienable right to liberty, and also that people could be born into slavery.

    Compartmentalization is a powerful thing, and the more intelligent you are, the greater your capacity to hold contradictory ideas in your mind.

     •  Reply
  74. Profile pic
    The Orange Mailman  5 days ago

    Wait, if this is about black history month, you can’t do that any longer.

     •  Reply
  75. Missing large
    John Jorgensen  5 days ago

    Jefferson and I were once shipwrecked on a desert island. I searched the length and breadth of the island for anything edible and found exactly ten bananas. I brought them back to our camp and turned them over to him. He gave me one, used the other nine to make himself a pitcher of daquiris, lay back in a hammock drinking them, and treated me to a brilliant, stirring explanation of how, in a just society, we would each have five bananas.

     •  Reply
  76. Missing large
    crocman48  5 days ago

    This strip is getting worse than Doonesbury.

     •  Reply
  77. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  5 days ago

    The excuse word for today is “chattel,” but since Thomas and his cronies are illegal aliens, Trump is likely going to erase their history, immediately after he zero’s out our National Debt. Raising the tariffs tax on them just might work.

     •  Reply
  78. Screenshot 20180802 120401 samsung internet
    Kurtass  5 days ago

    Remember, back then blacks were chattel, not men.

     •  Reply
  79. Photo
    SimonMaguire  5 days ago

    Which is why I believe Adams is the only true good guy out of all of them.

     •  Reply
  80. 210408 doc w
    walstib Premium Member 5 days ago

    I demand that the entire Jefferson Airplane and Jefferson Starship catalog be reissued with new band names!

     •  Reply
  81. Missing large
    dpatrickryan Premium Member 5 days ago

    Because “men” meant white male landowners. Duh.

     •  Reply
  82. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  5 days ago

    The term didn’t exist at the time, but Jefferson apparently was what we now would call a shopaholic.

     •  Reply
  83. Facepalm bear 2
    Lablubber   5 days ago

    And now you know why the GOP hates woke>

     •  Reply
  84. 6b6a17aa 4633 4ce3 959e 2cd6e82fbf91
    alexius23  5 days ago

    Ah, Sally Hemings …..Jefferson’s wife owned her half sister. (Hemings) When one of Jefferson’s daughters came to Paris to joins Jefferson…(US ambassador to France) The daughter came with Sally Hemings. Sally was 14-15 & her Master~Jefferson was in his 40’s. They ended up with 6 children. Jefferson freed all his slave children when they reached a certain age.

     •  Reply
  85. Mbsils
    marilynnbyerly  5 days ago

    By men he meant men, not women, so he was more concerned about people with dangly bits. Also, those men had to own property.

     •  Reply
  86. Missing large
    [Unnamed Reader - bf182b]  5 days ago

    Because everyone was doing it.Because the System had taught him over and over that it was the correct thing to do.You know, – reasons.

     •  Reply
  87. Missing large
    JoeMartinFan Premium Member 5 days ago

    And therein lies the difference between slavery in America and slavery throughout world history – the other slave-owning societies weren’t hypocritical about it. Slavery, as terrible as it was, was just part of society. But when Jefferson wrote those words, and the very second the founding fathers signed that document, the slaves should have been freed.

     •  Reply
  88. Missing large
    Drgnslr Premium Member 5 days ago

    Actually, he didn’t. We all have to buy products from a country where the government sanctions organ harvesting from dissidents.

     •  Reply
  89. Missing large
    JoeMartinFan Premium Member 5 days ago

    I wish there was a million-like button for today’s strip! And yes, a megaphone (at least a virtual one) IS necessary, especially in this era of revisionist history.

     •  Reply
  90. Missing large
    dps1943  5 days ago

    Sadly, the Brits built their southern colonies to be profitable off cheap labor. When the colonies sought to form the USA, prohibiting slavery would have prevented a union. But the issue wasn’t forgotten. It took 76 years, but slavery was finally outlawed by the 13th amendment to the document that never would have been ratified if “no slaves” had been in the original.

     •  Reply
  91. Missing large
    id123175  5 days ago

    Judging the past by current moralities is dumb. Morals are cultural and not absolute.

     •  Reply
  92. Aoh14ggnpr0bjht13a1u9vlhky2idrnlstoohaw9irxd=s96 c
    DanielRyanMulligan1  5 days ago

    Times were different, my main man, times were different….dan aka…ps it warms my heart to see some evidence that RAT has some decency….Too bad that’s a more unbelievable concept than talking animals in this comic strip!!!!! Dan aka…ps yay, RAT’S RIGHT!!!!!!

     •  Reply
  93. Missing large
    JoeMartinFan Premium Member 5 days ago

    The discussion of slavery and its aftereffects in America is not designed to create villains or to make certain people feel guilty. It’s factual history, and it’s there to help ensure that we never allow such a thing to happen again. There’s no reason for anyone to feel defensive about the truth, just as there is no reason for men to feel defensive about the history of women’s struggles in America. Instead, it should make men want to stand with women to see that they receive equal rights.

     •  Reply
  94. Missing large
    johngregor Premium Member 5 days ago

    How could he have held an opinion held by almost all of humanity from the dawn of time? What a moron.

     •  Reply
  95. 98dc6e4d 2f79 4b1b b6ad 40e22f07889d
    Buoy  5 days ago

    I suppose a strip like this can create a greater discussion, which in it’s ideal form would be a good thing, but it also is a glaring example of what is wrong with today’s “discourse.” I use the word discourse in its loosest sense. Outrage before understanding is the order of the day. So rare is the desire to actually understand an issue. What has happened to complexity, nuance, critical thinking, context, etc, etc… ?

     •  Reply
  96. Mh 465796339 863108746036623 6589731031279380187 n
    Radish...   5 days ago

    They have found several skeletons under Mr Franklin’s old houses.

     •  Reply
  97. Missing large
    LMH  5 days ago

    Mr. Pastis, thank you. History repeats itself.

     •  Reply
  98. Froggy with cat ears
    willie_mctell  5 days ago

    Cognitive dissonance has been with us long before Festinger coined the phrase.

     •  Reply
  99. Missing large
    WF11  5 days ago

    Forgive me if this is a repeat from someone else’s comment, but I read that Jefferson also said slavery was “…like having a wolf by the ears. You don’t like it, but you don’t dare let it go.”

     •  Reply
  100. Photo
    AndrewSihler  5 days ago

    My understanding of the “men created equal” has to do with the European/British conviction that there are qualitative and immutable differences between the nobility and “common people” which are, therefore, justly written into laws and how they’re enforced. It was by no means a declaration that everyone is the same, has the same strength, the same talents, the same faults, the same appearance, or anything of that sort.

     •  Reply
  101. 69a2f960 2132 4569 a8f7 3d56dd1b2cda
    WineStar Premium Member 5 days ago

    Don’t forget TJ also gave us the mess of the current Electoral College due to his temper tantrum when he lost to Adams in 1796. We went from per district electoral representation to “all or nothing” whole state electors.

     •  Reply
  102. Missing large
    egadi'mnotclad  4 days ago

    I read Jefferson sold his biological children with his favorite black mistress to other plantations.

     •  Reply
  103. Me  mick foley
    dwkiser28603  4 days ago

    To Trump and Musk, I say upon you these words to Oliver Cromwell and Neville Chamberlain. “YOU HAVE SAT HERE FAR TOO LONG FOR ANY GOOD THAT YOU HAVE DONE. DEPART I SAY, AND LET US BE DONE WITH YOU. IN THE NAME OF GOD GO!”

     •  Reply
  104. Me  mick foley
    dwkiser28603  4 days ago

    The British always did have a better way of stating the obvious

     •  Reply
  105. Me  mick foley
    dwkiser28603  4 days ago

    oh heck, I meant that for Doonesbury

     •  Reply
  106. Amazing fox photos 25
    eddi-TBH  4 days ago

    Humans are masters of juggling moral contradictions. It’s the only thing keeping us from suicide as a species

     •  Reply
  107. Missing large
    cloquet33  4 days ago

    I agree. My morals class I took in college taught me that the problem most people have is they put today’s morals on people in history.

     •  Reply
  108. 52235711 609503869514283 2056609200942874624 n
    oakie9531  4 days ago

    he was a hemp farmer…and when Washington won the first election, African Americans, Native Americans and women could vote, you just had to own land…when the woman of New Jersey gave the next election to John Adams, Jefferson put an end to their voting rights once he took office

     •  Reply
  109. Missing large
    debbiehorst73  4 days ago

    Rat speaks the truth! In regards to Jefferson owning people, so did our first President George Washington. I’m not sure Jefferson hated slavery. He certainly used it to his own advantage, taking Sally Hemming’s as his mistress, and having children with her. His children with her also became slaves.

     •  Reply
  110. Missing large
    mac04416  4 days ago

    Ever hear the expression: “putting a round peg in a square hole”?

     •  Reply
  111. Missing large
    Jim Crigler  4 days ago

    Slavery was nearly universal for 5600 years of recorded history. And 40,000,000 people are in slavery today.

     •  Reply
  112. Missing large
    Rich Douglas  4 days ago

    No man is an island. This is what is meant by not having done it yourself. It takes an entire society for any one person to be successful. Jefferson was a man of his time. The Southern economy was built on the backs of slaves. While an entire society can and should shrug off such an evil institution, it is quite another for a single person to do it alone.

     •  Reply
  113. Avocado
    blindavocado Premium Member 4 days ago

    Perhaps if the idiot who wrote this actually read history instead of virtue signaling he would know

     •  Reply
  114. Missing large
    Komix Lover  4 days ago

    Why are we judging behavior in the 1700s by today’s standard? Societal norms affect behavior. Or simply put, the way things are at a specific point in time, be it economic or peer pressure.

    As far as the framers, they needed to wage one war at a time. The fight for independence from Britian was currently on the plate and compromise was needed to attain that end.

     •  Reply
  115. Bunnypancakehead
    DarkHorseSki  4 days ago

    He started the USA along the path to ending slavery. And, we can tell from the recorded discussions at the time the Constitution was written that folks expected slavery to be naturally ended in the USA by 1820 or so.

     •  Reply
  116. Klingon crest a
    Scott S  4 days ago

    The recently renamed my alma mater from James Madison Memorial High for the same reason.

    Renaming Madison, Wisconsin would prove a lot more challenging, I would imagine.

     •  Reply
  117. Missing large
    oldtwin75  4 days ago

    I believe he did NOT believe in slavery, but knew if he freed his slaves, they would suffer due to the lack of jobs, discrimination, etc. Times were very different then.

     •  Reply
  118. Missing large
    gsteele531  3 days ago

    This keeps coming up. “Created equal” had nothing to do with slaves. It had to do with commoners and kings. Jefferson wrote that there was no case for birthright kingship and a caste system making commoners inferior. All men are NOT created equal in ability, and only idiots think so – he was dissing royalty and George III.

     •  Reply
  119. Missing large
    Timothy Abraham Premium Member 3 days ago

    Fonzie just jumped the shark

     •  Reply
  120. Screenshot  18
    Da Cat Guy  3 days ago

    Oh, no, Goat, Rat did indeed need that megaphone.

     •  Reply
  121. Missing large
    jbruins84341  3 days ago

    It always bugs the cr@p out of me when people try to judge 18th century practices by 21st century morals. What if your grandchildren think you were a horrible person for thinking you could own a sentient being, aka a cat or dog?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine